PDA

View Full Version : "I didn't see any pieces of any plane." - First Incident Commander at the Pentagon



Silver Rocket Bitches!
25th February 2013, 05:23 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFiSiXO_6lg&feature=player_embedded

osoab
25th February 2013, 05:38 PM
should be in the other thread, but jooboo will piss his pants otherwise.

Ponce
25th February 2013, 06:50 PM
The pictures that they are showing are the ones "after" the front wall came down.....I have a video that show the whole front wall and all that you can see is a six foot (vertical) X 10 (horizontal) hole in the wall and it shows nothing related to a plane.....no seats, dead bodies, luggage, wings etc etc.

V

joboo
25th February 2013, 08:49 PM
should be in the other thread, but jooboo will piss his pants otherwise.

There's nothing on an internet forum that would get me that agitated. If it did, I would find something more interesting to do...usually play some music. I'm in too good of shape mentally, and physically to get upset over something on an internet forum. Reason being I voluntarily put myself though very high levels of stress (i.e: central nervous system) 5 days a week at the gym, which makes stuff like this seem trivial by comparison. Diet also helps a bunch. Get the avocados, and fish oil happening, hit the sauna each time for a good sweat, and detox with some chlorella, also good stuff. Drink a half gallon of white tea in the sauna (other half during the workout) with some Himalayan salt, and some honey to flush out all the free radicals, and blast the immune system,

Almost forgot .... When did they plant everything/everyone? Before or after the missile hit without anyone noticing? Nobody has bothered to explain this part yet.

Serpo
26th February 2013, 12:42 AM
Keep chewing your tasty vitamins Joboo ,you are going to need them.


In too good a shape mentally ....hahahaha,,,,,,,,,,yes you hardly need us

JohnQPublic
26th February 2013, 05:34 AM
Is he still alive?

Santa
26th February 2013, 06:03 AM
Almost forgot .... When did they plant everything/everyone? Before or after the missile hit without anyone noticing? Nobody has bothered to explain this part yet.

The answer to that dumb ass question is, "whenever they damn well pleased." They had the entire property in security lockdown. Do you really think the fucking Pentagon can't secure their own headquarters?

osoab
26th February 2013, 06:14 AM
Almost forgot .... When did they plant everything/everyone? Before or after the missile hit without anyone noticing? Nobody has bothered to explain this part yet.

If you paid attention to the news conference, the guy stated that they had to move their command post away after the warning of a second inbound "airplane".

There would be plenty of time in the chaos.

Besides if it was a plane, why not release all of the cctv footage that was available.

Also notice the looks of the guys behind him after he says he never saw any plane parts.

Son-of-Liberty
26th February 2013, 06:25 AM
I didn't think there was any debate to be had about the pentagon. I don't know what hit it. I suppose you could argue whether it was a missile or some sort of drone or small jet.

It sure as hell wasn't an airliner like we were told and if you believe that crap you're a fucking idiot.

Silver Rocket Bitches!
26th February 2013, 06:45 AM
There's a Citgo right on the corner that points directly at the spot of impact. Immediately after the event the FBI confiscated all the surveillance tapes from the gas station. WHAT'S ON THOSE TAPES?!

Santa
26th February 2013, 07:39 AM
There's a Citgo right on the corner that points directly at the spot of impact. Immediately after the event the FBI confiscated all the surveillance tapes from the gas station. WHAT'S ON THOSE TAPES?!

Yeah, and why would the FBI confiscate and then NEVER release them? A cover up.
Remember those video's of something hitting the building? Remember that the building facade exploded just before what looked like a missile actually struck?

INSIDE JOB... Pentagon, DoD, FBI, NSA, CIA, MOSSAD, who the fuck knows whoever else. It was an INSIDE JOB. Collusion. Scumbag bastards need to be hung!

JDRock
26th February 2013, 08:19 AM
I didn't think there was any debate to be had about the pentagon. I don't know what hit it. I suppose you could argue whether it was a missile or some sort of drone or small jet.

It sure as hell wasn't an airliner like we were told and if you believe that crap you're a fucking idiot.

but...but jooboo SAYS the official hoax is true......hahahhahaaaaa

Hatha Sunahara
26th February 2013, 08:45 AM
Yeah, and why would the FBI confiscate and then NEVER release them? A cover up.


How many people in the FBI watched those videos? How many people in the DoD watched the surveillance videos from the Pentagon itself? How many people on the White House staff watched the available videos that showed what actually hit the Pentagon. And the WTC buildings in New York?

