The media propaganda thread

[Katmandu]

Here are some of the recent posts showing the sometimes subtle, sometimes blatant media propaganda and brainwashing on the public. Feel free to add to this as you come across more instances.

Verichip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zV4fLXzK2xg

Coke and surveillance cameras:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auNSrt-QOhw

Candy bar and RFID posted by Sui Juris:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=sk2Lfgh1c4Q


And here is another that I just ran across. One big party. That's exactly what we have today. Dems and Repubs are one big party run by the same taskmaster. And this commercial puts that across in a subtle way that is sure to go right over the head of the general public.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRGgrOJs9EA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRGgrOJs9EA

[Ponce]

One more time......

"They will only tell you what they want you to know, or what they cannot longer hide"... Ponce

First post of the day.........good morning to one and all.

[Katmandu]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8y_-sKf-2Aw


https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8y_-sKf-2Aw

[Katmandu]

From the OP: Whether or not the author's "Psst! Rewind!" comments below work or not, staying away from globalist-enabling technologies is a worthy thing to do.



The text below goes with the video above:

12 Simple Steps to Verichip the World
http://getmindsmart.com/Verichip_the_World.html

(embed video here: ‘Mobile Payments around the Globe’ ) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y_-sKf-2Aw&feature=related

We are the last generation with a voice and free will to change the course of history. Everyone connected everywhere – smart phones are to be the tools of the Smart World Order; bringing an end to physical cash, keys, drivers’ licences, etc. They are also intended to be used daily to validate identity in the new ‘trusted’ internet community. The phone, or the chip that links the user’s ID to the phone, then becomes too valuable to lose, and the only safe place is under the skin. Unless we refuse to comply….

It goes something like this:

1. Create a climate of fear.

2. Get everyone online.

3. Enable even the poor to carry a cell phone.

4. Get everyone to talk about RFID and biometrics: the first phase of acceptance is expectation.

5. Chip as many things and people as you can (phones, pets, clothing, etc.) to make it normal.

6. Set up a global ID system but keep it hush hush.

7. Promote implants for health and safety, so people think they’re good.

8. Make it so you can use your phone for everything, especially payments and proving identity.

9. How do we know it’s really you? Your biometrics please!

10. Cyber attack! Revolution! Please protect us!

11. The economy collapses….. cash is gone, and all payments are now digital.

12. Phones get lost and stolen; biometrics get spoofed; carrying a phone is such a bother – and Verichips are just easier all round….

But… “Pssst!! Rewind!”

Time to change our minds.

We don’t have to co-operate. Awake and determined, we refuse to sign up with an Identity Provider, and we refuse to pay for anything with a phone.

We make it plain: they can stick their NSTIC up their ***

Their planned revolution takes a different course:

Be part of the movement they didn’t expect.

We are the warriors, writing history:

By the year 2020, in a bid to be free, we stood up to the corporatocracy, and won.

[steel_ag]

Clean Getaway ....

http://obeyclothing.com/men/shirts/clean-getaway-basic-tee.html

[Katmandu]

The orchestrated news

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAkxR9T01pw&feature=player_embedded#t=3s


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAkxR9T01pw&feature=player_embedded#t=3s

[woodman]

"What a coincidence!"

[Katmandu]

Obama using computer-generated Twitterbots to create appearance of social media support for gun control

http://www.naturalnews.com/039289_Twitterbots_Obama_gun_control.html#ixzz2MHo rfONR

Wednesday, February 27, 2013 by: J. D. Heyes

(NaturalNews) All of those Twitter messages that appear to represent millions of people who support President Obama's gun control agenda... Yeah, many of those are bot-driven. In other words, they're fake.

That's what a Republican congressman from Texas is alleging, anyway. He says the president's entire gun control narrative is a fraud being perpetrated over one of the world's busiest social media sites.

Rep. Steve Stockton accused Obama Feb. 25 of trying to make support for his gun control positions more muscular than it really is by flooding Twitter with messages from bot-driven programs, The Hill newspaper reported.

Obama, it seems, can't get out of campaign mode.

