Log in

View Full Version : Cop Tasers 10-Year-Old Boy For Refusing to Clean Patrol Car .



Ponce
31st October 2012, 09:46 AM
First post of the day...........good morning rainy morning to one and all.
===============================================


A state police officer in New Mexico is being sued after he allegedly tasered a child in a school playground for no reason other than he refused to clean the cop’s patrol car.
The boy’s legal guardian, Rachel Higgins, claims that Officer Chris Webb shot the boy, referred to as “R.D.”, with a 50,000 volt stun gun while visiting on a “career day” at Tularosa New Mexico Intermediate School on May 4.
The complaint notes that the officer approached a group of boys and asked which of them wanted to clean his car. When R.D. said he had no desire to clean the patrol vehicle, Officer Webb is claimed to have stated “‘Let me show you what happens to people who do not listen to the police.’”
He then pointed his taser at the boy, according to the report, and fired two barbs directly into the 10-year old’s chest, electrifying him and causing him to blackout.
Webb then extracted the barbs from the child’s chest, leaving scarring ” that look like cigarette burns”.
“Instead of calling emergency medical personnel, Officer Webb pulled out the barbs and took the boy to the school principal’s office,” the complaint states.
The complaint claims that the boy has suffered mental trauma and night terrors and is now afraid of going to sleep at night for fear he will not wake up again.
Ms Higgins stated in Santa Fe County Court that “No reasonable officer confronting a situation where the need for force is at its lowest, on a playground with elementary age children, would have deployed the Taser in so reckless a manner as to cause physical and psychological injury.”
Higgins is suing on the grounds of battery, failure to render emergency medical care, excessive force, unreasonable seizure, and negligent hiring, training, supervision and retention.
Police guidelines on tasers state that the weapons must only be used as a last resort when an officer is under direct threat. The idea that a 10-year old boy weighing less than 100lbs poses any form of danger to a police officer is a joke.
Numerous studies over recent years have proven that Taser stun guns can cause heart problems and even induce sudden and lethal cardiac arrest.
Webb’s alleged remark to the boy sums up the way many police officers see themselves, as grand overlords that cannot be questioned or challenged. To these people, anyone who reacts in a way they find disagreeable is a viable target for attack, no matter if they are a child, a pregnant woman or a person with a disability.
Earlier this month, two police officers in Texas tasered a man who was having a seizure, causing the 50-year-old to suffer a heart attack and permanent brain damage. The cops were so ill equipped to deal with the situation, that they broke out tasers and shocked a man who was already convulsing on the ground.
As we reported on Infowars Nightly news, it took paramedics 11 minutes to revive the man and bring back his pulse. It is a miracle he is still alive, though he will now have to live with severe disabilities for the rest of his life.

http://poorrichards-blog.blogspot.fr/2012/10/cop-tasers-10-year-old-boy-for-refusing.html

midnight rambler
31st October 2012, 09:53 AM
Lemme guess - he got a (paid) suspension (aka a cop vacation) pending an investigation, a raise, a promotion, and received a citation for outstanding community service.

Twisted Titan
31st October 2012, 10:21 AM
OTBwtb...OTB

madfranks
31st October 2012, 11:46 AM
Officer Chris Webb shot the boy, referred to as “R.D.”, with a 50,000 volt stun gun while visiting on a “career day”

...

Officer Webb is claimed to have stated “‘Let me show you what happens to people who do not listen to the police.’”
He then pointed his taser at the boy, according to the report, and fired two barbs directly into the 10-year old’s chest, electrifying him and causing him to blackout.

It seems to me he was merely showing the kids the reality of what it is like to be a cop, e.g. you get to go around shooting strangers with tazers for fun.

midnight rambler
31st October 2012, 11:49 AM
It seems to me he was merely showing the kids the reality of what it is like to be a cop, e.g. you get to go around shooting strangers with tazers for fun.

Yeah, that's it - tasers as a recruitment tool.

gunDriller
31st October 2012, 01:06 PM
heck, i'd go on a Kosher diet if it would give me a legal reason not to talk to Pigs/ Uniformed Thugs.

palani
31st October 2012, 01:36 PM
Funny. I recall years ago debate in congress about the livestock industry using shock probes to help get the cattle and hogs in motion. The way the debate went one farm state congressman got up and states "I am sure using these shock probes is more humane than a 2x4".

midnight rambler
31st October 2012, 01:40 PM
Are you suggesting that tasers are 'more humane' than nightsticks?

palani
31st October 2012, 01:44 PM
Are you suggesting that tasers are 'more humane' than nightsticks?

Not me but this congressman in question might have that view.

midnight rambler
31st October 2012, 01:48 PM
Not me but this congressman in question might have that view.

It's certainly more humane for the donut munchers 'cause with a taser they don't have to get up close and personal like they do with a nightstick and therefore the use of tasers contributes to the ultimate extremely crucial primary objective of 'officer safety'. It also opens up the recruitment field to very petite wymyn.

k-os
31st October 2012, 06:05 PM
FTA:


Higgins is suing on the grounds of battery, failure to render emergency medical care, excessive force, unreasonable seizure, and negligent hiring, training, supervision and retention.