It gives some weight to Dimitri Khalezov's idea that there are 3 levels of explanation for what happened on 911. The first level, for the Plebs and the unwashed is that it was 19 Arab Hijackers working for the non existent Al Qaeda that crashed airliners into the buildings. The second level was what the lower level participants and the people holding office were told -- that the government was being blackmailed by al Qaeda who threatened to blow up nuclear weapons that were placed near the top of the two towers in New York and would kill millions of people, so the government had to destroy the WTC Towers. And the third truth was what really happened. In other words, two big lies--one for the masses and one for the useful idiots are what is holding this whole 911 conspiracy together so no one will dig deeper to get to the story that isn't a lie.


Hatha

mamboni
26th February 2013, 08:51 AM
but...but jooboo SAYS the official hoax is true......hahahhahaaaaa

Ergo, Joboo is "a fucking idiot" per Son-of-Liberty.

Santa
26th February 2013, 09:53 AM
that the government was being blackmailed by al Qaeda who threatened to blow up nuclear weapons that were placed near the top of the two towers in New York and would kill millions of people, so the government had to destroy the WTC Towers. Yeah, that's the "Jack Bauer" type deception where National Security is held up to be one's patriotic duty. The end justifies the means.

And besides, there's no telling how many crimes against humanity have been buried under mountains of redundant paperwork.

Or, take a couple photos of aluminum debris scattered on the lawn, send it to the NYTimes, Reuters and AP. Make up some trivial bs and BINGO. The whole fucking world gets jooboo'd.

Serpo
26th February 2013, 10:26 AM
Infact the Joboos did it.....................

Horn
26th February 2013, 10:56 AM
Get the avocados, and fish oil happening, hit the sauna each time for a good sweat,

4486

joboo
26th February 2013, 11:21 AM
The answer to that dumb ass question is, "whenever they damn well pleased." They had the entire property in security lockdown. Do you really think the fucking Pentagon can't secure their own headquarters?


There's a highway right there, cars stropped all over the place, and you call me the dumbass? LOL...wow.. Your mind works in extremely bizarre ways as I've already made this point 100 times. Yes they had the men in black mind eraser pen... ok ...more fantasy world disconnected from reality logic.
-------------

NEhow....

^^
The level headed vibes come shining through don't they....slam dunk or what folks? I rest my case.

How come the planes entered the twin towers all nice and neat? According to you guys there should have been luggage, bodies, and debris flying around all over the place when the buildings were hit. ....but that didn't happen even a little bit, it all went right inside the building.

Zero debris was outside the building where they were hit. Some people even went so far to say it was impossible for them to even penetrate the buildings due to the metal composition, but they were dead wrong also.

Personally I think you guys are far too conspiracy minded to even think about any of this clearly. There's a disconnect from reality somewhere.

Horn
26th February 2013, 11:24 AM
Personally I think you guys are far too conspiracy minded to even think about any of this clearly. There's a disconnect from reality somewhere.

4487

joboo
26th February 2013, 11:34 AM
4487

Exactly what I'm talking about. Skip over the questions, attack the messenger, and play out the wild minded conspiracy angle. It's become all so predictable. ;)

Wait a sec....so this guy who got there first, and locked down the place, and got "control" of everything is automatically telling you the truth, just like the 9/11 omission did...on national TV even?

Are you sure of that? Isn't everyone controlled, lying, and in on it, by your own admissions?

Cherry picking away...lalalalaa....picking those cherries...

Silver Rocket Bitches!
26th February 2013, 11:54 AM
Exactly what I'm talking about. Skip over the questions, attack the messenger, and play out the wild minded conspiracy angle. It's become all so predictable. ;)

Wait a sec....so this guy who got there first, and locked down the place, and got "control" of everything is automatically telling you the truth, just like the 9/11 omission did...on national TV even?

Are you sure of that? Isn't everyone controlled, lying, and in on it, by your own admissions?

Cherry picking away...lalalalaa....picking those cherries...

Juristic Person? Is that you? It's like deja vu...

joboo
26th February 2013, 12:19 PM
Juristic Person? Is that you? It's like deja vu...

Nopes...and still no questions were answered in my posts...hmm Refute the logic...no it's better to just accuse the messenger in a bait, and switch! ;)

jimswift
26th February 2013, 02:19 PM
So nobody can prove anything?

....in regards to what hit the Pentagon.

Horn
26th February 2013, 03:12 PM
Exactly what I'm talking about. Skip over the questions, attack the messenger, and play out the wild minded conspiracy angle. It's become all so predictable. ;)

4488

Neuro
26th February 2013, 04:15 PM
Wait a sec....so this guy who got there first, and locked down the place, and got "control" of everything is automatically telling you the truth, just like the 9/11 omission did...on national TV even?

