PDA

View Full Version : Suprised this didn't make the msm news...



EE_
19th December 2012, 05:10 PM
NOT!
Video at link http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-19/ubs-fined-1-4-billion-swiss-francs-for-manipulating-libor-rate.html

UBS Fined $1.5 Billion by Regulators for Rigging Libor
By Elena Logutenkova & Lindsay Fortado - Dec 19, 2012 1:37 AM MT

UBS AG (UBSN), Switzerland’s biggest bank, must pay about 1.4 billion Swiss francs ($1.5 billion) to U.S., U.K. and Swiss regulators for trying to rig global interest rates, triple the penalties levied against Barclays Plc. (BARC)

Fines from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice total $1.2 billion, UBS said in a statement today. It will pay 160 million pounds ($260 million) to the U.K. Financial Services Authority, the largest- ever fine imposed by the regulator, and disgorge 59 million francs in estimated profits to the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority.

“Clearly, this chapter isn’t positive,” UBS Chief Executive Officer Sergio Ermotti told reporters on a conference call. “We want to move forward and I think we’re showing our determination in the bank to move forward and to change the bank for good.”

About 30 to 40 people have left UBS as a result of the probes, Ermotti said, adding that the behavior of certain employees was “unacceptable.” He said he doesn’t expect any more departures.

UBS rose 0.4 percent to 15.31 francs by 9:25 a.m. in Swiss trading. The stock has advanced 37 percent in 2012, outpacing a 23 percent increase in the Bloomberg Europe Banks and Financial Services Index, which tracks 38 companies.

2,000 Requests
Global authorities are investigating claims that more than a dozen banks altered submissions used to set benchmarks such as the London interbank offered rate to profit from bets on interest-rate derivatives or make the lenders’ finances appear healthier. Barclays, the U.K.’s second-biggest bank, agreed to pay 290 million pounds in June to resolve the U.S. and U.K. Libor probes.

The U.K. finance regulator found more than 2,000 documented requests by UBS traders to manipulate rates in chat messages and group emails, and that at least 45 people at the bank knew of the practice between over a six-year period until the end of 2010. Bank employees colluded with interdealer brokers and paid them bribes to help manipulate yen Libor submissions by other banks, the FSA said in a statement.

“This is quite outrageous,” said Dirk Becker, a Frankfurt-based analyst at Kepler Capital Markets with a reduce rating on UBS. “I was surprised that UBS was apparently one of the biggest instigators of this scandal.”

Influencing Submissions
UBS traders made “numerous requests” asking bank employees to submit interest rates with higher or lower values to benefit their proprietary trading positions, the Swiss regulator said in a statement, adding that evidence shows that “many” of the requests for Libor rates in Zurich and London were accepted.

Most of the requests were made by one trader who worked in Tokyo from 2006 to 2009, and who also contacted employees at other banks and brokers trying to influence their Libor submissions. Finma didn’t find any indication of the top management of UBS at the time being aware of the traders’ misconduct, it said.

“UBS’s misconduct was all the more serious because of the orchestrated attempts to manipulate the yen Libor submissions of other banks as well as its own and the collusion with interdealer brokers and other panel banks,” FSA director of financial crime Tracey McDermott said.

The bank didn’t qualify for the regulator’s standard 30 percent discount for cooperation because the settlement was reached later, the FSA said. UBS got a 20 percent discount.

Guilty Plea
UBS’s unit in Japan agreed to plead guilty to one count of wire fraud in relation to the manipulation of benchmark rates including yen Libor, the company said. UBS entered into a non- prosecution agreement with the U.S. Justice Department in relation to UBS AG and all its subsidiaries and affiliates except for UBS Securities Japan Co. Ltd.

One year ago, Japanese regulators penalized UBS’s Japanese operations, curtailing the bank’s ability to participate in the Tokyo interbank derivative market for a week, and ordering the bank to improve its regime of compliance and internal controls.

The fines, in total, amount to less than three weeks revenue at UBS, based on figures from 2011.

Ermotti said he doesn’t expect further penalties from the Japanese regulator and that the bank is “confident” it will be able to continue to operate in Japan and globally as normal.

Ermotti, 52, took over as CEO last September after his predecessor, Oswald Gruebel, 69, stepped down in the wake of a loss from unauthorized trading by an employee. Ermotti joined UBS in April 2011, after the period covered during the rate- rigging investigations.

Fourth-Quarter Loss
UBS continues to cooperate with other investigations into the setting of benchmark rates, Ermotti said in a memo to employees, adding that the effect of the actions of multiple institutions on the actual rate fixings, which one would need to know before trying to determine whether or how clients were affected, is still not clear.

“No amount of profit is more important than safeguarding the good name of our firm,” Ermotti said in the memo. “I must remind all of you that we share a responsibility to run our business in a manner that is fully compliant with laws and regulations of those jurisdictions in which we operate. Each of us is a guardian of our reputation.”