I am asking the legal/lawful gurus here . . . does "unreasonable seizure" have another definition of which I am unaware, or is there perhaps something missing from this article?

The cop that did this is a tool. Either he did it accidentally, which makes him a tool, or he did it on purpose, which makes him completely unfit to carry such a tool on his waistband.

Sometimes I wonder if stories like this are out there just so we become numb to them. As if the point of the story (or action) is that we just get f'ing used to the abuse.

midnight rambler
31st October 2012, 06:10 PM
FTA:



I am asking the legal/lawful gurus here . . . does "unreasonable seizure" have another definition of which I am unaware, or is there perhaps something missing from this article?

The cop that did this is a tool. Either he did it accidentally, which makes him a tool, or he did it on purpose, which makes him completely unfit to carry such a tool on his waistband.

Sometimes I wonder if stories like this are out there just so we become numb to them. As if the point of the story (or action) is that we just get f'ing used to the abuse.

The use of the term 'unlawful seizure' may be a result of the wording of the NM statutes. Other terms that I can think that apply are unlawful detention and kidnapping ("unlawful detention or imprisonment regardless of purpose" --Black's 4th Ed.).

No way this was 'accidental' - no difference whatsoever with pointing a loaded gun at someone.

And I seriously doubt that anyone is ever going to become numb over having taser barbs pulled out of their skin.

k-os
31st October 2012, 06:24 PM
And I seriously doubt that anyone is ever going to become numb over having taser barbs pulled out of their skin.

No, what I meant was . . . people would become numb to it from reading so many articles and watching so many stories about it.

LuckyStrike
31st October 2012, 06:27 PM
or he did it on purpose, which makes him completely unfit to continue breathing



I like that better.

midnight rambler
31st October 2012, 06:29 PM
No, what I meant was . . . people would become numb to it from reading so many articles and watching so many stories about it.

I know what you meant but that can be said about a lot of stuff. The remnant will never become inured while the lost always will - that's just how the Lucifer worshipers roll. It's a juggernaut.

palani
1st November 2012, 02:10 PM
A cattle prod is the same as a taser WITHOUT the barbs.

http://thegazette.com/2012/11/01/shellsburg-man-pleads-guilty-to-using-cattle-prod-on-a-16-year-old-girl/

Shellsburg man pleads guilty to using cattle prod on 16-year-old girl


A 50-year-old Shellsburg man charged with using a cattle prod on a 16-year-old girl pleaded guilty last week in Benton County Court.

Eric Kolsrud entered his written guilty plea to assault causing injury, a serious misdemeanor, and contributing to the delinquency of a minor, a simple misdemeanor, on Oct. 25. Sentencing is set 2 p.m. on Nov. 15.

According to a police report, Kolsrud used a “Hot Shot” shocking device on teenage girl following an argument last July. The shocking device is used to control livestock. Kolsrud also told a 15-year-old girl who lived in the same house to lie to officers if they asked her about the incident, authorities said.

iOWNme
1st November 2012, 02:58 PM
A cattle prod is the same as a taser WITHOUT the barbs.

http://thegazette.com/2012/11/01/shellsburg-man-pleads-guilty-to-using-cattle-prod-on-a-16-year-old-girl/

Shellsburg man pleads guilty to using cattle prod on 16-year-old girl



Man or OTHER animal?

chad
1st November 2012, 03:02 PM
we used to try and shock each other with cattle prods when we farrowed hogs- we were about 13. what a bunch of retards we were. i never got hit because i was a fast little bastard, but i hit a couple of people now and then. they were the old ones from the 1960s that had D cell batteries in them. good thing i'm not 13 now, somebody would probably be dead. i did gt tricked in to pissing on an electric fence once, though. once.

palani
1st November 2012, 03:05 PM
Man or OTHER animal?

It is a commercial charge. You can be charged with anything at any time these days.

Did you watch the first video here?

http://www.creditorsincommerce.com/videos-watch.php

midnight rambler
1st November 2012, 03:10 PM
we used to try and shock each other with cattle prods when we farrowed hogs- we were about 13. what a bunch of retards we were. i never got hit because i was a fast little bastard, but i hit a couple of people now and then. they were the old ones from the 1960s that had D cell batteries in them. good thing i'm not 13 now, somebody would probably be dead. i did gt tricked in to pissing on an electric fence once, though. once.

When I was growing up people made homemade hotshots using a wooden cane and a dry cell (and a model A coil?). The bite from one of those was far more severe than any store-bought hotshot I guarantee ya. Once at a rodeo I was behind the arena in a staging area standing next to my horse when this one ahole kid I knew and his buddy hit me on the leg from behind with one of these homemade hotshots. I jumped so high I ended up on the other side of my horse. (I wasn't the only victim, they were walking around hitting everyone who didn't see them coming)

DMac
2nd November 2012, 11:25 AM
we used to try and shock each other with cattle prods when we farrowed hogs- we were about 13. what a bunch of retards we were. i never got hit because i was a fast little bastard, but i hit a couple of people now and then. they were the old ones from the 1960s that had D cell batteries in them. good thing i'm not 13 now, somebody would probably be dead. i did gt tricked in to pissing on an electric fence once, though. once.

See you can learn things from teevee


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wW6rENTfaU


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wW6rENTfaU