Conspiracy Theory

[Cebu_4_2]

http://www.thedailybell.com/images/the-daily-bell-top-logo6.jpg Conspiracy Theory Conspiracy theory is a phrase used to refer to any putative conspiracy. Today, it is used by some – over and over – to discredit those who claim that there is an Anglo-American (http://www.thedailybell.com/floatWindow.cfm?id=956) power elite (http://www.thedailybell.com/floatWindow.cfm?id=610) intent on taking over the world. There very obviously is a New World Order (http://www.thedailybell.com/floatWindow.cfm?id=2045) taking shape today. But the more people try to mention it, the more the words "Conspiracy Theory" are used to denigrate their perceptions.
The main criticism of those who try to explain today's world events is that they have "no proof." Of course, there is rarely hard proof because the powers-that-be run the intelligence agencies that would provide the proof and own the mainstream media (http://www.thedailybell.com/floatWindow.cfm?id=1861) that would tend to investigate but instead ignore patterns that are clearly globalist.
In fact, the conspiracy actually lies with those who continually suppress evidence about what is going on. The patterns are unmistakable even if the proof is not immediately at hand. Ironically, when the proof does surface, as with global warming (http://www.thedailybell.com/floatWindow.cfm?id=1919) emails that showed clearly there was a cover-up underway – to suppress evidence that did not support global warming – such evidence is not examined by the mainstream press but in a sense suppressed.
Despite the best efforts of the Anglo-American power elite to suppress evidence of their New World Order conspiracy the Internet has virtually blown up the secrecy with which they have operated. This has put the elite into the odd position of denying what is clearly evident on the Internet itself – thousands of blogs and alternative news services now track the unfolding globalization of money power (http://www.thedailybell.com/floatWindow.cfm?id=1863).
Today there is a world court, an international political body (the UN (http://www.thedailybell.com/floatWindow.cfm?id=1848)) and the International Monetary Fund (http://www.thedailybell.com/floatWindow.cfm?id=1823) is attempting to set up a world currency. Still, the powers-that-be deny that the world is centralizing or that the goal is one-world government. There is a European Union (http://www.thedailybell.com/floatWindow.cfm?id=1891), an African Union, Union of South American Nations, Association of South East Nations, and many believe that a Union of the Americas is on its way shortly. The power elite denies such plans and claims that those who are presenting such arguments have no proof and are merely indulging in fanciful flights of fancy.
In fact, these arguments might have obfuscated the issue several decades ago but today people are beginning to get angry about their financial and political situation versus money power. As problems deepen more and more people will turn to the Internet and alternative media (http://www.thedailybell.com/floatWindow.cfm?id=723) to find out what is actually occurring in the world. Protestations that such information constitutes a conspiracy will likely be less and less effective. Conspiracy Theory may come into its own.

[osoab]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_5nIEnR2J0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_5nIEnR2J0

[Serpo]

Except its no theory anymore.............its straight out CONSPIRACY

[vacuum]

This article seems to be about one single conspiracy theory, rather than conspiracy theories in general.

[Santa]

The act of denigrating any given conspiracy theory aught to be known henceforth as "joobooing."

[joboo]

The act of denigrating any given conspiracy theory aught to be known henceforth as "joobooing."

Your perception seems to be off again. I only take issue with the far fetched angles.

Some people love to run away with everthing they see that counters the official narrative as undeniable truth. This simply ins't the case, and these types of people are, by and large, off their rocker. All information needs to be properly scrutinized before reaching a conclusion either way. If the logic simply does not pan out as being realistic, then something is wrong with the theory.

Seems pretty obvious no?

[Cebu_4_2]

Your perception seems to be off again. I only take issue with the far fetched angles.

Some people love to run away with everthing they see that counters the official narrative as undeniable truth. This simply ins't the case, and these types of people are, by and large, off their rocker. All information needs to be properly scrutinized before reaching a conclusion either way. If the logic simply does not pan out as being realistic, then something is wrong with the theory.

Seems pretty obvious no?

If YOUR logic doesn't pan out then it could possibly go farther then your Jooiss can comprehend. Still doesn't automatically conclude it as false. Such as the proven video of Jackie blowing Johns brains out, right in front of your eyes. See you guys get paid to fuck up real forums and have a certain amount of minimum transactions to get paid in said forums. You can admit when you are wrong and still get paid but for whatever your reason you are programmed to just fuck up decent forums.

[joboo]

If YOUR logic doesn't pan out then it could possibly go farther then your Jooiss can comprehend. Still doesn't automatically conclude it as false. Such as the proven video of Jackie blowing Johns brains out, right in front of your eyes. See you guys get paid to fuck up real forums and have a certain amount of minimum transactions to get paid in said forums. You can admit when you are wrong and still get paid but for whatever your reason you are programmed to just fuck up decent forums.

Straight up dude, I think you're out of your mind. Something fell off the deep end somewhere, and it aint pretty.

Whatever is going on up there strikes me as a logistical disaster.

Sorry if you find that offensive, but I'm the type of person that says what's on my mind, and I'm not a huge fan of being politically correct with terminology.

[Hatha Sunahara]

What we call conspiracy theories are the perceptions of occult forces influencing historical events that alter the course of history. Our expectations are that in a democracy, it is the majority that make decisions about the direction the society will take (however stupidly it happens). What we see as the determining forces of history are usurpations of that power by a tiny minority operating behind the scenes. Conspiracy theories are attempts to discern just what is going on behind the scenes. Try to wrap that description around the Kennedy Assassination, The Martin Luther King Assassination, The Lincoln Assassination, the Federal Reserve Act, 911, The Patriot Act, The Homeland Security Act, The NDAA. All of them are usurpations of the 'overt' power structure.

We have of course, the tiny minority that controls everything paying people to discredit these musings about what really happened. We see it right here on this very thread. All these directed history events have nothing to do with the people who own and control everything. Just watch our shills and trolls deny that we have a police state and a tyranny swallowing us up this very moment. Everything is normal and natural according to them. All you sheep need to go back to sleep. Nothing to see here. Move along.


Hatha

[PatColo]

Thursday, May 9, 2013


Are "conspiracy theories" gaining traction? (http://www.john-friend.net/2013/05/are-conspiracy-theories-gaining-traction.html)








"... let us never tolerate outrageous 'conspiracy theories' concerning the attacks of September the 11th, malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves..."

- Former President George W. Bush, speaking (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K5M0xtxQVQ) at the United Nations

The rise of the internet and blogosphere, social media outlets like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, and a government and media increasingly blatant in their collusion to deceive and propagandize the American public has led to a gradual public acceptance (or at least an entertainment) of "conspiracy theories" - which the mainstream Jewish-controlled media generally presents as any alternative explanation or interpretation of reality opposing, criticizing, or contradicting the "official narrative" of past and current events.

In fact, a "conspiracy" is simply two or more individuals acting covertly to carry out an illicit, nefarious, or illegal end, often using deception and treachery, while a "theory" is merely an informed, yet hypothetical proposition explaining a phenomenon or "a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation," according to Dictionary.com (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/theory?s=t). We see conspiracies taking place on a daily basis (robbery or theft, embezzlement, bribery, fraud, etc.), and many serious, professional people (police officers, detectives, lawyers, judges, etc.) theorize about them in order to solve and prevent crimes.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-OhXVvC_PcLQ/UYdnYiWCTeI/AAAAAAAABSY/53e9lPsLCBk/s320/Quiet%21.jpg (http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-OhXVvC_PcLQ/UYdnYiWCTeI/AAAAAAAABSY/53e9lPsLCBk/s1600/Quiet%21.jpg)

And yet, being labeled a "conspiracy theorist" has traditionally been on par with being labeled a "racist" or an "anti-Semite" - labels most individuals and organizations seek to avoid like the plague. The very idea that an individual could have an alternative or critical thought about the "official narrative" of any given event, past or present, has been equated with "hate" and "insanity." Indeed, thinking critically - examining all available information and hypotheses, using logic, and thinking independently - is demonized not only in the mainstream mass media, but also in our formal educational establishment. People that think for themselves are often portrayed and thought of as "dangerous subversives," "crazed conspiracy theorists," and "irrational hate mongers" - dismissed or ignored by the vast majority of Americans. But it appears the times are changing, finally.

The mainstream Jewish-controlled mass media in the United States, and much of the Western world, has distorted the actual meaning of "conspiracy theory" and transformed it into a derogatory propagandistic term, which is used to demonize, ostracize, and ultimately discredit any critical thinker actually trying to figure out what is what. However, overusing the term "conspiracy theory" or "conspiracy theorist" has ultimately discredited the very propagandistic term the media and public officials have developed and utilized so well in the past - same regarding the propagandistic term "racist" and "anti-Semite." When you use and apply terms like these to so many people for so many baseless, ridiculous reasons, the propagandistic effect starts to lose its value.

