Sheriff "Mack" video, this is from 11/2011 but it connects the dots to today

[General of Darkness]

One thing I didn't know is Jack Roll's roll in the protection of the second amendment. You'll heard in the video I posted.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Roll


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqJU_vbu5S8

[Tumbleweed]

Looks like this is the latest from Sheriff Richard Mack and I believe it's pretty good and worth listening to.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhUPyrj3KgA

[Hatha Sunahara]

Aren't these sheriffs politicians? Just like the people we send to congress? Don't they run for office? And the people we send to congress don't represent us. They ignore us. And here in these videos we see Sheriffs claiming that their concern is that we can protect ourselves because they can't always show up in time to protect us. But they don't have any obligation by law to protect us. The Sheriffs get funding from asset seizures. A lot of them are funded by the Federal government through some program. Well, can you trust a politician? A law enforcement politician?

I don't care what my local sheriff says. When the chips are down, that guy can sell me and everybody else out. So I trust the sheriffs as much as I trust other politicians.

Here's a balancing presentation why you should be wary of your local sheriff.

http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2013/01/put-not-your-trust-in-federalized.html

You have to be motivated by principles to support the constitution. I don't know a single politician that is motivated by principles. Not one.


Hatha

[General of Darkness]

Hatha,

While I agree with you, you can't assume that every ounce of integrity has left the country.

I don't think we've gotten to that point, at least my heart/gut doesn't sense that.

Just saying,

Mishko

[EE_]

Aren't these sheriffs politicians? Just like the people we send to congress? Don't they run for office? And the people we send to congress don't represent us. They ignore us. And here in these videos we see Sheriffs claiming that their concern is that we can protect ourselves because they can't always show up in time to protect us. But they don't have any obligation by law to protect us. The Sheriffs get funding from asset seizures. A lot of them are funded by the Federal government through some program. Well, can you trust a politician? A law enforcement politician?

I don't care what my local sheriff says. When the chips are down, that guy can sell me and everybody else out. So I trust the sheriffs as much as I trust other politicians.

Here's a balancing presentation why you should be wary of your local sheriff.

http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2013/01/put-not-your-trust-in-federalized.html

You have to be motivated by principles to support the constitution. I don't know a single politician that is motivated by principles. Not one.


Hatha

Mr. Hatha said a mouthfull right here "The Sheriffs get funding from asset seizures"...and these fine men look the other way while these criminals wrongfully seize peoples property. I've watched and have read some stuff on this matter, and found that property is seized all the time for bullshit reasons, and the owners never get it back even after the charges have been dropped. Texas is the worst being able to keep 90% of the take!

Watch!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLSz_p7Q1lg

[EE_]

Hatha,

While I agree with you, you can't assume that every ounce of integrity has left the country.

I don't think we've gotten to that point, at least my heart/gut doesn't sense that.

Just saying,

Mishko

Yes, every ounce of integrity has left the country! Yes, we've gotten to that point!
For the people that run this show, money trumps everything!, country, family and God!

Listen to the good judge!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gU-tiGU6SiA

These people love their sheriff

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=na2PG4dnTYU

[General of Darkness]

Yes, every ounce of integrity has left the country! Yes, we've gotten to that point!
For the people that run this show, money trumps everything!, country, family and God!

Listen to the good judge!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gU-tiGU6SiA

These people love their sheriff

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=na2PG4dnTYU

Well I guess, but at the end of the day the truth lies between eating x and being a fuckhead.

[Glass]

Watching the Fox report, I think the question people need to ask themselves is: Is this my property?

In every case the answer will be no. As a result someone else can seize it who has a suitable claim.

I think the last comments made is what needs to happen. Re-venuing needs to be arbitrated so the claims can be verified before the transfer is finalised. I guess when we look at the outcome of the Robosigning we can see this will not happen.

If you buy something with someone elses money, then it is not yours, unless you are happy to be a thief. Otherwise you got to give it up on demand. It's that simple.

[Hatha Sunahara]

Hatha,

While I agree with you, you can't assume that every ounce of integrity has left the country.

I don't think we've gotten to that point, at least my heart/gut doesn't sense that.

Just saying,

Mishko



Don't get me wrong God, I didn't say all the integrity of all the people has evaporated in this country. But if there is anyone who has any power over you, it would be a mistake to assume they have any integrity. The politicians have none. The cops have none. The judges have none. Yes there may be exceptions, but keep it in the context of the positive rating of congress, which is hovering at or below 5% at the moment. The law doesn't protect you. All the public institutions are far more likely to victimize you than to help you. Don't tell me you haven't noticed how much corruption there is. I bet you only trust your close friends. I bet you get anxious when you pay some stranger for something in advance.


Hatha

[Tumbleweed]

I think Richard Mack is right about county sheriffs being the solution in this situation. They are elected and local so you can talk to them. My CC permit is expired and when I go to renew it I intend to chat with the sheriff of my county. I want to know where he stands on the second amendment, anymore restrictons or confiscation. It would be safest for the patriots of this country to have the sheriff between them and the Feds if push comes to shove. I think that's what Richard Mack is saying and I believe he's right. It would make it tougher for the media and the politicians to demonize a sheriff and a whole county. They're not so likely to get away with killing a bunch of people to set an example either.


In the last local election an inlaw of mine ran against the sheriff. He didn't win probably because he didn't have the name recognition, started late and didn't have money to campaign with. He got a lot of votes and scared the hell out of the sheriff though. I had helped my inlaw with his campaign and got in touch with Richard Mack. I paid to have his information sent to the sheriff in office on following the constitution. It's time for me to check on how that worked out and I intend to. Maybe everyone should be contacting their county sheriff and finding out where they stand as Richard Mack suggests.
If your sheriff won't stand between you and the Feds protecting your rights spelled out in the constitution then you need to throw the SOB out of office and get someone who will.