PDA

View Full Version : Moon’s crust thinner than expected – NASA



EE_
19th December 2012, 08:03 PM
I thought we knew everything about the moon?
That's why we've never had the need to go back to the only planetary object a man can reach.
Why are there no telescopes or bases built on the moon? Why has the moon not been excavated to see what lies inside?

18 December, 2012, 17:08

The Lunar surface is thinner than previously thought, NASA scientists revealed after a year-long mission to map the moon by two probes ended with a literal bang. The mission was dedicated to uncovering more about the formation of the solar system.

Two probes – nicknamed ‘Ebb’ and ‘Flow’ – completed a programmed crash at the end of their mission, revealing evidence that the Moon’s crust is thinner than expected because of the damage the crash caused beneath the surface, compared to the surface itself.
Scientists were also able to use the distance between the probes to determine more precise measurements of the moon’s crust.

Each probe was the size of a washing machine and flew as low as a few miles above the moon’s tallest mountains. The probes were also tasked with drawing up detailed gravity maps of the moon. They reacted to more intense gravity areas by speeding up, and slowed down in less intense areas.

The probes also took more than 115,000 images of the lunar surface, producing the highest-resolution gravity map of a celestial body in existence.

Once the probes ran out of fuel, they were pulled towards the lunar surface and eventually crashed, as programmed, into a mountain near the moon’s north pole.

The crashes went ahead as planned at 22:28 GMT and 22:29 GMT, and occurred at a speed of 3,760 miles per hour (1.7 kilometers per second).

“We do feel the angst about the end of the mission,” the director of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, said. “On the other hand, it is a celebration because this mission has accomplished tremendous science.”

Their discoveries will help scientists better understand how the moon was formed and shaped, and may shed light on other planets in the solar system, including Earth.
“Ebb and Flow have removed a veil from the moon,” said Maria Zuber, the lead researcher at the Massachusetts

Institute of Technology.
The probes’ crash site was named after Sally Ride, the first US woman in space.
Ebb and Flow were launched in in September 2011, and had orbited the moon since January 1.

http://rt.com/news/nasa-science-moon-crust-278/

JohnQPublic
19th December 2012, 08:16 PM
Blue cheese can develop a thin crust or rind. ;)

Santa
19th December 2012, 08:40 PM
“We do feel the angst about the end of the mission,” the director of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, said.

Aw! Apparently the nice folks at NASA realized the Moon's just too thin skinned and sensitive to manhandle.

Glass
19th December 2012, 08:40 PM
how much kinetic energy would those 2 "satellites" impart travelling at 3,760 miles per hour?

And how can they measure how much damage was done "beneath the surface"?

This becomes a bit more fishy if you aks me.

ArgenteumTelum
19th December 2012, 09:58 PM
The moon is hollow and beings live inside.....

Ponce
19th December 2012, 10:15 PM
And how long do you think that it will be before they show us those 115,000 photos?......they will first check each one of them reallyyyyyyyyy close and then show us only what they want us to see and no more.......How many of them will be from the other side of the moon?......to me that the other side is where the real bases are at.

brosil
20th December 2012, 06:52 AM
Wait, this is NASA and it doesn't seem to have anything to do with moslems. How can that be?

undgrd
20th December 2012, 11:43 AM
Makes you wonder if Meteors were what impacted our planet back in the day.

Hmmmmmm

drafter
20th December 2012, 11:59 AM
I thought we knew everything about the moon?
That's why we've never had the need to go back to the only planetary object a man can reach.
Why are there no telescopes or bases built on the moon? Why has the moon not been excavated to see what lies inside?