It appears that ever since Dr. Kevin Barrett pointed out (http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/04/17/298720/falseflag-meme-surrounds-boston-blasts/) that the phrase "false-flag" - a term often associated with the propagandistic label "conspiracy theory" - has essentially become mainstream, especially after the recent Boston "bombing", many mass media news outlets (including many Jewish news outlets) have had to address the broader public acceptance of the fact that "conspiracy theories" are in fact legitimate explanations of past and current events, painting a much more accurate (if not totally accurate) picture of reality and offering a much more plausible, coherent explanation of various happenings. Before addressing the mainstream mass media reaction to the wider public acceptable of various "conspiracy theories," I'd first like to discuss the alternative media and "conspiracy industry" - the wide array of voices and personalities offering explanations and interpretations of events most would describe as "conspiracy theories."

A problem confronting many people seeking alternative explanations or views on past and current events is the wide variety of individuals and websites in the alternative media presenting or discussing what are commonly known as "conspiracy theories." It becomes extremely difficult to objectively assess all the information out there and make sense of it all. Many individuals in the alternative media appear to be more interested in rankings, popularity, and/or making a profit than getting to the truth and presenting an accurate picture of reality.



http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Gi8XvCRE3GI/UYx-KCUdzfI/AAAAAAAABUU/XNMy3VfKjLs/s1600/ZCF.jpg (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Gi8XvCRE3GI/UYx-KCUdzfI/AAAAAAAABUU/XNMy3VfKjLs/s1600/ZCF.jpg)


The Jews are behind virtually every "conspiracy theory"
you read about on the internet, despite
what Alex Jones and others say.




Numerous individuals and websites promote quite fanciful, and oftentimes ridiculous, "conspiracy theories" about myriad subjects, and either ignore, downplay, or cover up the fact that organized international Jewry sits atop the global power structure, directing and advancing the tyrannical policies we see all around the world. Popular alternative media personalities, such as Alex Jones, constantly refer to "The New World Order" and elitist plans to implement a tyrannical global government, eliminating national sovereignty, free speech, and other Natural Rights endowed by the Creator. However, many of these disingenuous propagandists fail to mention - whether purposefully or not - the fact that organized international Jewry is the driving force behind the entire "New World Order" conspiracy and most other false flag, PSYOP-style events (http://www.john-friend.net/2013/04/understanding-false-flags-psyops-and.html) we've seen over the past 10+ years, including 9/11. Most alternative media personalities and those involved in the "conspiracy industry" are simply too afraid or too compromised to address the fact that virtually every "conspiracy" is organized and directed by one particular group of people and their political entity - international Jewry and Zionist Israel.

The prime beneficiary of the various "conspiracies" you can learn about in the alternative media is the criminal, terrorist state of "Israel" and the international network of Jewish criminals largely controlling the Western world - politically, economically, and culturally. Yet these facts are not openly or widely discussed and explained, even in the alternative media. And when they are, there are repercussions (http://therebel.org/kaminski/639068-kaminski-booted-off-yet-another-network), often quite negative (http://www.john-friend.net/2013/03/a-note-to-readers.html).

In any case, Ynetnews (http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4373651,00.html) recently reported that the Israeli embassy is crying and complaining to U.S. officials that television shows like "Veep" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veep_%28TV_series%29) and "House of Cards" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Cards_%28U.S._TV_series%29) are "critical of Israel." The Israeli daily quoted a "source" from the Israeli embassy as saying, presumably with a straight face:


"These series present Israel as a country which one should be very careful not to offend, and that anyone daring to criticize it is reprimanded by the Jewish lobby," a senior state official says. "This justifies all conspiracy theories about the Israeli and Jewish control of American politics."



Isn't this type of pathetic drivel insulting? It is quite obvious that "anyone daring to criticize" Israel in American politics or high society is in fact "reprimanded by the Jewish lobby," oftentimes getting run out of politics, financially and socially ruined, or even murdered. Also notice, the Israeli embassy official quoted in this story simply invokes "conspiracy theories about the Israeli and Jewish control of American politics," as if that's also not demonstrably provable in numerous cases, in an attempt to discredit or demonize any sort of criticism or "conspiracy theorizing" (i.e., thinking critically) relating to Israeli and Jewish power.

The Jews openly control American politics - it's no secret anymore folks: the Israel/Jewish lobby is the most powerful force in Washington D.C. and Israel gets unwavering financial, political, and diplomatic support from the United States. Almost all key positions of power in the United States federal government - in the White House, in Congress, in the Supreme Court, etc. - are controlled by Jews, many of whom have or are suspected of having dual citizenship with the terrorist state of Israel. There is no "conspiracy theory" here - it is a fact the Jews control America.

The extremely subversive and degenerate website Salon.com (http://www.salon.com/topic/conspiracy_theorists/) routinely "investigates" and "exposes" individuals that think, write, and speak critically about issues commonly understood as "conspiracy theories." Many mainstream (http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/08/the-psychology-of-conspiracy-theories/) websites (http://gawker.com/tag/conspiracy-theories) from a wide variety (http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842) of viewpoints (http://www.realclearhistory.com/2011/09/28/debunking_jfk_conspiracy_myths_307.html) regularly cover "conspiracy theories" in an attempt to demonize any sort of questioning of the official line. The Atlantic (http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/04/12-million-americans-believe-lizard-people-run-our-country/63799/) recently ran this ridiculous headline:



http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-w0hbNjoFPTE/UYdddhPm1hI/AAAAAAAABSA/DZcWYpRbw6s/s400/Picture+1.jpg (http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-w0hbNjoFPTE/UYdddhPm1hI/AAAAAAAABSA/DZcWYpRbw6s/s1600/Picture+1.jpg)


Really? The Atlantic is attempting to discredit all "conspiracy theories" by associating them with the ridiculous shape shifting lizards theory. Do they think we're all that stupid?


Perhaps the most revealing recent article relating to "conspiracy theories" came from none other than The Times of Israel (http://www.timesofisrael.com/why-do-jews-and-israel-so-often-feature-at-center-of-conspiracy-theories/), a mainstream Israeli online daily. Here's the headline:



http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hbPmsHPjqlY/UYr0_X8ikYI/AAAAAAAABTI/FDfCqY5MZAY/s400/Jewish+Conspiracies.jpg

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hbPmsHPjqlY/UYr0_X8ikYI/AAAAAAAABTI/FDfCqY5MZAY/s1600/Jewish+Conspiracies.jpg)


I'd like to highlight some key excerpts of this article and offer my commentary. As I said, this article is quite revealing for a number of reasons. The article (http://www.timesofisrael.com/why-do-jews-and-israel-so-often-feature-at-center-of-conspiracy-theories/) begins:


Whether it’s the Boston Marathon bombings, the cold-blooded murder of 20 schoolchildren in Connecticut, or the definitive American tragedy of this generation, 9/11, one thing is certain — a cottage industry will arise claiming the event was perpetrated or staged by Jews or Israelis for some nefarious purpose.

A new study out this week (http://publicmind.fdu.edu/2013/guncontrol/) — more than four months after a gunman massacred 20 children and six educators at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut — finds that one-quarter (25 percent) of Americans believe facts about the shooting are being hidden by the government or media and an additional 11% are unsure.

“That’s a terrifying number,” says Farleigh Dickinson University professor Dan Cassino, who commissioned the poll.

“There is a huge swell of theories claiming [Sandy Hook] was faked,” he says. “It’s easy to deride these sorts of conspiracy theories, but they seem to have found an audience.” [...]



Gasp! Professor Cassino is "terrified" more and more Americans are using their brain and thinking critically and independently about important subjects and events. The fact of the matter is that there is absolutely no reason for any rational individual to actually believe there even was a shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School, let alone that 20 children and 6 adults were murdered. The other events mentioned - the recent Boston "bombings" and 9/11 - and the "official narrative" explaining them are so absurd and ridiculous, any person blindly supporting or believing the government and media version of these events is simply ignorant or compromised. And yet, "experts" like Professor Cassino would have us believe people even questioning these events are the bad guys.

The article continues:
But why are Jews so often the subject of conspiracy theories?

Cassino says Jews are blamed for misfortunes today for much the same reason they’ve been blamed for centuries.

“There is a perception of Jews as the Other — a part of society, but still somehow foreign. Couple that with resentment over Jewish success in certain areas of society, and they’ll be blamed for things that are otherwise just ineffable.”

Michael Barkun, a Syracuse University professor emeritus and author of “A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America,” says conspiracy theorists are guided by three main beliefs: nothing happens by accident; everything is connected; and nothing is as it seems.

