Asian-Americans are part of the non-White coalition

[Rubicon]

An op-ed today’s LATimes argues that Asians have signed on in overwhelming numbers to the non-White coalition that has become dominant in the Democratic Party. Based on their experience studying the Asian American community, two political scientists, Taeku Lee and Karthick Ramakrishnan, claim that the main reasons that Asians voted overwhelmingly for Obama have to do with seeing the Republican Party as too concerned with limiting immigration and too much associated with Christianity (Asian Americans turn Democratic (http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-lee-asian-american-voters-20121123,0,7582583.story)).

The 73% of Asians voting for Obama was indeed remarkable—higher than Latinos (71%) or Jews (~70). Given their income profile, Asians are voting much more like Jews who, as the old saw goes, vote like Puerto Ricans but earn like Episcopalians. The point here is that their motives for doing so are similar to those of Jews—a lack of identification with the traditional people and culture of America (although doubtless with far less fear and loathing than is typical of Jews).

Asian-Americans are part of the non-White coalition (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/11/asian-americans-as-part-of-the-non-white-coalition/)

[Carl]

They are not "Asian Americans", the are asians who live in America, same with the hispanics and most of those claiming to "Afiricans".

That's what you get when "political correctness" destroys the cultural, social assimilation process.

[hoarder]

They are not "Asian Americans", the are asians who live in America, same with the hispanics and most of those claiming to "Afiricans".

That's what you get when "political correctness" destroys the cultural, social assimilation process.Political correctness = social engineering.
Assimilation process= social engineering.

[Carl]

Political correctness = social engineering.
Assimilation process= social engineering.
Political correctness = social engineering = Intent: to fragment and destroy domestic culture.
Assimilation process= social engineering = Intent: to encourage adoption of domestic culture.

[hoarder]

Political correctness = social engineering = Intent: to fragment and destroy domestic culture.
Assimilation process= social engineering = Intent: to encourage adoption of domestic culture.Assimilation process=

"The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world domination by the dissolution of other races...and by the establishment of a world republic in which everywhere the Jews will exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the Children of Israel...will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition..." (Karl Marx in a letter to Baruch Levy, quoted in Review de Paris, June 1, 1928, p. 574)

[Carl]

So, telling newcomers that they have to play by our rules and in our language is a bad thing?

[hoarder]

So, telling newcomers that they have to play by our rules and in our language is a bad thing?Newcomers? What do we want newcomers for? There are no jobs. If we accept any newcomers at all, they should be of the same race as the majority population. Multiculturalism doesn't work.

[TheNocturnalEgyptian]

Are you kidding me. Just because someone votes democrat does not mean they are part of an anti-white coalition. How stupid is this going to get.

People have reasons for doing the things they do, and it's not because they're all part of some secret club that you aren't allowed in. Most people actually do have good intentions, it's just that they are acting from poor information and their execution is bad.

Most people who vote democrat think they are making things better. There are complex reasons like social conditioning/shaming, television propaganda. Do you really think people sit around at home trying to "foil the white man"? COME ON! If anything they are sick and tired of the older generations, especially those who have been in power for so long, trying to pass prohibitive laws which stifle society. White men might be used as a scapegoat, sure I get that, but it's not as cut and dry as some people make it sound.

The more you make this a whites against everybody else thing, the more it is going to become one! Plenty of white people have been involved in making our society worse. Sure there are a few jewels of inspiration, but it fucking sickens me to hear everyone talking like "Oh we're good because we're white" NO. WRONG. It's not as simple as all that. You can only be good if you are GOOD. How "good" you may be has NOTHING TO TO WITH YOUR RACE. You want to win? Teach some non-whites what libertarianism is! Otherwise you are fucked! If you don't want to live in a multi-cultural society fine, I don't care. But by refusing to incorporate others into the fold and encouraging access to information, things are going to get worse!

This is a battle for societal control. This is libertarianism vs. liberalism.