You must be right, he got there first, saw plenty of plane debris, and decided to lie about it, probably to undermine the government, and to help start off the truth movement. Yeah that must be it.

joboo
26th February 2013, 04:35 PM
You must be right, he got there first, saw plenty of plane debris, and decided to lie about it, probably to undermine the government, and to help start off the truth movement. Yeah that must be it.

I'm wondering how all the witnesses along the flight path, and right there on the highway, and elsewhere, something like over 130 people, actually saw the plane and/or saw it hit the building, are of no consequence.

It also makes me wonder how there's obfuscation of each event with live exercises all happening like 7/7 and back in 93.

Horn
26th February 2013, 04:55 PM
I'll offer the physical evidence to clear up any doubt between eyewitnesses, as there were some who saw a missile hit.

This physical evidence proves beyond any reasonable doubt that a Boeing 757 could not have completed the flight path & hit the Pentagon on 911.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtlzCyKbw5Q

joboo
26th February 2013, 05:07 PM
It doesn't really clear up anything. It just hinges the entire thing on a computer simulation which may or may not be accurate.

I want to know how it's possible to get all those people to lie about what they saw. I don't think it's possible, nor do I think anyone would even think to try it, and believe they would get away with it right there during rush hour traffic.

It's also equally far fetched to think they would carry in bags of processed human slop, aka all the hamburgered passengers they somehow got off the plane somewhere after takeoff, and started convincingly slinging it around everywhere intermixed with plane debris, and on top of all this, make the plane itself disappear into thin air.

It just doesn't mirror reality imo.

Horn
26th February 2013, 05:20 PM
It just doesn't mirror reality imo.

Sending 165,000 troops into a country to commit atrocities for completely fabricated reasons mirrors it fairly well.

Fabricating an evidence trail on 53 more bodies would be a breeze compared.

joboo
26th February 2013, 05:33 PM
Sending 165,000 troops into a country to commit atrocities for completely fabricated reasons mirrors it fairly well.

Fabricating an evidence trail on 53 more bodies would be a breeze compared.

They actually shot planes visibly into the other buildings (which went right in, and left no debris at the point of impact btw). Seems to me like they had them at their disposal, and were using them rather effectively.

It's actually something like 90 bodies, and their clothing as well. How one forensically fakes bone fragments of people getting slammed into a building at 530 mph is one thing. Somehow getting them off the airplane after takeoff is another, and then making a airplane disappear altogether is again quite the feat of engineering in itself. Then there's the invisible machinery required to plant, or knock over light poles, and even more heavy equipment to plant all the debris like the landing gear, tires, and engine parts...and then there's over 130 witnesses seeing the plane right there and/or seeing it hit the building. How many saw a missile again? How many saw the plane fly away?

But these realities are all skipped over repeatedly in the thought process, and I get called colorful names from A-Z instead.

Horn
26th February 2013, 07:41 PM
But these realities are all skipped over repeatedly in the thought process, and I get called colorful names from A-Z instead.

And again you've missed the point that its a physical impossibility based on the scene, for a Boeing 757 to have traversed the front lawn in such a manner.

This disproves any other possibility but a missile, that you might be inclined to breech on the topic.

Not based on anyone's simulations, its solely a matter of mathematics.

This evidence proves without any doubt whatsoever, and without any loopholes.

JDRock
26th February 2013, 08:35 PM
now its horns turn to bend halo over the table and have his way......halo must love getting owned hahahaa

Horn
26th February 2013, 09:03 PM
Some other "pieces" still missing from that day, or only available to certain authorities for dissemination.



Black Boxes

Contents of Flight Data and Cockpit Voice Recorders Are Missing

All jetliners are equipped with flight data recorders (FDRs) and cockpit voice recorders (CVRs) contained in "black boxes" designed to survive the most severe crashes. To date, none of the contents of any of the black boxes have been released to the public, With the exception of a partial transcript of Flight 93's CVR, the contents of any of the black boxes remained unknown to the public until August of 2006, when the National Security Archive published long-hidden NTSB Reports including flight path and other studies of the commandeered flights. The studies include FDR data from Flight 77 and Flight 93. Authorities had previously claimed that all but the voice recorder on Flight 93 were either not recovered or too damaged to yield data. The black boxes of Flight 77 (Pentagon) were allegedly found on September 14th. (<---How convenient)

