View Full Version : The Satanic Beatles
Norweger
6th February 2013, 05:38 PM
I've spent some time researching the Beatles and i thought I'd share some of the "jewels" I've found with you.
Some of you are already familiar with the "Paul is dead" myth.. which obviously is all bogus, but it's interesting nevertheless that they've perpetuated the myth in almost all of their music, videos and artwork.
The myth goes something like this: Paul got killed in a car crash back in 1966 and they had to replace him.
I begin with Strawberry Fields forever. Take a look at 0:14 in this video and you will see a car driving through Pauls head.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzcZttcpYFQ
In this video called you got to hide your love away the "girl" is obviously a man, but considering the innocence of the time nobody would even think it. Early subliminal promotion of homosexuality right there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mv4gGTtbRqg
The cover of Sgt Peppers lonely hearts club is a photography of a funeral and on the top left you can see Aleister Crowley. The Buddha statue in the front points towards the old and the reincarnated Paul McCartney. Notice the hand above Paul McCartneys head which is another symbol of death. The head behind the hand is the author Stephen Crane who wrote the book the open boat about which is about 4 men who went out on a mission, but only three returned. If you look at the doll on the right you will see that it says "Welcome the Rolling Stones".
http://www.ymskrecordings.com/audio_files/beatlessgtpepper/sgt_pepper_cover.jpg
If you hold a mirror across the middle of the words "LONELY HEARTS" written across the center of the bass drum, you will see "IONEIX HE<>DIE". When arranged as "I ONE IX HE <> DIE," this image suggests the date (11-9, or November 9, 1966) that Paul died, as the diamond between the words "HE" and "DIE" points directly at Paul.
http://beatlesnumber9.com/pid2.jpg
Here is the cover of the Rolling Stones album Their Satanic Majesties Request. This might explain the "Welcome the rolling stones reference" on the cover of the Sgt Peppers lonely hearts club band album.
http://www.centrosangiorgio.com/subliminale/articoli/immagini/satanic_majesties.jpg
The Abbey Road cover symbolizes a funeral procession where Lennon is the priest, Ringo the partaker, McCartney the dead one and Harrison the gravedigger. Notice that McCartney is barefoot which is a how people get buried in many cultures, he is also holding a cigarette also known as a coffin nail. You can also see a car in the path that Paul is walking up the road.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_A9fNctDQu8Q/S_au2AnsDGI/AAAAAAAAApE/7gEsgJqvX4Q/s1600/abbeyroad1.jpg
The registration plate on the beetle says "28 if" 28 if he'd still be alive.
http://ludix.com/moriarty/images/28if.jpg
This photo is a reference to whom Aleister Crowley got the "Book of the law" from.. an entity called Aiwass. It can also be interpreted as Paul was. Some even speculate that McCartney is the son of Crowley.
http://www.covershut.com/covers/The-Beatles---Magical-Mystery-Tour-2009-Remaster-Part-2-Front-Cover-13635.jpg
From The Yellow Submarine music video. Here Lie buried number 49. 4 = Paul, 9 = McCartney.
http://www.jojoplace.org/Shoebox/Rigby_Grave_YellowSub/RigbyGraveYS_DVD.jpg
I will post more later on.
Dogman
6th February 2013, 05:51 PM
Hell I remember when churches and radio stations were outraged about the god is dead thing. And many an album was burnt at anti Beatles gatherings.
That caused a big stink in the bible belt.
Libertarian_Guard
6th February 2013, 05:56 PM
I never took a good look at the cover of Sgt. Peppers before. Notice W.C. Fields, Bob Dylan, Carl Marx and Marlin Brando. Lots of other strange stuff, TV too. And what about welcoming The Rolling Stones? Which came first?
Horn
6th February 2013, 06:00 PM
I'd always thought the Paul was dead meme originated from Lennon, and Harrison thinking he was a fame ham and not enough of a rebble.
Was taken lightly at first, but one of the issues later on between the band.
If any one of them were in association with Diablo, I'd consider Lennon.
Norweger
6th February 2013, 06:05 PM
http://willemaus.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/mdc2.jpg
This is one of the strangest photos in my opinion. The best way to go is by M&D Company? Supposedly it got released in the booklet that came with the Magical Mystery Tour album exactly 10 years before Lennon got killed by Mark David Chapman.
Norweger
6th February 2013, 06:12 PM
http://conspiromedia.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/mccartney-black-rose.jpg
McCartney the only one with a black rose.
http://www.videogameobsession.com/etc/Beatles/The%20Beatles%20-%20Let%20It%20Be%20-%20cover%20art.jpg
Red background on McCartneys photo.
Libertarian_Guard
6th February 2013, 06:25 PM
http://i47.tinypic.com/23lxqo9.jpg
Norweger
6th February 2013, 06:25 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODkmDRgat6k
A man says number 9 in the song Revolution 9 and backwards it sounds like "Turn me on dead man".
I once heard Revolution 9 backwards and forwards at the same time.. probably the most terrifying thing I've ever heard.
Norweger
6th February 2013, 06:28 PM
http://i47.tinypic.com/23lxqo9.jpg
This is also a satanic mantra from Crowley.. as if one does not need the almighty.
"Love is the Law, Love under Will" -Aleister Crowley.