Whites vs. everyone else? give me a break. Plenty of whites on the side of liberalism and plenty of non-whites on the side of the libertarians. Whites are just being used as a scapegoat, sure...I understand that...but it's NOT the crux of the issue, it goes so much deeper than that

[hoarder]

Are you kidding me. Just because someone votes democrat does not mean they are part of an anti-white coalition. How stupid is this going to get. The left plays the politics of envy and redistribution. Who are non-Whites envious of? Since most don't realize that most of the power and wealth is held by Jews, they think Whites do. What percentage of non-whites consciously think that voting Democrat is a way of taking from Whites is not known, but I'm sure many do.

[D sciple]

dems - communists

repubs - communist light

[D sciple]

Bottom line, everyone is totally raping the white man because we're huge pussys who forgot THE Law.

[Rubicon]

This is a battle for societal control. This is libertarianism vs. liberalism.

No. It's non-whites vs. whites. Libertarianism only works in a homogeneous white society.

[TheNocturnalEgyptian]

The left plays the politics of envy and redistribution. Who are non-Whites envious of? Since most don't realize that most of the power and wealth is held by Jews, they think Whites do. What percentage of non-whites consciously think that voting Democrat is a way of taking from Whites is not known, but I'm sure many do.


You could argue that the left and right (as they exist in our country) are for different degrees of redistribution, or you could argue that the right doesn't exist in our country, and that the republicans and democrats are both forms of "The Left".


I'll tell you why my white mother votes democrat. Education. That's it. It's literally the only thing she cares about. I've tried to make her see the short-sightedness in this and I can't do it. If you don't "support education", there is no way she will vote for you. She doesn't give a damn about tax theory. What's the difference to her if the govt is taking 2/5th or 1/3rd? Like I said, people have reasons for the things they do, and they genuinely believe they are making things better. She's not anti-white, race isn't really a factor for her in general. Just "Money for Education".

Could it be that the democratic party represents a single issue that she cares about, and because she's just as much of a sheeple as most of our parents, she simply doesn't care about all the other harm the party may be doing? She's a single issue voter.

Just because race can play into it doesn't mean that it DOES play into it in 100% of situations.

[TheNocturnalEgyptian]

No. It's non-whites vs. whites. Libertarianism only works in a homogeneous white society.


Well that's false. There are plenty of libertarian message boards out there with individuals of all races practicing libertarian principles. Would you care to support your theory? Please tell me exactly how race enables the libertarian mechanism to flourish.


By definition, the idea of "I'll leave you alone, you leave me alone" means that different races can co-exist as long as nobody harms another. What makes the non-aggression principle specific to a white society in your mind?



I mean, you even could have said "Libertarianism works BETTER in racially homogenous societies" and it would be a tougher argument for me. Waaaay tougher. But claiming that it only works in white societies? Laughable.

[Shami-Amourae]

"Whites only Libertarianism" is American Nationalism. See ramzpaul (http://www.youtube.com/user/ramzpaul) videos for more information.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h09kXWySxk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMTDZBqZ7v4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqOget9Fd9w

[hoarder]

I wont comment on "Libertarianism" other than I think it's a Jewish idea designed as a substitute for Constitutional Liberty which they destroyed.

Freedom is a "White thing". Before you post examples to "prove" non-Whites like freedom, use your sense of proportion to gauge what I say.

What nations in the world were founded on liberty? How many were non-White?

When the Bolsheviks took control of USSR, which ethnic group was executed by the millions? Ukranians then were blond haired, blue eyed Germanic people.

When Jewish communism swept the world, certain regions did not buy it. What race was predominant in those regions?

Jews narrowed down opposition to their world conquest by religion, race, nationality and gender. Of course they see threats in each race, religion, nationality and gender, but does it not seem eveident that White Christian males in USA are the ones who need to be shoved aside in order to implement the NWO?

Whites have a higher orientation to individualism than other races. This is both a strength and weakness, but it does make them more liberty-oriented than other races in general.

