PDA

View Full Version : Vote for Romney, it is a matter of life and death?



slvrbugjim
13th October 2012, 11:43 AM
Yesterday I got an email from friends urging me to vote for Romney, as if it's a matter of life and death. Mortified that people I associate with actually believe there's a difference between the candidates, I responded as follows:

"How bad would a candidate wearing the label 'Republican' have to be for you to write someone in? Would you pull the lever for Hitler-R over Stalin-D?

The reason I ask is that I can find no material differences between the two buffoons on the ballot, and no one here has identified any (beyond labels).

In case anyone missed it, a global financial crisis started raging 4 years ago, and it hasn't stopped. The crisis was caused by fraud on Wall Street, it has totaled $12 TRILLION losses to U.S. taxpayers, and yet not one banker has been prosecuted. Not. One. (By way of comparison, the S&L crisis cost the U.S. just 1% of current losses, and yet 1000+ financial executives went to prison for fraud.)

Wall Street's fraud is so profitable that it's enabled the criminals to purchase the entire political process, which is why we now have the choice between 2 sock puppets for president. Behold their similarities:

Just like Obama, Romney opposes the prosecution of bankers who commit massive financial crimes. (Romney is either so owned by Wall Street or such a coward—take your pick—that he won’t even mention the theft of $1.6 billion by MF Global CEO Jon Corzine, one of Obama’s biggest fundraisers.)

Just like Obama, Romney has no plans to force derivatives trading—now at $1.2 QUADRILLION annually—onto an open market.

Just like Obama, Romney supports Tim Geithner as Treasury Secretary despite Geithner’s documented giveaways to Wall Street (and Citigroup in particular) at the direct expense of Main Street.

Just like Obama, Romney supports Quantitative Easing 3 (i.e., paying Wall Street banks par for their worthless mortgage-backed securities).

Just like Obama, Romney opposes auditing the Federal Reserve.

Just like Obama, Romney supports bailouts of banks that failed. (This comes naturally for Romney because Bain Capital survived due to a bailout.)

Just like Obama, Romney opposes the restoration of Glass-Steagall and has no plans to break up any too-big-to-fail banks, which are now 20% larger than they were before the crisis hit.

Just like Obama, Romney supports federal stimulus plans costing U.S. taxpayers $100’s of billions of dollars.

Just like Obama, Romney passed massive universal coverage health-care legislation that was written and will be interpreted and executed by lawyers for the medical and pharmaceutical industries.

Just like Obama, Romney opposes competition for health-care services and supports the exemption of the entire industry from antitrust laws, which is why prices in this sector have risen at 9+% per year for decades.

Just like Obama, Romney supports the indefinite detention of U.S. citizens, without trial or even charges, via the National Defense Authorization Act. They also support warrantless wiretapping and the suspension of habeus corpus.

Just like Obama, Romney supports foreign wars that we cannot afford.

So thanks, but no. I cannot in good conscience vote for either slated stooge

AndreaGail
13th October 2012, 12:00 PM
Can't wait to hear his response lol

It's interesting how much marketing there is in politics and namely the R and D labels. Both sides try to differentiate themselves saying how their brand is far superior and will have better results. But in the end they both come from the same generic source, cheaply made in china stamped with a kosher label. The illusion of choice

gunDriller
13th October 2012, 12:17 PM
i don't understand how the Repub's., who love killing civilians in foreign countries, got a reputation as being "Pro-Life". just part of their 'brand' i guess.

which is not to 'dis' the actual pro-life concept ... just need to hear one interview with a baby who was a aborted, and lived, and treated right by a sympathetic nurse - and many babies have survived late-term abortions.

TheNocturnalEgyptian
13th October 2012, 01:58 PM
I've been a registered libertarian since age 18


Like many here, I'd rather unregister completely than continue this fraud

There is no functional difference between the parties.

The electoral college will simply change my vote anyway.

Bigjon
13th October 2012, 02:13 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4R4KtYVF-74


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4R4KtYVF-74&feature=player_embedded

Twisted Titan
13th October 2012, 02:17 PM
Voting does nothing but gives validation and sanction to the abuse of your oppressors.

messianicdruid
13th October 2012, 03:01 PM
"We are told that this Presidential election is the most important in 50 years. One nationally prominent Christian Right columnist has written that this is the most important Presidential election in the history of the United States.

How could anyone know if this is the most crucial election? You might think that it would be possible to assess this by looking at the #1 issue of this election, and then compare it with the #1 issue that some previous election settled. Unfortunately, this is not possible. It is not possible for two reasons. First, we do not know the future. Second, because Presidential elections are never fought over a crucial dividing issue that proves to have been divisive after the election is settled.

Here is a list of crucial issues in American political life today. Which of these is central to the campaign?


End legalized abortion
End the war in Afghanistan
End the FED
End the war on drugs
End executive orders
End the Department of Homeland Security
The unfunded liabilities of Medicare
The unfunded liabilities of Social Security
Audit the government's gold's ownership
Balance the federal budget before 2016
These are major issues. They should be publicly addressed. They are so far under the rug that the mainstream media are oblivious to them. Obama is staying silent, and the mainstream media prefer that he get away with this. Think "closing Guantanamo." Think "climate change."

This is the way that every Presidential race is always conducted. Does this seem like a preposterous statement? Probably. Is it an accurate statement? Let me state my case."

www.garynorth.com/public/10188.cfm

slvrbugjim
15th October 2012, 02:42 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4R4KtYVF-74


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4R4KtYVF-74&feature=player_embedded

Keyes Brings up one point that most have thought about, that why is it that most people believe that the guy in office is worse than the
guy trying to get in, when if fact it may be very true That the guy trying to get in is in fact much worse.

FreeEnergy
15th October 2012, 08:49 PM
Here is a list of crucial issues in American political life today. Which of these is central to the campaign?

End legalized abortion
End the war in Afghanistan
End the FED
End the war on drugs
End executive orders
End the Department of Homeland Security
The unfunded liabilities of Medicare
The unfunded liabilities of Social Security
Audit the government's gold's ownership
Balance the federal budget before 2016
These are major issues. They should be publicly addressed.

garynorth.com

who's gary North?

because some of his issues are clearly messed up.

* abortion has nothing to do with current economic issues, it is a diversion
* end the Fed is good
* war in Afghanistan = war on drugs = drug / pharma cartel
* Social security is not "unfunded liabilities" , it is a FUND that government has stolen from and is not planning to pay back (how does one expect for a government to discuss this?)
* government gold ownership? was there ever any?