Horn
6th February 2013, 06:34 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-ydua3F1Ik
Norweger
6th February 2013, 06:40 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1Wf4bGatoo
Libertarian_Guard
6th February 2013, 06:42 PM
http://i49.tinypic.com/5oii42.png
Libertarian_Guard
6th February 2013, 07:16 PM
http://i48.tinypic.com/ixv7l2.jpg
StreetsOfGold
6th February 2013, 09:18 PM
Rock music = brutalizes the mind > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8NzHfd_bmo
Romans 12:2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.
zap
6th February 2013, 09:30 PM
Norweger (http://gold-silver.us/forum/member.php?15689-Norweger),
What about Elvis? Most folks liked either them or him? My people liked Elvis.
Oh and sorry, I am not trying to derail, But it was either the Beatles or Elvis?
Was Elvis Satanic?
Personally I don't think so when he died I was in 3rd grade and I loved his songs, still do!
Norweger
6th February 2013, 10:24 PM
I haven't research Elvis, but he probably paved the way for a lot of degeneracy in much of the same manner as the Beatles.
Glass
7th February 2013, 03:42 AM
PatColo posted a very long audio of about 5 hours.
Episode 2 (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?63404-The-9-11-Interview-You-Need-To-Hear-Clint-Richardson&p=609739&viewfull=1#post609739)
It's long because he goes through who's related to the queen. Turns out they all are, anyone who's been any one in rock n roll and hollywood. All the prez's and vice prez's. Elvis is in there related in some way. This is the way it's been since the begining.
i can't recall when he gets to Elvis but its during the last hour IIR.
JDRock
7th February 2013, 07:40 AM
ahhh dont forget the beatles handler and boss -Brian Epstein....
sirgonzo420
7th February 2013, 07:51 AM
PatColo posted a very long audio of about 5 hours.
Episode 2 (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?63404-The-9-11-Interview-You-Need-To-Hear-Clint-Richardson&p=609739&viewfull=1#post609739)
It's long because he goes through who's related to the queen. Turns out they all are, anyone who's been any one in rock n roll and hollywood. All the prez's and vice prez's. Elvis is in there related in some way. This is the way it's been since the begining.
i can't recall when he gets to Elvis but its during the last hour IIR.
The reigning Queen of England is my 12th cousin...
I was not invited to the latest Royal Wedding.
joboo
7th February 2013, 12:44 PM
May have had differing views on religion....but Satanic is one hell of a stretch.
Athiest perhaps...Satanic? LOL....wow ok.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4p8qxGbpOk
Norweger
7th February 2013, 12:54 PM
14 seconds out in the video i see another reference to death. A dude in the audience is holding a sign that says "Come back".. I've actually seen a photograph where Paul McCartney is painting that sign.
Yes, love, Love under will as Aleister Crowley said, that is their philosophy.
joboo
7th February 2013, 01:00 PM
I'm going to bet 99% of all people that have ever listened to the Beatles developed no satanic emotions from the experience whatsoever.
If they had some hidden satanic meanings tucked in, they hid it so incredibly well it actually had the opposite effect on people.
Norweger
7th February 2013, 01:00 PM
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_29k8mzEqTBQ/SBu26_RyVfI/AAAAAAAABBg/jFFSVVFWNJ8/s320/Lennon_Satan.jpg
McCartney making the 666 with his hand and Lennon showing the Mano Cornuto. Yup, nothing satanic about that.
joboo
7th February 2013, 01:05 PM
https://lh3.ggpht.com/_29k8mzEqTBQ/SBu26_RyVfI/AAAAAAAABBg/jFFSVVFWNJ8/s320/Lennon_Satan.jpg
McCartney making the 666 with his hand and Lennon showing the Mano Cornuto. Yup, nothing satanic about that.
Interpreting hand gestures is a lot like looking at tea leaves.
Their music....pretty much least satanic thing out there aside from reruns of Lawrence Welk.
Norweger
7th February 2013, 01:07 PM
Funny coincidence.
I'm just now watching Top Gear Season 19 episode 2 and the guys are in America and they've just come across a road with serrations in it that plays music if you drive over it.. Jeremy Clarkson then decides to reverse over them to listen for subliminal messages and then he says: Yes, Paul McCartney is dead because he wasn't wearing any shoes or socks.
Interpreting hand gestures is a lot like looking at tea leaves.
Their music....pretty much least satanic thing out there aside from reruns of Lawrence Welk.
Yes, that is what they want you to believe.
joboo
7th February 2013, 01:12 PM
Funny coincidence.
I'm just now watching Top Gear Season 19 episode 2 and the guys are in America and they've just come across a road with serrations in it that plays music if you drive over it.. Jeremy Clarkson then decides to reverse over them to listen for subliminal messages and then he says: Yes, Paul McCartney is dead because he wasn't wearing any shoes or socks.
Yes, that is what they want you to believe.
All I know, and what everyone else has noticed over the years, is their music does not elicit satanic feelings of any kind, so they failed miserably with the whole convert people to satanism conspiracy.
Norweger
7th February 2013, 01:18 PM
I think your viewpoint on satanism is what you've seen in the Hollywood movies where you have a dude in a black cape sacrificing an infant on an altar.
Beatles pretty much created pop culture and what is the result we see today?
StreetsOfGold
7th February 2013, 01:23 PM
Norweger (http://gold-silver.us/forum/member.php?15689-Norweger),
What about Elvis? Most folks liked either them or him? My people liked Elvis.
Oh and sorry, I am not trying to derail, But it was either the Beatles or Elvis?
Was Elvis Satanic?
Personally I don't think so when he died I was in 3rd grade and I loved his songs, still do!
