View Full Version : Hitlery's demonic laugh about war with Iran
midnight rambler
4th October 2012, 04:43 AM
What does Queen Jezebel know?
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=799_1348921063
PatColo
4th October 2012, 05:03 AM
your thread beat mine by 4 mins. \uu\
Hillary Laughs re Iran War, maybe (false flag) attack best thing (vid) (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?64022-Hillary-Laughs-re-Iran-War-maybe-%28false-flag%29-attack-best-thing-%28vid%29)
I'll lock mine & point peeps here. My OP:
posted to YT on 10/3, but liveleak's had it since 9/29 (http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=799_1348921063) - euro show, not sure when it first aired.
it's like she's on the sauce,
Hillary Clinton Laughs Like a Pig when Subject of Iran War Comes Up (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ob5UzotRGTM)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ob5UzotRGTM
related:
Thread: Isreli lobbyist announces "we need a false flag to get Iran rolling" (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?63854-Isreli-lobbyist-announces-quot-we-need-a-false-flag-to-get-Iran-rolling-quot)
PatColo
4th October 2012, 05:10 AM
What does Queen Jezebel know?
I dunno, Iran's sunburn anti-ship missiles are not news-
Nasty surprises await warmongers in Persian Gulf (http://www.presstv.ir/detail/229255.html)
http://previous.presstv.ir/photo/20120229/saberimoghaddam20120229131009210.jpg
Wed Feb 29, 2012 2:0PM GMT
The most important thing I've read these last few days is the excellent article 'Armageddon Approaches' written by Dr Lasha Darkmoon , a cautionary piece which points the reader towards some very scary background information.
For example, according to Russ Winter of The Wall Street Examiner , Iran’s Sunburn missiles, acquired from Russia and China over the last 10 years, have the capability of creating "a world of hurt" for the US Navy’s 5th Fleet.
"The Sunburn is perhaps the most lethal anti-ship missile in the world, designed to fly as low as 9 feet above ground/water at more than 1,500 miles per hour (mach 2+). The missile uses a violent pop-up maneuver for its terminal approach to throw off Phalanx and other US anti-missile defense systems. Given their low cost, they’re perfectly suited for close quarter naval conflict in the bathtub-like Persian Gulf.”
With its 90-mile range, the Sunburn can be fired from practically any platform, including a flat bed truck, and could hit a ship in the Strait in less than a minute.
Adding this warning, Mark Gaffney says , "The US Navy has never faced anything in combat as formidable as the Sunburn missile.”
He mentions the even more-advanced SS-NX-26 Yakhonts missiles, also Russian-made (speed: Mach 2.9; range: 180 miles) deployed by the Iranians along the Persian Gulf's northern shore.
“Every US ship will be exposed and vulnerable. When the Iranians spring the trap, the entire lake will become a killing field,”
“In the Gulf's shallow and confined waters evasive manoeuvres will be difficult, at best, and escape impossible. Even if US planes control of the skies over the battlefield, the sailors caught in the net below will be hard-pressed to survive. The Gulf will run red with American blood."
As both writers point out, the Iranians will have mapped every firing angle along their Gulf coastline. And the rugged terrain will not make detection easy.
“Shooting fish in a barrel”, but who are the fish this time?
Britain recently announced the deployment of HMS Daring, a new Type 45 destroyer, to the Persian Gulf in order to send a significant message to the Iranians because of the firepower and world-beating technology carried by this warship. A Daily Telegraph report says she has been fitted with new technology that will give it the ability to "shoot down any missile in Iran's armory. The £1 billion destroyer also carries the world's most sophisticated naval radar, capable of tracking multiple incoming threats from missiles to fighter jets." Her 48 Sea Vipers can shoot down fighters as well as sea skimming missiles.
Apart from HMS Daring, Britain is believed to have at least 3 other vessels in the Persian Gulf, and more can be sent. Are they all equipped with the same world-beating technology?
Dr Darkmoon observes, "Both America and Israel are unfortunately just not ready to wage the type of warfare they prefer to wage and at which they so excel: shooting fish in a barrel. Unlike Iraq, which the warmonger neoconservatives told us would be a ‘cakewalk’ - easily conquered in six weeks - Iran is unlikely to offer its American and Israeli antagonists easy opportunities to indulge in their fish-in-a-barrel fantasies."
