View Full Version : It has NOTHING to do with self-defense, it's ALL about feeling good
midnight rambler
5th March 2013, 09:13 AM
Feelings...it's all about feelings...now we know -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RgXsCnrYZGY#
chad
5th March 2013, 09:17 AM
yesterday was very telling. they want everything banned, not just "assault weapons."
Dogman
5th March 2013, 09:26 AM
They want to use England as a model for what to do here!
EE_
5th March 2013, 09:39 AM
Why is it always Jews that are at the front of this?
Wait, I already know...they know one day we are going to turn our guns on them.
ArizonaDad
5th March 2013, 09:50 AM
What about MY feelings? I feel safer when the good guys around me are armed. The only people who feel safer when the good guys are unarmed are the bad guys. We don't need to identify the bad guys. They are identifying themselves.
midnight rambler
5th March 2013, 09:51 AM
The message is clear: people are irresponsible, incompetent, and reckless, and cannot be trusted with guns. Only highly trained corporate state actors who've been carefully screened to eliminate those with IQs over room temperature are qualified* to have guns.
*their careers and their pensions insure that corporate state actors will always make the right decisions using their very best discretion /sarc
Santa
5th March 2013, 10:01 AM
Why is it always Jews that are at the front of this?
Wait, I already know...they know one day we are going to turn our guns on them.
I just worked an estate sale for the family of a deceased Jew IRS judge, (lol) and let me tell you, that old Jew bastard had guns. Plenty of guns. In fact, he was a bigshot in the NRA back in the day.
Unfortunately, his kids took all the weapons, so I never got to bid on them. All they left was a fire proof gun safe and about a 100 lbs. of reloading brass, lead and tools that sold immediately.
EE_
5th March 2013, 10:01 AM
You never hear the stats on how many people with CCW permits commit crimes. People that get permits are responsible and are not likely to commit crimes.
EE_
5th March 2013, 10:05 AM
I just worked an estate sale for the family of a deceased Jew IRS judge, (lol) and let me tell you, that old Jew bastard had guns. Plenty of guns. In fact, he was a bigshot in the NRA back in the day.
Unfortunately, his kids took all the weapons, so I never got to bid on them. All they left was a fire proof gun safe and about a 100 lbs. of reloading brass, lead and tools that sold immediately.
I bet most Jews have guns and don't tell anyone about them. They know they have been thrown out at least 109 countries throughout history and it will happen again...and they know it!
109 Locations whence Jews have been Expelled since AD250
YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .PLACE
250 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Carthage
415 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Alexandria
554 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Diocèse of Clermont (France)
561 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Diocèse of Uzès (France)
612 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Visigoth Spain
642 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Visigoth Empire
855 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Italy
876 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sens
1012 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz
1182 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France
1182 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Germany
1276 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Upper Bavaria
1290 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - England
1306 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France
1322 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France (again)
1348 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Switzerland
1349 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hielbronn (Germany)
1349 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Saxony
1349 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hungary
1360 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hungary
1370 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Belgium
1380 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Slovakia
1388 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Strasbourg
1394 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Germany
1394 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France
1420 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lyons
1421 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Austria
1424 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fribourg
1424 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Zurich
1424 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cologne
1432 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Savoy
1438 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz
1439 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Augsburg
1442 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Netherlands
1444 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Netherlands
1446 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bavaria
1453 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France
1453 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Breslau
1454 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wurzburg
1462 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz
1483 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz
1484 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Warsaw
1485 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vincenza (Italy)
1492 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Spain
1492 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Italy
1495 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lithuania
1496 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Naples
1496 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Portugal
1498 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Nuremberg
1498 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Navarre
1510 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Brandenberg
1510 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prussia
1514 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Strasbourg
1515 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Genoa
1519 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Regensburg
1533 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Naples
1541 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Naples
1542 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague & Bohemia
1550 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Genoa
1551 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bavaria
1555 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pesaro
1557 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague
1559 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Austria
1561 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague
1567 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wurzburg
1569 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Papal States
1571 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Brandenburg
1582 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Netherlands
1582 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hungary
1593 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Brandenburg, Austria
1597 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cremona, Pavia & Lodi
1614 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Frankfort
1615 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Worms
1619 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Kiev
1648 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ukraine
1648 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Poland
1649 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hamburg
1654 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Little Russia (Beylorus)
1656 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lithuania
1669 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Oran (North Africa)
1669 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vienna
1670 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vienna
1712 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sandomir
1727 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Russia
1738 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wurtemburg
1740 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Little Russia (Beylorus)
1744 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague, Bohemia
1744 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Slovakia
1744 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Livonia
1745 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moravia
1753 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Kovad (Lithuania)
1761 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bordeaux
1772 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Deported to the Pale of Settlement (Poland/Russia)
1775 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Warsaw
1789 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Alsace
1804 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Villages in Russia
1808 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Villages & Countrysides (Russia)
1815 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lbeck & Bremen
1815 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria
1820 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bremen
1843 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Russian Border Austria & Prussia
1862 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Areas in the U.S. under General Grant's Jurisdiction[1]
1866 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Galatz, Romania
1880s - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Russia
1891 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moscow
1919 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bavaria (foreign born Jews)
1938-45 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Nazi Controlled Areas
1948 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Arab Countries
Santa
5th March 2013, 10:33 AM
I wonder what the statistics are on the percentage of Jew Lawyers and Judges in the US? Not just on the supreme court, which is over 30%, but nationwide.