No question about it -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e10Wv373uKA
He would sometimes carry madame blavatsky's book with him on stage
joboo
7th February 2013, 01:23 PM
I think your viewpoint on satanism is what you've seen in the Hollywood movies where you have a dude in a black cape sacrificing an infant on an altar.
Beatles pretty much created pop culture and what is the result we see today?
Might as well go back to Chuck Berry for Rock and Roll.
Norweger
7th February 2013, 01:27 PM
I'm sure that we can go back further, yes, but none has come even close to be as influential as the Beatles.
http://iwasyou.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/thewingedbeetle.jpg
StreetsOfGold
7th February 2013, 01:28 PM
I'm going to bet 99% of all people that have ever listened to the Beatles developed no satanic emotions
There is no such thing as a "satanic emotion"
If you're not saved, you're a child of the devil by nature. You can believe you're a "good person" without any "satanic emotions" (<?) as you say, but you'll go to hell like a bullet.
joboo
7th February 2013, 01:37 PM
There is no such thing as a "satanic emotion"
If you're not saved, you're a child of the devil by nature. You can believe you're a "good person" without any "satanic emotions" (<?) as you say, but you'll go to hell like a bullet.
Could be, but we'll have to agree to disagree on that.
horseshoe3
7th February 2013, 01:51 PM
I've never studied it closely, but there is a definite change in their music in about 66. The first couple years was just enjoyable, fun loving songs. After that, it got all wierd, new age, occult stuff.
joboo
7th February 2013, 01:51 PM
I'm sure that we can go back further, yes, but none has come even close to be as influential as the Beatles.
https://iwasyou.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/thewingedbeetle.jpg
You also have to consider a lot of the flower power genre came out of reaction to war. Musicians are essentially reflections of the times to convey emotions. Being a musician myself, I don't see musicians so much as a catalyst but rather a reaction to events unfolding in society.
freespirit
7th February 2013, 01:52 PM
Let's not overlook the influence of the tavistock institute on the beatles... I don't know how to copy/paste etc from my iPod, but if you google "beatles tavistock" you'll see what I mean.
Norweger
7th February 2013, 01:54 PM
Let's not overlook the influence of the tavistock institute on the beatles... I don't know how to copy/paste etc from my iPod, but if you google "beatles tavistock" you'll see what I mean.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDELeIgYpQc
Cebu_4_2
7th February 2013, 01:54 PM
Being a musician myself,
Playing the skin flute don't count.
Santa
7th February 2013, 01:56 PM
Atheism is the Statist version of Satanism.
The prime objective of Satan, as I understand it, is to cause disbelief in God.
When a population no longer believes in God, they're left alone with the State for their earthly security.
By State I mean any and all forms of worldly governance.
You know the adage, "You gotta serve someone." It's either God or State.
joboo
7th February 2013, 01:58 PM
Playing the skin flute don't count.
I plays skins, but the ones fastened to a drum shell. Three drumsets in my house. Two accoustic downstairs, an electric set upstairs. Roland TD-20 kit in black with the V expressions pack addon. Slick setup. Omar Hakim is a big fan of this setup. Pearl mix and match kit from when I was 10, and Yahaha Rock tour custom rounds out the acoustic. Paiste, Zildjian, and Sabian metals mostly.
Hillbilly
7th February 2013, 02:19 PM
Paul was replaced, for what reason I do not know but he is not the original Paul. Also look at the Standardization of of music in 440 instead of 432 brought to you by Rockefeller and the Joeseph Goebbels. EMI the Beatles label was a Military Electronics company pretty scary shit when you add it all together. Preston Nichols seems to be on to some of it.
Cebu_4_2
7th February 2013, 02:56 PM
Whats this 432 stuff? I remember reading on it a while back but never did figure it out.
horseshoe3
7th February 2013, 03:04 PM
Yeah, I always thought the debate was between 440 and 441. I never heard of 432 before.
Santa
7th February 2013, 03:32 PM
"A440 is the musical note A above middle C, which has a frequency of 440 Hz and serves as a general tuning standard for musical pitch.
Prior to the standardization on 440 Hz, many countries and organizations followed the Austrian government's 1885 recommendation of 435 Hz. The American music industry reached an informal standard of 440 Hz in 1926, and some began using it in instrument manufacturing. In 1936 the American Standards Association recommended that the A above middle C be tuned to 440 Hz.[1] This standard was taken up by the International Organization for Standardization in 1955 (reaffirmed by them in 1975) as ISO 16.[2] Although not universally accepted, since then it has served as the audio frequency reference for the calibration of acoustic equipment and the tuning of pianos, violins, and other musical instruments.
A440 is widely used as concert pitch in United Kingdom[3] and the United States. In continental Europe the frequency of the A is commonly 442 Hz and 443 Hz.[4][5] In the period instrument movement, a consensus has arisen around a modern baroque pitch of 415 Hz, baroque for some special church music (Chorton pitch) at 466 Hz and classical pitch at 430 Hz.[6]
The A above middle C is sometimes referred to as Concert A. (The C above Concert A is called Concert C.)
A440 is often used as a tuning reference in just intonation regardless of 1/1 or key. For example, A is common to all stringed instruments."
Cebu_4_2
7th February 2013, 03:38 PM
Thanks Santa, we're getting closer. The part that stuck out to me was the frequency somehow changed and in doing so changed the perception of music from peaceful to not so peaceful... See I have no clue but remember something about it. No wonder I can't find anything searching.
