PDA

View Full Version : Why The Elite Want Riots In America



Hatha Sunahara
12th February 2013, 10:06 AM
I remember Greg Palast's Article where he described the IMF riot. It was about the Neoliberal Takeover Strategy. I can't wait for part 2 of this article.

Hatha



http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/february2013/110213_banking_elite.htm


Why The Banking Elite Want Riots in America
Civil War 2: The economic imperative for mass social unrest


Every indication clearly suggests that authorities in the United States are preparing for widespread civil unrest. This trend has not emerged by accident - it is part of a tried and tested method used by the banking elite to seize control of nations, strip them of their assets, and absorb them into the new world order.
There is a crucial economic imperative as to why the elite is seeking to engineer and exploit social unrest.
As respected investigative reporter Greg Palast exposed in 2001 (http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2001/apr/29/business.mbas), the global banking elite, namely the World Bank and the IMF, have honed a technique that has allowed them to asset-strip numerous other countries in the past - that technique has come to be known at the "IMF riot."
In April 2001, Palast obtained leaked World Bank documents that outlined a four step process on how to loot nations of their wealth and infrastructure, placing control of resources into the hands of the banking elite.
One of the final steps of the process, the "IMF riot," detailed how the elite would plan for mass civil unrest ahead of time that would have the effect of scaring off investors and causing government bankruptcies.
"This economic arson has its bright side - for foreigners, who can then pick off remaining assets at fire sale prices," writes Palast, adding, "A pattern emerges. There are lots of losers but the clear winners seem to be the western banks and US Treasury."
In other words, the banking elite creates the very economic environment - soaring interest rates, spiraling food prices, poverty, lower standards of living - that precipitates civil unrest - and then like a vulture swoops down to devour what remains of the country's assets on the cheap.
We have already seen this process unfold in places like Bolivia, Ecuador, Indonesia, Greece and Argentina. Next on the chopping block are Spain, Italy, Britain and France - all of which have seen widespread riots over the last two years.
As Ha-Joon Chang explains in the Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/28/europe-riots-root-imf-austerity), the roots of Europe's riots were sparked by "governments inflicting an old-IMF-style programme on their own populations," namely the same programs of "austerity, privatisation and deregulation," that caused the riots of the 80's and 90's in poorer countries.
Although the likes of the IMF and the World Bank have pillaged half of the globe with their economic terrorism, America remains the ultimate prize. The first step of the four step process for bankster seizure of a country - privatization of state-owned assets - is already well under way in America, with infrastructure being sold off to foreign corporations (http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/our-politicians-are-selling-off-pieces-of-america-to-foreign-investors-and-goldman-sachs-is-helping-them-do-it), with the aid of Goldman Sachs, at a frightening pace.
A key component of the banking elite's insidious agenda to bring about an economic collapse in America by design also centers around the process of de-industrializing the country, eviscerating the nation's platform for self-sufficiency and replacing it with dependence on banker bailouts. This has already been largely achieved in Europe - with just about every major economy on the continent run by Goldman Sachs-affiliated technocrats (http://www.infowars.com/goldman-sachs-completes-economic-takeover-of-europe/).
In the United States, 32 per cent of manufacturing jobs have been lost since 2000, while 56,000 manufacturing facilities have been mothballed since 2001. The Obama administration has also declared war on the coal industry, with Obama himself promising to "bankrupt" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpTIhyMa-Nw) anyone who tries to build a new coal plant. Meanwhile, China builds a new coal plant every two weeks.
Given the clear economic motive for stirring unrest in the United States, we'd expect to see preparations for domestic disorder in numerous different guises - and indeed the signs are everywhere.
National Defense Authorization Act
The Obama administration's passage of NDAA legislation (http://www.policymic.com/articles/20835/why-the-ndaa-bill-is-even-scarier-than-you-thought) that authorizes kidnapping and indefinite detention without trial of American citizens on U.S. soil serves to create the framework for mass arrests of protesters and journalists in a time of declared national emergency.
Obama's War on Whistleblowers
The Obama administration's brazen and aggressive prosecution of whistleblowers (http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/06/obamas-whistleblowers-stuxnet-leaks-drones) for divulging government corruption in the public interest is clearly a device designed to intimidate whistleblowers from speaking out when the proverbial hits the fan.
Spying on Social Media for Signs of Unrest
The Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies are actively engaged in spying on social media (http://www.prisonplanet.com/dhs-stonewalls-congress-on-social-media-spying.html) as well as news websites to look for reports or comments that “reflect adversely on the U.S. government and the DHS.” The government is on the lookout for the 'tipping point' when heated online rhetoric spills onto the streets in the form of unrest.
Building Huge Spy Centers to Track Unrest
The NSA is building the country's biggest spy center (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/all/) in the middle of the Utah desert. The purpose of the data facility is to intercept, "all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails—parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital “pocket litter.”
By creating a gigantic database of every communication imaginable, the NSA hopes to monitor and pre-empt the spread of mass civil unrest in America.
Preparing Drones for Domestic Oppression
Last week, the Justice Department re-affirmed its position (http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/features/us/jan-june13/drones_02-06.html) that the Obama administration can use armed drones to assassinate Americans. Under the NDAA, the whole of the United States has been declared a "battlefield," (http://www.thepoliticalguide.com/Issues/2012_NDAA/) meaning that drones may soon be used to execute American citizens on U.S. soil.
A government that resorts to killing its own citizens without any legal process whatsoever is clearly a dictatorship engaged in domestic oppression. The only imaginable scenario under which this program would be justifiable was if the U.S. was under a state of martial law and the government was on the verge of collapse.
Preparing for Martial Law
The Department of Homeland Security has purchased over 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition (http://www.infowars.com/dhs-purchases-200-million-more-rounds-of-ammunition/) in the last 10 months alone. At the height of combat operations in Iraq, the U.S. Army only used 5.5 million bullets a month. Why has the DHS stockpiled enough bullets for a 30 year war if it is not preparing for some form of domestic disorder?
Preparation for martial law can be seen in numerous different guises, but perhaps the most chilling is a nationwide FEMA program (http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2007/160807_quell_dissent.htm) which is training pastors and other religious representatives to become secret police enforcers who teach their congregations to "obey the government" in preparation for the implementation of martial law, property and firearm seizures, mass vaccination programs and forced relocation.
Characterizing the American People as the New Target of the War on Terror
The U.S. Army’s Operating Concept 2016-2028 dictates that the military’s “full spectrum operations” will include “operations within American borders.” Scenarios where Americans form into militia groups and become "insurrectionists" as a result of an economic collapse and have to be eliminated by the U.S. Army have already been mapped out (http://www.infowars.com/u-s-army-to-be-used-against-insurrectionist-tea-party/) by military planners.
A leaked U.S. Army manual (http://www.infowars.com/army-manual-outlines-plan-to-kill-rioters-in-america/) also reveals plans for the military to carry out “Civil Disturbance Operations” during which troops will be used domestically to quell riots, confiscate firearms and even kill Americans on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.
The Department of Homeland Security's 'See Something, Say Something' program habitually portrays middle class Americans as terrorists (http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/). In addition, numerous DHS-funded reports have characterized "liberty lovers" (http://www.infowars.com/homeland-security-report-lists-liberty-lovers-as-terrorists/) and other constitutionalists as domestic terrorists.
Every indication presents us with the inescapable reality that the US government is preparing for mass civil unrest at some point over the next five to ten years. When we look at the recent history of nations that have suffered financial collapse, domestic disorder is clearly a key component of a deliberate agenda on behalf of the banking elite to undermine and loot economies - confiscating national sovereignty in the process.
In Part 2, we'll explore why the elite, although keen on provoking mass social unrest and even civil war, are destined to lose the battle.