“If that’s your view of the world, then appearances can’t be trusted. There has to be some hidden reality and linkings that have to be exposed,” he says.

According to Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center, “Conspiracy theories are the way weak minds deal with complex situations.” He calls America “probably the most conspiracy-oriented country in the world” and says the problem has gotten worse in recent years.

Why? The Internet.

“The Internet is the perfect place to incubate conspiracy theories,” says Rabbi Abraham Cooper of the Simon Wiesenthal Center. “Old ones like ‘The Protocols of the Elders of Zion’ and new ones like the Zionists and the CIA engineered 9/11.”

He says many conspiracy theories of the past died out as those who promulgated them tended to be isolated and unable to reach larger audiences. [...]



You'll notice that the various "experts" and "scholars" paraded in front of the cameras and quoted in the mainstream mass media to "debunk the conspiracy theorists" never actually address the legitimate facts independent investigators bring to light that contradict the "official narrative" of past and current events. They will never engage in an open debate or dialogue. Their tactics are intellectually dishonest and cowardly. And it's becoming obvious, even to the most deluded. Do they really think they can continue to get away with this sort of nonsense?

As more and more people around the world start to recognize the reality of the situation we find ourselves in, the global power elite - dominated largely by international Jewry - will continue their efforts to discredit and marginalize independent researchers and activists engaging in critical thinking (i.e., "conspiracy theorizing"), albeit to no avail. Drastic measures to silence critics of Jewry and those engaging in historical revisionism have been outlined, even by the federal government of the United States (http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/40258.htm). Just the other day, the World Jewish Congress approved a resolution (http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/wjc-approves-resolution-calling-for-ban-of-public-holocaust-denial.premium-1.519763) calling for a ban on public "Holocaust" denial - which basically means a ban on anyone who has actually objectively investigated the alleged Jewish "Holocaust" narrative, and concluded the obvious: it is a gigantic hoax.










http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9rrTmOs_bY0/UYtNGB59x5I/AAAAAAAABTc/TgnLutc3H3E/s400/Holohoax+denial.jpg (http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9rrTmOs_bY0/UYtNGB59x5I/AAAAAAAABTc/TgnLutc3H3E/s1600/Holohoax+denial.jpg)

Can you tell how desperate these people are getting?

What seems clear to me is the cat is out of the bag at this point: millions of people are understanding that "conspiracy theories" often do in fact paint a much more accurate and realistic assessment of past and current events as opposed to the "official narrative" vigorously propounded by the controlled mainstream mass media and political establishment. The primary weapon in the arsenal of the tyrants controlling the world, those criminal forces pushing for a "New World Order" on every front, is their control of information. Many people are seeing through the artificial reality promulgated by the Jewish controlled mainstream media and "entertainment" industry, and many more are starting to ask questions. Let's hope they find truthful voices in the alternative media to guide them in their pursuit of the truth.


Posted by John Friend (http://www.blogger.com/profile/17331636747072636125) at 10:37 PM 11 comments: (http://www.john-friend.net/2013/05/are-conspiracy-theories-gaining-traction.html#comment-form)

[Horn]

IMO, there will be order in the end, though it will not be of the coerced or manipulated variety.

Once man wakes up to himself through communication such that it (order) remains a universal constant law. There's nothing "they" can do to speed or hinder the process towards their favor. It will be their demise.

Afterwards the human race might be able to get some real work done.

Nothing will be possible without Silver of course. :)

[PatColo]

Nothing will be possible without Silver of course. :)

Or toilet paper, Ponce would hasten to add.

Of course I'm more partial to the cool refreshing blast of a bum gun, myself. --H H--

http://seeyousoon.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Bum-Gun_2.jpg

[Serpo]

Yes well they are actually better,popular in Asia but you still need toilet paper.

[Cebu_4_2]

Man this thread went to shit.

[PatColo]

^ au contraire, with the bum gun, matters are pleasantly shit-free, cleaner than a cat's behind after it drops a deuce. :)

As to still needing TP, you surely mean to dry matters after the bum gun blasting. Problem with TP though is of course, it'll disintegrate on contact with the water, and leave the region like dingo ball town. :(

http://www.ssrfanatic.com/forum/attachments/f24/103721d1299518149-route-66-international-ssr-rally-sedona-car-show-rocks-dingleball.jpg

I guess if you're particular about "drying" matters after having your bum gun fun, you could use some sort of (cotton/cloth) hand towel; after all matters are clean like after a shower. Most people I know just yank up their shorts and move on- because you're talking about so little water there as it all naturally falls into the bowl (you use the gun while still sitting on the pot, never standing up between pinching off your big stinky fudge-dragon, and blasting the offending asshole shitless with the bum gun's cool & invigorating stream), it'll hardly make a momentary wet spot visible on your shorts, and certainly not enough to soak through to penetrate your outer pants.

Now, as everyone can plainly see, Horn's reply #11 is to blame for derailing this thread... bad Horn, bad! >:(

So back to CT shit now please, :D

[Tumbleweed]

I quit using toilet paper some time back. I bought a portable bidet from Boulder Bidet and it works very well. If you do a good job of washing there is only water left behind. I bought some cheap wash cloths at walmart to dry myself and just throw them in the washing machine when I'm done.

More information on the bidet at this link. http://boulderbidet.com/

[gunDriller]

I quit using toilet paper some time back.

same for me. got about a ton of rags at estate sales a few years ago, though actually it's more like boxes of fabric scraps.

when they have Done Their Duty, they go out in the side yard. giving The Bugs a chance to Feast on the Remains ... thereby stripping the rags clean.


but i always keep rolls of toilet paper handy, because i know how everybody is Very Particular about this particular human custom.

[PatColo]

^^ if you were a little 'ill' and made a real mess with lots of dirty splash-back, like:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpIGPVu8hVU

...would your Boulder Bidet have adequate capacity? Or would it need an inconvenient refill before you'd quite finished your hose-down?

[Bigjon]

http://www.totousa.com/ProductDetail.aspx?ProductID=298

Toto washlet is my brand, but you still need paper to check the accuracy of the job.

[gunDriller]

so is Toilet Paper just another Madison Avenue scam - to get back to the conspiracy theme ?

i know they didn't sell toilet paper 237 years ago. were the nation's founders all sitting on dirty butts when they signed the Declaration of Independence, or did they have an old-fashioned solution ?

my theory is that they used rags.

[Cebu_4_2]

my theory is that they used rags.

corn cobs

[gunDriller]

corn cobs

maybe - if all you had was corn cobs.

and to think, we were talking about Conspiracy Theory.

[Horn]

Ponce actually has both sides of this Conspiracy Theory covered, and hung out to dry.


Israel Water Authority dismisses claim as 'political weapon,'; says Palestinians breaching water agreement.

http://www.jpost.com/National-News/NGO-report-accuses-Israel-of-water-apartheid-309419

[Tumbleweed]

^^ if you were a little 'ill' and made a real mess with lots of dirty splash-back, like:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpIGPVu8hVU

...would your Boulder Bidet have adequate capacity? Or would it need an inconvenient refill before you'd quite finished your hose-down?

Generally one bottle is enough and two seem to be 99.9 % effective. Depends on your aim and technique.

[PatColo]

so is Toilet Paper just another Madison Avenue scam - to get back to the conspiracy theme ?

In the same spirit, take the South Park 9/11 Conspiracy episode. Was anyone else shocked by the "surprise ending", when it turned out NOT to be the jooboi (Kyle Broflovski (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyle_Broflovski)) who really layed the big mud monkey in the urinal?? :o


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nrr90RZhjDQ


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=552oMfm1NfA

[Horn]

We can't let this turd, I mean thread go down the toilet, Pat

The title is too good. :)

[PatColo]

Prof James Tracy of Memory Hole Blog (http://memoryholeblog.com/), came into prominence as a leading "academic" critic of the S.Hook & Boston psyops. <2 hour podcast interview here, just started listening:


July 6, 2013 (http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/07/06/cancel-the-cabal-july-3-2013/)
Cancel the Cabal, July 3, 2013 (http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/07/06/cancel-the-cabal-july-3-2013/) 6 (http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/07/06/cancel-the-cabal-july-3-2013/#comments)

Home (http://memoryholeblog.com/category/home/) • Tags: alternative media (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/alternative-media/), journalism (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/journalism/), conspiracy theory (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/conspiracy-theory/), police state (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/police-state/), social engineering (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/social-engineering/), public education (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/public-education/), academe

(http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/academe/)

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSoFKmFvznVNbzNFNM4KERe-wSLFysxwbJ0i5VjNzDEHmSxHlWG

James Tracy’s Wednesday July 3rd appearance (http://www.tnsradio.com/49/post/2013/07/professor-james-tracy-on-cancel-the-cabal.html) on Stephen Roberts’ Cancel The Cabal includes a far-reaching discussion addressing the public anxiety surrounding conspiracy research alongside the history of American public education, propaganda and media and government collusion.