Santa
7th February 2013, 03:45 PM
I posted a thread a while back about "Sonic Warfare".
Vibrations, frequencies, pitches, are used to affect and influence the populace.
Look at Dub-Step and the Rave scene going on today. Tavistock through and through. International Intelligence.
They're feeding a huge portion of the worlds population Molly or whatever new drug de'jour, and pounding them with sub bass vibrations.
freespirit
7th February 2013, 03:50 PM
Thanks Santa, we're getting closer. The part that stuck out to me was the frequency somehow changed and in doing so changed the perception of music from peaceful to not so peaceful... See I have no clue but remember something about it. No wonder I can't find anything searching.
I think it was John Coleman who also wrote of the tavistock connection and their approach to music structure. The answers you are seeking may be found searching from this angle. When the beatles came to America they were touted as "that Liverpool sound" when in fact there were no other bands in Liverpool at that time performing that particular "sound". The T.I. Introduced a new musical structure, composed several albums then taught the beatles how to play the songs... There is more to it, but I won't spoil it for you.
;)
joboo
7th February 2013, 03:50 PM
Paul was replaced, for what reason I do not know but he is not the original Paul. Also look at the Standardization of of music in 440 instead of 432 brought to you by Rockefeller and the Joeseph Goebbels. EMI the Beatles label was a Military Electronics company pretty scary shit when you add it all together. Preston Nichols seems to be on to some of it.
Are you saying altering the pitch of middle C, or concert A, induces some form of evil toughts?
This sounds incredibly far fetched, and new agey, to me. Do you have any additional information to indicate this?
Santa
7th February 2013, 03:52 PM
Dub step comes straight from the Top Academic Institutions in London. It's absolutely NOT grassroots music derived from natural indigenous culture.
It's high tech mass mind control.
joboo
7th February 2013, 04:00 PM
Dub step comes straight from the Top Academic Institutions in London. It's absolutely NOT grassroots music derived from natural indigenous culture.
It's high tech mass mind control.
All dub step is computerized sound effects overlayed on the basic configurations of drum rudiments. ...aka drum rudiments.
You can only fill a time signature with so many variations of beat patterns, as they all stem from the same basic roots.
To make the statement that it is mass mind control...mind control to do what?
Santa
7th February 2013, 04:08 PM
All dub step is computerized sound effects overlayed on the basic configurations of drum rudiments. ...aka drum rudiments.
You can only fill a time signature with so many variations of beat patterns, as they all stem from the same basic roots.
To make the statement that it is mass mind control...mind control to do what?
To cause the population to think like you, I reckon.
You completely ignore a vast and documented history of Academic RandD on this topic.
Santa
7th February 2013, 04:27 PM
All dub step is computerized sound effects overlayed on the basic configurations of drum rudiments. .
No, it uses sub and ultra sonic frequencies along with powerful psychotropics to affect and to manipulate the mind. Perhaps to keep the pop. in a state of ineffectuality or social impotence.
Raves are worldwide. It's a huge growing phenomena.
joboo
7th February 2013, 04:41 PM
To cause the population to think like you, I reckon.
You completely ignore a vast and documented history of Academic RandD on this topic.
Wow another personal attack, surprising. You guys are top notch lately.
Live performance would be one aspect. Recorded post production is another.
The ear drum membrane, like a speaker cone, is only so reactive.
Can you even discern the difference in 8hz past a certain level of frequency?
What quality of speakers do you need to perceive 8hz in variation?
i.e. How many people have recording studio monitor quality in their homes, or similar quality in earphones? I do because I need it, but I'm thinking most people will not have the sensitivity of equipment to even discern the difference.
yes/no?
Santa
7th February 2013, 04:50 PM
Another interesting tidbit is that Thelonious Monk, the jazz pianist, was discovered and financed by a Rothschild.
I find this stuff all very disconcerting personally. I've always believed that the arts sprang from one's individual soul, so to speak. That it
was the fruit of personal self expression, and therefore represented the very best of what individuals have to offer. A tremendous ideal.
And this thread suggests the idea that music perhaps has always been a primary control meme by the Top. That is, based on the idea that Satan is essentially the State in which the population is governed. A Luciferian State, or a scientific machine state.
It's not much of a stretch to see that sustained musical frequencies and patterns are very similar to ritual repetitions, mantras and incantations.
sirgonzo420
7th February 2013, 04:55 PM
Wow another personal attack, surprising. You guys are top notch lately.
Live performance would be one aspect. Recorded post production is another.
The ear drum membrane, like a speaker cone, is only so reactive.
Can you even discern the difference in 8hz past a certain level of frequency?
What quality of speakers do you need to perceive 8hz in variation?
i.e. How many people have recording studio monitor quality in the homes or similar quality in earphones? I do because I need it, but I'm thinking most people will not have the sensitivity of equipment to even discern the difference.
yes/no?
Not consciously perhaps, but it's a bit naive to suggest that sound and vibration are incapable of inducing certain states of consciousness.
One doesn't need to be aware of programming to be programmed.
That being said, the idea of a rave is a sort of collective mind, where the humans present are extensions of one quite tangible stream of sound and vibration. I don't think it is any more nefarious than anything else that is going on.
I am not a raver, but I do not find that ravers are any more or less mind controlled or programmed than Super Bowl viewers.
