PDA

View Full Version : The Truth Exposed



EE_
23rd October 2012, 06:23 AM
I don't know what to make of this or where or how this guy got this info...but very intriguing.
Still watching now.
I've always felt the Jared Laughner shooting was a staged event...something was just not right about it. This guy adds more credence to what I thought all along.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=45w9GlL7deU#!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=6J1uJIDrgIc


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=c7prvR5dR4s

BrewTech
23rd October 2012, 06:30 AM
I didn't watch the vid, but this is exactly what I meant when I posted in the MARINES MARTIAL LAW thread about disinfo...

ALL CAPS and EXPOSED tells me to tread carefully... disinfo ahead.

EE_
23rd October 2012, 08:14 AM
I am treading carefully...part 2 is even more interesting.

undgrd
23rd October 2012, 09:20 AM
I watched 30 minutes of the first video. EE, I would like to hear what you have to say about these videos before I continue. To be frank, what I've heard so far sounds pretty unbelievable.

jimswift
23rd October 2012, 11:00 AM
I'm 20 minutes on the first one and I'm not the least bit surprised at this point.

After these "reality shows" got cranked up in full gear after that 'Big Brother' garbage I felt it was BS and these people were actors. To this level no, but had a strong intuition it was scripted.

Geeeez.

EE_
23rd October 2012, 11:07 AM
I like conspiracy theories and these vids provide a healthy dose.
I like how he makes the connections of the families and the Rockefellers and how some of the same people appeared at the same shooting events and OWS.
Some looked like a good match, some didn't...but we are living in a Hollywood society.
I liked the surprise ending! (last 6 minutes)

sirgonzo420
23rd October 2012, 06:06 PM
The guy who put this video together could very easily be diagnosed as paranoid schizophrenic, not that he is actually schizo, just that he could easily convince a psychologist that he is.

So if you don't want to sit though a couple hours of "ear comparisons", I'll try to distill some of the more thought provoking pieces examined in the videos.

The clip of Bush discussing gov't-manufactured news in the very beginning of the first video is worth seeing.

35-39 minutes into the first video is a little clip of what appears to be an agent provocateur, who signals to police that cameras are rolling and it is time for them to charge the crowd of "protestors".

"Ponce" makes an appearance at 43 minutes into the second video.

Also, Lady Gaga is JonBenet Ramsey, and Walt Disney is Hitler.

PatColo
23rd October 2012, 07:46 PM
Rep Giffords Operation Safeway EXPOSED (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?54660-Rep-Giffords-Operation-Safeway-EXPOSED&highlight=dallasgoldbug)
Started by General of Darkness (http://gold-silver.us/forum/member.php?3309-General-of-Darkness), 30th September 2011 04:56 PM 1 (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?54660-Rep-Giffords-Operation-Safeway-EXPOSED&highlight=dallasgoldbug) 2 (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?54660-Rep-Giffords-Operation-Safeway-EXPOSED/page2&highlight=dallasgoldbug)



Site puports to expose ZSM hoax "news" footage, common actors (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?56710-Site-puports-to-expose-ZSM-hoax-quot-news-quot-footage-common-actors&highlight=dallasgoldbug)
Started by PatColo (http://gold-silver.us/forum/member.php?3395-PatColo), 9th December 2011 02:30 PM


^ post from Aug '12:

This "dallasgoldbug" is a total sham. He was guest on Charles Giulianni's podcast yesterday. He made far-fetched claims throughout. DGB had recently "reported" that Deanna Spingola is AKA Victoria Jackson (former SNL bubblehead), and Spingola protested, even had a show a couple weeks ago spent debunking the claim and similar claims by DGB, calling and emailing DBG in hopes of having him come on the show to explain himself, but it was in vain. So Spingola called the last segment of yesterday's Giulianni show and confronted DGB- and DGB basically withered AFAIC. Then today's show has been all Giulianni taking calls about DGB.

Here's the last two Giulliani podcasts, if you've got nothing better to do!