Listen to MP3 of broadcast here (http://www.tnsradio.com/uploads/7/1/4/8/7148904/professor_james_tracy.mp3).


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=s5fVU1MGRHw#at=529

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=s5fVU1MGRHw#at=529

(http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=s5fVU1MGRHw#at=529)

Memory Hole Blog posts referenced or alluded to in discussion:
The Politics of Imagined Opinion (http://memoryholeblog.com/2012/03/10/the-politics-of-imagined-opinion/)
The Technocratization of Public Education (http://memoryholeblog.com/2012/06/13/the-technocratization-of-public-education/)
“Progressive” Journalism’s Legacy of Deceit (http://memoryholeblog.com/2012/07/20/progressive-medias-legacy-of-deceit/)
Useful Engines in the One World Schoolhouse (http://memoryholeblog.com/2012/10/19/useful-engines-in-the-one-world-schoolhouse/)
The Sandy Hook Massacre: Unanswered Questions and Missing Information (http://memoryholeblog.com/2012/12/24/the-sandy-hook-massacre-unanswered-questions-and-missing-information/)
James Tracy on Alex Jones w/Paul Joseph Watson (http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/01/21/james-tracy-on-the-alex-jones-show-wpaul-joseph-watson-january-18/)
Witnessing Boston’s Mass Casualty Event (http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/04/22/witnessing-bostons-mass-casualty-event/)
Why James Tracy Should Resign (http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/05/15/why-james-tracy-should-resign/)

[Cebu_4_2]

How is there enough time in the world for you to listen to all these long podcasts?

[PatColo]

^ no TV, and multi-tasking IE giving the podcasts my divided attn whilst doing something else. Can listen on MP3 player anytime (away from 'puter).

Thread: great truth radio podcast blog - no commercials! (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?60988-great-truth-radio-podcast-blog-no-commercials%21)

[PatColo]

New studies: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile (http://www.phantomreport.com/new-studies-conspiracy-theorists-sane-government-dupes-crazy-hostile)


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-EIaOFSZsmw8/Ucq6k9_iDlI/AAAAAAAACKg/CBlHvhsRB-A/s400/Futurama-Good-News.jpg (http://www.phantomreport.com/new-studies-conspiracy-theorists-sane-government-dupes-crazy-hostile)


& this time, it really is. (http://www.phantomreport.com/new-studies-conspiracy-theorists-sane-government-dupes-crazy-hostile)


Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.
The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

more: http://www.phantomreport.com/new-studies-conspiracy-theorists-sane-government-dupes-crazy-hostile

[aeondaze]

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.
The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

Who allowed for the funding of this clearly anti-estblishment research, heads will roll. Someone within tavistock or CIA is monitoring their activities as we speak. Can't have this sort of information spread far and wide, but we've all known this for years.

So much for that push to classify distrust of govenments and large institutions a psychological condition reqiring treatment. This paper will be disapeared and all funding ended pronto I imagine.

[aeondaze]

This is a great article here is a snipet,


Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”

Finally some recognition that we've been subject to psychological violence in relation to these matters. Who'd have thought the internet as a statistical tool would eventually vindicate the soundness of those that assert conspiracies are real based on agressive responses that have no basis in logic.

[PatColo]

New studies: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile (http://www.phantomreport.com/new-studies-conspiracy-theorists-sane-government-dupes-crazy-hostile)



Coast to Coast "pulls it" after Dr. Kevin Barrett query (http://libertyfight.com/2013/coast_to_coast_pulls_it_after_kevin_barrett_query. html)

Coast to Coast cancels conspiracy show at the last minute after Dr. Kevin Barrrett requests fair time to respond

By Martin Hill
LibertyFight.com (http://libertyfight.com)
August 2, 2013
Coast to Coast AM (http://www.coasttocoastam.com/), the internationally syndicated radio show and top late night ratings winner, has inexplicably "pulled it"- they cancelled an announced and publicized scheduled radio interview with conspiracy skeptic Dr. Michael J. Wood after Dr. Kevin Barrett asked for a chance to respond. It's important to note that Dr. Wood, a defender of the establishment line, was specifically invited on the program to discuss Dr. Barrett's article, s noted in the Coast to Coast announcement [screenshot below.]. The coast to coast announcement stated


"First Hour: A story by Kevin Barrett on PressTV.ir has interpreted a study as showing that conspiracists are "more sane" than conventionalists. However, that's not correct according to one of the study's authors, Mike Wood, from the School of Psychology at the University of Kent, Canterbury, U.K., who joins George Knapp to discuss the findings of his research. Further guest info, TBA."


But when Dr. Barrett contacted Coast to Coast requesting an opportunity to respond, Coast to Coast scrapped the entire program and instead ran a segment on whales and dolphins at the last minute! It's also noteworthy that Coast to Coast, while referring to Barrett's article on their website, neglected to even link to it.

On July 27, Barrett noted that Coast to Coast cancelled the scheduled show, which had been slated for July 28th:




Conspiracy Theorists OK: Government Dupes Clueless, Humorless (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/07/27/c2c-conspiracy/): "Coast to Coast Radio just canceled its plans to broadcast a show tonight on my widely-read Press TV article on research suggesting that “conspiracy theorists” are saner than government dupes. Here is the listing they just took down: Note that they did not even link my article!!! Apparently they had planned to give Michael Wood, the author of one of the studies I cited, a platform to attack my article – while refusing to even link the article, much less invite me on the air to defend it. When I protested, and asked that they allow me to defend my article, Coast to Coast decided to pull the show. They replaced it with a show on cetaceans: You don’t have to be a "paranoid conspiracy theorist" to wonder why Coast to Coast is so averse to giving me a fair hearing. Below is my new article rebutting Wood’s attack on my Press TV piece. -KB"


LibertyFight.com sent an inquiry to Dr. Michael Wood asking about this matter:

"Dr. Wood, Do you have any comment on why Coast to Coast yanked your scheduled and announced interview at the last minute, only after Barrett requested a fair time to respond? Given the fact that this all started from Barrett's article, why do you think they refused his offer of response or direct debate with you? Any theories on why they refused to link to the actual article which is the point of discussion? Additionally, would you be willing to debate Barrett directly on an hour-long live radio program?"


Dr. Wood responded





Dear Mr. Hill-
Thanks for the inquiry. I don't think it's accurate to say that "this all started from Barrett's article;" it started with my research, which C2C happened to find out about through Barrett's article. When they first contacted me, they had read Barrett's article and assumed that it was an accurate representation of the study, and wanted to have me on to talk about my research. When I told them that the article was inaccurate they said that was interesting in itself and wanted to talk further about what we'd found and how it lined up with the way it was portrayed in the alternative media. Controversy sells, I suppose, which is probably why they included a reference to the whole business in the show description.


When C2C called me to let me know that I'd been bumped in favour of the whale and dolphin show on the 29th, the producer said that they were just really excited to have the whale and dolphin people on ASAP so my interview had been pushed back a few weeks. They didn't say anything about Barrett, in fact until I read the article you linked I had no idea he'd contacted them at all.


Anyway, any interview about the study in question would involve addressing some of the media misrepresentations of it - it's part of publishing research that's in the public interest. It's not accurate to say that the show would be a "platform to attack [Barrett's] article" except in the sense that discussing the details of my own research is at odds with his own interpretation of it. What debate there was has been pretty much hashed out in our various blog posts and articles at this point, so I don't think a radio show debate would be necessary or constructive. Barrett's either a poor journalist, a troll, or both, and in any case he's not automatically entitled to a platform to debate everyone he misrepresents whenever they try to discuss their own work.


Best,
Michael Wood





Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, author and radio host, once noted that he "got witch-hunted out of the University of Wisconsin (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/2012/05/professors-speak-out-lawrence-davidson.html) for researching and speaking out on controversial subjects like 9/11 and Palestine." He has been has been featured in the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/01/education/01madison.html?_r=3&oref=slogin&oref=slogin), FOX news and many other outlets. His website is truthjihad.com (http://truthjihad.com/) and he has a daily radio show (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/). Archives can be found here (http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/Truth_Jihad_Radio_13.html). He also writes for Veterans Today (http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/barrett/).