Cebu_4_2
7th February 2013, 04:57 PM
A shameless post copied and pasted with no credit given:
I'm not convinced that the 528 Hz promoted by Len Horowitz is all that he claims it is. There's another guy named Jamie Buturff who says that Horowitz is way off base and 528 Hz is a poor choice.
You can see Jamie's videos here:
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL21257F2621425450
Jamie says that 432 Hz is a much better choice all around. Don Nicoloff mentioned to me some weeks ago that 432 Hz was the original concert pitch for orchestral tuning until it was changed to 440 Hz, Jamie thinks there was something sinister in that change. He might be right.
The fact that Horowitz went out of his way to smear this guy and tried to keep him from talking at conferences, tells me that Horowitz has something to hide. If 528 Hz was the "love" frequency that he keeps claiming, then what is he worried about and why is he working so hard to stifle Jamie Buturff? Considering Len Horowitz and Sherri Kane's conduct over the past several months, I don't see much "love" coming from either of them. They launched into an insane smear and slander campaign against Ted Gunderson and Dr True Ott in August 2010, and later on added me to their Hit List when I started to defend True Ott and Ted against their viscious slandering. I don't know why anyone in their right mind would want to pay attention to anything Len Horowtiz has to say. That guy has simply gone off the deep end no longer holds any credibility in my book.
You can pulse a crystal with any frequency you want. There's no rule, but using 15 - 16 Hz is a good choice as it's the first harmonic of the Schumann frequency and that's in sync with earth energies.
joboo
7th February 2013, 04:58 PM
No, it uses sub and ultra sonic frequencies along with powerful psychotropics to affect and to manipulate the mind. Perhaps to keep the pop. in a state of ineffectuality or social impotence.
Raves are worldwide. It's a huge growing phenomena.
Raves are pretty social events. I know a large crowd that hits them up every weekend, and the dj's that perform at them. It's not my style of music, but it's one hell of a circle of friends. All cool cats, and a very close knit social group that respects each other, and likes to have fun.
I see what you're saying, but it's not mirroring what my life experiences are telling me.
The only primary negatives I see is the drug use associated with it. I don't prefer the music as a whole, too repetitive, but I like some of the rhythm structures. Mostly what you will find is it takes people's minds off things, and helps time to pass as background music.
Santa
7th February 2013, 05:13 PM
This shit affects the mind subliminally, at levels both beneath and above our conscious awareness.
joboo
7th February 2013, 05:14 PM
Not consciously perhaps, but it's a bit naive to suggest that sound and vibration are incapable of inducing certain states of consciousness.
One doesn't need to be aware of programming to be programmed.
That being said, the idea of a rave is a sort of collective mind, where the humans present are extensions of one quite tangible stream of sound and vibration. I don't think it is any more nefarious than anything else that is going on.
I am not a raver, but I do not find that ravers are any more or less mind controlled or programmed than Super Bowl viewers.
I agree fully with the concept, frequency for sure has it's effects, I'm just not sure that amount of variation is enough to be experienced on consumer level audio equipment to make any appreciable difference. At 10Khz etc.. 8hz is such a small fraction of that it seems to be a wash. Then theres the acoustics of the room you're listening to it in.
I checked out some 432hz music on youtube, then found it's regular version for comparison. I didn't get much from it. Maybe I'll try sourcing some 432hz .flac mp3 examples.
Apparently there is a plugin for winamp that allows you to adjust all your music down for 432hz during playback.
joboo
7th February 2013, 05:16 PM
This shit affects the mind subliminally, at levels both beneath and above our conscious awareness.
All music, and sounds do.
Santa
7th February 2013, 05:39 PM
If any one thing fits the definition of Occult, this is it. Hidden knowledge not only kept hidden by the elite but hidden in the sense that the conscious mind remains essentially unaware of it. Therefore hidden from view. Like being under a spell. Like hypnosis. Like an ongoing trance.
joboo
7th February 2013, 05:40 PM
I do find that the raver type drugs combined with that music creates a sense of chaos for me. I really don't enjoy being in that state of mind. It's like a form of confusion.
What I do notice is the people that do like it, it helps them break loose, dance their feet off, and get lost in the moment. Seems to be a pathway to an escape from reality.
There are so many incredibly talented musicians in the world, and so few are signed to record contracts. The movie, and music industry needs a good house cleaning.
sirgonzo420
7th February 2013, 05:48 PM
If any one thing fits the definition of Occult, this is it. Hidden knowledge not only kept hidden by the elite but hidden in the sense that the conscious mind remains essentially unaware of it. Therefore hidden from view. Like being under a spell. Like hypnosis. Like an ongoing trance.
माया !
Santa
7th February 2013, 05:58 PM
What I'm saying is there is scientific research using these rave scenes for experimental purposes going on using subliminal weird repetitious sub base beats and patterns, along with psychotropic cocktails.
It's a spreading addiction. People that are into these Raves are like lemmings being used as lab rats. :) Taking unknown drug cocktails from an unknown manufacturer to participate in sensual orgies of self gratification. Great fun. Nothing like hooking up with a couple of hot twin Wiccans at a Rave.
Very Bacchanalian. :rolleyes:
joboo
7th February 2013, 06:01 PM
"hot twin wiccans"
Yes...go on...pics please. ;D
Norweger
7th February 2013, 06:16 PM
http://musicthatisntbad.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Revolver.jpeg
John Lennon in center of the Revolver cover. It's also worth noticing that Pauls head is the only one that is not looking forward and that you can only see one of his eyes.
http://clearmag.com/assets/2010/03/The-Gun-that-Killed-John-Lennon.jpg
The gun that Chapman used.