[johngr]

dems - communists
repubs - communist light

You got that one wrong, imo...

dems - blue communists
repubs - red communists

[ShortJohnSilver]

Hoarder, just a correction: Ukrainians are Slavs, not Germanic.

[D sciple]

I think these off whites just can't leave us alone because our women are the hottest.

As you all know, I believe the Saxons (essentially) are the descendants of the 12 tribes of Israel. Our country should be divided up into farm lots for US (numbers 33:54), then let a capitalistic market develop from that.

Pure libertarianism will not work because the best players will get ALL OF THE CHIPS, then everyone will need to come to them for jobs; in essence slavery. Now perhaps if those best players were also saxons, they might not be too cruel, but I doubt it, and we don't even really need to worry about it since it's not lawful (pure libertarianism/capitalism).

However, if the off white peoples (slavic, greek etc) can get past their Gods (Roman b.s., and it's constitutional derivative), they can chill.

Pure brown are obviously way too far away from the kingdom and just won't leave because of our women. :)

[hoarder]

Hoarder, just a correction: Ukrainians are Slavs, not Germanic.Ukraines ethnic history is convoluted. There was a large Germanic sector when the Bolsheviks took over.
http://www.franko.lviv.ua/personal/mdlviv/roboty/grmminor.html
http://www.genealogienetz.de/reg/ESE/karukr.html

[hoarder]

Pure libertarianism will not work because libertarianism pretends media is a business and the players who own the media will get ALL OF THE CHIPS, then everyone will need to come to them for jobs; in essence slavery. Fixed it ferya!

[TheNocturnalEgyptian]

I don't mean to be taking the gloves off here (I like you, hoarder) but American Constitutional Liberty is bullshit.

I love the constitution as much as the next man, I studied it for years and used to fantasize about people actually following it.



When have we ever had true constitutional adherance in America? We broke the pact of our founding documents on day 1. "All men are created equal" "Except for the indebted slaves, women, and the actual slaves". You could be jailed for being the wrong gender or race w/o an escort....Liberty...don't make me laugh, it never happened


Please don't try to nostalgia me back to a paradise that never existed. American constitutionalism (what you're saying was Liberty) was a time when millions were enslaved and not legally allowed to leave their caste.


The idea was good, the execution was poor. Sure there are degrees of freedom that existed for some individuals, and my ancestors were some of them...that's not the point....Liberty in America? Totally wrong, never existed...

[hoarder]

I don't mean to be taking the gloves off here (I like you, hoarder) but American Constitutional Liberty is bullshit.

I love the constitution as much as the next man, I studied it for years and used to fantasize about people actually following it.



When have we ever had true constitutional adherance in America? We broke the pact of our founding documents on day 1. "All men are created equal" "Except for the indebted slaves, women, and the actual slaves". You could be jailed for being the wrong gender or race w/o an escort....Liberty...don't make me laugh, it never happened


Please don't try to nostalgia me back to a paradise that never existed. American constitutionalism (what you're saying was Liberty) was a time when millions were enslaved and not legally allowed to leave their caste.


The idea was good, the execution was poor. Sure there are degrees of freedom that existed for some individuals, and my ancestors were some of them...that's not the point....Liberty in America? Totally wrong, never existed...The founders knew Liberty and multiculturalism were incompatible. I can see how minorities wouldn't like to use the Constitution as a blueprint for Liberty.

We believe what is convenient to believe until we gain the courage to progress to the inconvenient which is self-evident.

Did Liberty in general improve as women and minorities were "freed" or did Americans lose liberty during that era?

Social engineering is real. Women were "made equal" for strategic reasons. The American family has been destroyed. 60 years ago Whites were 1/3 of the world's population, now they are less than 10%. This is real genocide whether you acknowledge it (or identify with it) or not.

Social experiments are high-risk undertakings because the outcome rarely resembles what the advocates promoted. As social experiments go, Constitutional America was a resounding success. Libertarianism is a much more dangerous social experiment and very compatible with world government by design.

It makes much more sense to demand our ruler follow the Constitution than to throw it away for a new social experiment.