According to the federal authorities controlling Ground Zero, the black boxes from the two crashed 767s, Flight 11 (http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/attack/flight11.html) and Flight 175 (http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/attack/flight175.html), failed to turn up in the rubble taken from the site. 4 (http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/blackboxes.html#ref4) The 9/11 Commission Report (http://911research.wtc7.net/post911/commission/report.html) backs the FBI's story, flatly stating: "The CVRs and FDRs from American 11 and United 175 were not found."
There are accounts contradicting the official account of the black boxes. Two men who worked in the cleanup operation at Ground Zero claim that they helped authorities find three of the four black boxes in October of 2001. One of the workers, New York City firefighter Nicholas DeMasi, has self-published a book with other Ground Zero workers in which he describes the recovery of the devices. 5 (http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/blackboxes.html#ref5) The book, Behind the Scenes: GROUND ZERO, A Collection of Personal Accounts, can be ordered through SummerOfTruth.org (http://www.summeroftruth.org/groundzero.html).
In December 2005, CounterPunch reported that an NTSB source contradicted the official account:
"Off the record, we had the boxes," the source says. "You'd have to get the official word from the FBI as to where they are, but we worked on them here."

http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/blackboxes.html


Dick Bridges, a spokesman for Arlington County, Va. authorities, told the Associated Press the voice recorder was damaged on the outside and the flight data recorder was charred in fires that broke out following the crash. But he said the FBI was still confident data can be retrieved from both.

Bridges said the recorders were found "right where the plane came into the building."


were allegedly found on September 14th. (<---How convenient)



http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/september01/wash_9-14.html

Silver Rocket Bitches!
26th February 2013, 09:16 PM
They actually shot planes visibly into the other buildings (which went right in, and left no debris at the point of impact btw). Seems to me like they had them at their disposal, and were using them rather effectively.

It's actually something like 90 bodies, and their clothing as well. How one forensically fakes bone fragments of people getting slammed into a building at 530 mph is one thing. Somehow getting them off the airplane after takeoff is another, and then making a airplane disappear altogether is again quite the feat of engineering in itself. Then there's the invisible machinery required to plant, or knock over light poles, and even more heavy equipment to plant all the debris like the landing gear, tires, and engine parts...and then there's over 130 witnesses seeing the plane right there and/or seeing it hit the building. How many saw a missile again? How many saw the plane fly away?

But these realities are all skipped over repeatedly in the thought process, and I get called colorful names from A-Z instead.

State once and for all your theory of what happened. Do you agree with the official version of events? Do you have a theory? Is it plausible that a missile disguised as a plane hit the Pentagon? Why aren't we allowed to see the numerous recordings from that day? Why aren't you asking questions like the rest of us?

jimswift
27th February 2013, 05:30 AM
I too would like to hear his thesis on 911 considering he basically has said he's 'finished the internet' and knows EVERYTHING that there is to know about it.

Put it to rest joboo, tells us what happened.

Neuro
27th February 2013, 05:39 AM
I too would like to hear his thesis on 911 considering he basically has said he's 'finished the internet' and knows EVERYTHING that there is to know about it.

Put it to rest joboo, tells us what happened.
Yes, I am all ears!

Horn
27th February 2013, 06:06 AM
Its a conspiracy theory, correct?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98

kiffertom
27th February 2013, 06:15 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZjhxuhTmGk
here is a jet hitting a wall at 500mph

Horn
27th February 2013, 06:30 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZjhxuhTmGk
here is a jet hitting a wall at 500mph

So you're adding evidence for the impossible flight path given the track its attached to, correct?

Or a missile poking through the backside of the Pentagon, as your jet didn't make it.

kiffertom
27th February 2013, 07:57 AM
So you're adding evidence for the impossible flight path given the track its attached to, correct?

Or a missile poking through the backside of the Pentagon, as your jet didn't make it.just showing a video of a crash!

Son-of-Liberty
27th February 2013, 08:24 AM
How come the planes entered the twin towers all nice and neat? According to you guys there should have been luggage, bodies, and debris flying around all over the place when the buildings were hit. ....but that didn't happen even a little bit, it all went right inside the building.

Zero debris was outside the building where they were hit. Some people even went so far to say it was impossible for them to even penetrate the buildings due to the metal composition, but they were dead wrong also.

Except on the twin tower impacts the planes left wing and engine marks. If you look at the pictures of the pentagon before the roof collapsed there are no marks where the wings or tail would have been.

The glass isn't even broken on the windows above the main hole where the tail should have been.

Note: I embeded pics of the pentagon but they aren't showing up when I refresh the page for some reason. They can be found here. http://www.teamlaw.net/091101.htm

You can click on the photos at that link to enlarge them.

http://www.teamlaw.net/images/PenthitistaReduced.jpg
http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/wtcnorthhole.jpg
http://www.teamlaw.net/images/Penthitista1.jpg

Son-of-Liberty
27th February 2013, 08:27 AM
http://911review.org/img/SIPA-N0116740.JPG

Silver Rocket Bitches!
27th February 2013, 10:23 AM
I too would like to hear his thesis on 911 considering he basically has said he's 'finished the internet' and knows EVERYTHING that there is to know about it.

