View Full Version : Elongated Skulls & Ancient Engineering In Peru
Horn
3rd November 2012, 07:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JIu6EjPxG4
Archiveing and Covering all our True Supressed History.. Enjoy!!
See my Playlists and page for soo much more information in depth!!!
http://www.youtube.com/danielofdoriaa
joboo
3rd November 2012, 07:36 PM
http://gold-silver.us/forum/image.php?u=3304&dateline=1351981338 (http://gold-silver.us/forum/member.php?3304-Horn) (http://gold-silver.us/forum/member.php?3304-Horn)
freespirit
3rd November 2012, 07:42 PM
watched this the other night... one of the more interesting cases i've seen so far.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_N-N90U50Q
Horn
3rd November 2012, 07:42 PM
Feel free to make fun of my shoes, joboo.
I'm not that sensitive about them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46YbXEc64d8
Horn
3rd November 2012, 08:56 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HboEc2-HbKQ
joboo
3rd November 2012, 10:16 PM
Feel free to make fun of my shoes, joboo.
I'm not that sensitive about them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46YbXEc64d8
It's ok you don't need to get all defensive over them.
joboo
3rd November 2012, 10:45 PM
They're lovely shoes.
http://www.cherryplucker.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/cp-pix-324-break-editors-are-hacks-9.jpg (http://www.cherryplucker.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/cp-pix-324-break-editors-are-hacks-9.jpg)
(http://www.cherryplucker.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/cp-pix-324-break-editors-are-hacks-9.jpg)
Horn
4th November 2012, 12:33 AM
Your the kind of kid who used to pull the arms off my G.I. Joe?
joboo
4th November 2012, 12:43 AM
Hey, however you got them to fit is none of my business. Fabulous shoes.
Horn
5th November 2012, 05:55 AM
watched this the other night... one of the more interesting cases i've seen so far.
So here we have some of the best case evidence for extra-terrestrial activity, along with a subsequent departure.
Are the elongated skulls simply a mocking desire that was created after their departure, or some craft that may have been handed down for a deeper purpose? Evidence of demagoguery is replete in human history with its worship of extra-terrestrial "sub-gods".
The Sumerian text was a key piece, what was the name of that bowl again?
This page gets into really breaking down some text,
http://www.sevenfoldtruth.com/urantia-clues23.htm
Horn
5th November 2012, 06:14 AM
Fuentemagna Bowl - good search term
3942
http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~legneref/archeol/fuentema.htm
(http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~legneref/archeol/fuentema.htm)
It should be noted that there was one challenge to the authenticity of the Fuente Magna by skeptics who suggested that it was a fabrication by archeologists to gain international attention. The overwhelming support from the major portion of the academic community should discredit this criticism, as it has in times past when challenges arose to the existence of any writing at all in the Americas (e.g., that of the Olmec and Maya).
After further investigation FuenteMagna has more futicaka surrounding it then can call it believable. This shouldn't negate the inexplicable engineering found at Puma Punku though. The overall appearance of Puma Punku leaves a wanting with its clean surfaces of little script to track, or an obvious disconnection from anything surrounding it.
Its as if it were so sacred as not to be touched, The lack of post dated "graffiti" or additions to, gives it unknown credence, maybe they're just not recorded or discarded?
Yet, the heads of their own are to be drilled, tapped and molded as play things...
Horn
5th November 2012, 09:19 AM
Then here's a video that throws them all for a loop.
All stones were cast, what do you think of that?
Wish I could travel to Puma Punku to see if true.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=znQk_yBHre4#!
freespirit
5th November 2012, 10:26 AM
what they are doing is attempting to disparage any theory that does not reinforce their own antiquated, narrow minded observations.... this is a method that has been used by the "experts" on Giza, etc.
their egos wont allow them to consider the possibility that they may have been incorrect, or at the very least misguided, and they can't accept the idea that someone else figured out something they were not able to do.
"hey, i discovered some new information about (insert ancient civilization here)..."
"oh, well...since your new information conflicts with my own, we'll just ignore this new info and hope it goes away, or we'll ridicule you and your discovery and make you go away. that way, my fragile ego remains intact, and the world keeps thinking i'm the smartest thing since sliced bread and all my life's work hasn't been for naught..."
...ya know??
freespirit
5th November 2012, 10:28 AM
when one takes into consideration precession of the equinoxes, all generally accepted theories on man's history and our origins become questionable.
Horn
5th November 2012, 11:17 AM
Speaking of latest discoveries:
Scientists Find Underground Chamber Pumapunku (http://scienceray.com/earth-sciences/scientists-find-underground-chamber-pumapunku-2/)
August 13, 2012,
A team of archaeologists using ground penetrating radar have found an underground chamber that could finally answer some of the mysteries of Pumapunku.
