PDA

View Full Version : In hearings, Chuck Hagel expands on ‘Jewish lobby’ apology



Horn
1st February 2013, 07:12 AM
WASHINGTON (JTA) -- In his Senate confirmation hearings, defense secretary nominee Chuck Hagel expanded on his apology for using the term "Jewish lobby" and said it also was wrong to suggest pro-Israel groups "intimidate" Congress into doing "dumb things."

Hagel, the former Republican senator from Nebraska nominated by President Obama to become defense secretary, faced an array of tough questions on Thursday from members of both parties on the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Two members, Sens. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) focused particularly on Hagel's claim in a 2006 interview that the "Jewish lobby" is intimidating.

"I've already said I regret referencing the Jewish lobby, I should have said, 'pro-Israel lobby,'" Hagel said. "The use of 'intimidation' -- I should have used 'influence.' I think that would have been more appropriate. I should not have said 'dumb' or 'stupid,' because I understand or appreciate there are other views on these things."

The difficulties of getting past the pro-Israel lobby's preferred locution -- "pro-Israel lobby" -- were evidence in departures from this by both Wicker, who called it the "Israel lobby" and Graham , who called it the "Israeli lobby." Those designations also discomfit officials in the pro-Israel lobby, who see the dropping of the prefix, "pro," as intimating loyalty to another nation.


Senators also asked Hagel about his past skepticism of some Iran sanctions and his wariness of a military strike. He reiterated his commitment to sanctions and said all options, including the military option, were on the table in order to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Hagel also said he was committed to the special U.S.-Israel relationship.

Much of the hearing was taken up with reviewing past Hagel statements and actions on Israel and Iran. He acknowledged putting a hold on comprehensive Iran sanctions in 2008 but said he did this with other Republican senators, and he suggested that the hold was placed at the behest of the Bush administration.

For a recap of Thursday's confirmation hearings, visit JTA's Capital J blog for Washington Bureau Chief Ron Kampeas' live blogging (http://blogs.jta.org/politics/article/2013/01/31/3118381/live-blogging-chuck-hagel-confirmation) of the event.



Help us tell the Jewish story with reporting from around the world. Please donate to JTA. (http://donate.jta.org/)

http://www.jta.org/news/article/2013/01/31/3118426/hagel-in-hearings-expands-on-lobby-apology

gunDriller
1st February 2013, 07:24 AM
seems like the Jewish Israeli lobby was a bit more closeted before 9-11.

Norweger
1st February 2013, 07:39 AM
The dog wants a treat from his master.

mick silver
1st February 2013, 01:15 PM
sounds like he's good at kissing some jew ass

Libertarian_Guard
1st February 2013, 01:46 PM
sounds like he's good at kissing some jew ass

Your comment sounds nuts. Hagel is among the least likely to kiss jew (zionist) a$$. Just look how the republican zionists tried picking him apart this week.

MNeagle
1st February 2013, 01:55 PM
@rajivwashpost (http://twitter.com/rajivwashpost) tweeted: (http://twitter.com/rajivwashpost/status/297125216830763008)http://a0.twimg.com/profile_images/2220774604/ThisOne_normal.jpg (http://twitter.com/rajivwashpost/status/297125216830763008)
At Hagel hearing, 136 mentions of Israel and 135 of Iran. Only 27 refs to Afghanistan. 2 for Al Qaida. 1 for Mali.


Sen. Chuck Hagel confirmation hearing adjourns after 8 hours, 20 minutes, with recesses - @HuffPostPol (http://twitter.com/HuffPostPol)

...

joboo
1st February 2013, 04:50 PM
A lot like Superbowl Sunday. Sometimes you gotta touch the football when playing the game. ;)

Horn
1st February 2013, 05:23 PM
4393..


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wgAX3boU1E

slvrbugjim
1st February 2013, 08:32 PM
Your comment sounds nuts. Hagel is among the least likely to kiss jew (zionist) a$$. Just look how the republican zionists tried picking him apart this week. this is very very true

joboo
2nd February 2013, 02:16 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSza30iP6JQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAKRwPKLTgs

hmm...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9g6MNWiLSeo

Horn
2nd February 2013, 07:33 AM
Gee if only every other cabinet member received such political grillings during selection.

