View Full Version : Missile did hit the Pentagon .......... V
Ponce
15th January 2013, 09:40 AM
Missile did hit the pentagon.......look at the size of that hole.....I have a DVD that shows the same hole BEFORE the the front of the bldg came down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cFewUG3rSY&feature=player_embedded#
old steel
15th January 2013, 10:40 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cFewUG3rSY
joboo
15th January 2013, 10:55 AM
Leaked from where...how did this 15 yr old kid get/find it?
I'm going to guess... https://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/features.html
osoab
15th January 2013, 11:31 AM
Leaked from where...how did this 15 yr old kid get/find it?
I'm going to guess... https://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/features.html
Did you read the vid comments?
I am guessing not.
joboo
15th January 2013, 11:42 AM
Did you read the vid comments?
I am guessing not.
All I got was:
"this vid came from a lawsuit of wrongful death with the airlines, it was foia'd in court to save a lawsuit. this wasnt released until the lawsuit. "
I thought this stuff was all top secret " National Security"
Filmed from where though?
Even still how do we know that's the video, and it's legit? Too many unanswered questions still.
It starts off with all kinds of random cut scenes (heavy editing), and whatever is filming it appears to be moving, and in mid air.
It looks CGI'd
old steel
15th January 2013, 11:58 AM
Scroll forward to 1:03
At 1:12 the limo driver admits it was a hoax.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o
osoab
15th January 2013, 11:58 AM
It looks CGI'd
Same thing I thought when I first viewed the only only camera angle .gov gave out to the publik for the pentagon.
Ponce
15th January 2013, 12:03 PM
Missile hoax or not no freaking plane hit the pentagon.......was the passenger a mini plane? and like I said "I have a DVD that shows the same hole 'BEFORE" the wall cam down....the window to the right and left were unbroken and even after the wall came down you can see all the paper work on the desks and eve a person standing and looking out at the upper lefft.
V
joboo
15th January 2013, 12:12 PM
Same thing I thought when I first viewed the only only camera angle .gov gave out to the publik for the pentagon.
Wanna hear something crazy? I was one of the first few people to comment on the official released vids on YT, and I thought it was a missile as well. I was convinced 100%. I kept counter commenting all over the place that it was, and then that idea caught on, next thing you know everyone was talking about missiles, and they pulled the vids offline for a few days. There were published news reports of them taking them offline IIRC.
Do we know either way? Not really. Is there any solid evidence for a missile. No. Any plane evidence?... yes, a bunch of it. Does it make people sound crazy saying a missile hit the thing over a few super grainy frames of film, it sure does. It's one of the weakest points to argue for 9II, and all it does is solidify the nutter claim. So many better angles to focus on.
osoab
15th January 2013, 12:14 PM
What that an aluminum plane would penetrate to the fifth layer of the pentagon.
Fuck physics.
joboo
15th January 2013, 12:22 PM
What that an aluminum plane would penetrate to the fifth layer of the pentagon.
Fuck physics.
People also argue the planes shouldn't have penetrated the towers as well due to physics, but they did.
sirgonzo420
15th January 2013, 12:24 PM
People also argue the planes shouldn't have penetrated the towers as well due to physics, but they did.
Building 7 was a doozy.
I remember watching a video where they were counting down to detonation.
joboo
15th January 2013, 12:29 PM
Building 7 was a doozy.
I remember watching a video where they were counting down to detonation.
I caught that vid as well, with multiple explosions going off, and them telling everyone to get back just moments before.
7 is a slam dunk imo.
Ponce
15th January 2013, 01:03 PM
What that an aluminum plane would penetrate to the fifth layer of the pentagon.
Fuck physics.
Well, if the passenger plane had hit the pentagon and made that size of a hole then the front part of the plane would had squash and not allowed the rest of the plane to follow thrue, of in other words the fron of the plane would had acted as a plug.
V
Libertarian_Guard
15th January 2013, 05:27 PM
No how, no way, did a commerical aircraft crash into the Pentagon on 9/11!
But if I am wrong, may I ask what ever became of the aircraft? Did it all melt in a micro second or explode and vanish into thin air?
The evidence of the origional hole in the Pentagon tells the story here. Why didn't the engines embed themselves into the Pentagon as well. And what about the landing gear, wing spars, etc? Lots of thick heavy aluminum and even more small aluminum unaccounted for!
joboo
15th January 2013, 05:41 PM
I believe they did dig the engines out iirc. Some claim they are not the proper engines though.
As for what happened to most of the plane...this helps explain somewhat (smaller plane much stronger wall):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xM8E-CogkYE
Thing I can't figure out is what bent over, and knocked down the lamp posts on the highway?
Libertarian_Guard
15th January 2013, 05:52 PM
I believe they did dig the engines out iirc. Some claim they are not the proper engines though.
As for what happened to most of the plane...this helps explain somewhat (smaller plane much stronger wall):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xM8E-CogkYE
Thing I can't figure out is what bent over, and knocked down the lamp posts on the highway?
Why didn't they bother to show a picture of the impact site after the crash? Everything atomized? You believe that?
Horn
15th January 2013, 05:59 PM
And there is no counter missile shield over the Pentagon, but they are planning on installing one in the Ukraine.
OK
joboo
15th January 2013, 06:00 PM
Why didn't they bother to show a picture of the impact site after the crash? Everything atomized? You believe that?
Not everything, but some of it would have disintegrated on impact. The momentum of the chunks of concrete from the first wall would act as projectiles, and carry through the other walls. Looking at satellite photos the walls don't seem to be that thick.
There was a fair bit of wreckage removed, how they would have time to plant all that inside a burning building, where a missile just hit, without anyone driving by noticing all that going on puzzles me.
I ultimately don't know either way. Did they auto pilot the thing via to pull off the maneuver via enhanced gps tracking? Dunno. Too many unanswered questions.
Glass
15th January 2013, 06:49 PM
I remember seeing an image of 2 photos side by side. 1 photo showed the smoking hole. The other photo showed the smoking hole. I could never get my head around why people made such a big deal about the pentagon event.
I sat there and I stared and stared at that image. Then it clicked. My blood ran cold. The left image showed the smoking hole and all the lamp posts still standing. The right image showed the smoking hole and the lamp posts were on the ground. Thats when I got why people were going on about the pentagon event.
I don't think I have a copy of it, or I saw it on a YT that I don't recall the name of. I would like a copy because you can give it to someone and they can treat it like those newspaper puzzles of spot the differences.
osoab
15th January 2013, 07:27 PM
Why didn't they bother to show a picture of the impact site after the crash? Everything atomized? You believe that?
A shill's got to do what a shill's got to do...
Ponce
15th January 2013, 08:42 PM
There is more evidence to prove that there is more bullshit than truth........
V
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.