The spectacle of the world's school-yard bully, the United States, flanked by hooligan helpmates Britain, France and Canada all menacing Iran is building up to a chilling climax. If what I'm reading is correct, British ships in the bathtub of the Persian Gulf will be among the fish in the barrel on this occasion, with Iran doing the shooting. Britain's chief hooligans, William Hague and David Cameron, could be courting disaster for the much-vaunted HMS Daring. Why are they getting us involved anyway? It's obviously not for Britain, whose best interests are served by making friends and doing business with Iran.
No, they suffer the same delusions as their erstwhile partner in crime, the disgraced former Defence Secretary Liam Fox and the many others in our Parliamentary establishment who have swallowed the daft idea that Israel's enemies are Britain's enemies. How much sense can you expect from people who are signed-up Friends of Israel - in Hague’s case since the tender age of 15?Diplomacy? What diplomacy?
As the whole world surely knows by now, the US-British track record in Iran doesn’t bear examination. And when they get on their high horse and spout about democracy everyone falls about laughing. Who overthrew Iran’s fledgling democracy in 1953? Who trashed Palestine’s democracy in 2006? Who keeps banging on about Israel being the “only democracy in the Middle East” when, actually, it’s a racist ethnocracy?
For over 30 years Britain has had no high-level diplomatic contact with Iran except for Jack Straw’s visits a decade ago. Hague won’t answer questions about the diplomatic efforts he has made, if any. In a fit of lunacy he shut down the embassy in Tehran last year and chucked the Iranians out of London, and he’s now straining at the bit to get our young men needlessly embroiled in what is essentially a nuke-bristling US/Israel quarrel with non-nuke Iran… the ulterior motive and ultimate prize being Iran’s oil.
The US hasn’t had a proper embassy in Tehran since 1979. But a few months ago it set up a virtual embassy with this sick-making address to the Iranian people .
“We have created Virtual Embassy Tehran to offer you another perspective and another source of information, so you can make up your own minds about the US, our concerns about the Iranian government’s activities at home and abroad, and our serious efforts to achieve a resolution to those concerns,”
“This website is not a formal diplomatic mission, nor does it represent or describe a real US Embassy accredited to the Iranian Government. But, in the absence of direct contact, it can work as a bridge between the American and Iranian people.”
As President Obama said earlier this year and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton affirmed in her recent VOA and BBC appearances, “You - the young people of Iran - carry within you both the ancient greatness of Persian civilization, and the power to forge a country that is responsive to your aspirations. Your talent, your hopes, and your choices will shape the future of Iran, and help light the world. And though times may seem dark, I want you to know that I am with you,”
“It is in that spirit that we launch our Virtual US Embassy Tehran. It is our Mission to the Iranian people.”
Yeah, a US mission that’s accompanied by vicious sanctions imposed with the help of gullible friends like Britain and the EU and calculated to cripple Iran’s economy and make the lives of its young people hell. The consequences for us are damaging too.
Britain’s defence chief Philip Hammond, who replaced Fox after the scandal that exposed his 'special friend' Adam Werritty and behind-scenes plotting with Israel against Iran, has publicly warned Iran that any blockade of the Strait of Hormuz would be "illegal and unsuccessful".
But why escalate matters to the point where a blockade becomes likely? And why, asks Dr Darkmoon, do it for Israel anyway? "Cui bono? Iran has much more to offer America than Israel does,”
"Iran has oil in abundance, Israel has none. Iran does not hold America’s political class to ransom. Iran does not try to browbeat successive American administrations into putting Iranian interests before American ones. Iran’s dual citizens do not spy on America or sell American military secrets to Russia and China-there are no Iranian Rosenbergs or Jonathan Pollards. Iran does not coerce Americans into fighting and dying for it in foreign wars. Iran does not expect $3 billion a year in handouts, and even more in loan guarantees that never get repaid,”
"Iran would be a far greater asset to America than Israel could ever be. Israel is a liability and a burden,”
"More fool America for cuddling up to a ‘friend’ who has stabbed it in the back in the past - the Lavon affair, the USS Liberty incident, the Jonathan Pollard betrayal - and is more than likely to stab it in the back again at some time in the foreseeable future,”
"Dump Israel. That’s my advice. Before Israel sets the world on fire, taking America with it."