Maybe the intention is to seat him so as to let the mooslims attack us...

mick silver
2nd February 2013, 08:54 AM
we will see in time what i said means shit are not . seen this big show before

mick silver
2nd February 2013, 09:02 AM
"I've already said I regret referencing the Jewish lobby, I should have said, 'pro-Israel lobby,'" Hagel said. "The use of 'intimidation' -- I should have used 'influence.' I think that would have been more appropriate. I should not have said 'dumb' or 'stupid,' because I understand or appreciate there are other views on these things."

Horn
2nd February 2013, 10:49 AM
I should not have said 'dumb' or 'stupid,' because I understand or appreciate there are other views on these things."

Its true, that's the one area you can't tread, seriously.

You have to bring them smoke & mirrors (to the illusion of stupidity), for them to find their own way thru, and see the reflection of stupidity.

Its an act of gracious gratuity.

If he is a master of strategy, or dumb oaf, I cannot tell his qualifications.

PatColo
2nd February 2013, 12:26 PM
"I've already said I regret referencing the Jewish lobby, I should have said, 'pro-Israel lobby,'" Hagel said.

sheesh, at least he didn't say "Jew lobby" - the "explanation" link at top of joogle search results when your search includes the word "Jew",
http://www.google.com/explanation.html


An explanation of our search results

If you recently used Google to search for the word “Jew,” you may have seen results that were very disturbing. We assure you that the views expressed by the sites in your results are not in any way endorsed by Google. We’d like to explain why you’re seeing these results when you conduct this search.


A site’s ranking in Google’s search results relies heavily on computer algorithms using thousands of factors to calculate a page’s relevance to a given query. Sometimes subtleties of language cause anomalies to appear that cannot be predicted. A search for “Jew” brings up one such unexpected result.


If you use Google to search for “Judaism,” “Jewish” or “Jewish people,” the results are informative and relevant. So why is a search for “Jew” different? One reason is that the word “Jew” is often used in an anti-Semitic context. Jewish organizations are more likely to use the word “Jewish” when talking about members of their faith. The word has become somewhat charged linguistically, as noted on websites devoted to Jewish topics such as these:




http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/jonah081500.asp


Someone searching for information on Jewish people would be more likely to enter terms like “Judaism,” “Jewish people,” or “Jews” than the single word “Jew” In fact, prior to this incident, the word “Jew” only appeared about once in every 10 million search queries. Now it’s likely that the great majority of searches on Google for “Jew” are by people who have heard about this issue and want to see the results for themselves.


The beliefs and preferences of those who work at Google, as well as the opinions of the general public, do not determine or impact our search results. Individual citizens and public interest groups do periodically urge us to remove particular links or otherwise adjust search results. Although Google reserves the right to address such requests individually, Google views the comprehensiveness of our search results as an extremely important priority. Accordingly, we do not remove a page from our search results simply because its content is unpopular or because we receive complaints concerning it. We will, however, remove pages from our results if we believe the page (or its site) violates our Webmaster Guidelines, if we believe we are required to do so by law, or at the request of the webmaster who is responsible for the page.


We apologize for the upsetting nature of the experience you had using Google and appreciate your taking the time to inform us about it.


Sincerely,

The Google Team


P.S. You may be interested in some additional information the Anti-Defamation League has posted about this issue at http://www.adl.org/rumors/google_search_rumors.asp. In addition, we call your attention to Google’s search results (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=anti-semitism) on this topic.

Libertarian_Guard
2nd February 2013, 02:01 PM
http://i50.tinypic.com/34yzbt5.jpg

PatColo
6th February 2013, 07:01 AM
Jewish Lobby Crushes Chuck Hagel (http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=793)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvIE-ZE6DB0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvIE-ZE6DB0

Horn
6th February 2013, 07:41 AM
Yes, it seems he was being tested to become Israel's defense minister,

Bro. Nathanial put it all together professionally.