Put it to rest joboo, tells us what happened.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=204yyqebnDE

joboo
27th February 2013, 10:23 AM
State once and for all your theory of what happened. Do you agree with the official version of events? Do you have a theory? Is it plausible that a missile disguised as a plane hit the Pentagon? Why aren't we allowed to see the numerous recordings from that day? Why aren't you asking questions like the rest of us?

I already have probably a dozen times or more in the other thread, but you'd be hard pressed to find it in between all the fine upstanding individuals on this forum calling me an asshole, fuckhead, jew, faggot, idiot, jerk, shill, etc...

Great gang of honest amicable characters here just searching for the truth.

Real top caliber stuff.

Silver Rocket Bitches!
27th February 2013, 10:26 AM
I already have probably a dozen times or more in the other thread, but you'd be hard pressed to find it in between all the fine upstanding individuals on this forum calling me an asshole, fuckhead, jew, faggot, idiot, jerk, shill, etc...

Great gang of honest amicable characters here just searching for the truth.

Real top caliber stuff.

That's unfortunate that you had to go through such bullying on an Internet forum. I hope you are able to live a normal life after all you've been through.

But the question remains, what is your personal theory of what happened at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001? Is there anything about the official story that you are skeptical about?

Roland
27th February 2013, 10:46 AM
I already have probably a dozen times or more in the other thread, but you'd be hard pressed to find it in between all the fine upstanding individuals on this forum calling me an asshole, fuckhead, jew, faggot, idiot, jerk, shill, etc...

Great gang of honest amicable characters here just searching for the truth.

Real top caliber stuff.
joboo i just want you to know i don't think your a complete ass hat.
with just the empirical evidence of your comments on this forum about various topics and members. iv come to the conclusion you are something else entirely....not to say thats a bad thing, it just depends on where you stand in the sand

joboo
27th February 2013, 10:50 AM
That's unfortunate that you had to go through such bullying on an Internet forum. I hope you are able to live a normal life after all you've been through.

But the question remains, what is your personal theory of what happened at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001? Is there anything about the official story that you are skeptical about?

Oh, I'll be able to live "that normal life", but it's really interesting when I put up a question, a gang of idiots ramp up, and acts like total dickheads every time without fail. There's much better words for it no doubt.

Even if I was a 100% proven shill. Thre's a right way, and wrong way. Unfortunately the 15 yr old loser method is etched in stone now for everyone to see. Bit of a disgrace to this forum to say the least. All it did for me was drive home the fact that some people here really are absolutely crazy, and mentally unstable.

Anyhow...

I'm skeptical about everything else except the missile. It's my only point of contention, and I've said this more than a few times as well already. They had the planes, and they guided them in by simply pressing the big easy button despite how "impossible" it all looks. 100+ witnesses visually confirmed it. Many saw it actually bank over the VDOT tower. Logistically it's only thing that ultimately makes sense the deeper it's analyzed. There's just too many factors involved, too many witnesses, and too many external people that were involved (forensics), to cover it up, and fake it. How could they possibly fake the remains of over 90 people with shattered bone fragments? How does one reproduce that in a chop shop? Over 90 people. That's a feat in itself.

They could have just pressed a button to get this done. The hole is the right size, there were wing marks on the building, and keep in mind the wing profile would have been affected from hitting the lamp poles, in addition to everything I posted a few rounds up.

mamboni
27th February 2013, 10:51 AM
I already have probably a dozen times or more in the other thread, but you'd be hard pressed to find it in between all the fine upstanding individuals on this forum calling me an asshole, fuckhead, jew, faggot, idiot, jerk, shill, etc...



For the record Joboo, I just want to say that I don't think you're a faggot.;D

joboo
27th February 2013, 11:05 AM
You'll have to forgive my disbelief on that claim. ;) It's just an internet forum, and it's trivial in comparison to probably what's coming (SHTF). If posting on an internet forum drives people over the edge into a regressive rage, heaven help them when it gets to that point.

mamboni
27th February 2013, 11:08 AM
You'll have to forgive my disbelief on that claim. ;) It's just an internet forum, and it's trivial in comparison to probably what's coming (SHTF). If posting on an internet forum drives people over the edge into a regressive rage, heaven help them when it gets to that point.

Oh, I didn't realize you're a practicing homosexual - sorry. Here at GSUS, we will never hold your sexual orientation against you.