Don't worry, in 50 years or so our grandchildren will be reading about the mysteries of the moon, and the Chinese moon missions that did what we weren't interested in doing.

messianicdruid
20th December 2012, 03:35 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeTwzhPKsDE&feature=player_embedded

Libertarian_Guard
20th December 2012, 04:37 PM
And how long do you think that it will be before they show us those 115,000 photos?......they will first check each one of them reallyyyyyyyyy close and then show us only what they want us to see and no more.......How many of them will be from the other side of the moon?......to me that the other side is where the real bases are at.



http://i47.tinypic.com/16ju5h.jpg

Horn
20th December 2012, 04:47 PM
The Russians would've landed and been mining for nickel if it were worth anything,

seeing as how they are technically superior [sarc off]

Glass
6th April 2014, 11:25 PM
well is seems NASA just can't get enough of smashing things into the Moon. April 21 is the date they expect to bomb the moon with another of their "refredgerator" sized space probes into the "dark side" of the moon. I wonder what they are really up to. It seems to me the could be conducting a war up there. Just speculating. Because you would think an orbiting craft could hold an orbit fairly well up there. A solar powered unit could probably go on for years like some of these rover devices have. A nuclear powered ship would probably not have any problems staying up there for decades. I guess gravity drag might cause the thing to fall regardless. I don't know. It occurs to me if they can send a deep space probe that keeps going for 30+ years as it leaves the solar system this task should be a no brainer.

So I think something else could be going on. and it isn't just for kicks. Based on the OP, I wonder how a fridge hitting the moon could tell them that the crust is thinner than expected. Seems odd to me that they could work anything out from that at all.


NASA spacecraft to crash on moon soon

The science spacecraft launched from Virginia's coast last year has been orbiting the moon for months and is about to conclude its mission with a crash into the lunar surface, authorities said.

The unmanned spacecraft, the Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer, was the first to be sent from Virginia to the moon, NASA said.

With its primary scientific mission completed and its fuel almost exhausted, the intricate package of instruments is being lowered gradually into an orbit as little as a mile or two above the pocked and cratered surface of the moon, NASA said last week.
The orbit is designed to let the craft continue gathering data as close as possible to the surface, as a kind of scientific bonus.
It is also a prelude to the planned crash of the spacecraft - described as about the size of a vending machine or small car - into the far side of the moon.
NASA said it expects the craft to crash, crumple and break apart "on or before" April 21.
It was launched on September 6 from the Wallops Flight Facility on Wallops Island on Virginia's Atlantic shore.
It's estimated that millions of people for miles around saw a fiery streak in the night sky as the spacecraft was propelled aloft by a rocket built and operated for the Air Force by Orbital Sciences, a company based in Northern Virginia.
A principal aim was to study lunar dust and the makeup of the highly rarefied lunar atmosphere. Such information could answer questions about other bodies in the solar system, NASA said.
NASA said a variety of factors could cause the craft's impact to come before April 21.

The space agency is inviting the public to guess when it will occur, at socialforms.nasa.gov/ladee (http://socialforms.nasa.gov/ladee).

Winners will get a personalised commemorative certificate, NASA said.



link to story (http://www.theage.com.au/world/nasa-spacecraft-to-crash-on-moon-soon-20140407-zqrmq.html)

singular_me
7th April 2014, 02:52 AM
I have read this a few times too and that all activity would occur on its dark side according to David Icke... while I am a little skeptical (need more proofs but not trashing the idea) I surely don't go along with the *quite outer space-we are all alone* anymore


The moon is hollow and beings live inside.....

maybe in 6 years the landing will be a real one....

Astronauts will LIVE on the moon by 2020, Nasa report
May 27, 2013 - Nasa report predicts private firms will travel to the lunar surface ... to live on the moon by 2020, a Nasa commissioned report has claimed.
https://www.google.com/#q=moon+travel+2020

Cebu_4_2
7th April 2014, 04:10 AM
Just can't plant a garden there which would suck.

I had a cool link but it was deleted by google jewtube... imagine that.

Horn
7th April 2014, 07:28 AM
it really is a geode, not sure its full of stars?

if it were inhabited it was during the ancient war, then abandoned.