The question certainly needs to be asked, she says, "What hold does Israel have over America? Is America prepared to sustain immense damage to its vital interests on behalf of an unstable and insolent ally that remains, if numerous polls are to be believed, the world’s most hated nation?"
Ask it here too. What hold does Israel have over Britain? The only people impressed by Israel are MPs and ministers whom the pro-Israel lobby has 'groomed' and funded, the Jewish community (though by no means all of them) and a rabble of Christian Zionists; no-one else. And no-one else wants to fight Israel's unjust wars or help America do Israel’s dirty work.
So if Hague, Hammond and Cameron love Israel so much let them and the regime’s other admirers don uniform and flak-jacket and go play battleships in the Persian Gulf’s “bathtub” themselves. Who in their right mind would volunteer to be that trio’s cannon-fodder?
Stuart Littlewood, British Writer-Photographer
DISCLAIMER: The authors' views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Press TV News Network.
SSM/HE
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/229255.html
PatColo
4th October 2012, 05:24 AM
Bollyn mainstream radio appearance, just noticed, haven't listened yet, description says they talk possible FF attack scenarios for iran war. It's 2 hours with full comm breaks & news, so you'll need to advance often.
Today - Bollyn on K-TALK (http://www.bollyn.com/#article_13712)
October 1, 2012
http://www.bollyn.com/public/2001-Logo-1.jpg
I was on the Jack Stockwell radio show on K-TALK of Salt Lake City (KTKK-630 AM) on Monday, October 1. The show aired from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. (Mountain Time). The host of the show was Dale Williams. The two-hour show is already archived and can be downloaded at:
http://radiorecast.com/ktalk/archive/Jack_Stockwell/20121001%20Stockwell%20Chrisopher%20Bollyn.mp3 (http://radiorecast.com/ktalk/archive/Jack_Stockwell/20121001%20Stockwell%20Chrisopher%20Bollyn.mp3)
We discussed 9-11 and the prospects of another Israeli-engineered false-flag event to start a war with Iran.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Netanyahu_at_UN.JPG
Americans should realize that Bibi Netanyahu of Israel, who is pushing for war against Iran, is one of the chief architects of the false-flag terrorism of 9-11. As I wrote in "Solving 9-11 to End the Zionist War Plan for Iran," (http://www.bollyn.com/solving-911-to-end-the-zionist-war-plan-for-iran/) we need to understand the Israeli role in 9-11 to prevent them from taking us into another disastrous war.
iOWNme
4th October 2012, 06:34 AM
Our leaders are absolute PSYCHOPATHS.
We have been at War with Iran for months. We have wiped out 30-40% of the value of their Rial in a few short months. We have done everything under the sun to provoke the Persian people. And now our leaders are on TV literally LAUGHING about the idea of killing brown people.
http://business.iafrica.com/worldnews/819878.html
A week ago, the rial was trading at around 22 000 to the greenback and at 13 000 a year ago.
Remember NeoCon McCain's "Bomb Bomb Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran".......This has been inn the making for quite some time.
Im not sure even Lenin, Stalin or Mao ever went into an hysterical public demonic laughing spree about the idea of killing their enemies. If they did it was behind closed doors. This puts Clinton in a whole new class of FILTH.
Errosion Of Accord
4th October 2012, 06:41 AM
psy·cho·path http://static.sfdict.com/dictstatic/g/d/speaker.gif (http://dictionary.reference.com/audio.html/lunaWAV/P08/P0897700) [sahy-kuh-path]
noun a person with a psychopathic (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/psychopathic) personality, which (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/which) manifests as amoral and antisocial behavior, lack of ability to love (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/love) or establish meaningful personal relationships, extreme egocentricity, failure to learn from experience, etc.
Proposed DSM III-R criteria Sadistic (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sadistic) personality disorder is:
A) A pervasive pattern of cruel, demeaning, and aggressive behavior, beginning by early adulthood, as indicated by the repeated occurrence of at least four of the following:
Has used physical cruelty or violence for the purpose of establishing dominance (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dominance) in a relationship (not merely to achieve some non-interpersonal goal, such as striking someone in order to rob him/her).
Humiliates (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humiliation) or demeans people in the presence of others.
Has treated or disciplined someone under his/her control unusually harshly.