Truth Hertz with Charles Giuliani 2012.08.01 (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2012/08/truth-hertz-with-charles-giuliani.html)
Guest: Dallasgoldbug. Spingola calls into the show in the last segment. LOL

64k Listen (http://www.talkshoe.com/resources/talkshoe/images/swf/lastEpisodePlayer.swf?fileUrl=http://k005.kiwi6.com/hotlink/s7w0fpp6dz/truth_hertz_with_charles_giuliani_2012_08_01.mp3)

Download (http://k005.kiwi6.com/hotlink/s7w0fpp6dz/truth_hertz_with_charles_giuliani_2012_08_01.mp3)

Archive (http://www.oraclebroadcasting.com/archives.php?who=Truth_Hertz)


Truth Hertz with Charles Giuliani 2012.08.02 (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2012/08/truth-hertz-with-charles-giuliani_2.html)


Charles finally realizes that dallasgoldbug is full of it. He takes calls and the show ends up being all about Ed Chiarini (dallasgoldbug).

64k Listen (http://www.talkshoe.com/resources/talkshoe/images/swf/lastEpisodePlayer.swf?fileUrl=http://k005.kiwi6.com/hotlink/qw0b97l9dl/truth_hertz_with_charles_giuliani_2012_08_02.mp3)

Download (http://k005.kiwi6.com/hotlink/qw0b97l9dl/truth_hertz_with_charles_giuliani_2012_08_02.mp3)

Archive (http://www.oraclebroadcasting.com/archives.php?who=Truth_Hertz)

Hatha Sunahara
24th October 2012, 01:22 AM
He did some coverage of the Kyron Horman case, which has been big on local news here for two years or more. I'm having some difficulty grasping how the news media, the police, the court system and all these actors are all playing out a scripted drama designed to defraud the American taxpayers and citizens.

I don't believe Walt Disney and Adolph Hitler are the same person even if they have identical ears. And didn't anyone do a background check on Janet Napolitano and discover that she was the red diaper baby named Leslie Cagan? If Homeland Security is a fraud, are all their orders for a billion bullets a fraud too?

My sense from these videos is that it is another monkey wrench in our collective sense of reality. Nothing we know is true. Everything and everybody is a fraud, therefore you can't believe anything--not even what you see with your own two lying eyes. One thing I find somewhat credible is that the actors in the Jackass movies are in the business of faking news stories. Bradley Manning is a fictitious character? Assange is a fictitious character? Abby Hoffman was fictitious? Gabby Giffords is fake? Gary Johnson is fake? Maybe that's why Ron Paul doesn't support him even though he is a libertarian. I wonder how much Ron Paul knows about all this fakery? The only thing that matters in all of this is that you need to believe that everything you see on the TV news is fake. I already believe that without the elaborate investigations and proof that are delivered in these videos.

Hatha

PatColo
24th October 2012, 01:43 AM
My sense from these videos is that it is another monkey wrench in our collective sense of reality. Nothing we know is true. Everything and everybody is a fraud, therefore you can't believe anything--not even what you see with your own two lying eyes.

Good call- it's a nihilism promotion op, attacking our "objective reality" underpinnings so inconvenient to the NWO. With peeps like us in their crosshairs, "gold bugs", "truth seekers" (the operative behind this is Ed Chiarini aka dallasgoldbug aka wellaware1)

ziopedia:


Nihilism (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8a/Loudspeaker.svg/11px-Loudspeaker.svg.png / (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English)ˈ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)n (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)aɪ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key). (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)ɨ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)l (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)ɪ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)z (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)əm (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)/ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English) or / (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English)ˈ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)n (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)iː (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key). (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)ɨ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)l (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)ɪ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)z (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)əm (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)/ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English); from the Latin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin) nihil, nothing) is the philosophical (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy) doctrine (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctrine) suggesting the negation (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/negation) of one or more putatively meaningful (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meaning_of_life) aspects of life (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life). Most commonly, nihilism is presented in the form of existential nihilism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_nihilism), which argues that life is without objective meaning, purpose, or intrinsic value (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrinsic_value_%28ethics%29).[1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#cite_note-0) Moral nihilists (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Moral_nihilism) assert that morality (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morality) does not inherently exist, and that any established moral values are abstractly contrived. Nihilism can also take epistemological (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology) or metaphysical (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics)/ontological (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology) forms, meaning respectively that, in some aspect, knowledge is not possible, or that reality does not actually exist.