The recent controversy all started when Dr. Kevin Barrett published an article on Press TV titled New studies: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile (http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/07/12/313399/conspiracy-theorists-vs-govt-dupes/). In it, Barrett stated, in part, "But now, thanks to the internet, people who doubt official stories are no longer excluded from public conversation; the CIA’s 44-year-old campaign to stifle debate using the “conspiracy theory” smear is nearly worn-out. In academic studies, as in comments on news articles, pro-conspiracy voices are now more numerous - and more rational - than anti-conspiracy ones. No wonder the anti-conspiracy people are sounding more and more like a bunch of hostile, paranoid cranks." Barrett's article was referring to Woood's new study "What about Building 7?” A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories (http://www.frontiersin.org/personality_science_and_individual_differences/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00409/abstract). Note that Dr. Wood's blog entry initially announcing and linking to his new study had only generated one single response, from a reader named John asking where the link for the report was. This testifies to the fact that mainstream apologists, whether they like it or not, do not generate the interest, publicity and discussion that the alternative media does. The only reason that this study got any attention at all is because Barrett made an issue out of it.
Wood's blog dated July 10th where he made the announcement of his new study, along with the lone comment and Wood's reply, is here: [Excerpt]


What does online discussion tell us about the psychology of conspiracy theories? (http://conspiracypsych.com/2013/07/10/what-does-online-discussion-tell-us-about-the-psychology-of-conspiracy-theories/)
http://conspiracypsych.com/2013/07/10/what-does-online-discussion-tell-us-about-the-psychology-of-conspiracy-theories/

(http://conspiracypsych.com/2013/07/10/what-does-online-discussion-tell-us-about-the-psychology-of-conspiracy-theories/)


Posted on July 10, 2013 by Mike Wood
I’ve just had a new paper published in Frontiers in Psychology along with Karen Douglas, my co-author and PhD supervisor. Frontiers is an open-access journal, meaning that anyone can read the full text for free, so if you’re interested go ahead and check it out.

"What about Building 7?” A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories (http://www.frontiersin.org/personality_science_and_individual_differences/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00409/abstract)


On July 13th Dr. Wood posted an update noting the publicity which his study garnered, thanks to Barrett, in which he rebutts Barrett's claims [Excerpts]:

Setting the record straight on Wood & Douglas, 2013

(http://conspiracypsych.com/2013/07/13/setting-the-record-straight-on-wood-douglas-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-504)


Posted on July 13, 2013 by Mike Wood
"...Our recently published Frontiers study on online communication, "What about Building 7?" A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories, has been the subject of some chatter on the Internet – but not quite in the way I had hoped. A story by Kevin Barrett on PressTV.ir has interpreted the study as showing that conspiracists are "more sane" than conventionalists, and, given that this is an appealing headline for long-suffering conspiracists, has been copy-pasted around the Internet in a highly uncritical fashion.

".....Anyway, the damage seems to have been done – the PressTV article has been reprinted on a lot of different websites, forums, and social media thanks to its sensationalised headline and smug triumphalism. I’m ambivalent about this – I like that my research is being recognised since I am inherently a media whore, but I’m less happy about the fact that it’s only seeing wide exposure after having been twisted and misinterpreted by an extremely biased article on Iranian state-run media. Still, the http://spp.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/01/18/1948550611434786.abstract">last article that we published was met with headlines like "Psychologists prove conspiracy theorists are all crazy!" (there’s no room for nuance on the Internet, is there?) so I suppose it all balances out. I just hope that some people will read the paper itself rather than taking PressTV’s word for what it says."



On July 28th Wood continues to write about his study and the Barrett controversy:
The Wood & Douglas (2013) commission report: Whitewash or coverup? (http://conspiracypsych.com/2013/07/28/the-wood-douglas-2013-commission-report-whitewash-or-coverup/#more-902)

Posted on July 28, 2013 by Mike Wood




"As I write this the fuss about our Frontiers article, “What about Building 7?” A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories (http://www.frontiersin.org/personality_science_and_individual_differences/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00409/abstract), has mostly died down, so now seems like a good time to do a bit of a postmortem and take a look at some of the issues that have come up since the whole ruckus kicked off with Kevin Barrett’s awful PressTV article (http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/07/12/313399/conspiracy-theorists-vs-govt-dupes/) and its infinite copy-pastes around the blogspamosphere."


Wood noted that he had been interviewed on two radio shows regarding the matter: Google Hangouts interview with the Renegade Variety Hour (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pZc9RPNWA0), and Legalise Freedom (http://legalise-freedom.com/radio/michael-wood-the-psychology-of-conspiracy/) [MP3 here (http://legalise-freedom.com/audio/LF53-Mike-Wood.mp3).] Wood then goes on to use the cynical demeaning ad hominem type smears regarding 'conspiracy theorists,' referring to ominous 3AM phone calls and blinking out Morse Code with his eyes:




"...Third, well, at least he’s not claiming I got a 3AM call from George Soros demanding that I go back on my findings. There’s no profit motive here, because any future employers would probably not take their cues from smear job articles on Iranian state media. I just don’t like people abusing my work to spread self-serving misinformation..."
"...The one thing Barrett got mostly right, and which he’s still going on about, was the hostility finding: we did find that conventionalist comments were more hostile on average than conspiracist comments. Some people have looked at this finding and concluded that it constitutes evidence that conspiracists really are more mentally well-adjusted than conventionalists, that the rest of Barrett’s misrepresentations don’t really matter, and, for good measure, that They Got To Me (if you look closely, during the Renegade Variety Hour interview you can see that I’m blinking out SOS in Morse Code with my eyes)..."



Apparently Dr. Wood has been a guest on Coast to Coast am previously, as they still have a guest bio page up for him here (http://www.coasttocoastam.com/guest/wood-michael-j/63836). Art Bell, longtime host of Coast to Coast, recently announced that he is going back on air soon. Bell, although he has a large fan base, is another shill and alleged pervert (http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy-ab&q=art+bell+pervert&oq=art+bell+pervert), who won't touch the truth about 9/11/01.



Martin Hill is a Catholic paleoconservative and civil rights advocate. His work has been featured in the Los Angeles Daily News, San Gabriel Valley Tribune, The Orange County Register, KNBC4 TV Los Angeles, The Press Enterprise, LewRockwell.com, WhatReallyHappened.com, Infowars.com, PrisonPlanet.com, Economic Policy Journal, FreedomsPhoenix, Haaretz, TMZ, Veterans Today, Jonathan Turley blog, The Dr. Katherine Albrecht Show, National Motorists Association, RomanCatholicReport.com, Republic Broadcasting Network, WorldNetDaily, OverdriveOnline.com, Educate-Yourself.org, Dr. Kevin Barrett's Truth Jihad radio show, Strike-The-Root.com, ActivistPost.com, Los Angeles Catholic Lay Mission Newspaper, KFI AM 640, IamtheWitness.com, Redlands Daily Facts, BlackBoxVoting, The Michael Badnarik Show, The Wayne Madsen Report, Devvy.com, Rense.com, The Contra Costa Times, Pasadena Star News, Silicon Valley Mercury News, Long Beach Press Telegram, Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, L.A. Harbor Daily Breeze, CopBlock.org, DavidIcke.com, Whittier Daily News, KCLA FM Hollywood, The Fullerton Observer, Antiwar.com, From The Trenches World Report, and many others. Archives can be found at LibertyFight.com (http://libertyfight.com) and DontWakeMeUp.Org (http://dontwakemeup.org).


http://libertyfight.com/2013/coast_to_coast_pulls_it_after_kevin_barrett_query. html

[PatColo]

John Friend podcast, 2 hrs,


Monday, October 28, 2013
The Realist Report with John Friend (http://www.john-friend.net/2013/10/the-realist-report-with-john-friend_28.html)


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-LAZACp0SINI/Um2uUzQj4PI/AAAAAAAACV4/Qv2Hdx3hKno/s400/Quiet%21.jpg (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-LAZACp0SINI/Um2uUzQj4PI/AAAAAAAACV4/Qv2Hdx3hKno/s1600/Quiet%21.jpg)


On this edition of The Realist Report (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-realist-report/2013/10/29/tom-in-ct--cass-sunstein-conspiracy-theories), we'll be joined once again by Tom in Connecticut. Tom and I will be discussing Cass Sunstein's 2008 public policy paper entitled "Conspiracy Theories" and other issues relating to psychological and information warfare.

You can download the mp3 for this program here (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-realist-report/2013/10/29/tom-in-ct--cass-sunstein-conspiracy-theories.mp3), or visit The Realist Report (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-realist-report) on BlogTalkRadio to subscribe via iTunes and view past programs.