When your position is weak, spam it to life

The president's "anti-gun campaign is a fraud," Stockman charged. "Obama's supporters are panicking and willing to do anything to create the appearance of popular support, even if it means trying to defraud Congress."

"I call upon the president to denounce this phony spam campaign," he added.

Needless to say, the president has yet to "denounce" anything he has said in regards to pushing for more gun control. And we don't expect he will.

Stockman said that, in response to Obama's call for Americans to tweet their congressman in support of new gun control measures he has proposed - such as banning higher-capacity magazines, military look-alike rifles and universal background checks - he only received 16 tweets, but they were all identical. He said a closer examination revealed that only six of them were from real people.

"The other 10 are fake, computer-generated spambots," said Stockton's office, in a press statement.

As evidence, he said the 10 tweets used default graphics and names and have not engaged in any interaction whatsoever with other people, the congressional newspaper reported. In fact, he said two of the tweets were sent at almost exactly the same time, and both follow just one person: Brad Schneck, the president's former digital strategist.

The Texas lawmaker also said just one of the six tweets from an actual person is a constituent of his in his home state. Here is a rundown of the fraudulent tweets, per Stockman's press release:

-- They all use the default "egg" avatar.
-- They have account names resembling names automatically suggested by Twitter.
-- They have engaged in no human interaction.
-- They have tweeted almost nothing promotional, sponsored messages pushing real estate websites and other liberal "grassroots" campaigns.
-- They follow mostly MSNBC anchors or media outlets, not actual people.

Stockman also notes that reporter Robert Stacy McCain's investigation of the fraudulent Obama campaign (available at: www.theothermccain.com) finds the majority of the Obama-supporting accounts were created in fewer than 48 hours before contacting members of Congress.

"If you are a real person who contacted us about your support for the president's anti-gun campaign, we are listening," said Stockman. "We do not agree with you, but we appreciate your sincere opinions and encourage you to continue to contact us."

"But," he continued, "the vast majority of the president's supporters have no feelings because they have fake profiles from spammers." He went on to say that Obama's anti-gun activists "are trying to defraud Congress using the same scam that sells 'male enhancement pills.'"

When leadership is out, spam

Some websites were understandably critical of the spamming.

From The Daily Caller:

Schenck describes himself as a "former digital strategist at #Obama2012 and @ObamaInaugural." He also doesn't seem to think anybody knows how Twitter works. Or maybe he just doesn't know how Twitter works. Either way, it's pretty clumsy work for a "digital strategist."

These guys think you're stupid, America. But then, they've got some pretty strong evidence to back them up. You reelected them.

Per Twitchy, a site that aggregates Twitter feeds:

"Kathleen H. Dittus" wasn't born yesterday, you know. She - or her Twitter account, at least - was born today. No, she hasn't even been born yet; she's still inside that "egg" avatar, but she can't wait to break out and lend the president a hand with his gun control effort.

The @BarackObama account, fresh off of exploiting Gabby Giffords to push its demand that Congress vote on an assault weapons ban, is doing its best to get #WeDemandAVote trending, but some conservatives are noticing that a lot of the supporters are a little, um, young. They have zero followers, follow no one, and have tweeted just once.

Clearly, the president seems more interested in campaigning than leading. Then again, the measures he's proposing would have done nothing to stop any of the past gun massacres anyway.

[PatColo]

this was a thread here a year or so ago,

Media Reacts To Conan's Same-Sex Wedding News - (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GME5nq_oSR4)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GME5nq_oSR4

from RT,
RT vs Mainstream Media (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QI5n6RmAfMA)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QI5n6RmAfMA

on the risk of running afoul of joozmedia (http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/jews-do-control-the-media/) propaganda:
Israel's War on Truth | Brainwash Update (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMFAfQJKlAM)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMFAfQJKlAM

Published on Nov 21, 2012
Abby Martin highlights the Israeli Military's bombing of media buildings and targeting of journalists, including the RT office in Gaza, and calls out the Israeli government for making veiled threats to RT's headquarters in Moscow.

