A very good reason to kill RFK

[midnight rambler]

He didn't buy into the 'lone assassin' conclusion of the Warren Commission. We definitely can't have anyone doubting 'the official narrative'.

http://news.yahoo.com/rfk-children-speak-assassination-dallas-050810379.html

[Neuro]

He didn't buy into the 'lone assassin' conclusion of the Warren Commission. We definitely can't have anyone doubting 'the official narrative'.http://news.yahoo.com/rfk-children-speak-assassination-dallas-050810379.htmlRFK jr looks very similar to his father. Does he have any political ambitions?

[midnight rambler]

RFK jr looks very similar to his father. Does he have any political ambitions?

I have no idea, but I'm thinking he doesn't since being a Kennedy and wanting to speak above a whisper about not buying into the 'lone assassin' nonsense could lead to inexplicable 'burial at sea' - you know, like JFK Jr.

[gunDriller]

the rumor, which i believe to be accurate, is that RFK collected a lot of documents relating to his brother's assassination.

obviously, not too hard to believe. heck, we didn't know JFK, and we collect info about it.

but none of us are en-route to be elected President - which RFK was.


once RFK won the primary, he was a shoe-in for the Presidency. and he certainly would have investigated his brother's assassination - while the evidence was 'hot'.

couldn't let that happen.

the alleged assassin of RFK - a Palestinian named Sirhan Sirhan ? - i would call that a 'calling card' of sorts.

more dirty work from IsraHell.

Coup #1 = JFK assassination

Coup #2 = RFK assassination

Coup #3 = 9-11.


were there any other incidents between 1968 & 2001 that would qualify as a "coup" ?

October Surprise (1980) maybe, but it was not a forced taking of power, which i think is the definition of a coup.

[Neuro]

the rumor, which i believe to be accurate, is that RFK collected a lot of documents relating to his brother's assassination.

obviously, not too hard to believe. heck, we didn't know JFK, and we collect info about it.

but none of us are en-route to be elected President - which RFK was.


once RFK won the primary, he was a shoe-in for the Presidency. and he certainly would have investigated his brother's assassination - while the evidence was 'hot'.

couldn't let that happen.

the alleged assassin of RFK - a Palestinian named Sirhan Sirhan ? - i would call that a 'calling card' of sorts.

more dirty work from IsraHell.

Coup #1 = JFK assassination

Coup #2 = RFK assassination

Coup #3 = 9-11.


were there any other incidents between 1968 & 2001 that would qualify as a "coup" ?

October Surprise (1980) maybe, but it was not a forced taking of power, which i think is the definition of a coup.
Shooting of Reagan around 1981-82, maybe?

[gunDriller]

Shooting of Reagan around 1981-82, maybe?

there's a very interesting detail. Hinckley's father having dinner with a Bush family member the week (or night) before the shooting ?

in any case, with Reagan partially disabled, Bush was an acting pResident - a lot like Cheney during Bush43's 2 terms.

i was thinking of "Jew Coup's".

the Texas Mafia, of which Bush is a member in good standing, obviously has a strong working relationship with Israel.

[midnight rambler]

there's a very interesting detail. Hinckley's father having dinner with a Bush family member the week (or night) before the shooting ?

in any case, with Reagan partially disabled, Bush was an acting pResident - a lot like Cheney during Bush43's 2 terms.

i was thinking of "Jew Coup's".

the Texas Mafia, of which Bush is a member in good standing, obviously has a strong working relationship with Israel.

I once heard a USN&WR reporter comment during a conversation about how the Kennedy assassination and the Reagan assassination attempt were related: "You know, Reagan never mentioned anything about the counterfeit money after that assassination attempt." (NOTHING in that conversation up to that point was said about 'counterfeit' money, the Fed, the banksters, etc.)

I was FLOORED when I heard him say that, considering the source (northeastern liberal establishment).

[gunDriller]

I once heard a USN&WR reporter comment during a conversation about how the Kennedy assassination and the Reagan assassination attempt were related: "You know, Reagan never mentioned anything about the counterfeit money after that assassination attempt." (NOTHING in that conversation up to that point was said about 'counterfeit' money, the Fed, the banksters, etc.)