Below are relevant links for this program:




CIA Document 1035-960: Concerning Criticism of the Warren Report (http://www.jfklancer.com/CIA.html)
Are "conspiracy theories" gaining traction? (http://www.john-friend.net/2013/05/are-conspiracy-theories-gaining-traction.html) by John Friend
Cass Sunstein (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Sunstein) - Wikipedia
Conspiracy Theories (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1084585) by Cass R. Sunstein & Adrian Vermeule - January 15, 2008
Obama confidant's spine-chilling proposal: Cass Sunstein wants the government to "cognitively infiltrate" anti-government groups (http://www.salon.com/2010/01/15/sunstein_2/) by Glenn Greenwald





Posted by John Friend (http://www.blogger.com/profile/17331636747072636125) at 8:38 PM No comments: (http://www.john-friend.net/2013/10/the-realist-report-with-john-friend_28.html#comment-form) (http://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogID=7213060208416317403&postID=5552705916490360633)

[Hypertiger]

You are living in the new world order and it began rising up before any of you alive on Earth existed to be born into and become products of the NWO.

you all think it is taking shape...you are watching it collapse to oblivion and thinking its the evil forces of evilness trying to take over that which is good

It is that which is evil collapsing and evil is fighting for its life to survive as long as possible...and you all are the supply of power to and from evil to sustain your existence.

the system is collapsing because the demand for power by all of you is greater than all of you can supply...to the global system which is master and you all the slaves that supply the power to the master which uses the power to create the servant you all slave for.

Money.

[mick silver]

You are living in the new world order and it began rising up before any of you alive on Earth existed to be born into and become products of the NWO.

you all think it is taking shape...you are watching it collapse to oblivion and thinking its the evil forces of evilness trying to take over that which is good ...........

It is that which is evil collapsing and evil is fighting for its life to survive as long as possible...and you all are the supply of power to and from evil to sustain your existence.

the system is collapsing because the demand for power by all of you is greater than all of you can supply...to the global system which is master and you all the slaves that supply the power to the master which uses the power to create the servant you all slave for.

Money. so do i need to buy more paper for my ass ...................

[Horn]

Money.

Or more specifically another person's.

[PatColo]

Oh dear... from the UK-taxpayer funded BBC,

26 October 2013
Are conspiracy theories destroying democracy?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24650841

...to which PatColo quips back, YES,


http://i.imgur.com/XLTJQbd.jpg

Joosh-Bolshevik/Communist/Zionist tinfoil hat "conspiracy theories" like that ^ ARE destroying democracy! As for BBC's complicity in said destruction,

"UK Truther refuses license fee due to BBC/WTC7 coverup, goes to court, WINS"
http://tinyurl.com/qf84735

"BBC editor tells staff to be soft on Israel"
http://tinyurl.com/okj3hnq

8/31/13, BBC hoaxed up this whole "syrian army incendiary bombed a SCHOOL" propaganda story & video, complete with crisis bad-actors:
http://tinyurl.com/ppfwtj7

[PatColo]

Conspiracy theories? No one does it better than West’s elite
2013 11 20
By Neil Clark | RT (http://rt.com/op-edge/conspiracy-theory-west-poisoning-648/)

http://www.redicecreations.com/ul_img/27825arafat_.jpg
For a long time elite establishment gatekeepers in the West have scoffed at that those who claim Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat was poisoned. As to those who claimed he was poisoned by Israel - well-of course they’re crazy conspiracy theorists!

http://www.redicecreations.com/ul_img/27825AleksandrLitvinenk.jpgYet these same people who ridiculed the idea of Arafat’s poisoning are, by and large, the same people who assert, without any shadow of a doubt, that the murdered spy Aleksandr Litvinenko was poisoned by the Russian authorities in London in 2006.

Now we still don’t know for sure that Arafat was poisoned, or that Israel was responsible, but after last week’s news that Swiss scientists have found levels of polonium-210 18 times higher than normal in his exhumed body, it is much harder for these elite gatekeepers to haughtily dismiss as ‘cranks’ those who maintain that Arafat was murdered.

What the Litvinenko and Arafat cases show us is that there are officially ’approved’ conspiracy theories and those which do not receive official approval.

The labeling of people as ‘conspiracy theorists’ by gatekeepers in the West has nothing to do with how much evidence there is to support a claim or the quality of that evidence, but is a political call, based on who the conspiracy theory concerns and who is making it.

Establishment gatekeepers are not objective judges, but are heavily biased and label any idea they don’t like as a ’conspiracy theory’. Labeling someone a ’conspiracy theorist’ is their standard way of declaring that person to be ’off-limits’, i.e. he/she is an unreliable source and a ’crank’. It’s a way that dissent and debate is stifled in what appear to be free, democratic societies - and how people who challenge the dominant establishment narrative are deliberately marginalized.

Yet the greatest irony is that in the last 20 years or so, the biggest pushers of conspiracy theories have been these very same Western elite politicians and establishment gatekeepers so quick to accuse others of peddling conspiracy theories.

They were the ones who pushed, with great zeal, the conspiracy theory that Saddam Hussein had WMDs in 2003. This was one which had real, deadly consequences, leading to a blatantly illegal war and the deaths of at least 500,000 people. These elite gatekeepers have also pushed the conspiracy theory that Iran has secretly been developing nuclear weapons - again without producing any compelling evidence. This conspiracy theory has led to the imposition of draconian sanctions on the Islamic Republic, which have caused great suffering to ordinary people.

This year, these establishment conspiracy theorists have been at it again, claiming with great conviction that it was the Syrian government which launched a chemical weapons attack at Ghouta, even though we still don‘t know for sure who was responsible.

[...]

Read the full article at: rt.com (http://rt.com/op-edge/conspiracy-theory-west-poisoning-648/)

[PatColo]

I have no clue of who she is, but they surveilled her & her family, gang stalked (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aG4Am33hlOM) her, and ultimately poisoned her & her husband.


http://www.redicecreations.com/ul_img/27786murphy_2.jpg

Brittany Murphy Did NOT Die of Natural Causes, Lab Report Shows (http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=27787)
2013 11 19

More news is coming out on the strange and alarming death of actress Brittany Murphy. New independent tests go against the official determination of death by ’natural causes’, and suggest the POISONING of both Brittany and her husband. Red Ice Radio spoke with national security whistleblower Julia Davis about the case, and Davis connects Murphy’s death with the Department of Homeland [more... (http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=27787)] (http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=27787)


another account:

Revealed: Brittany Murphy 'was poisoned by government spooks in revenge for star's support of whistleblower', claims her grief-striken father



Father Angelo Bertolotti, 87, claims Brittany and her husband were killed for supporting Department of Homeland Security whistleblower
Julia Davis claimed U.S. was letting in terrorists over the Mexican border because of lax security and her backers were put under surveillance
She and Mr Bertolotti are writing a tell-all book on the mystery
The Clueless actress died on December 20, 2009 and the Los Angeles County Coroner said at the time it was due to pneumonia
Husband Simon Monjack died five weeks later in the same house
A new toxicology report ordered by her father found ten heavy metals in the actress' system, meaning she might have ingested rat poisoning


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2509626/Brittany-Murphys-father-believes-husband-poisoned-death-government-spooks.html


Red Ice Radio this summer:


Julia & BJ Davis - Hour 1 & 2 - Top Priority: The Terror Within (http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2013/05/RIR-130526.php)
May 26, 2013

"Top Priority: The Terror Within" is a documentary film by Fleur De Lis Film Studios. It features an incredible true story of Julia Davis, a national security whistleblower who was falsely declared a "Domestic Terrorist" and subjected to retaliation of unprecedented proportions by the Department of Homeland Security. She joins us to discuss what happened when she discovered and reported a breach of national security at the largest and busiest land border crossing in the U.S. on 4th of July, 2004. The DHS failed to act on her reports but instead of correcting the shortcomings exposed by Julia’s report, they opened investigations against her. Her husband BJ, a film producer who documented these events with a camera, also joins in to talk about the detailed events of this major story, never reported on by mainstream media, although Julia took her case to court and won. They’ll detail unprecedented retaliation and abuses of the Patriot Act in Julia’s case and talk about how the DHS spent American taxpayer’s money on warrantless surveillance, including aerial surveillance with a Blackhawk helicopter and a fixed-wing airplane, wiretaps, sneak and peek burglaries, Internet monitoring and On-Star tracking of the Davis family. They’ll explain why this story was never reported on by mainstream media and who was involved. In the second hour, we hear about several deaths connected to this story including Julia’s father, her neighbor who filmed the footage of the Blackhawk and the actress Brittany Murphy as well as her husband. Julia and BJ talk about the diminishing of our American rights amongst "terror theatre 101." Don’t miss this astonishing story of the real terror, within the US government.
http://www.redicecreations.com/img/radiodownloadbutton.png (http://rediceradio.net/radio/2013/RIR-130526-juliabjdavis-hr1.mp3)http://www.redicecreations.com/img/radiodownloadbuttonb.png (http://rediceradio.net/radio/2013/RIR-130526-juliabjdavis-hr2.mp3)

[Horn]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXoYmnx0K5I

[Horn]

I have no clue of who she is, but they surveilled her & her family, gang stalked (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aG4Am33hlOM) her, and ultimately poisoned her & her husband.


http://www.redicecreations.com/ul_img/27786murphy_2.jpg

Brittany Murphy Did NOT Die of Natural Causes, Lab Report Shows (http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=27787)
2013 11 19

Whoa! if that cat gets out of the bag... and very well could.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0OmsKxDrO8

[PatColo]

Whoa! if that cat gets out of the bag... and very well could.