Did ancient aliens or ancient humans build Pumapunku? What exactly was the building’s purpose? What did the building look like and how did it end up destroyed? Where did the knowledge and skill to build and carve the blocks come from? It is these questions among many others that archaeologists have not been able to answer regarding the site that leaves us with a huge mystery. But a new discovery could be about to change all of that
Using ground penetrating radar, a team of archaeologists have discovered a large underground anomaly that is only 60 feet from the Pumapunku foundation. The team believes that the anomaly is a man-made chamber versus a natural one and is the only one detected so far from the radar scans. Head archaeologist Domingo Mendoza stated that the team is convinced the chamber is most likely a tomb but there is no direct proof of this just yet.
In a statement to a local newspaper, head archaeologist Dr. Mendoza gave the following details of the discovery:
The anomaly found is approximately four feet underground and then goes to depth of 10-11 feet. (thereby making the height of the chamber 6-7 feet)
The chamber is approximately 12 feet in length and 5 feet in width and appears to be mostly empty.
The chamber appears to have steps leading into it but it does appear to have been filled in with something. (the team thinks rocks and loose soil were thrown in to block access to it)
The chamber does not have ground entrances to it and the very top of the chamber is 4 feet beneath the current ground level. (the team thinks the chamber was dugout and then purposely buried)
There appears to be something quite large at the end of the chamber that the team thinks could be a sarcophagus.
So what is next for this amazing discovery? The team is currently looking for a drilling company with the hopes of creating a small hole into the chamber from above and then inserting a small video camera to see exactly what the anomaly is. If all goes according to plan, then they expect answers in the coming weeks. If the chamber does turn out to be a tomb or something else that was dugout artificially then the team will proceed with excavations at the site in the coming months.
Are we on the verge of an amazing discovery? Will Pumapunku’s mysteries finally be solved? Will we find evidence of ancient alien intervention with the site? Make sure you stay tuned on this one because things just got interesting …http://s3.amazonaws.com/readers/2012/08/13/pumapunkuruinsancientmystery_1.jpeg
Read more: http://scienceray.com/earth-sciences/scientists-find-underground-chamber-pumapunku-2/#ixzz2BNSYf1n3
StreetsOfGold
5th November 2012, 11:32 AM
all generally accepted theories on man's history and our origins become questionable.
For Bible rejectors perhaps, everything is explained in Genesis but Bible rejectors who hate the God of the Bible and hate his word and (symbolically) spit on what he said will continue to be baffled by what they see as preserved after Noah's flood, including the obvious tell-tale signs of the flood itself.
freespirit
5th November 2012, 12:24 PM
what i was referring to SoG, was the generally accepted idea of the length of time man has been around. somewhere around 5,000 to 12,000 years (give or take). this has been based on ancient monuments coinciding with certain celestial positions at various points on the calendar. the numbers that are generally accepted are based upon the time between these celestial occurrences and do not consider precession of the equinoxes into the equation.
when one does consider precession, it offers up the idea that man may have flourished some 26,000 or so years earlier than we had anticipated. even further than that possibly.
the sphinx, stonehenge, machu picchu and any other ancient site that has viewing spots to observe the heavens during solstice, etc., could have been built many thousands of years prior to what we accept as fact. the heavens, through precession will appear in the same spot in the sky every 26,000 years (+/-).
this would throw serious speculation on those who pioneered our currently accepted theories.
but for myself, i am christian, and believe that GOD created all things, including the heavens and earth and he could have done so millions or billions of years ago for all we know.
***please note- during the typing of this post the numbers of years used (underlined) are an approximation done so to the best of my recollection at the time, and i reserve the right to edit later when i have time to look up the numbers...;D
Horn
5th November 2012, 12:45 PM
but for myself, i am christian, and believe that GOD created all things, including the heavens and earth
And the elongated skulls of Ancient Egypt - Sumeria?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bTAjahf5qw
freespirit
5th November 2012, 01:27 PM
And the elongated skulls of Ancient Egypt - Sumeria?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bTAjahf5qwthe elongated skulls could be explained by binding the head of an infant much the way they bound women's feet in ancient china.
also certain indian tribes were known to bind infants' heads to back boards to protect the fragile neck, while the women wore the back board when gathering food, etc...
this caused a deformation of the skull as was evidenced in the skeletons of children of these tribes that have been found.
i think the same thing may be possible here...
freespirit
5th November 2012, 01:37 PM
what i was referring to SoG, was the generally accepted idea of the length of time man has been around. somewhere around 5,000 to 12,000 years (give or take). this has been based on ancient monuments coinciding with certain celestial positions at various points on the calendar. the numbers that are generally accepted are based upon the time between these celestial occurrences and do not consider celestial procession into the equation.
when one does consider celestial procession, it offers up the idea that man may have flourished some 26,000 or so years earlier than we had anticipated. even further than that possibly.
the sphinx, stonehenge, machu picchu and any other ancient site that has viewing spots to observe the heavens during solstice, etc., could have been built many thousands of years prior to what we accept as fact. the heavens, through celestial procession will appear in the same spot in the sky every 26,000 years (+/-).
this would throw serious speculation on those who pioneered our currently accepted theories.
but for myself, i am christian, and believe that GOD created all things, including the heavens and earth and he could have done so millions or billions of years ago for all we know.