EE_
5th March 2013, 11:01 AM
I wonder what the statistics are on the percentage of Jew Lawyers and Judges in the US? Not just on the supreme court, which is over 30%, but nationwide.
According to Forbes, out of the 2%ers, 48% of US billionaires are Jewish and 25/30% of US multi-millionaires are Jewish
Percent of Jews that ever had a callus on their hands, 0%
I will guess the majority of judges and lawyers are Jews
Jews Dominate Top Law Schools
A percentage of the law school professoriate at these schools never falls under 25% and usually is around 50%.
The top ten law schools are:
1. Yale
2. Stanford
3. Harvard
4. Columbia
5. NYU
6. U. of Chicago
7. Berkeley (Boalt)
8. Michigan
9. Pennsylvania
10. Virginia
Here are the top ten's deans and their race
1. Yale - Harold Koh - Asian
2. Stanford - Larry Kramer - jew
3. Harvard - Elena Kagan - jew
4. Columbia - David Schizer - jew
5. NYU - Mordechai Revesz - jew
6. U. of Chicago - Saul Levmore - jew
7. Berkeley (Boalt) - Christopher Edley Jr. - black
8. Michigan - Evan Kaminker - likely jew
9. Pennsylvania - Michael Fitts - white
10. Virginia - John Jeffries - white
chad
5th March 2013, 11:18 AM
what this boils down to is one group of people scared of guns, are never going to own guns because they are afraid of them, so nobody should own them. then there's the other camp, but they are stupid because they do not understand that guns are scary.
madfranks
5th March 2013, 11:34 AM
I encourage anyone who hasn't watched the OP video, WATCH IT. At about the 1:10 mark he says, "What we are doing here tonight is not to protect ourselves from violent crime, what we are trying to do here tonight, is protect students and teachers from feeling uncomfortable."
The loathing I have for that scum bag is too much for me to put into words. Your "feelings" do not give you the right to force us, under threat of violence, to render ourselves defenseless so some person can feel good about it.
Twisted Titan
5th March 2013, 12:10 PM
They can kiss my 230.grain @$$ .
Your feelings means as much to me as they would to a criminal.
What i got im keeping and any law you pass isnt going to change that.
People with common sense know how this is gonna end up
Twisted Titan
5th March 2013, 12:17 PM
1772 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Deported to the Pale of Settlement (Poland/Russia)
Now I know why Katherine recieved the title of" The Great"
mick silver
5th March 2013, 12:22 PM
You never hear the stats on how many people with CCW permits commit crimes. People that get permits are responsible and are not likely to commit crimes.
your right i have never thought of it this way . never seen it on the news .
Sparky
5th March 2013, 12:40 PM
I encourage anyone who hasn't watched the OP video, WATCH IT. At about the 1:10 mark he says, "What we are doing here tonight is not to protect ourselves from violent crime, what we are trying to do here tonight, is protect students and teachers from feeling uncomfortable."
The loathing I have for that scum bag is too much for me to put into words. Your "feelings" to not give you the right to force us, under threat of violence, to render ourselves defenseless so some person can feel good about it.
MF, you (and maybe others here as well) are totally missing what he is doing here. He is purposely and very explicitly pointing out the ridiculous premise, i.e. that other people's feelings outweigh the right of self defense. That's why he asks her to repeat it. And it's why he carefully re-states what is transpiring at that hearing, and then apologizes for it at 2:00, essentially saying that he's embarrassed to be a part of it. The apology is met with some applause. He's the good guy here. The idiot woman who follows him is the bad guy.
chad
5th March 2013, 12:42 PM
thanks sparky. i caught that as well, but i was too lazy to type it out as you did.
Sparky
5th March 2013, 12:43 PM
P.S. Notice the evil eye that Hudak gives him at 2:15. She's fed up that he is mocking the entire proceeding.
madfranks
5th March 2013, 01:42 PM
MF, you (and maybe others here as well) are totally missing what he is doing here. He is purposely and very explicitly pointing out the ridiculous premise, i.e. that other people's feelings outweigh the right of self defense. That's why he asks her to repeat it. And it's why he carefully re-states what is transpiring at that hearing, and then apologizes for it at 2:00, essentially saying that he's embarrassed to be a part of it. The apology is met with some applause. He's the good guy here. The idiot woman who follows him is the bad guy.
I see you're right. The title of this thread led me to believe he was genuine.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.