Horn
7th February 2013, 06:22 PM
This shit affects the mind subliminally, at levels both beneath and above our conscious awareness.
What Beatles song hadn't you already sung in your head, before you heard them play it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHqvN5YO9wY
BrewTech
7th February 2013, 06:23 PM
I do find that the raver type drugs combined with that music creates a sense of chaos for me. I really don't enjoy being in that state of mind. It's like a form of confusion.
What I do notice is the people that do like it, it helps them break loose, dance their feet off, and get lost in the moment. Seems to be a pathway to an escape from reality.
There are so many incredibly talented musicians in the world, and so few are signed to record contracts. The movie, and music industry needs a good house cleaning.
Exactly the point, and the objective.
Norweger
7th February 2013, 06:26 PM
http://img2.etsystatic.com/000/0/5968905/il_fullxfull.162647470.jpg
This is the original yesterday and today cover. Paul in a casket.
http://www.thebeatlesuniverse.com/uploads/The_Beatles-Yesterday_And_Today-Frontal.jpg
This is what they replaced it with.
joboo
7th February 2013, 06:59 PM
Exactly the point, and the objective.
Agree, but aside from the confusion induced aspects (the drugs) all music does that to some extent, if not to a great extent.
It's just another expression of it. Computers came in and dehumanized music for the most part. I can't say if that's a conspiracy rather than a natural progression of technology though.
horseshoe3
7th February 2013, 07:02 PM
The ear drum membrane, like a speaker cone, is only so reactive.
The ear drum isn't the only part of the body that is capable of resonating.
Can you even discern the difference in 8hz past a certain level of frequency?
What quality of speakers do you need to perceive 8hz in variation?
At middle A, 8 Hz is 1/6 of a step. Definitely noticeable.
joboo
7th February 2013, 07:26 PM
The ear drum isn't the only part of the body that is capable of resonating.
At middle A, 8 Hz is 1/6 of a step. Definitely noticeable.
I agree, cells resonate and are affected. Universal freq's earth freq, it's all related.
At 5khz, 10Khz...what are the percentages of 8hz deviation?
Can consumer home audio speakers, and ear buds reproduce this slight variation in any respectable quantity. How much is lost in translation is what I'm wondering.
It would be interesting to see some MRI images of effects of the brain between the two.
There is a lot of data missing at this point for me.
horseshoe3
7th February 2013, 07:41 PM
At 5k or 10k, we would still be talking about 1/6 step, NOT 8 Hz any more. 1/6 step at 10k is about 180 Hz. 8 Hz only applies between 432 and 440. In music, everything is proportional as you go up and down. Once the instrument is tuned, the finite number 8 has no meaning any more.
joboo
7th February 2013, 08:13 PM
At 5k or 10k, we would still be talking about 1/6 step, NOT 8 Hz any more. 1/6 step at 10k is about 180 Hz. 8 Hz only applies between 432 and 440. In music, everything is proportional as you go up and down. Once the instrument is tuned, the finite number 8 has no meaning any more.
Shit, I know this...I got my wires crossed.
I was thinking from a harmonics perspective.
Here's in the air tonight @432:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flOuxXetceE
And what I presume to be the regular tuned version:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Mt0ee9FraQ
joboo
7th February 2013, 08:50 PM
Yesterday @432
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykV7O9hnCZ4
Yesterday @440
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRNn5nR2Yco
joboo
7th February 2013, 11:15 PM
More apparent...
Let it be @432
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbV5qf594X8
Let it be @440
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytu3yEE9ACE
432 does seem have a more sombre aura to it. More organic perhaps.
I like it.
Audacity mp3 converter:
http://audacity.sourceforge.net/
"Open the file in audacity, click "edit" and select > all
Then go to "effect", "change pitch", and in "Frequency (hz)" Put this for percent change:
-1.818182
The way to calculate the % change is:
100 x (new frequency - original frequency)/original frequency
so for 440 Hz > 432 Hz that is:
100 x (432 - 440)/440 = 100 x 8/440 = -1.818182
File > export, to save in various formats. For MP3 you will need to download the lame encoder, and path to it as prompted.
I'm converting some Mp3's and seeing some very surprising results. Way more organic, and natural.
joboo
8th February 2013, 12:50 AM
converted "Dust in the wind" from Flac. Interesting results.
It sounds a lot more relaxed, and natural.
I'm convinced.
Hillbilly
8th February 2013, 01:00 AM
Whats this 432 stuff? I remember reading on it a while back but never did figure it out.
432 is based off of the natural tone scale of the earth and resonates with the heart. 440 is artificial and resonates mostly with the brain and can really agitate people. It disturbs the mind. I have tuned my guitar to 432 and it is great much more musical sounding.
JDRock
8th February 2013, 08:16 AM
a440 is a product of negotiations with the ashkeNAZI party...hense it is suspect at the least.
Cebu_4_2
8th February 2013, 08:35 AM
a440 is a product of negotiations with the ashkeNAZI party...hense it is suspect at the least.