[mick silver]

back up

[Katmandu]

Edward Bernays set up the first “public relations” department for the express purpose of using propaganda as a tool to manipulate the public for profit. He created the term "public relations" to replace the word "propaganda" because it had a negative connotation to it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s18vu5tCzsc&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s18vu5tCzsc&feature=player_embedded



Planned Obsolescence and Perceived Obsolescence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=N2KLyYKJGk0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=N2KLyYKJGk0


The Planned Obsolescence of Humanity
March 13, 2013

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/03/13/the-planned-obsolescence-of-humanity/

Barbara H. Peterson, Guest Writer
Waking Times

Remember when things lasted a long time? I recall going with my dad to the hardware store, and being able to find just about everything needed to fix anything on the ranch. Need a gasket? Just get the gasket material and cut your own. Got a gadget that won’t work? Just get the part that’s broken, replace that one part, and the gadget works again. Not so, today. Today, we buy something, and if it doesn’t work, we simply throw it away and get a new one, because that is the way things are made. They are not made to last. They are made to break and the sooner, the better.

This is planned obsolescence, and it has been eroding our society ever since it was set in motion along with mass marketing and fast-tracked, courtesy of Edward Bernays, who set up the first “public relations” department for the express purpose of using propaganda as a tool to manipulate the public for profit. We are now strangling in its grip, oblivious to the reality behind the slogans and hype, and successfully programmed to think this is normal, standing proud in our ignorance.

With a need for instant gratification firmly entrenched in our nation’s psyche by an army of professional con artists out to make a buck, the concept of a throwaway society reared its ugly head to the delight of those behind the scenes, greedily rubbing their hands together in anticipation of the windfall they were about to receive – profit without end. And this is the society in which we now live. A society based on instant gratification and planned obsolescence.

I noticed that this nation’s “fix it yourself” mentality started changing years ago. Parts that were once easily obtainable became “no longer available.” Want a part to fix your whatchamacallit? Nope, can’t have it – gotta get a new one. The parts aren’t available anymore, and good luck getting your whatchamacallit open to replace anything in it. If it breaks, don’t fix it, throw it away and buy a new one.

Cars that were once made to be worked on by home mechanics now take a computer specialist to diagnose. Who cares? After all, if consumers buy a new car every couple of years or so, who needs them to last? Can’t wear the same dress to the party, gotta have a new one, along with shoes to match. Last year’s style simply will not do.

Yes, the corporations have programmed us well. We are a nation of wasteful consumers, keeping the gluttonous purveyors of gadgets, doohickeys and flash in champagne and caviar. Thank you, Edward Bernays, for your ever so helpful insight into enabling corporations to program the masses for wasteful spending in order to line the pockets of greedy, blood sucking leaches whose only purpose is to use us up and spit us out. You see, planned obsolescence does not merely apply to things. It also applies to people.

We are living in a world where very powerful people behind the scenes hold license to decide who is to live and who is to die. They get to pick and choose who the throwaway people are. The expendables. The ones who hold no worth in their eyes. Through some sort of arbitrary judgment – one lives, one dies, and the rules always change.

The rules change because the object has no say and no value – functioning merely as a piece on the grand chessboard. And if you happen to be the flavor of the month, you get to live. But only for a time, and only if you are nice. Really, really nice and obey your masters. But it won’t be forever. Forever is much too good for the pawns. Pawns are meant to be sacrificed, just as we are being sacrificed on the altar of big business and decaying from whatever poisons the propaganda machine put forth by Bernays directs us to take.

We’re poked and prodded, drugged into submission, shot full of poisons, and fed toxic waste. We are, each and every one of us, a statistic in a planned obsolescence program. And while we are breaking down from stress, toxins, chemicals, GMOs, vaccines, and medical quackery, to name a few, we are generating a whole lotta cash for a whole lotta people, as well as providing valuable data while we serve as guinea pigs for experimental research in genetic modification.

