PDA

View Full Version : What In The World Is Going On In Texas?



palani
31st December 2012, 12:21 PM
Some black robed cross dresser who thinks a lot of himself.

http://www.lawinjustice.com/d7/


THE COURT: You realize that order is an order of the Court. So any failure to comply with that order is contempt, punishable by lots of dollars, punishable by possible jail, death .
MR BELL: And death
(See Motion for Reconsideration )


THE COURT: They do and I have jurisdiction, too. So I'll tell you what.... You want to challenge the court order, I have the marshals behind me. I can come to your house, pick you up, put you in jail. I can seize your property, do anything I need to do to enforce my orders. I'm telling you don't screw with me. You are a fool, a fool, a fool, a fool to screw with a federal judge, and if you don't understand that, I can make you understand it. I have the force of the Navy, Army, Marines and Navy behind me.

(See Motion for Reconsideration )


THE COURT: We do have marshals that walk around here and people that can take control if a judge is unable to convince people of the judge's jurisdiction.

(See Motion for Reconsideration )


THE COURT: This is going on and on and on until Mr. Baron has nothing. I mean actually everything is depleted. I gather that Mr. Baron is worth lots of money. But it may be that we sell all the domain names. We may sell all of his stock. We may cash in all of his CD's, and we may seize all of his bank accounts

madfranks
31st December 2012, 12:36 PM
It's rare that the veil of legitimacy is lifted and the ruling criminal class is exposed as the mob of violent thieves that they are, but this is a great example of it. Do what I say or I will destroy you.

Glass
31st December 2012, 03:33 PM
So the ruling was reversed but no refunds.


The Court of Appeals has ruled that the receivership over Jeff was “abuse of (the judge’s) discretion”.
The ruling “reverses” the receivership that has left Jeff without his civil rights and assets for over two years. According to the ruling, Jeff’s freedom to travel, to enter into transactions and to own possessions is restored, although he is left penniless. Presumably, his right to hire a lawyer restored, but does not seem to be left with any money to do that. The diabetes research trust that Jeff founded also appears to be left without any funds.
The ruling, which can be found here (http://www.lawinjustice.com/Mandate_of_Fifth_Circuit_COA.pdf), contains a dozen or so pages of “facts” that are mostly inaccurate, alleging that Jeff “fired lawyers”, interfered with the legal system, tried to move assets offshore, etc…. (The full opinion can be found on the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals website). On the same day that the ruling was made, a group of the lawyers who placed Jeff into the receivership and were been paid approximately $7 million of Jeff’s money demanded the court place Jeff in “involuntary bankruptcy”. The lawyers now call themselves “creditors” (To be placed into an involuntary bankruptcy, there must be creditors) and claim that Jeff must be placed into bankruptcy so that they can be paid more money.






Link (http://www.lawinjustice.com/d7/node/71)

Jeff didn't need an attorney. Jeff needed Counsel.

Jeff needs to pick the breaches of law from the 2nd judges findings and prosecute each one on his own for compensation. Don't trust anyone.

Twisted Titan
31st December 2012, 07:14 PM
As my Momma would say

You dont go to court to get justice

You go to court to get business

And the party with the bigger business gets the justice...got it?

Hatha Sunahara
31st December 2012, 07:30 PM
This is one almighty judge. I presume they all have to struggle with power going to their heads. This one seems to have lost that battle. Has he lost touch with the law? Or is the law so corrupt that he's just trying to 'fit in'?


Hatha