This is a440:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTOg4aYGtdY
Norweger
8th February 2013, 09:45 AM
Here are some other Paul is dead songs from the era.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whAZ8aYztgU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-sra4zpVx0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gK2CUoDuEpQ
Norweger
8th February 2013, 09:49 AM
How about the name Ringo Starr?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/97/Pentacle_2.svg/220px-Pentacle_2.svg.png
Celtic Rogue
8th February 2013, 10:23 AM
RU SERIOUS? ^^^:)&o)(~[(:)]
Celtic Rogue
8th February 2013, 10:25 AM
OH yeah... What about that Lennon. He took his name from a satanic joo commie right.... i see your point? /sarc
Santa
8th February 2013, 11:18 AM
Ok, the thing is though, there's no denying that there are all kinds of references, intimations and blatantly overt signs and symbols of Satanism in the Music Industry. Why is that?
You can't just dismiss this shit. It's far too in our faces. Far too global. It would not be wise to dismiss.
And forget the hipsters that follow every trend with their idiotic tattoo's.
The notion that commercial corporate culture is driven by what the consumer wants is bullshit.
Consumer wants are driven by the Marketing and Media Industry.
We need to be much more discerning and critical of the societal control mechanisms being used on us.
There's no way that so many people would be all tatted up with satanic imagery if the Media and Marketers hadn't glamorized this shit.
To Glamorize is to cast a Spell.
Norweger
9th February 2013, 05:04 PM
http://youtu.be/eZh_BqJqKns
Notice how he ends the conversation with a "cheers".
Horn
9th February 2013, 05:33 PM
Ok, the thing is though, there's no denying that there are all kinds of references, intimations and blatantly overt signs and symbols of Satanism in the Music Industry. Why is that?
Its a by-product of Judeo-Christianity.
Santa
9th February 2013, 06:14 PM
Its a by-product of Judeo-Christianity.
I'm not sure what your definition of Judeo-Christianity is? Do you mean Christian Zionism?
Is all degeneracy and perversity in our culture somehow a result of Judeo-Christianity?
osoab
9th February 2013, 07:40 PM
http://youtu.be/eZh_BqJqKns
Notice how he ends the conversation with a "cheers".
Could be stoned out of his mind.
Glass
9th February 2013, 09:12 PM
cheers is just a thing we say.... like thanks or see ya later
Hillbilly
9th February 2013, 11:50 PM
http://youtu.be/eZh_BqJqKns
Notice how he ends the conversation with a "cheers".
Faul (Fake Paul) new in advance it was going to happen and hated John Lennon that's why he is not surprised or broken up by the news.
Hatha Sunahara
10th February 2013, 12:14 AM
The Beatles songs prior to Sgt Pepper's Album were pre psychedelic drugs. Sgt. Pepper's songs and those after it had many subliminal references and content associated with the drug experience. It had something to do with their visit to India and the influence of the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. Suddenly you hear a sitar in their music. There is a distinct spiritual shift there, almost like the progression of the consciousness of a user of psychedelic drugs. I just wonder how that fits into the satanic view of these musicians?
I agree that music is the expression of the soul, as is most art. I don't doubt that pop music in the English speaking world has been used by the people who want to rule the world as a vehicle toward that end. In the 1960's some major cultural shifts happened. Summarized by 'sex, drugs, and rock n roll'. I was a teenager in the 1960s. I enjoyed reading about history, and I was aware back then of the Roman concept of Panem et Circensis as a means of distracting the Plebs into mindless ignorance of what the rulers were doing. I always saw the sex drugs and rock-n-roll lumped in with stadium sports, television, and consumer culture as a similar modern extension of panem et circensis. The sex, drugs and rock-n-roll were introduced as in inducement to pry people away from religion. To reduce the influence of religion on people, to make them more secular. More receptive to 'moral and ethical flexibility'. When I look back on it, it strikes me as a period of some critical social engineering.
I have read at least one story about how the Beatles were given their lyrics and music by one or several agents of the people who were behind their success. Whatever symbolism or subliminal unconscious programming is present in their music could very well have been authored by the social engineers--the Tavistock institute perhaps. I don't doubt for a minute that there is satanic content in their music, and that it has influenced all of us who listened to that music at the time. The idea that satan is a hipster would never come from a religious origin.
Hatha
Horn
10th February 2013, 07:23 AM
Is all degeneracy and perversity in our culture somehow a result of Judeo-Christianity?
Dig It,
The Beatles were basically just a cover band, give the people what they want.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siV_IZcwU60
If You Meet The Buddha On The Road, Kill Him
You want it.
Don't you?
It.
Yeah, she's got it
Ooh, she's really got it
She was born part of a Fifty's dream
TV Generation, from the cradle to the teens
Mr. Rogers, I Love Lucy, and Mary Tyler Moore
Jackie Gleason, Honeymooners and Zsa Zsa Gabor
Green Acres, yeah that's what you're looking for
You're a product of these times, just like the people next door
Bigger house, bigger 'fridge, bigger washing machine
'Cos you're a consumer'n, baby, you're the advertiser's dream
That's alright, outta sight, you couldn't care less
You can put it on a VISA card or American Express
Tell the people what they want, then decide what they need
Advertise, merchandise, satisfy their greed
Bigger house, bigger 'fridge, bank loan, get a bigger car
You can sell them any old shit if it's endorsed by a movie star
TV's got a little piece to dictate
They said you'd believe it 'cos it's a #1 rating
You're the products that you buy, the consumer and the goods
And you want it so bad, you'd sell your soul if you could
joboo
11th February 2013, 10:44 PM
Bill Burr...I love this guy.
Bill Burr re: John Lennon (excessive profanity)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ss0XNOWvzlU
Original vid (at the 1 min mark...)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9kgu71d81U
Norweger
30th October 2014, 08:32 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0ZmICCAtt4
Horn
31st October 2014, 06:21 PM
Its only a Norweger song.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvxyPQT0lhc
Serpo
31st October 2014, 06:33 PM
Who are the Beatles..............