But what the hey? After all is said and done, the puppet masters will survive! And they will garner more and more cash and power to play at immortality. The goal? Remaking the world and its inhabitants from the molecule up. We the people are living under planned obsolescence. And we don’t even know it because we are being systematically fed comfortable lies by a propaganda machine in the guise of public relations for the express purpose of profit, power and total control.

But it’s okay, our replacements are right around the corner. After all, the bodies we have can’t last forever. Let’s throw them away and get new ones. What say we make them bigger, better, smarter and more controllable than the obsolete model. The human model.

Why not build super soldiers that we can just replace when we feel like it? Expendable. Throwaways. Or factory workers, or maybe housekeepers, maids, miners, firefighters, police, truck drivers…. The possibilities are endless. One gives you trouble, just throw it away and get a new one. And when the time comes to shed this mortal shell, just hop right on into the artificial body of your dreams, courtesy of a brain transplant, or maybe your brain on a chip, implanted in that disposable body.

Natural humans would become as obsolete as last year’s iPod.

A powerful dream, eh? Complete control over life and death. Intoxicating. And also dangerous. Very dangerous. Not to mention foolish, disastrous, maniacal, insane, against nature and all that is right and natural and good. Man replacing man and nature. The same species that thinks nuclear power plants on fault lines are an okay idea. Go figure. But seriously, what could possibly go wrong?

[Katmandu]

In your face, by Coke. The ad below states:

"Time and again, these low- and no-calorie sweeteners have shown to be safe, high-quality alternatives to sugar. In fact, the safety of aspartame is supported by more than 200 studies over the last 40 years."

http://i41.tinypic.com/118lpxw.png

[Katmandu]

".......they are the first to move toward the sound of tyranny and injustice...."

I think the makers of this video first need to get the [implied] definition of tyranny correct.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Huk6U0X8vUg

[Katmandu]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_UBMShwSEw


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_UBMShwSEw

[PatColo]

this latest JFriend podcast could also fit under climate change hoax... but see desc. 2 hrs:

Monday, November 25, 2013 The Realist Report with John Friend (http://www.john-friend.net/2013/11/the-realist-report-with-john-friend_25.html)


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lGjxO4HIjfk/UpOo5G6N-NI/AAAAAAAAChc/Ciz6TauFYmU/s320/Quiet%21.jpg (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lGjxO4HIjfk/UpOo5G6N-NI/AAAAAAAAChc/Ciz6TauFYmU/s1600/Quiet%21.jpg)

On this edition of The Realist Report (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-realist-report/2013/11/25/dr-eric-karlstrom--global-warming-hoax-911), we'll be joined once again by Dr. Eric Karlstrom. Dr. Karlstrom and I will be talking about the "Global Warming" hoax, Dr. Karlstrom's views of 9/11, and mind control via mass media, culture distortion, and social engineering.

You can download the mp3 for this program here (http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/5/685/show_5685101.mp3), or visit The Realist Report (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-realist-report) on BlogTalkRadio to subscribe via iTunes and view past programs.

Below are relevant links for this program:




Climate Change Hoax Exposed (http://americanfreepress.net/?p=13240) by John Friend - American Free Press
How the Controllers Control Us? The Co-Option and Corruption of Culture and Institutions (http://www.911nwo.com/how-they-control-us.htm) by Dr. Eric Karlstrom
Mind Control: History and Applications (http://www.911nwo.com/history-of-mind-control.htm) by Dr. Eric Karlstrom (Ed. note: I do not endorse everything written in these two articles, but there is a lot of good material.)
9/11 - New World Order (http://911nwo.com/)
Natural Climate Change (http://naturalclimatechange.us/)
The OSS-Tavistock MindControl Cult- 9/11 Truthling Infiltration Timeline (http://911closeup.com/nico/911truthling_cult4.html)
American Universities are Degenerate Drunken Sex Pits (http://www.dailystormer.com/american-universities-are-degenerate-drunken-sex-pits/) - Daily Stormer




Posted by John Friend (http://www.blogger.com/profile/17331636747072636125) at 3:07 PM No comments: (http://www.john-friend.net/2013/11/the-realist-report-with-john-friend_25.html#comment-form) http://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
(http://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogID=7213060208416317403&postID=480606450945897176)