I was surfing some of the linked vids after watching yours, and found... :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLz6s38JNs0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLz6s38JNs0

[PatColo]

a couple recent blogs from James Tracy,


May 21, 2014 (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/05/21/cracking-conspiracy-theorys-psycholinguistic-code/)
Cracking “Conspiracy Theory’s” Psycholinguistic Code (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/05/21/cracking-conspiracy-theorys-psycholinguistic-code/) 82 (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/05/21/cracking-conspiracy-theorys-psycholinguistic-code/#comments) Home (http://memoryholeblog.com/category/home/) • Tags: alternative media (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/alternative-media/), Central Intelligence Agency (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/central-intelligence-agency/), conspiracy (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/conspiracy/), conspiracy theory (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/conspiracy-theory/), news media (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/news-media/), propaganda (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/propaganda/), Public Opinion (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/public-opinion/)
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRtpci0RMO2d9PolHQhfTL1olkGJB4mv HgkFp_JQzNHiT1QDQI0
By James F. Tracy

A new crusade appears to be underway to target independent research and analysis available via alternative news media. This March saw the release of “cognitive infiltration” advocate Cass Sunstein’s new book, Conspiracy Theories and Other Dangerous Ideas. In April, the confirmed federal intelligence-gathering arm, Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), released a new report, “Agenda 21: The UN, Sustainability, and Right Wing Conspiracy Theory.” Most recently, Newsweek magazine carried a cover story, titled, “The Plots to Destroy America: Conspiracy Theories Are a Clear and Present Danger.”

More…

(http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/05/21/cracking-conspiracy-theorys-psycholinguistic-code/#more-11082)




May 15, 2014 (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/05/15/to-act-or-not-to-act-the-dilemma-of-the-conspiracy-observer/)
To Act Or Not To Act: the Dilemma of the Conspiracy Observer (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/05/15/to-act-or-not-to-act-the-dilemma-of-the-conspiracy-observer/) 106 (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/05/15/to-act-or-not-to-act-the-dilemma-of-the-conspiracy-observer/#comments) Guest Posts (http://memoryholeblog.com/category/guest-posts/) • Tags: alternative media (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/alternative-media/), conspiracy (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/conspiracy/), Public Opinion (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/public-opinion/), Sandy Hook Elementary (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/sandy-hook-elementary/)
http://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/tin-foil-hat.jpg?w=474 (http://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/tin-foil-hat.jpg)
By Patrick Murphy

Those of us who are interested in getting to the bottom of conspiracies have been presented with new challenges as spectacular national atrocity events have become increasingly frequent. In an article published here more than a year ago I speculated that this stepped-up pace points to a looming denouement. It looks to me like a pattern. While each dramatic event stands alone as its own special stage play, it is also likely that each of them is a mere “act” in a much larger production, unfolding over the course of decades, and although I believe that the plot is approaching its culmination, I can’t know what that will look like, or exactly when it will happen. How many more of these traumas will we be subjected to, before whole story is played out?
More… (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/05/15/to-act-or-not-to-act-the-dilemma-of-the-conspiracy-observer/#more-10992)




May 14, 2014 (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/05/14/faux-liberalisms-politics-of-hate/)
Faux Liberalism’s Politics of “Hate” (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/05/14/faux-liberalisms-politics-of-hate/) 19 (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/05/14/faux-liberalisms-politics-of-hate/#comments) Home (http://memoryholeblog.com/category/home/) • Tags: censorship (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/censorship/), news media (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/news-media/), philanthropy (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/philanthropy/), police state (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/police-state/), press freedom (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/press-freedom/), Public Opinion (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/public-opinion/)
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ4rto068ZNAdKSay1GuxuzG0bPaW1AX rQn6l9DJMadnMApYg5-
By James F. Tracy

Massachusetts Representative Edward Markey’s “Hate Crimes Reporting Act of 2014 (http://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-bill/2219/text)” proposes to exert Congressional authority over mass media employing speech that may “encourage … hate crimes based on gender, race, religion, ethnicity, or sexual orientation.” In contrast to establishment liberal Cass Sunstein’s proposed “cognitive infiltration” of unorthodox research communities questioning official narratives, Markey’s recommendation straightforwardly lays the groundwork for the criminalization of free speech—and prospectively any other intellectual or journalistic endeavor the state deems undesirable. Indeed, Markey’s power play is an especially compelling—though increasingly commonplace—example of despotism masquerading as liberalism, one that no honestly free society would seriously consider.
More… (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/05/14/faux-liberalisms-politics-of-hate/#more-10949)

[osoab]

Conspiracy theories? No one does it better than West’s elite
2013 11 20
By Neil Clark | RT (http://rt.com/op-edge/conspiracy-theory-west-poisoning-648/)

http://www.redicecreations.com/ul_img/27825arafat_.jpg
For a long time elite establishment gatekeepers in the West have scoffed at that those who claim Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat was poisoned. As to those who claimed he was poisoned by Israel - well-of course they’re crazy conspiracy theorists!

http://www.redicecreations.com/ul_img/27825AleksandrLitvinenk.jpgYet these same people who ridiculed the idea of Arafat’s poisoning are, by and large, the same people who assert, without any shadow of a doubt, that the murdered spy Aleksandr Litvinenko was poisoned by the Russian authorities in London in 2006.

Now we still don’t know for sure that Arafat was poisoned, or that Israel was responsible, but after last week’s news that Swiss scientists have found levels of polonium-210 18 times higher than normal in his exhumed body, it is much harder for these elite gatekeepers to haughtily dismiss as ‘cranks’ those who maintain that Arafat was murdered.

What the Litvinenko and Arafat cases show us is that there are officially ’approved’ conspiracy theories and those which do not receive official approval.

The labeling of people as ‘conspiracy theorists’ by gatekeepers in the West has nothing to do with how much evidence there is to support a claim or the quality of that evidence, but is a political call, based on who the conspiracy theory concerns and who is making it.

Establishment gatekeepers are not objective judges, but are heavily biased and label any idea they don’t like as a ’conspiracy theory’. Labeling someone a ’conspiracy theorist’ is their standard way of declaring that person to be ’off-limits’, i.e. he/she is an unreliable source and a ’crank’. It’s a way that dissent and debate is stifled in what appear to be free, democratic societies - and how people who challenge the dominant establishment narrative are deliberately marginalized.

Yet the greatest irony is that in the last 20 years or so, the biggest pushers of conspiracy theories have been these very same Western elite politicians and establishment gatekeepers so quick to accuse others of peddling conspiracy theories.

They were the ones who pushed, with great zeal, the conspiracy theory that Saddam Hussein had WMDs in 2003. This was one which had real, deadly consequences, leading to a blatantly illegal war and the deaths of at least 500,000 people. These elite gatekeepers have also pushed the conspiracy theory that Iran has secretly been developing nuclear weapons - again without producing any compelling evidence. This conspiracy theory has led to the imposition of draconian sanctions on the Islamic Republic, which have caused great suffering to ordinary people.

This year, these establishment conspiracy theorists have been at it again, claiming with great conviction that it was the Syrian government which launched a chemical weapons attack at Ghouta, even though we still don‘t know for sure who was responsible.

[...]

Read the full article at: rt.com (http://rt.com/op-edge/conspiracy-theory-west-poisoning-648/)


Looks like Izzy might have done in Litvinenko too. Not directly, but as a courier.