Is amused by, or takes pleasure in, the psychological or physical suffering (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffering) of others (including animals (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoosadism)).
Has lied (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie) for the purpose of harming or inflicting pain on others (not merely to achieve some other goal).
Gets other people to do what he/she wants by frightening them (through intimidation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intimidation) or even terror).
Restricts the autonomy of people with whom he or she has a close relationship, e.g., will not let spouse leave the house unaccompanied.
Is fascinated by violence, weapons, injury, or torture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torture).
Old Herb Lady
4th October 2012, 07:05 AM
9. The inability to feel empathy for anyone.
Uncle Salty
4th October 2012, 12:28 PM
Hitlery again is setting up a false flag. She said, and I am paraphrasing, why doesn't somebody just attack us so we can get it on. Yeah, Iran is going to attack us.
Libertarian_Guard
4th October 2012, 09:33 PM
http://i46.tinypic.com/fny9hl.jpg
http://i48.tinypic.com/egyf51.jpg
vacuum
4th October 2012, 10:04 PM
Looks like Killary is advocating a false flag too.
StreetsOfGold
4th October 2012, 10:16 PM
That was a Phyllis Diller laugh to the tee.
Keep in mind that Diller, a dirty potty mouthed preformer (to the end) would require going into a "trance-like" state BEFORE she could perform.
Translation: That means she needed devils to come into here before her performance for those of you Bible illerates.
General of Darkness
4th October 2012, 10:40 PM
That was a Phyllis Diller laugh to the tee.
Keep in mind that Diller, a dirty potty mouthed preformer (to the end) would require going into a "trance-like" state BEFORE she could perform.
Translation: That means she needed devils to come into here before her performance for those of you Bible illerates.
That's the first thing I thought of when I heard it. All these cockholsters are fricken nutz.
EDIT.
Listen to what she says. "The best thing that could happen is that they attack us, it would unify the regime" False Flag anyone?
I live in L.A. other than a massive port for commerce and a shit load of useless beaners, it's a dump. If I was going to do a false flag, hell, it would be at the top of my list.
joboo
4th October 2012, 11:25 PM
From the comments...
This is what a youtube hired shill account looks like:
https://www.youtube.com/user/TheStradguy
old steel
5th October 2012, 12:01 AM
Hitlery is the one who needs to be taken out.
Neuro
5th October 2012, 07:48 AM
Listen to what she says. "The best thing that could happen is that they attack us, it would unify the regime" False Flag anyone?
I really don't like defending this lying fanatical fascist communist Crypto-Jew, but she was paraphrasing the Iranians, to motivate why not attacking them now is a good idea...
Hermie
5th October 2012, 08:48 AM
That was a Phyllis Diller laugh to the tee.
Keep in mind that Diller, a dirty potty mouthed preformer (to the end) would require going into a "trance-like" state BEFORE she could perform.
Translation: That means she needed devils to come into here before her performance for those of you Bible illerates.
You are way off about Phyllis Diller. She was NOT a blue material act.
Where did you come up with this shit?
State your opinions, yeah, but don't make up lies about a person.
Old Herb Lady
5th October 2012, 10:26 AM
Hmmm. Lets see if we hear her demonic laugh when Ms. Leskankewinsky publishes her soon tell-all book about Billy Boy's tenure in the Oral Office.
Neuro
5th October 2012, 10:32 AM
Hmmm. Lets see if we hear her demonic laugh when Ms. Leskankewinsky publishes her soon tell-all book about Billy Boy's tenure in the Oral Office.
She co-authored it and will be laughing all the way to the bank!
Old Herb Lady
5th October 2012, 11:19 AM
She co-authored it and will be laughing all the way to the bank!
Great ! they can both laugh their *** arses off together over an extra large ice cream sundae on the way to their jew bank.
StreetsOfGold
5th October 2012, 12:54 PM
You are way off about Phyllis Diller. She was NOT a blue material act.
Where did you come up with this shit?
State your opinions, yeah, but don't make up lies about a person.
Her trance-like state is what SHE SAID. Dig up the youtube clips which show her saying this. I did a glance at her life after she passed away and found it easily. I also saw her interviewed not too long before she passed away and she was talking like a 30 year sailor man. There were also some clips of her recent acts and she was certainly NOT telling jokes that would be acceptable to Jesus Christ.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.