Labels: The Realist Report (http://www.john-friend.net/search/label/The%20Realist%20Report)

[PatColo]

Prof James Tracy:


January 2, 2014 (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/01/02/the-magnificent-achievements-of-eco-propaganda/)
The Magnificent Achievements of Eco-Propaganda (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/01/02/the-magnificent-achievements-of-eco-propaganda/) 95 (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/01/02/the-magnificent-achievements-of-eco-propaganda/#comments) Home (http://memoryholeblog.com/category/home/) • Tags: alternative media (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/alternative-media/), environmentalism (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/environmentalism/), propaganda (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/propaganda/), Public Opinion (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/public-opinion/), public relations (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/public-relations/), social engineering (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/social-engineering/)
https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ3thSEHwzxBDIfVQyVrlQC19fjiczIr QGHaPM1qssGqK7LBxsBOQ
By James F. Tracy


Today a good deal of what qualifies as propaganda is much more subtle than overt. When an entire civilization or way of life is to be significantly altered the tried-and-true method of “repeating a lie until it becomes truth” needs to be done over a period of many years and in a multitude of varying ways to take hold and change the very assumptions and beliefs of a people.


This process is especially vital for reaching a given society’s more elite demographic—the opinion leaders who perceive themselves as “smarter than the average bear” and thus impervious to simple appeals and indoctrination.

A case in point is the agenda backed by powerful global elites and recognizable under names such as “climate change” and “sustainability.” The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fifth Assessment Report, released on September 27, 2013, came replete with an assemblage of legitimizing features along these lines (“scientific,” “scholarly,” “authoritative,” “peer reviewed,”). Also termed the “Climate Bible,” journalists and policymakers alike regard it as “authoritative” and “the gold standard” of climate science. The public is told that the official body’s findings are now clearer than ever: “human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.”[1]


Among the most vociferous agitators for the IPCC’s climate change orthodoxy are the foundation-funded, tax-exempt, progressive-left media that sit alongside the bevy of similarly tax-exempt, foundation-funded environmental organizations that together uphold and publicize the theory of CO2-based anthropogenic (human-caused) climate change (ACC).[2] Self-professed as “independent,” “investigative,” even “educational,” the so-called “alternative media” turn a blind eye to seriously scrutinizing the highly questionable IPCC’s “scientific” review of the climatological literature and its implications for the array of ambitious programs and policies stealthily introduced throughout the industrialized world, many of which are seldom subject to popular plebiscite. Think “smart grid” and “smart growth.”


Logical questions from such apparently independent organs might include, “How does the IPCC produce its findings?” and “Who benefits?” Instead, there is an almost knee-jerk response on behalf of progressive-left editors and readerships to trust and support the UN group’s purportedly objective and meticulous review of the peer-reviewed climatological literature.


https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQMyMelncIJ7fOmYxeiw8mWrQU0fAtSy yuxo1J0HVUHiAiE0bfr

Between August and December 2013 such progressive outlets published dozens of articles and commentaries whole-heartedly touting the IPCC report. For example, Truthout.org posted 25 articles, Alternet.org ran 40, MotherJones.com circulated 38, and DemocracyNow.org featured 11.


These were often presented with bleak headlines accenting the urgent appeals found in the IPCC publicity. For example, “International Scientists Warn Climate Deniers Are Enabling Earth’s Suicide (http://www.truth-out.org/buzzflash/commentary/item/18194-international-scientists-warn-climate-deniers-are-enabling-earth-s-suicide)” (Truthout, 9/13/13), “6 Scary Conclusions in the UN’s New Climate Report” (http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2013/09/ipcc-climate-report-scary-conclusions) (Mother Jones, 9/27/13), “Greenhouse Gas in Atmosphere Hits New Record: UN (http://www.alternet.org/progressive-wire/greenhouse-gas-atmosphere-hits-new-record-un),” (Alternet, 11/1/13), and “’Africa is Being Pushed Closer to the Fire’: Africans Say Continent Can’t Wait for Climate Action (http://www.democracynow.org/2013/11/22/africa_is_being_pushed_closer_to)” (Democracy Now! 11/22/13).