I was FLOORED when I heard him say that, considering the source (northeastern liberal establishment).


in some ways, maybe Reagan really was a Revolutionary.

maybe he was taking his (version of a) Revolution a little too seriously ?


he MUST have seen some things, as pResident, that really pissed him off. sounds like US bankster games was one of them - and that was 30 years ago. i think of the bankster games kicking into high gear in the mid to late 90's. basically about the time that the Jew banksters Greenspan, Rubin, and Summers block-tackled Brookesley Born (CFTC head) and told her to stay the f*ck away from regulating credit derivatives.


speaking of Brookesley Born - a good interview about that @ Financial Sense ... which i can't find right now.

this is good though - Born got a shot in at Greenspan in a public meeting a few years ago, when she had been proven right about her credit derivatives as a Weapon of Mass Financial Destruction.


"At todays Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission hearing, Brooksley Born, the former head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, declared Alan Greenspans tenure at the Federal Reserve an unmitigated failure to his face. Greenspan accords a certain degree of respect on Capitol Hill, despite Borns accurate take on his many failures, and so this outburst was highly unusual and gratifying.

Born, who pushed to strictly regulate derivatives under the Clinton Administration, but lost the battle to, among other people, Alan Greenspan, told the former Federal Reserve chair that his agency failed to prevent housing bubble, failed to prevent the predatory lending scandal, failed to prevent the activities that would bring the financial system to the verge of collapse.

You failed to prevent many of our banks from consolidating and growing to a size that are now too big or too interconnected to fail,Born added. She added that Greenspans views on deregulation, which he took as an article of faith, contributed to the Federal Reserves failure in delivering on its mandate.

Looking as angry as he could at his advanced age, Greenspan replied, The flaw in the system I acknowledged was an ability to fully understand the state of potential risks that were fully untested& That means we were under-capitalizing the banking system for 40 or 50 years.

He then pivoted to a defense of his work, using an innocent bystander argument. I dont have the discretion to use my own ideology to affect my judgments on what Congress did. If somebody asked my view on a particular subject, I would give it to them. But I ran my office as required by law & I fundamenally disagree with your perspective."

http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/04/07/brooksley-born-excoriates-alan-greenspan-you-failed/

if there was such a thing as Pinocchio - you lie and your nose gets longer - Greenspan would have impaled someone with his schnozz after making that last statement.


http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/warning/view/

""I didn't know Brooksley Born," says former SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt, a member of President Clinton's powerful Working Group on Financial Markets. "I was told that she was irascible, difficult, stubborn, unreasonable." <== what a Jew Bankster thinks about Gentiles Who Get in their Way.

Damn, sounds like me ! :)


ANYWAY, maybe Reagan actually had a streak of honesty in him.

i tried a search on "reagan counterfeit money" & didn't get anything about that particular Reagan comment.


and, as i'm sure many G-S.us'ers would remind me, the bankster games started way before Reagan (1980's) & Born (1990's).

e.g. circa 1814, Rothschild, profiting immensely by controlling the news about the Battle of Waterloo. the first major act of financial sociopathy that i can think of off the top of my head. i wonder if Rothschild managed to pull that off without killing anyone.


getting back to RFK - had he been allowed to be elected, and to serve 4 years in office, it would be quite a different world.

[midnight rambler]

i tried a search on "reagan counterfeit money" & didn't get anything about that particular Reagan comment.

I've a law researcher friend who is totally trustworthy, he's been 'wide awake' since the early '50s and I know he would not make up something like this. He told me he heard Reagan give a stump speech in San Antonio in August '80 where Reagan said, "We have a counterfeit currency in this country."

And I *know* what I heard that USN&WR reporter say in March of '92, it could not have been more clear - he was interviewing a buddy of mine and I was sitting in a chair about 8' from him when he said it. I was working on something with pen in hand, and when he said that I dropped that pen and nearly fell out of my chair - seriously. It was THAT profound under the circumstances. It was a "HOLY SHIT! This guy *knows*!" moment. I would have NEVER suspected this guy saying something like that.