Libertytree
12th February 2013, 10:30 AM
I too am looking forward to part 2. Thanks.

Hatha Sunahara
12th February 2013, 10:50 AM
Here's a link to Palast's 2001 article in which he described the IMF riot.

http://www.gregpalast.com/the-globalizer-who-came-in-from-the-cold/

The only thing that is new here is that it looks like America is the target. Back when I first read this, I thought "This is what we're doing to all these third world countries." Now I am completely aware that it is not 'we' that's doing it to them. It's the bankers that are doing it to everybody.


Hatha

Libertytree
12th February 2013, 10:56 AM
The term "economic hit men" comes to mind, only on a much more well thought out and grander scheme. Hey, they've had a LOT of practice.

gunDriller
12th February 2013, 12:13 PM
The term "economic hit men" comes to mind, only on a much more well thought out and grander scheme. Hey, they've had a LOT of practice.

Can't do Disaster Capitalism without Disasters !

And if there's no natural disasters to profit from, we'll just have to have some man-made disasters (BP Oil Spill, 9-11, and to some extent Fukushima.)

Cebu_4_2
12th February 2013, 02:26 PM
Don't forget HAARP causing disasters.

Twisted Titan
14th February 2013, 01:46 AM
Greg Palast??

Ask him about the zionist connection to 911 and watch him squirm

Serpo
14th February 2013, 02:01 AM
These creeps make me absolutely sick, they are so selfish ,power crazy and delirious.The world would be a far better place without them and they know it.