Uncritical advocacy of the IPCC’s anthropogenic (human-caused) global warming extended beyond headlines to media criticism. In December, for example, the progressive Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) observed that corporate controlled network newscasts routinely failed to link “extreme weather” to “global warming.” “In the first nine months of 2013,” FAIR observes,




there were 450 segments of 200 words or more that covered extreme weather: flooding, forest fires, tornadoes, blizzards, hurricanes and heat waves. But of that total, just a tiny fraction–16 segments, or 4 percent of the total–so much as mentioned the words “climate change,” “global warming” or “greenhouse gases.[3]



What is left unmentioned is that fact that all of these “extreme weather” incidents have one common denominator that FAIR and corporate and progressive media alike consistently overlook: the sun. As University of Winnipeg climatologist Dr. Tim Ball explains (here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOyBfihjQvI#t=2149) at 35:00), the IPCC’s “terms of reference” through which the body proceeds to generate its findings exclude the sun and its many demonstrable atmospheric effects as factors in the warming and cooling of the earth’s climate.[4] It is thus no wonder that at best fringe or nonexistent causes of “climate change”–such as minuscule alterations in atmospheric gases–are pointed to with great alarm by the IPCC and its proponents.


Despite far more unambiguous and compelling scientific explanations the notion that “carbon emissions” are the foremost cause of natural climactic events has become something of a religion, and this is especially the case on the progressive-left, where adherents mechanically accept the curious agenda and its ostensibly “scientific” basis while vehemently condemning non-believers as “climate deniers.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYPwPXNazOs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYPwPXNazOs




As Canadian journalist Donna LaFramboise has documented in her important 2011 exposé (http://nofrakkingconsensus.com/my-book/), the IPCC’s scholarly personnel is in fact heavily weighted toward what are often third-or-fourth-rate scientific talent whose eco-political stances are strictly in accord with the IPCC’s “research” agenda pushing anthropogenic climate change. IPCC authors often include climatology graduate students and even environmental activists from organizations such as Greenpeace and the World Wildlife Fund—indeed, figures with little-if-any scientific training but with clear agendas to promote.


LaFramboise further found that one third of the literature reviewed and cited by the IPCC in its 2007 report was–contrary to IPCC chief publicist Ragendra Pachauri’s pronouncements–not even peer-reviewed, and in many cases included citations of promotional literature devised and distributed by environmental activist organizations.


These unethical and compromising relationships are not difficult to explain if one is to recognize the IPCC for what it in fact is—a powerful political organization with the overarching objective of manufacturing consent and achieving transnational policy harmonization around the largely discursive construct of anthropogenic carbon-centric climate change.


The fact that the IPCC is capable of forthrightly carrying out one of the greatest scientific frauds in human history, setting long range governmental policies while enlisting allegedly intellectual sophisticates and “progressive” news media as its most devoted foot soldiers, is no small-scale feat. It is, rather, an immense achievement in modern propaganda and thought control that only hints at the powerful forces behind a much more far-reaching agenda.