The term nihilism is sometimes used in association with anomie (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomie) to explain the general mood of despair at a perceived pointlessness of existence that one may develop upon realising there are no necessary norms, rules, or laws.[2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#cite_note-1) Movements such as Futurism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futurism_%28art%29) and deconstruction (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deconstruction),[3] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#cite_note-phillips-2) among others, have been identified by commentators as "nihilistic" at various times in various contexts.


Nihilism is also a characteristic that has been ascribed to time periods: for example, Jean Baudrillard (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Baudrillard) and others have called postmodernity (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodernity) a nihilistic epoch,[4] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#cite_note-3) and some Christian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity) theologians and figures of religious authority have asserted that postmodernity[5] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#cite_note-4) and many aspects of modernity (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modernity)[3] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#cite_note-phillips-2) represent a rejection of theism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theism), and that rejection of their theistic doctrine entails nihilism.
Contents




1 Forms of nihilism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Forms_of_nihilism)

1.1 Metaphysical nihilism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Metaphysical_nihilism)
1.2 Epistemological nihilism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Epistemological_nihilism)
1.3 Mereological nihilism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Mereological_nihilism)
1.4 Existential nihilism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Existential_nihilism)
1.5 Moral nihilism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Moral_nihilism)
1.6 Political nihilism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Political_nihilism)


2 History (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#History)

2.1 19th century (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#19th_century)
2.2 Kierkegaard (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Kierkegaard)
2.3 Nietzsche (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Nietzsche)
2.4 Heidegger's interpretation of Nietzsche (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Heidegger.27s_interpretation_of_Nietzsche )
2.5 Postmodernism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Postmodernism)


3 Nihilism and culture (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Nihilism_and_culture)

3.1 Television (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Television)
3.2 Dada (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Dada)
3.3 Literature (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Literature)
3.4 Music (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Music)
3.5 Film (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Film)


4 See also (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#See_also)
5 Notes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#Notes)
6 References (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#References)
7 External links (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism#External_links)

Glass
24th October 2012, 01:51 AM
The only thing that matters in all of this is that you need to believe that everything you see on the TV news is fake.

Television is for entertainment purposes only. I often wonder why people think that an organsation which telecasts 22 hours of make believe every day would suddenly start telecasting non make believe for one or two hours per day. Doesn't make any sense to me why people would think that.

Still you can't fix stupid as we all know.

singular_me
24th October 2012, 05:46 AM
I am half way through the first video and in my view it is way over the top, meaning not really believable. WHY would they need to add another layer of such high expensive disinfo when the system as a whole is already a massive scam/illusion to start with ??? Makes no sense. I am trying to follow the $$$ here and to me it doesnt add up.Take the 9-11 segment for example, I dont see the usefulness to have a footage with that witness-actress at all. The attacks were enough dramatic on their own and they had enough real people to interview to serve their goals.... makes no sense, like I said.

jimswift
24th October 2012, 06:16 AM
The attacks were enough dramatic on their own and they had enough real people to interview to serve their goals.... makes no sense, like I said.


I see it as shaping the narrative. No so much for the drama, but laying the foundation for the deception. Like spoon feeding the public.

EE_
24th October 2012, 07:48 AM
I've always felt there's a little bit of truth in every story and some of the conspiracies in the vid are real. GSUS members are probably some of the most skeptical people out there of anything we see and hear, so we aren't easily duped. The producer I think is either a conspiracy nut, just likes creating stories, or both.
I take very little at face value these days, so I am very skeptical of anything I see in the media/Internet, and with stories like this, but I still found it amusing. He did put in a lot of effort and hard work to create this video. I give him points for that.
I thought the ending with Disney matched to Hitler was pretty comical...but at the same time I have never trusted what Walt Disney produced. I think he was one of the innovators in the programming of the masses. I took it as Disney only used himself to produce footage of Hitler to dupe the masses and helping to perpetuate WWII...not that he was really Hitler.
The producer did point his finger at many of the right criminals that got us where we are today.

EE_
24th October 2012, 08:16 AM
Speaking of conspiracies...I'm trying to figure out why Fox news has been pumping the Benghazi attack 24/7 day after day after day? I think Fox news is the master of conspiracy.
They give their followers some truth to munch on and while the herd is bobbing their heads up and down, they slip in their lies hoping the sheep will keep bobbing.
Are we privy to everything the government does...no. Should we be, idk? So why this story?