(http://www.ancreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/boris-berezovsky-death-390x285.jpg) Revisiting Litvinenko, What Really Happened? (http://www.ancreport.com/posts/revisiting-litvinenko-what-really-happened/)

[PatColo]

@ James Tracy's blog:




January 17, 2016 (http://memoryholeblog.com/2016/01/17/teaching-911-to-conspiracy-theorists/)
Teaching 9/11 to Conspiracy Theorists (http://memoryholeblog.com/2016/01/17/teaching-911-to-conspiracy-theorists/) 9 (http://memoryholeblog.com/2016/01/17/teaching-911-to-conspiracy-theorists/#comments) by James Tracy (http://memoryholeblog.com/author/truthgulag/) • Home (http://memoryholeblog.com/category/home/) • Tags: academe (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/academe/), academic freedom (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/academic-freedom/), conspiracy theory (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/conspiracy-theory/), geopolitics (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/geopolitics/), James Tracy (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/james-tracy/), media disinformation (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/media-disinformation/), news media analysis (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/news-media-analysis/), propaganda (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/propaganda/), public opinion (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/public-opinion/), war on terror

(http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/war-on-terror/) https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/9-11-towers.jpg?w=474



This article was originally written in November 2015. Many have accused this author of teaching “conspiracy theories” to college students. Contrary to critics’ assertions, however, events such as the Sandy Hook School massacre or Boston Marathon bombing were never addressed in any courses taught at his former university. Only in the last college class he taught over a twenty year career in academe (13 of which were spent at Florida Atlantic University) did he have a chance to carefully examine and discuss September 11, 2001, or, more specifically, the US government’s official 9/11 conspiracy theory.-JFT



An enduring psychological effect of “the propaganda of the event” is a foremost element of all modern forms of war. Advances in hidden governance and concentrated media ownership have made the “war on terror” possible via increasingly fine-tuned trauma based mind control–in other words the enforcement of belief through overwhelming events subsequently placed in meaningful narrative context absent any contradictory information.


Such a phenomenon is readily apparent among the younger generations, particularly as they have come to rely on US government-sponsored conspiracy theories in order to make sense of momentous political events bearing upon their lives. Despite their irrational nature and profound shortcomings, such conspiracy theories are unquestioningly accepted as valid by an overwhelming majority of journalists and academics, who then repeat them as fact to their respective constituents.


More… (http://memoryholeblog.com/2016/01/17/teaching-911-to-conspiracy-theorists/#more-20426)

[PatColo]

BBC radio did this little 18 min conspiracy theory hit piece a few days ago. Features Jim Fetzer on the "pro" side, and 2 yadayada-SKI "psychologist" jooz on the "anti" side. Sandy Hoax, 911, holohoax, JFK, Apollo and some other conspiracies are all briefly addressed, but it's mostly high-level CT talk, with more time given to the 2 horn-rimmed glasses sounding jooz skoooling listeners about the psychosis afflicting most CTists. Fetzer holds his own pretty well overall... if BBC wanted a "proper slant" taken home by listeners, I'd say they failed-- it was a wash at best. :)





Conspiracy Theory (http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03kpvjf) The Why Factor (http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00xtky9)

Listen in pop-out player (http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/player/p03kpvjf)

Throughout history people have held conspiracy theories which cast doubt on the official narratives of some very serious events - from the Holocaust to 9/11, Diana to JFK, Lockerbie to Sandy Hook.


What prompts people to think in this way? How should Governments react to the people who doubt them? Or are they in fact critical in our attempts to hold Governments to account?


Mike Williams talks to a psychologist, a Professor of Political Science and a conspiracy theorist as he attempts to separate fact from fiction.

Download MP3 (http://open.live.bbc.co.uk/mediaselector/5/redir/version/2.0/mediaset/audio-nondrm-download-low/proto/http/vpid/p03lgnc5.mp3)







http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03kpvjf

[PatColo]

BBC radio did this little 18 min conspiracy theory hit piece a few days ago. Features Jim Fetzer on the "pro" side, and 2 yadayada-SKI "psychologist" jooz on the "anti" side. Sandy Hoax, 911, holohoax, JFK, Apollo and some other conspiracies are all briefly addressed, but it's mostly high-level CT talk, with more time given to the 2 horn-rimmed glasses sounding jooz skoooling listeners about the psychosis afflicting most CTists. Fetzer holds his own pretty well overall... if BBC wanted a "proper slant" taken home by listeners, I'd say they failed-- it was a wash at best. :)

Conspiracy Theory (http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03kpvjf)




from Fetzer today, published @ James Tracy's Memory Hole Blog, and at his own blog (http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2016/03/the-bbc-edits-our-interview-to-attack.html#comment-form). Check the MHB link for growing reader comments (only 3 atm).

I'm shocked, SHOCKED, I tell you!! :o




March 11, 2016 (http://memoryholeblog.com/2016/03/11/bbc-edits-interview-to-attack-conspiracy-theorists/)

BBC Edits Interview to Attack “Conspiracy Theorists” (http://memoryholeblog.com/2016/03/11/bbc-edits-interview-to-attack-conspiracy-theorists/) 3 (http://memoryholeblog.com/2016/03/11/bbc-edits-interview-to-attack-conspiracy-theorists/#comments)

by MHB Administrator (http://memoryholeblog.com/author/truthgulag/) • Guest Posts (http://memoryholeblog.com/category/guest-posts/) • Tags: BBC (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/bbc/), conspiracy theory (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/conspiracy-theory/), James Fetzer (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/james-fetzer/), media disinformation (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/media-disinformation/), news media (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/news-media/), propaganda (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/propaganda/), Sandy Hook Elementary (http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/sandy-hook-elementary/), social engineering

(http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/social-engineering/)

Prof. Jim Fetzer
jamesfetzter.blogspot.com
(http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com)

The BBC has massively edited an interview with me to use me as an example of a “conspiracy theorist”, where they excluded most of the proof that I presented during a 40 minute interview and added a lot of poppycock psycho-babble about why people are predisposed to believe conspiracy theories regardless of logic and evidence, the significance of which they systematically ignore: for them, reason and rationality do not matter!


https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/the-why-factor-bbc-worldwide.jpg?w=300&h=291


Here is a link where you can download the 18 minute program broadcast worldwide: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03kpvjf. If anyone finds it where I can embed it directly, please let me know. Contrast what they used with my previous, “Why I (Jim Fetzer) AM a “conspiracy theorist (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5H7mOU28i7M)“,



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5H7mOU28i7M


which I extracted from my pre-interview for the published BBC interview, because I made many more points about Sandy Hook, including on my banned book, NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2015/10/nobody-died-at-sandy-hook-it-was-fema.html) (2015) and its thirteen (13) contributors.


This is not my first go-around with the BBC, which came to my home years ago an interviewed me for eight (8) hours, then used 4.5 minutes in their first “Conspiracy Files” program on 9/11. They would return a couple of years later and interview me for another four (4) after I extracted a promise that they would give me somewhat more of a “fair shake”. I published about it here:


“The BBC’s Instrument of 9/11 Misinformation”
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/09/bbcs-instrument-of-911-misinformation.html

(http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/09/bbcs-instrument-of-911-misinformation.html)
But the BBC is far from the only major media outlet to publish propaganda and disinformation, including about Sandy Hook. Here are three examples about which I have recently published:


“Proof that The New York Times publishes Sandy Hook disinformation and propaganda”
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2016/01/proof-that-new-york-times-publishes.html
(http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2016/01/proof-that-new-york-times-publishes.html)

“The Washington Post joints the Sandy Hook propaganda game”
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-washington-post-joins-sandy-hook.html

(http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-washington-post-joins-sandy-hook.html)
Indeed, to my utter dismay, even The Chronicle of Higher Education has joined in:


“The Chronicle of Higher Education buckles to the ‘official account’ of Sandy Hook”
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-chronicle-of-higher-education.html

(http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-chronicle-of-higher-education.html)
Like so many other complex and controversial issues, if you have not actually done any research (on 9/11, JFK, Sandy Hook or the Boston bombing, for example), because the mainstream media is endlessly propagating the “official accounts” of these events, you are very likely to be taken in (as appears to be the case with one of our own).


We must understand the phenomenon in order to be in the position to cope with it. While all of you know the score regarding the misrepresentation of the evidence in the case of JFK, what we have been told about 9/11, Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing has been equally misleading. I encourage each of you to check it out for yourselves.





http://memoryholeblog.com/2016/03/11/bbc-edits-interview-to-attack-conspiracy-theorists/

______________________


semi-separately, here's a Mar 2 interview with guest James Tracy,

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7ehVER6wg-M/mqdefault.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ehVER6wg-M)
50:02
Sandy Hook & The High Cost of Free Speech -- Prof. James Tracy (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ehVER6wg-M)



16,263 views
1 week ago




Sandy Hook & The High Cost of Free Speech -- Prof. James Tracy

https://yt3.ggpht.com/-YhoSD_FT8dQ/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/qqAF1ePfcto/s88-c-k-no/photo.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/user/SGTbull07) SGTreport.com (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2nQYGjfe9I_tgWpqgJorUg)
97,278
16,263

Published on Mar 2, 2016
Professor James Tracy paid a heavy price for for free speech. He lost his job as a tenured Professor because he dared to question the official story of the Sandy Hook Elementary event. Now he could use your help, please consider donating to his legal defense fund: http://tracylegaldefense.org/