mccanney "a really big comet is coming"

[Large Sarge]

January 20, 2013 posting ... !!!!!!! ... THIS JUST IN ... IT IS TOO EARLY TO CONFIRM BUT SOME INITIAL DATA SUGGESTS THAT COMET C/2012/S1 HAS AT LEAST ONE COMPANION AND POSSIBLY UP TO SEVEN ... WHEN SOMETHING LIKE THIS HAPPENS ONE HAS TO BE VERY CAUTIOUS BUT AFTER EXAMINING THE DATA THAT I HAVE SEEN I WOULD SAY THAT IT APPEARS TO BE REAL ... FURTHERMORE ONE OF THE POSSIBLE COMPANIONS APPEARS TO BE AT ABOUT TWO LUNAR DISTANCES (HALF A MILLION MILES) AND HAS NOT FORMED A COMA FOR SOME ODD REASON ... IF THE OBJECT IS ORBITING THE NUCLEUS OF THE COMET AT THAT DISTANCE IT IMPLIES THAT THE NUCLEUS OF THIS COMET IS POSSIBLY AS BIG OR BIGGER THAN EARTH ... ALSO WITH COMPANIONS WE WILL BE ABLE TO DIRECTLY CALCULATE THE MASS AND THEREFORE THE SIZE OF THE COMET NUCLEUS ... USING STANDARD ASTRONOMICAL METHODS ... NASA TIER II SCIENTISTS HAVE ALREADY PUT THEIR FOOT IN THEIR MOUTHS WITH AN ESTIMATE BASED ON SOME GEEEE WHIZ BAD SCIENCE ... AS I HAVE SAID BEFORE ONE OF THE BIGGEST OPEN LIES AT NASA IS CONCERNING THE SIZE OF COMET NUCLEI ALWAYS MINIMIZING THEM TO ALMOST NOTHING AND TRYING TO PROMOTE THEIR INCORRECT DIRTY SNOWBALL COMET MODEL ... WE KNOW THEY CAN DIRECTLY MEASURE COMET NUCLEI WITH RADIO TELESCOPES SO WHY ALL THE BAD SCIENCE AND OPINIATED ESTIMATES ??? NORMALLY NO ONE WOULD BE ABLE TO CONTRADICT THEM BECAUSE THEY HOLD THE REIGNS OF THE RADIO TELESCOPES AND WHO IS TO CONTRADICT THEM ??? BUT WITH COMPANIONS WE USE A SIMPLE ASTRONOMICAL FORMULA AND WALA WE HAVE THE MASS OF THE NUCLEUS AND THERE IS NOTHING NASA CAN DO ABOUT THAT ... WITH THE RECENT INTERACTION OF THIS COMET WITH EARTH WHILE THE COMET WAS AT THE RANGE OF JUPITER'S ORBIT THIS WOULD BE THE SECOND INDICATION THAT THIS IS A WHOPPER OF A COMET ... NASA HAS BEEN EXTREMELY ACTIVE IN DAMAGE CONTROL ON THIS COMET AND JUST TODAY ISSUED A VIDEO CLEARLY DOING DAMAGE CONTROL ... WHY ALL THE ANNOUNCEMENTS WHEN THE COMET (ACCORDING TO NASA) WILL NOT EVEN BE VISIBLE UNTIL NEXT NOVEMBER ?!?!?! STAY TUNED FOLKS THIS IS GETTING REEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL INTERESTING ... jim mccanney

[Serpo]

i WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THE COMET ,but no link

[Libertytree]

Links? Missed the NOV ETA.

