Criminal/Civil charges filed against Washington.

[Nomoss]

Can't post links but its at http://ppjg.me
If some one will that would be nice.
Its a good read.

[Glass]

unfortunately this will fail because it is perfectly legal to do what they did according to US Code.

[palani]

unfortunately this will fail because it is perfectly legal to do what they did according to US Code.
Not if it brought to the Hague as a war crime. Genocide is still frowned upon.

[Neuro]

unfortunately this will fail because it is perfectly legal to do what they did according to US Code.
Attempted murder is legal?

[palani]

Attempted murder is legal?

Actual murder is legal ... what do you suppose abortion is?

[Neuro]

Actual murder is legal ... what do you suppose abortion is?
What I think doesn't really matter, but I guess the law doesn't count the fetus as a person, and thus you get around the murder charge...

[palani]

What I think doesn't really matter, but I guess the law doesn't count the fetus as a person, and thus you get around the murder charge...
No. That is legal rather than lawful. Has to do with being licensed to perform the act. A license is permission to do what is otherwise not legal. Abortion will never be lawful.

Unlawful is what is forbidden. Legal is what is permitted.

Usury is unlawful. Usury at 6% is deemed legal.

What is similar is not the same.

[iOWNme]

Not if it brought to the Hague as a war crime. Genocide is still frowned upon.


Law is upheld via the Hauge? Please do tell......

[Glass]

Attempted murder is legal?

I'm just pointing out the facts. I have a moral objection to murder like most people. I know Murder is unlawful. Not sure about it's legal status in other countries. It is legal in the US under many circumstances. It's been codified so it must be legal there. Don't you think?

Testing of chemical, biological weapons on US citizens is also legal in certain circumstances. Not sure about nuke, I would need to check.

[palani]

Law is upheld via the Hauge? Please do tell......

International law. You don't want to be considered domestic to the entity you are taking on.

Didn't you hear GW Bush cancelled a trip to Switzerland a year or so ago. Seems international warrants are active for his involvement in undeclared war and he is destined to be collected for disposition one of these days.

My notary is married to a Scotsman. He took on the English system of law because he was caught fishing (don't know the entire set of circumstances). She told me he had to go to the Hague to find relief. She did tell me that if an Englishman had been fishing under the same circumstances there would have been no charge. The fact that he was a Scots got him charged.

[Neuro]

I'm just pointing out the facts. I have a moral objection to murder like most people. I know Murder is unlawful. Not sure about it's legal status in other countries. It is legal in the US under many circumstances. It's been codified so it must be legal there. Don't you think?
I really don't know. Lawful and Legal is the same word in Swedish, so I am a bit confused... Further murder is never legal/lawful in Sweden, but in some instances the killing of another is not considered murder, war is such a scenario, self defense is another. Sometimes the killing of another is deemed manslaughter if it was not intentional to kill someone, but the actions you performed was the cause of death but it would still be unlawful...

[Glass]

PatColo made this post a couple weeks back

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?63404-The-9-11-Interview-You-Need-To-Hear-Clint-Richardson&p=570410&viewfull=1#post570410

This is for an interview with a guy who researches this stuff amongst other things. He doesn't deal with this specific topic until the last few minutes of the interview. If you forwarded to about the last 15 minutes. I think that is around about where this is discussed. Go back or forward a few minutes if there is no discussion at that point in time because it is there.

He mentions 2 specific US codes that legalise this. I made a note about Title 42 section 1981. Rights of US Citizens. I haven't got any notes about why I noted that one down and I haven't had time to go and grab the documents. I think I have seen both codes he cites before. The one about chemical weapons and other testing has been mentioned here before, I think it was mentioned to do with the covert spraying episodes over US cities that have been disclosed by the Govt.

[Nomoss]

Don't know why I would say this.. But this guy is full of BS.
He may like to read the DC act of 1871. Just for one..
Also see the the Independent Treasury Act of 1921.
And the bulk of the ownership of the FED?
The FED is the STATE.
I am now 50mins in to him and I WILL say he is FULL of FUCKING BULL SHIT! And can NOT take any more of his BS.

[Glass]

ok so the audio starts covering this from about 10 minutes in, not near the end.

Title 18 Part 1 Chapter 113b - Radiological dispersal devices
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2332h


(a) Unlawful Conduct.—
(1) In general.— Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly produce, construct, otherwise acquire, transfer directly or indirectly, receive, possess, import, export, or use, or possess and threaten to use—
(A) any weapon that is designed or intended to release radiation or radioactivity at a level dangerous to human life; or
(B) any device or other object that is capable of and designed or intended to endanger human life through the release of radiation or radioactivity.

(2) Exception.— This subsection does not apply with respect to—
(A) conduct by or under the authority of the United States or any department or agency thereof; or
(B) conduct pursuant to the terms of a contract with the United States or any department or agency thereof.


Title 50 Chapter 32 - Section 1520a - Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1520a



(a) Prohibited activities
The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)—
(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.

(b) Exceptions
Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e) of this section, the prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:
(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.
(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.

(c) Informed consent required
The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) of this section only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject.

(d) Prior notice to Congress
Not later than 30 days after the date of final approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department of Defense (whether directly or under contract) involving the use of human subjects for the testing of a chemical agent or a biological agent, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report setting forth a full accounting of those plans, and the experiment or study may then be conducted only after the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date such report is received by those committees.

(e) “Biological agent” defined
In this section, the term “biological agent” means any micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable of causing—
(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or
(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.


The thing not mentioned in the discussion is Section C of USC 50 Section 1520a - Informed consent. Suggests some disingenousness

[Nomoss]

Yes I have readed a lot of usc but did you read
The DC act of 1871? They can say as THEY like but
In the end.. when you wake up..
I say this guy is BS and he is disinfo.
They are going down. The Corp is going down.

[Glass]

The D.C Act, I've read about it. We have the same situation down here. We have a capital territory as well. Land donated from 2 states. Nice big satanic parliament building.

Not sure about Treasury Act 1921. Is it still in effect or did something replace it? The Fed I expect is the current result of it. I'm struggling to find any references containing the text of it. If you have one that would be appreciated.