Past Misdemeanors
The penalty is another blemish on UBS, which is scaling back its investment bank to concentrate on wealth management. UBS said in October it may post a loss for 2012 after taking an impairment charge of 3.1 billion francs related to goodwill and other non-financial assets at the securities unit, in addition to costs tied to firing 10,000 people by 2015.

“Developments arising from past misdemeanors can only enhance the sense of relief that UBS is turning its back on such risky areas and focusing on what it does best,” Tim Dawson, a Geneva-based analyst at Helvea SA with an accumulate rating on UBS, said in a note before today’s release.

The bank said today it expects to report a fourth-quarter loss of between 2 billion francs and 2.5 billion francs, primarily as a result of litigation provisions and regulatory matters.

Excluding charges related to reorganization, fines and accounting losses on its own debt and credits to personnel expenses because of changes to pension plans, UBS expects to report a full-year pretax profit of between 2.5 billion francs and 3 billion francs, it said.

This means a pretax return on equity of about 6 percent, Kepler’s Becker said. “This is not very impressive for one of the most highly-valued banks in Europe,” he said.

Unauthorized Trading
UBS estimated it will report a common equity ratio under fully-applied Basel III rules for the fourth quarter “roughly in line” with the third quarter’s level of 9.3 percent and positive net new money at wealth management units.

UBS was fined 29.7 million pounds last month by the FSA and told by the Swiss regulator it may have to increase capital levels for operational risks after a $2.3 billion loss from unauthorized trading by Kweku Adoboli. The former trader in UBS’s London office was sentenced to seven years in jail on Nov. 20 for fraud in relation to the loss, the largest from unauthorized trading in British history.

Libor, a benchmark for more than $300 trillion of financial products worldwide, is derived from a survey of banks conducted each day on behalf of the British Bankers’ Association in London. Lenders are asked how much it would cost them to borrow from one another for 15 different periods, from overnight to one year, in currencies including dollars, euros, yen and francs.

U.K. Arrests
U.K. prosecutors made their first arrests in the criminal Libor investigation on Dec. 11. Thomas Hayes, a former trader at UBS and Citigroup Inc., and two men who worked at the brokerage RP Martin Holdings Ltd. were questioned, people familiar with the case said last week. The U.K. Serious Fraud Office, which is conducting a criminal probe in parallel with the U.S. Department of Justice’s fraud division, has focused on e-mails between traders at UBS and other banks.

UBS received conditional immunity or leniency for cooperating with the U.S. Justice Department’s and Swiss Competition Commission’s antitrust investigations into submissions of yen Libor and Euroyen Tokyo interbank offered rate, or Tibor. The Canadian Competition Bureau also granted the bank conditional immunity in its investigation into yen Libor, while the Swiss commission granted immunity on Swiss franc Libor and certain transactions related to it.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-19/ubs-fined-1-4-billion-swiss-francs-for-manipulating-libor-rate.html

ArgenteumTelum
19th December 2012, 05:34 PM
CNBC had some coverage today.
More can be found here: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-19/ubs-trader-used-bribery-flattery-to-make-superman-rig-libor.html
here: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-19/ubs-1-5-billion-libor-settlement-signals-more-to-come.html
here: http://money.cnn.com/2012/12/19/news/companies/ubs-libor-us-fine/index.html?iid=HP_LN
here: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/19/us-ubs-libor-idUSBRE8BI00020121219

EE_
19th December 2012, 05:41 PM
UBS received conditional immunity or leniency for cooperating. Nice

jimswift
19th December 2012, 05:44 PM
Just about had it with these thieves not getting arrested and sentenced.

This horseshit fine business is some of the most ridiculous shit I've seen.

Last I thought I knew stealing was actually a crime.....and who gets the fine cash anyway?

EE_
19th December 2012, 06:33 PM
UBS Libor-rigging: how brokers and traders colluded
'Superman ... be a hero today,' one trader asked a broker as he requested a higher Libor rate. 'I'll try mate, as always', was the answer
Jill Treanor
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 19 December 2012 04.25 EST

UBS was the first bank globally to report suspected rate rigging.
Emails, telephone calls and electronic chats were a crucial part of the damning evidence amassed in the UBS Libor-fixing investigation. As the Swiss bank paid £940m on Wednesday to settle the claims, they reveal the extent to which brokers and traders colluded in rigging the rate.


One exchange shows how UBS traders asked brokers to be a"superman" in helping to fix Libor, while another manager at the bank discussed the "mind fuck" of the rates. Even as he attempted to rig the figures, another pledged he was "a man of my word".