[Large Sarge]

http://www.jmccanneyscience.com/

[vacuum]

january 20, 2013 posting ... !!!!!!! ... this just in ... it is too early to confirm but some initial data suggests that comet c/2012/s1 has at least one companion and possibly up to seven ... when something like this happens one has to be very cautious but after examining the data that i have seen i would say that it appears to be real ... furthermore one of the possible companions appears to be at about two lunar distances (half a million miles) and has not formed a coma for some odd reason ... if the object is orbiting the nucleus of the comet at that distance it implies that the nucleus of this comet is possibly as big or bigger than earth ... also with companions we will be able to directly calculate the mass and therefore the size of the comet nucleus ... using standard astronomical methods ... nasa tier ii scientists have already put their foot in their mouths with an estimate based on some geeee whiz bad science ... as i have said before one of the biggest open lies at nasa is concerning the size of comet nuclei always minimizing them to almost nothing and trying to promote their incorrect dirty snowball comet model ... we know they can directly measure comet nuclei with radio telescopes so why all the bad science and opiniated estimates ??? normally no one would be able to contradict them because they hold the reigns of the radio telescopes and who is to contradict them ??? but with companions we use a simple astronomical formula and wala we have the mass of the nucleus and there is nothing nasa can do about that ... with the recent interaction of this comet with earth while the comet was at the range of jupiter's orbit this would be the second indication that this is a whopper of a comet ... nasa has been extremely active in damage control on this comet and just today issued a video clearly doing damage control ... why all the announcements when the comet (according to nasa) will not even be visible until next november ?!?!?! stay tuned folks this is getting reeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllllllllllll interesting ... jim mccanney

[chad]

hawk, over.

[Ponce]

Time to hide under the bed with a canteen of water and loaf of bread......the whole thing should take two days.

V

[Large Sarge]

latest show from mccanney

http://www.jmccanneyscience.com/JamesMcCanneyScienceHour_January_17_2013.mp3

[Norweger]

Hope it swoops up all social democrats, parliamentarians, homosexuals, members of secret societies, feminists, journalists, marxists, communists, liberals and all the other pigs.

Hmm, doesnt hell have seven levels?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cUC0s0tHBw

[Serpo]

Hope it swoops up all social democrats, parliamentarians, homosexuals, members of secret societies, feminists, journalists, marxists, communists, liberals and all the other pigs.

Hmm, doesnt hell have seven levels?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cUC0s0tHBw


The way things are going they may have to make another level...........................................le vel 8

[Serpo]

Im ready ................http://kidzoutdoors.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Pastel-Dotty-Helmet-1.jpg

[joboo]

I wasn't sure what to believe until I saw it in all caps. Now, I'm convinced.

A few more layers of hardened epoxy on the tinfoil hat, and no worries.

[Libertytree]

4349

[Large Sarge]

this is no joke guys, Mccanney is brilliant, he singlehandedly solved a 5000 year old math problem, how to calculate prime numbers (with a formula, not using a super computer)

the guy is legend, and extremely honest and intelligent

better pay attention

[Libertarian_Guard]

this is no joke guys, Mccanney is brilliant, he singlehandedly solved a 5000 year old math problem, how to calculate prime numbers (with a formula, not using a super computer)

the guy is legend, and extremely honest and intelligent

better pay attention


Ok, but wtf can I do?

[Large Sarge]

Ok, but wtf can I do?


stay tuned, get prepared, etc

mccanney is brilliant and honest,

[Serpo]

Ok, but wtf can I do?


Looks like you are toast........hehe.......(avatar)

[joboo]

Astronomers are usually pretty good with computers as well.

From a legitimacy aspect I hope his website is no indication.

[Large Sarge]

everyone should listen to his weekly science shows, especially the last one, jan 17

he kind of hints the orbit will take it behind mars, so we might be spared some of it

[chad]

one of life's great mysteries is how really smart people always have websites that look they were designed by 1 year olds, but really dumb people have websites that look like they were designed by mensa members. i'll never figure it out.

[Son-of-Liberty]

That's because the really smart people are actually getting shit done instead of just making it look like they are.

[Bigjon]

Astronomers are usually pretty good with computers as well.

From a legitimacy aspect I hope his website is no indication.

Most astronomer's are on a leash tethered to their government paychecks. They all read from the same playbook and can't wander off outside their little box.

[Horn]

From Nasa


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_1HdOCOJ_Q

[Horn]

Proposed Orbit from some dude.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smpMQiBoE0Y