***please note- during the typing of this post the numbers of years used (underlined) are an approximation done so to the best of my recollection at the time, and i reserve the right to edit later when i have time to look up the numbers...;D
upon further research, i have discovered i had the number of years correct (26,000) but the terminology incorrect...the correct term is precession of the equinoxes. also many people believe that man has been around for approx 6000 years...guess i wasn't too far off after all, lol
*** earlier post edited for clarity***
Horn
5th November 2012, 02:45 PM
the elongated skulls could be explained by binding the head of an infant much the way they bound women's feet in ancient china.
So the locale to ancient engineering sites is completely coincidental?
My feeling is they were trying to mock something/one that was of high dominion. An older race?
I mean a head is something completely different than feet to physically mess with,, some higher purpose than as far as simply being considered attractive considered?
hmmm maybe to an alien.. lol
Also some info out there say some of the skulls show no marks towards the bindings at all... they must've become very skilled manipulators at it to show no marks at all.
freespirit
5th November 2012, 03:17 PM
So the locale to ancient engineering sites is completely coincidental?
perhaps...yet to be confirmed...
My feeling is they were trying to mock something/one that was of high dominion. An older race?
again, perhaps... this is an interesting idea...mimicry being the most sincere form of flattery...
I mean a head is something completely different than feet to physically mess with,, some higher purpose than as far as simply being considered attractive considered?
perhaps our resident doctors can weigh in on that one... my personal opinion is that if started early enough, it may be possible to "train" the skull to grow in a certain way/shape/form... i have no medical background to confirm this idea, i simply think it's possible...
hmmm maybe to an alien.. lol
if there are aliens, God must have made them too.
Also some info out there say some of the skulls show no marks towards the bindings at all... they must've become very skilled manipulators at it to show no marks at all.
they also say there are no tool marks on the crystal skulls, but they had to shape them with something.
now does the info say "some skulls" show no marks, or "many skulls" or "all skulls"? the wording is the thing...many meanings...
Horn
5th November 2012, 03:28 PM
if there are aliens, God must have made them too...
Who brought God into this conversation?
The "alien" influence on humans seems unnatural/ungodly.
Did you check that Veritas vid?
Some good conclusions in there with regards to man's amnesia that occurs somewhere around 6000 years ago.
I guess its too hard to tell if the long skull was a natural human genetic mutation.http://www.robertschoch.net/MSkl3.jpg
freespirit
5th November 2012, 03:40 PM
haven't had time to watch that particular vid, but have seen others in the past...i'll try watch it when i get a chance.
freespirit
5th November 2012, 03:50 PM
Who brought God into this conversation?
...that would be Streets of Gold, Horn...lol
Horn
5th November 2012, 04:59 PM
...that would be Streets of Gold, Horn...lol
Not to sound heady, but knowing the effects of cranial scar tissue and resultant Alzheimer effects.
The only logical conclusion is that man had his collective head "pinched" some 6000 years ago, due to some alien wantonness.
3944
Horn
5th November 2012, 05:10 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aq9NSR6xDs4
7th trump
5th November 2012, 05:14 PM
Maybe this is an ancient way of doing what the natives do today? Wearing your trousers down exposing what shouldnt be exposed and having gold grills on your teeth, and lets not forget ear lobe stretchers.
This thread is silly!
hoarder
5th November 2012, 05:14 PM
"Elongated" is the word traditionally used to distinguish the natural shape of the European skull. Now archeologists are using "elongated" to describe deformed skulls. I smell a Jew somewhere.
Horn
5th November 2012, 05:23 PM
Trump the coincidence is there, and binding your head is something people do en mass every Sunday.
Evidence of the alien war here... ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=GROz4ZgGWyQ
freespirit
5th November 2012, 08:02 PM
This thread is silly!
i will grant you that some of the speculation that revolves around these ancient artifacts can be very silly indeed. however, i find that the artifacts themselves to be endlessly interesting and full of questions like when, why and how. so far, i don't get the gut feeling any of the so-called "experts" have it pegged 100%
Horn
5th November 2012, 11:22 PM
This family portrait was made some 3000 years ago when it fashionable.
3947
Some fashions can be silly, but this one seems rather serious around about the head of the children
http://archaicgifts.com/item/AT/Akhenaton,_Nefertiti_And_Daughters_Egyptian_Family _Portrait_Wall_Plaque/ATE-077S.htm
Horn
6th November 2012, 04:12 PM
This page shows in detail how that stuff at Puma Punku is solid stone, and not cast.
http://hiddenincatours.com/photo-sets/lost-ancient-technology-evidence-in-peru/
I imagine some Inca sitting there buffing a stone for 2000 years,
or of course applying his "stone softening potion"
Horn
6th November 2012, 04:44 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Hl7mdxZ_jVk#!
Horn
7th November 2012, 06:13 PM
Juicy Living for you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD6al1GIDKY
Horn
7th November 2012, 06:29 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxNGRvr8Gtc
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.