Notes
[1] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, “Human Influence on Climate Clear: IPCC Says (http://www.ipcc.ch/news_and_events/docs/ar5/press_release_ar5_wgi_en.pdf),” Geneva Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization. The notion of “a 97% consensus” has itself become a common mantra for climate change fear mongering and grounds for labeling someone a “climate denier.” Yet there is limited evidence of any such consensus concerning ACC among climatologists. The oft-cited 2009 American Geophysical Union survey alleging a 98% consensus among scientists on ACC cannot sustain even modest scrutiny. See Larry Bell, “That Scientific Global Warming Consensus … Not! (http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2012/07/17/that-scientific-global-warming-consensus-not/)” Forbes.com, July 7, 2012, and “Global Warming Consensus Looking More Like a Myth (http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/021513-644725-geoscientists-engineers-dont-believe-in-climate-change.htm#ixzz2LAtp1Qee),” Investors Business Daily, February 15, 2013. Another study held up as “proof” of scientific consensus, “Expert Credibility in Climate Change,” asserts only carefully qualified claims along these lines. “A broad analysis of the climate scientist community itself,” the authors point out, “the distribution of credibility of dissenting researchers relative to agreeing researchers, and the level of agreement among top climate experts has not been conducted and would inform future ACC discussions.” The brief paper assesses “an extensive data set of 1,372 climate researchers” to conclude that the scientific expertise and prominence of those who accept the IPCC’s ACC tenets surpass those who remain “unconvinced.” This begs the question, To what degree are the requisites of foundation funding related to espousing IPCC/ACC opinion? William R. L. Anderegg, James W. Prall, Jacob Harold, and Stephen H. Schneider, “Expert Credibility in Climate Change (http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.abstract),” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010.
[2] James F. Tracy, “The Forces Behind Carbon-Centric Environmentalism (http://www.globalresearch.ca/co2-and-the-ideology-of-climate-change-the-forces-behind-carbon-centric-environmentalism/5342471),” Global Research, November 12, 2013.

[3] “TV News and Extreme Weather: Don’t Mention Climate Change (http://fair.org/press-release/tv-news-and-extreme-weather-dont-mention-climate-change/),” Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, December 18, 2013. It might be added that corporate media and progressive-left counterparts uniformly fail to consider other possible causes of such unusual weather events, such as geoengineering and similar “environmental modification techniques” acknowledged by the US military and undertaken in many industrialized countries. See, for example, Michel Chossudovsky, “Climate Change, Geoengineering, and Environmental Modification Techniques (http://www.globalresearch.ca/climate-change-geoengineering-and-environmental-modification-techniques-enmod/5357966),” Global Research, November 24, 2013.
[4] Independent journalist James Corbett has published several insightful interviews with Tim Ball, available for download here (http://www.corbettreport.com/?s=Tim+Ball&x=0&y=0).

[mick silver]

whan i hear climate change i also hear population control

[PatColo]

KBarrett interviews Dr. James Tracy of MemoryHoleBlog.com (http://memoryholeblog.com/), 1h 50m:

The Kevin Barrett Show 2014.03.07 (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2014/03/the-kevin-barrett-show-20140307.html)

https://lh3.ggpht.com/_1_WxkOeIxkk/SWfJP4JfXtI/AAAAAAAAAAM/asJQupnvRrg/S220/Kevin+BarrettQ+220+JPG80.jpg (http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_1_WxkOeIxkk/SWfJP4JfXtI/AAAAAAAAAAM/asJQupnvRrg/S220/Kevin+BarrettQ+220+JPG80.jpg)
James Tracy on foundation-funded "left," Chomsky, climate "science," and smart-meters"

Communications professor James Tracy of Memory Hole Blog (http://memoryholeblog.com/) wonders why the foundation-funded "left" is so touchy about 9/11 truth and other subjects that might displease their paymasters. He wonders whether even the best of the foundation-funded media-watchdog groups, Project Censored (http://www.projectcensored.org/), "is censoring non progressive-left outlets, including Infowars, while promoting nonsense like the SPLC's 'hate map' and climate non-science." We also discuss the strange case of Noam Chomsky, an accomplished critic of war and empire who exhibits guilty demeanor while covering up deep events like JFK and 9/11. (See Guilty demeanor: The private 9/11 emails of Noam Chomsky (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/11/05/chomsky-emails/).) Towards the end of the show, Professor Tracy explains how he managed to get the electric company to take the toxic "smart meter" off his house.

Kevin's blog (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.ca/)
TruthJihad.com (http://truthjihad.com/)


24k CF Download (http://noliesradio.org/archives/KB-TJ_tracy_2014_0308_web.mp3)


Posted by zapoper (http://www.blogger.com/profile/15726967138606494466) at 5:34 PM 13 comments: (http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440450620561193447&postID=1616209312117161414)