Legal Gun Owners in New York Outed Like Sex Offenders

[joboo]

http://theintelhub.com/2012/12/25/legal-gun-owners-in-new-york-outed-like-sex-offenders/


http://i2.wp.com/static.infowars.com/2012/12/i/general/mapguns.jpg?resize=558%2C447
http://mediakit.lohud.com/article/99999999/MEDIAKIT08/312140002/Contact-Us



LoHud.com/The Journal News Management Team Janet Hasson, President & Publisher
914-694-5203
jhasson@lohud.com

George Troyano, Vice President/Sales & Marketing
914-694-5157
gtroyano@lohud.com

CynDee Royle, Editor & Vice President/News
914-694-5001
croyle@lohud.com

Kathy Moore, Local Content Editor
914-694-3523
kjmoore@lohud.com

[Horn]

Wonder how many would turn them in if ordered to by the mayor?

[joboo]

Hopefully none, and they tell the guy to go take a flying one.

Great list for criminals to size up their break ins.

This news agency will hopefully be sued into oblivion.

[Ponce]

I like the one in the ocean to the right....there must be some real mean sharks there.

[Norweger]

I like the one in the ocean to the right....there must be some real mean sharks there.

That's a boating accident.

[Twisted Titan]

The jackass just made it easier for which houses they have to AVOID

All the others will get picked clean

[joboo]

https://christopherfountain.wordpress.com/2012/12/24/sauce-for-the-goose/

https://christopherfountain.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/janet-hasson-publisher-journal-news.jpg?w=500
Janet Hasson, publisher, Journal News

Janet Hasson, 3 Gate House Lane, Mamaroneck, NY 10534.
Phone number: (248) 594-2197; you might also try (914) 525-1923, but the area code is just a guess on the assumption that this number is a land line.
Here’s a photo showing her Mamaroneck house – interior shots are on Zillow (http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/3-Gate-House-Ln-Mamaroneck-NY-10543/33051179_zpid/):
https://christopherfountain.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/janet-hasson-3-gate-house-rd-mamaroneck.jpg?w=150&h=150
UPDATE: From reader RJS: Gannett’s CEO-
Gracia C Martore
728 Springvale Rd
Great Falls, VA 22066
(703) 759-5954

The reporter on the story is:
Dwight R Worley
23006 139 Ave
Springfield Gardens, NY 11413 (718) 527-0832


Janet Hasson herself is married with one child, and her personal interests, as culled from her credit card records, are noted below:

https://christopherfountain.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/screen-shot-2012-12-24-at-2-17-22-pm.png?w=500&h=240

[Shami-Amourae]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UESKyLr6llg

[joboo]

I wonder how much longer until the class action lawsuit?

[SLV^GLD]

They practically did the same thing in TN. It's all public record. Mapifying it is just the next logical step.

There should be no backlash for a news agency publishing information that is public record. If there is outrage then the news agency has done their jobs. Of course the outrage will be entirely misdirected but is that their fault?

[mamboni]

These gun owners have had their privacy violated by the state. They need to institute a class action lawsuit immediately and name names. They need to enlist the NRA in a campaign to exploit this unbelievable abuse of power. It is a perfect anti-state propaganda vehicle: "This is what can happen when you allow the state to register you and your possessions - the information can be published on line for the entire world to see. Is this government by and for the people?"

It's really a fucking outrage.

This act also undermines home security. A burgler can case a neighborhood and quickly target the non-gun owners. So the security of the neighborhood has been compromised because previously said burgler would have paused before breaking and entering given the unknown risk of a home firearm.

[joboo]

They practically did the same thing in TN. It's all public record. Mapifying it is just the next logical step.

There should be no backlash for a news agency publishing information that is public record. If there is outrage then the news agency has done their jobs. Of course the outrage will be entirely misdirected but is that their fault?

The information is there, but is it in an exploited form? The news agency is directly making profit from this. If they want to make money from it, then in that regard it can also be taken back from them.

Anyhow..that's how I see it. The "legal" reality might be something different entirely.


edit: I should add. A smart lawyer would make up a ton of pamphlets, outlining the situation, and drop them in everyone's mailbox in that area. Nice make work project.

[SLV^GLD]

I'm willing to bet the majority of folks now exposed had no idea their information was so easy to mine and display.

Now they know.

That is information worth paying for, if you ask me.

Not always the best idea to shoot the messenger.