VX1
27th February 2013, 11:34 AM
You'll have to forgive my disbelief on that claim. ;) It's just an internet forum, and it's trivial in comparison to probably what's coming (SHTF). If posting on an internet forum drives people over the edge into a regressive rage, heaven help them when it gets to that point.

All you really did was reiterate your objection to the missile aspect. Let's just take one other aspect. Who do you believe is responsible to the demolition wiring and execution of the WTC7 job? Somebody was, so where does the evidence best point to? Who are they in association with?

On a side subject, it is quite clear that Israel, and its founders, have openly waged a war of lies and disinformation on the Internet and subversion in America, with operations such as JIDF, networks of Sayanims, etc. A study of history shows this subversion to be nothing new, only the use of the technology. Do you believe that it is important for the average Joe in America to understand this is happening?

joboo
27th February 2013, 12:15 PM
All you really did was reiterate your objection to the missile aspect. Let's just take one other aspect. Who do you believe is responsible to the demolition wiring and execution of the WTC7 job? Somebody was, so where does the evidence best point to? Who are they in association with?

On a side subject, it is quite clear that Israel, and its founders, have openly waged a war of lies and disinformation on the Internet and subversion in America, with operations such as JIDF, networks of Sayanims, etc. A study of history shows this subversion to be nothing new, only the use of the technology. Do you believe that it is important for the average Joe in America to understand this is happening?

Well yeah, I'm not sure how many times I need to state the only issue I have is with the missile angle. Where the disconnect keeps happening I have no idea.

joboo
27th February 2013, 12:19 PM
Oh, I didn't realize you're a practicing homosexual - sorry. Here at GSUS, we will never hold your sexual orientation against you.

You drive home all my points the best of anyone on this forum. When things get rough I wouldn't want to be within 100 miles of anyone that thinks, and acts the way you do towards others that you have a "suspicion" over. It's a time bomb waiting to go off on some innocent family.

VX1
27th February 2013, 12:45 PM
All you really did was reiterate your objection to the missile aspect. Let's just take one other aspect. Who do you believe is responsible to the demolition wiring and execution of the WTC7 job? Somebody was, so where does the evidence best point to? Who are they in association with?

On a side subject, it is quite clear that Israel, and its founders, have openly waged a war of lies and disinformation on the Internet and subversion in America, with operations such as JIDF, networks of Sayanims, etc. A study of history shows this subversion to be nothing new, only the use of the technology. Do you believe that it is important for the average Joe in America to understand this is happening?


Well yeah, I'm not sure how many times I need to state the only issue I have is with the missile angle. Where the disconnect keeps happening I have no idea.

Again, all you really did was reiterate your objection to the missile aspect. We've got that. It would have taken a lot less strokes of the keyboard to just answer the question directed to you, if you could answer.

joboo
27th February 2013, 12:48 PM
Again, all you really did was reiterate your objection to the missile aspect. We've got that. It would have taken a lot less strokes of the keyboard to just answer the question directed to you, if you could answer.

I already have 100 times. I even posted a video called "War by deception" a couple weeks ago.

VX1
27th February 2013, 12:54 PM
Again, all you really did was reiterate your objection to the missile aspect. We've got that. It would have taken a lot less strokes of the keyboard to just answer the question directed to you, if you could answer.


I already have 100 times. I even posted a video called "War by deception" a couple weeks ago.

Many may have your character here on "ignore", so they might not have had the opportunity to see all 100 times. Good for you, perhaps this will help your cred.

mamboni
27th February 2013, 12:54 PM
You drive home all my points the best of anyone on this forum. When things get rough I wouldn't want to be within 100 miles of anyone that thinks, and acts the way you do towards others that you have a "suspicion" over. It's a time bomb waiting to go off on some innocent family.

You really need to cut down on the hyperbole. You are so inappropriate. Stop the hsitrionics and whining about being victimized. Get over yourself.

VX1
27th February 2013, 01:01 PM
I already have 100 times. I even posted a video called "War by deception" a couple weeks ago.


Many may have your character here on "ignore", so they might not have had the opportunity to see all 100 times. Good for you, perhaps this will help your cred.

But actually, if you first type "...all roads lead to Israel", and then feel compelled to immediately erase that truth... well, doesn't lend well to your cred. Hmmmmm.

The original post:
4492

joboo
27th February 2013, 01:06 PM
You really need to cut down on the hyperbole. You are so inappropriate. Stop the hsitrionics and whining about being victimized. Get over yourself.

It's not that at all...the opposite actually. You can dish it out, but you can't take a drop of it. Saran wrap for skin. You're quite literally nuts, some quack doctor, and the drama fits you throw over the banning nonsense, and ad hominem.