Here are some examples:

29 July 2009, in an electronic chat Trader A and Broker E discussed small reductions in UBS's Japanese yen Libor submissions. Broker E referred to External Trader E at Panel Bank 4, who thought the rate was going to increase. Broker E said that External Trader E " ... could be in for a shock going into august ... the three muscateers [sic] could do him a fair bit of damage". The reference to the three "muscateers [sic]" was to Trader A, External Trader A at Panel Bank 2 and Panel Bank 5.


In a telephone call on 18 September 2008, Trader A explained to Broker A of Broker Firm A: "If you keep 6s [i.e. the six month Japanese yen Libor rate] unchanged today ... I will fucking do one humongous deal with you ... Like a 50,000 buck deal, whatever. I need you to keep it as low as possible ... if you do that ... I'll pay you, you know, 50,000 dollars, 100,000 dollars ... whatever you want ... I'm a man of my word".


18 July 2007 Broker B at Broker Firm A contacted a submitter at Panel Bank 1 enquiring about Japanese Libor submissions that the bank was going to contribute. Broker B confirmed that the request came from Trader A at UBS. The conversation proceeded as follows:

Panel Bank 1 submitter: "Alright, well make sure he [Trader A] knows"

Broker B: "Yeah, he will know mate. Definitely, definitely, definitely"

Panel Bank 1 submitter: "You know, scratch my back yeah an all"

Broker B: "Yeah oh definitely, yeah, play the rules."


27 January 2009, Broker A explained that he had been "offering ... some cheap 3s all morning and 1 shouted them down at [Panel Bank 3] as well ... we were offering them at 50 mate ... that wasn't even true".


24 January 2007, Trader A at UBS asked Manager A at UBS to "try to keep 6m and 3m libors up". Manager A responded: "Standing order, sir".


19 January 2007 in an electronic chat, Trader A asked External Trader B at Panel Bank 3 to help him obtain a high three month Japanese Libor submission from Panel Bank 3 because he had "absolutely massive 3m fixes". Trader A said: "Anytime i can return the favour let me know as the guys here are pretty accommodating [sic] to me".


29 March 2007 Trader A asked what Japanese yen Libor submission UBS was going to set. Manager A: "Too early to say yet ... prob[ably] .69 would be our unbiased contribution ... as i said before - i dun mind helping on your fixings, but i'm not setting libor 7bp away from the truth i'll get ubs banned if i do that, no interest in that".


14 July 2009, Trader A requested of a broker in an electronic chat a higher Libor rate: "SUPERMAN ... BE A HERO TODAY." Broker F said: "ill try mate ... as always."


15 July 2009 in an electric chat Trader A requested: "3m and 1m unch [i.e. unchanged]". Trader A also inserted an extract of another electronic chat with Broker A of Broker Firm A in which Broker A said: "Putting the captain caos [sic] outfit on as we speak".


21 July 2009, Trader A contacted Broker E of Broker Firm B who advised him to make small changes to his Libor submissions: "If you drop your 6M dramatically on the 11th mate, it will look v fishy, especially if [Panel Bank 5] and [Panel Bank 2] go with you. I'd be v careful how you play it, there might be cause for a drop as you cross into a new month but a couple of weeks in might get people questioning you." Trader A replied: "Don't worry will stagger the drops ..."


The FSA's report does not identify any of the individuals involved. But it shows how brokers – the middle men who take the temperature of the markets – helped set rates that suited UBS, "shouting down" submissions at other banks. The brokers talked to other banks, playing a key part in helping them decide what level they would submit to the Libor rate (the price at which they believed other banks would lend them money).


In what are "run throughs" of what was going on the market, the brokers were found to have given a view to other banks that suited UBS's position.


The report focuses on "Trader A" at UBS, who also asked brokers to make false bids and offers (referred to as "spoofs") on cash trades in the market to skew perceptions of the rates at which cash could be borrowed or lent in the interbank market. There were also requests to change data on the electronic screens.

UBS conducted unnecessary trades with brokers – known as "wash trades" – in return for the help in fixing rates. "Broker A" received fees of more than £170,000 from UBS for helping to fix the rates which helped UBS traders to profit from other transactions. For period of at least 18 months, UBS made additional payments to Broker Firm B of £15,000 per quarter as a reward for the provision of a "fixing service". Broker C received £5,000 a quarter for his particular "fixing service".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/dec/19/ubs-libor-rigging-brokers-traders-colluded

Twisted Titan
19th December 2012, 09:35 PM
UBS received conditional immunity or leniency for cooperating. Nice



Coupled with the fact they can print money out of thin air...........even nicer

vacuum
19th December 2012, 09:43 PM
How can you fine financial institutions for financial crimes???

Then the fine is just like any other expense. If the profits from breaking the law are greater than the risk of being fined, break the law. It's just numbers.

They need to put people in prison. No fine. Prison. Mandatory. 5, 10, 15 year sentences.