Norweger
29th January 2015, 07:08 AM
Other "Paul is dead" songs from the end of the sixties.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whAZ8aYztgU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-sra4zpVx0
Norweger
29th January 2015, 07:08 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGGcBqrCguU
steyr_m
29th January 2015, 06:15 PM
I scanned quickly though the responses, so sorry if there is a repeat...
The only way to solve the mystery is to see pics of Paul pre- and post- "death" and see if the ears are the same shape. That is something that cannot be re-done/ re-worked / doctored, etc.
Horn
29th January 2015, 09:15 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UU60D3z2Gcw
Norweger
29th January 2015, 10:11 PM
I scanned quickly though the responses, so sorry if there is a repeat...
The only way to solve the mystery is to see pics of Paul pre- and post- "death" and see if the ears are the same shape. That is something that cannot be re-done/ re-worked / doctored, etc.
That is all baloney, he never died or anything like that. The point is that they planted all those "clues" in the songs, the videos, album covers and such.
steyr_m
30th January 2015, 05:10 AM
That is all baloney, he never died or anything like that. The point is that they planted all those "clues" in the songs, the videos, album covers and such.
Oh, I have never thought he died. I think it's people looking into things a bit too much. But..... if they want to make a case, ear analysis would be the way to go -- not looking into pictures, etc too much.
Norweger
11th February 2015, 08:46 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oc96AZdogdk
"Dear mister Lennon. Some information i received while using a Ouija board, i believe there will be an attempt to assassinate you.
The spirit that gave me this information was Brian Epstein"
http://slightlywarped.com/crapfactory/awesomemysteries/images/john_lennon.jpg
http://slightlywarped.com/crapfactory/awesomemysteries/john_lennon.htm
Hatha Sunahara
12th February 2015, 10:02 AM
Here's a theory that John Lennon faked his death, and possibly now appears as a guy named Mark Staycer:
http://mileswmathis.com/lennon.pdf
Hatha
steyr_m
12th February 2015, 10:17 AM
Here's a theory that John Lennon faked his death, and possibly now appears as a guy named Mark Staycer:
http://mileswmathis.com/lennon.pdf
Hatha
Here's a definite case of TL-DR I find it interesting, but not enough to read the whole thing. There was motive for him to fake his death, and I don't blame him. He couldn't go anywhere and be alone or left alone.
Uncle Salty
12th February 2015, 11:26 AM
Here's a definite case of TL-DR I find it interesting, but not enough to read the whole thing. There was motive for him to fake his death, and I don't blame him. He couldn't go anywhere and be alone or left alone.
I read it and I must say it is pretty convincing.
midnight rambler
12th February 2015, 11:46 AM
I read it and I must say it is pretty convincing.
Think of all the parties who would have to keep their mouths shut for 35 years (the witnesses to this supposed fake event - or those who would have been in place to witness the event yet didn't see anything remotely like that happen, e.g. the people who were hanging out at the scene and personnel at the hospital, etc.).
Uncle Salty
12th February 2015, 01:02 PM
Think of all the parties who would have to keep their mouths shut for 35 years (the witnesses to this supposed fake event - or those who would have been in place to witness the event yet didn't see anything remotely like that happen, e.g. the people who were hanging out at the scene and personnel at the hospital, etc.).
Like that stopped the coverup of 9/11....
steyr_m
14th February 2015, 05:58 PM
I read it and I must say it is pretty convincing.
Thanks, maybe I'll give it some time...
Neuro
25th June 2017, 12:19 PM
Think of all the parties who would have to keep their mouths shut for 35 years (the witnesses to this supposed fake event - or those who would have been in place to witness the event yet didn't see anything remotely like that happen, e.g. the people who were hanging out at the scene and personnel at the hospital, etc.).
Well here is the interview with the attending physician at the hospital, where "John Lennon" was brought after being shot.
Amazingly the Dr didn't recognize him, even though they were neighbors and personally aquatinted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbNg805zwuY&feature=share
In the interview he also admitted destroying every physical evidence that John Lennon had been there, including blood stained nurses uniforms, and the medical records were sealed and hidden away in a vault. I think this adds to the credibility of the theory that John Lennon wasn't murdered by Mark Chapman.
Neuro
25th June 2017, 12:29 PM
Here's a theory that John Lennon faked his death, and possibly now appears as a guy named Mark Staycer:
http://mileswmathis.com/lennon.pdf
Hatha
Bump! Read this if you didn't already do it. I think it is very convincing information that John Lennon is still alive and that he played a Lennon impersonator called Mark Staycer in a movie called "Let him be", which was essentially buried immediately after its premier in 2009.
Stop Making Cents
25th June 2017, 03:21 PM
I hate the Beatles - their music is absolute garbage. How did the boomers become so enamored with these faggots? I honestly don't get it.
Glass
25th June 2017, 05:38 PM
I hate the Beatles - their music is absolute garbage. How did the boomers become so enamored with these faggots? I honestly don't get it.
propaganda aka marketing. That was one of the objectives of the Beatles. Fine tune techniques to influence the minds of the masses.
The music took a distinctive turn after Paul died. They went straight into Alister Crowley (Pepper) mode after that. Yellow Submarine and Stg Peppers came along almost immediately. Both heavy in praise to Crowley.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.