Textbook lunatic behavior, and I pity your neighbors. You must be dipping into the prescriptions you prescribe for your patients (if you have any)...or something. I dunno. It's some kind of substance abuse because normal people don't act like you.

joboo
27th February 2013, 01:07 PM
But actually, if you first type "...all roads lead to Israel", and then feel compelled to immediately erase that truth... well, doesn't lend well to your cred. Hmmmmm.

The original post:
4492

I can't remember if he changed the title. So i edited it. It used to be called that. All roads do lead to Isreal btw..

joboo
27th February 2013, 01:16 PM
Anyhow, I'm off to the gym, I recommend you guys get off your butts, and do the same. Sitting in front of a computer all day is a less than stellar way to experience life.

mamboni
27th February 2013, 01:17 PM
It's not that at all...the opposite actually. You can dish it out, but you can't take a drop of it. Saran wrap for skin. You're quite literally nuts, some quack doctor, and the drama fits you throw over the banning nonsense, and ad hominem.

Textbook lunatic bahavior, and I pity your neighbors. You must be dipping into the prescriptions you prescribe for your patients (if you have any)...or something. I dunno. It's some kind of substance abuse because normal people don't act like you.

What a whinning baby you are. He cries in pain as he strikes at thee! LOL "Oy vay, I'm a poor Joo and all the goyim are out to get me and poor poor Israel. Oy, so many antisemites, so little time."

JDRock
27th February 2013, 02:26 PM
waaaha waahh waahh jewboo is off to the gym to get bigger muscles so we wont bully him hahahaa

Horn
27th February 2013, 03:58 PM
http://911review.org/img/SIPA-N0116740.JPG

That's a pretty good photo, where'd you get that, SipaPress?

joboo
27th February 2013, 04:57 PM
What a whinning baby you are. He cries in pain as he strikes at thee! LOL "Oy vay, I'm a poor Joo and all the goyim are out to get me and poor poor Israel. Oy, so many antisemites, so little time."

I'm not crying out in pain, I actually pity you. I'm just pointing out how ridiculous some people act here. You behave like a vindictive 15 yr old basket case towards me at every opportunity, then every so often you blow a head gasket in some ridiculous "look at me, I need comforting" drama over how you just can't take it any more. It's akin to feeding a squirrel in the park, do I care if one gets upset that I didn't toss him some bread....not exactly.... but feel free to continue on acting the part if it gives you that sense of deviant personal pleasure by all means.

joboo
27th February 2013, 05:01 PM
waaaha waahh waahh jewboo is off to the gym to get bigger muscles so we wont bully him hahahaa

I do it for health reasons, nobody here poses a threat to me.

mamboni
27th February 2013, 05:03 PM
I'm not crying out in pain, I actually pity you. I'm just pointing out how ridiculous some people act here. You behave like a vindictive 15 yr old basket case towards me at every opportunity, then every so often you blow a head gasket in some ridiculous "look at me, I need comforting" drama over how you just can't take it any more. It's akin to feeding a squirrel in the park, do I care if one gets upset that I didn't toss him some bread....not exactly.... but feel free to continue on acting the part if it gives you that sense of deviant personal pleasure by all means.


This is pure projection. You're a typical whining paranoid Jew who acts like an asshole, insults, condescends, makes sweeping inuendos and then, when you get a hostile reaction, start whining about how you're the victim and everyone hates you. You're not fooling anyone with this jew-jitsu bullshit. We've seen it all before and we'll see it again. Same BS artistry, different day.

Horn
27th February 2013, 05:11 PM
I do it for health reasons, nobody here poses a threat to me.

Ignorance is typically its own worst enemy.

Santa
27th February 2013, 05:12 PM
I'm not crying out in pain, I actually pity you. I'm just pointing out how ridiculous some people act here. You behave like a vindictive 15 yr old basket case towards me at every opportunity, then every so often you blow a head gasket in some ridiculous "look at me, I need comforting" drama over how you just can't take it any more. It's akin to feeding a squirrel in the park, do I care if one gets upset that I didn't toss him some bread....not exactly.... but feel free to continue on acting the part if it gives you that sense of deviant personal pleasure by all means.

You've got to be Jo-King. Lol...

joboo
27th February 2013, 05:18 PM
This is pure projection. You're a typical whining paranoid Jew who acts like an asshole, insults, condescends, makes sweeping insults and inuendos and then, when you get a hostile reaction, start whining about how you're the victim and everyone hates you. You're not fooling anyone with this jew-jitsu bullshit. We've seen it all beofre and we'll see it again. Same BS artistry, different day.