Hatha Sunahara
14th February 2013, 08:07 PM
Here's Part 2--about why the elite would lose a civil war:

http://www.infowars.com/why-the-elite-would-lose-a-civil-war/



Why The Elite Would Lose a Civil War (http://www.infowars.com/why-the-elite-would-lose-a-civil-war/) Manufacturing mass social unrest would be a foolish mistake
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Infowars.com
February 14, 2013

Despite the fact that the banking elite wants to generate riots and stir social disorder in order to collapse the U.S. economy so they can buy up real assets on the cheap, if such chaos was to spill over into a full blown civil war, the consequences for the technocrats would be disastrous.
In part one (http://www.infowars.com/why-the-banking-elite-wants-riots-in-america/) we explored why the elite routinely generate civil unrest in countries as a tactic of driving down confidence, scaring away investors and setting themselves up as the saviors in order to loot what’s left of the economy for next to nothing.
We also documented how authorities in America are clearly in a preparatory phase for mass civil unrest to break out within the next 5-10 years.
However, basic figures, along with the lessons of recent history, clearly suggest that should such disorder spiral into a new civil war, which many suggest is the very outcome federal agencies are gearing up for (http://www.infowars.com/are-the-feds-preparing-for-civil-war/) (the DHS alone has purchased enough bullets (http://www.infowars.com/dhs-purchases-200-million-more-rounds-of-ammunition/) to wage a 30 year conflict), the result for the elite is inevitable failure.
It is imperative to stress that ordinary Americans do not want a civil war. This is not something we or anyone we associate with is actively calling to initiate. This is simply a warning to the power structure that their policies are setting the stage for this very outcome – and it’s not going to end well for them.
Al Sharpton recently suggested that Americans should accept government regulation of the Second Amendment because the primary reason the founders put the right to bear arms in the constitution – to defend against government tyranny – is no longer applicable. Sharpton brazenly implied that the government would just be able to drone strike all Americans who resisted being disarmed.
“First of all, if the government were to come to disarm you, you would not be able to use an automatic weapon to defend yourself. Let’s be serious. We’re in a world of drones now so the Second Amendment would not help you in that area. It is absurd to try to cite that,” said Sharpton (http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/27/sharpton-on-2nd-amendment-people-do-not-have-the-right-to-unregulated-rights-in-this-country-video/).
In reality, even if a tiny minority of armed Americans chose to resist government oppression – the odds would be stacked hugely in their favor.
Consider the fact that there are almost 100 million gun owners in the United States, who in total own over 300 million firearms and rising.
There are only around 1.4 million active duty personnel in the entire US military – that includes the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force and Coast Guard. Even if you include national guard reserves, the total figure is less than 2.3 million.
Even if just five per cent of American gun owners actively resisted in a civil war, that would be five million Americans – more than double the entire US military and national guard, many of whom are already engaged overseas. So even if the government used the military to fire upon U.S. citizens, the troops would be easily outnumbered.
Consider the recent story about the manhunt for former LAPD officer Christopher Dorner.
It took the vast resources and manpower of the Los Angeles Police Department and numerous other law enforcement bodies and federal agencies over a week to track down one guy - one guy!
As part of that manhunt, LAPD officers showed themselves to be bumbling incompetents – engaging in frenzied shootings of innocent people (http://www.naturalnews.com/039061_Christopher_Dorner_LAPD_execution.html) who looked nothing like Dorner and eventually having to burn Dorner alive inside a cabin in order to apprehend him.
If it takes the LAPD over a week to find and kill one guy, how much effort do you think would be required to disarm or kill 100 million American gun owners without meaningful resistance?
Consider the US occupation of Afghanistan that has now entered its 12th year.
A total of almost 500,000 coalition forces and Afghan National Security Forces have failed to defeat Taliban insurgents numbering just 25,000 – a ratio of 20 to 1 – in over 12 years of combat operations.
If the finest of the US military and their allies cannot defeat 25,000 ragtag insurgents in 12 years, how on earth are 100 million Americans going to be subdued?
Consider the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
17,000 troops working on the grounds of the Baghdad Airport couldn’t even secure the road (http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/1009/p01s05-woiq.html) leading to the airport months after the invasion.
If 17,000 troops can’t even control a single road, how does the government plan to successfully occupy an entire country in the event of martial law?
When a population is under occupation and they are being oppressed, the zeal for resistance knows no bounds.
Victory is achieved by refusing to submit – resistance is victory.
The banking elite which controls the US government – the same elite that has engineered riots in other countries – most recently Greece – as part of a process of turning those nations into empty vassals that can be easily looted for their wealth, infrastructure and resources, must realize that it cannot win a civil war in the United States.
Such an eventuality would result in massive bloodshed on both sides – and the elite simply doesn’t have the numbers to claim victory.
This is a warning to the technocrats – do not try to divide and conquer the American people, the police, and the military. Stop characterizing patriotic, freedom loving Americans as domestic terrorists. Do not try to initiate a civil war that would achieve nothing but carnage and a sustained breakdown of society.
As top constitutional scholars like Dr. Edwin Vieira (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyJYpI71h20) and Lew Rockwell (http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/127226.html) have noted, one of the reasons why the federal government is so petrified of the American people rising up to re-assert their God-given rights in the face of an establishment which is arming to the teeth against them, is the threat posed to their illegal power monopoly by the prospect of secession.
Secession is not about destroying America, it is about reinvigorating America as the founders envisioned it, and in the process disengaging from the very forces – the offshore banking elite – who are themselves working feverishly to destroy America so that they may be the first to slice up and devour the dead carcass of a once great nation, just as they have done to numerous other countries (http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2001/apr/29/business.mbas) over the last three decades.