That's bullshit straight up. That's your own little paranoid fantasy creation. I questioned a few things some didn't like to think about...akin to touching the "sacred third rail" or something, and some people went crazy train over it. Yourself in particular. I could care less what you think for a while now, as you've proven you're entirely incapable of maintaining a civil rational discussion at every opportunity without fail. You always go off like some wild eyed angry teenager for some reason. I'm guessing it's alcohol. How much do you drink during the day?

joboo
27th February 2013, 05:19 PM
Ignorance is typically its own worst enemy.

Dude fuck that I'm a cancer survivor if you didn't know.

mamboni
27th February 2013, 05:24 PM
Dude fuck that I'm a cancer survivor if you didn't know.


Wow, you are beyond shameless. What a pathetic display of abject desperation. Vapid.

joboo
27th February 2013, 05:31 PM
Wow, you are beyond shameless. What a pathetic display of abject desperation. Vapid.

I've got the MRI scans to prove it. I've been shot up with gadolinium and tossed into one of those tubes more times than I care to remember. You're so off base but convinced you're right there's nothing else to do but laugh.

Horn
27th February 2013, 05:46 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iQIchIUn84

osoab
27th February 2013, 05:46 PM
Cancer angle...

Nice...


/sarcasm...

JDRock
27th February 2013, 06:48 PM
oh sheeeeot! its been 5 minutes and halo hasnt posted to cover up the obvious!

joboo
27th February 2013, 07:40 PM
oh sheeeeot! its been 5 minutes and halo hasnt posted to cover up the obvious!

Dude, you're looped. I'm going to guess you're 25, maybe early 30's, still trying to figure things out.

Halo or Juristic Person or whomever is not posting on this forum, I would know, and would have taken them to task already just like I did on GIM. They've moved on with their lives apparently, and you're still living the ultra paranoid dream.

Son-of-Liberty
27th February 2013, 08:50 PM
Joboo, it is too bad this thread has regressed but I still don't think you addressed my point. There are no wing or tail marks where the plane supposedly struck the building.

The damage to the building is not consistent with a plane the size of a 757. Although there are some areas that appear damaged it could have been from the construction taking place. If they were installing thick wire like on the spools sitting on the lawn then they would likely have removed some of the windows or parts of the walls. There certainly is no damage from the tail. Don't tell me that it sheared off and went in the square hole to be vaporized. Also note that in the hole we are told the plane entered there appears to be part of a support still in the center of it. There is no way a 155 foot cabin of a plane went in that hole without taking out that support. It is insane.

I am not saying that I know what hit the pentagon. But is wasn't a 757.

If it was a missile strike the construction damage plus some flammables placed in the area to catch fire after the strike would give the appearance of a large plane impact without the risk of doing more damage to the building then planned. (it is the military headquarters after all)

They may have even rigged that area to collapse but it failed and did not collapse immediately. If it had we probably would have been fooled.

http://compusiast.com/articles/The_Twins/The_Twins_files/image048.jpg
http://compusiast.com/articles/The_Twins/The_Twins_files/image050.jpg
http://usarmy.vo.llnwd.net/e2/-images/2009/09/10/50291/size0-army.mil-50291-2009-09-11-090944.jpg
http://www.twf.org/News/Y2009/0101-engine331.jpg

Son-of-Liberty
27th February 2013, 09:00 PM
Another point is the entrance hole is square while the supposed exit hole is round. Weird huh?

http://compusiast.com/articles/The_Twins/The_Twins_files/image060.jpg

Son-of-Liberty
27th February 2013, 09:31 PM
Joboo, I have to thank you for getting me thinking about this topic again. I had researched it years ago. Made up my mind and haven't really paid attention since.

The more I think about it though the more I feel it wasn't a missile strike or drone or jetliner.

I think they OKC'd it.

They planted explosives in the building. Would have been easy with it "under construction."

I think they did this to make sure there would be no unintentional casualties or damage to the rest of the building.

I think it was supposed to collapse immediately which would have been fairly convincing because you wouldn't be able to tell if something hit it or not.

I think the video they released was doctored to show "something" striking the pentagon. It is grainy poor resolution video only 5 frames. Would have been easy to alter. All they really added was what appears to be the nose cone of something.

I think they released it to get people arguing about what hit the pentagon rather then realizing they were completely bamboozled and nothing at all hit it.

What's that saying? The bigger the lie the more likely people will believe it?

Son-of-Liberty
27th February 2013, 10:26 PM
That's a pretty good photo, where'd you get that, SipaPress?

www.911review.org

Guess Sipa press would have been the original source.

Horn
27th February 2013, 10:35 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsWZHKIg3Cs