PDA

View Full Version : Weapons Ban Shot Down, Obama Sends Kerry To U.N. To Pass International Gun Ban



Cebu_4_2
20th March 2013, 04:31 AM
BREAKING: Weapons Ban Shot Down, Obama Sends Kerry To U.N. To Pass International Gun Ban March 20, 2013

http://www.mrconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Obama-Angry1.jpg Diane Feinstein’s assault weapon ban may be deader than a doornail, but is the Obama administration trying to bring gun control into the United States via the NRA opposed U.N. Weapons Treaty?

Per the Washington Post.

The National Rifle Association, which is battling a raft of gun control measures on Capitol Hill, also has an international fight on its hand as it gears up to oppose a U.N. treaty designed to restrict the flow of arms to conflict zones.
…The NRA is among the treaty’s most vocal opponents and a founder of the World Forum on Shooting Activities, an international coalition of gun rights activists and gun manufacturers who plan to speak against the treaty.
“What we really object to is the inclusion of civilian firearms within the scope of the ATT,” said Tom Mason, the group’s executive secretary and a lawyer who has represented the NRA at U.N. meetings for nearly two decades. “This is a treaty that really needs to address the transfer of large numbers of military weapons that leads to human rights abuses. We have submitted language that you can define what a civilian firearm is.”
The NRA also argues that the treaty could infringe on gun rights as understood in the United States and could force Americans onto an international registry.
What is a “civilian firearm” in the mind of a UN bureaucrat or the Obama Administration? A pistol? Probably. A Mossberg Tactical Shotgun? Maybe not. An Ar-15? Doubtful. Oh, and don’t even start discussing an international gun registry. A list of gun owners at the government’s fingertips is nothing more than an invitation to try to confiscate every weapon in the country one day. That’s not acceptable today, tomorrow or ever.

monty
20th March 2013, 06:57 AM
Treaties, like laws that are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.
http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/category/treaty-making-powers-of-the-united-states/

http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/

<iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/60944105" width="400" height="300" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>


Edit: Posted this from my ipad, but can't get the link to the video to work.

7th trump
20th March 2013, 07:42 AM
Treaties, like laws that are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.
http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/category/treaty-making-powers-of-the-united-states/

http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/

<iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/60944105" width="400" height="300" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>


Edit: Posted this from my ipad, but can't get the link to the video to work.
You as a citizen established by the 14th amendment are in the jurisdiction of the federal government and the US Constitution restricts the federal government to mostly international affairs....commerce, ect.
The federal government can and most likely will impose a treaty on its subjects to further the one world government.
But the question is the more shit they pull on the American people the more they have to let the cat out of the bag about the 14th amendment citizenship being completely voluntary.

monty
20th March 2013, 11:50 AM
You as a citizen established by the 14th amendment are in the jurisdiction of the federal government and the US Constitution restricts the federal government to mostly international affairs....commerce, ect.
The federal government can and most likely will impose a treaty on its subjects to further the one world government.
But the question is the more shit they pull on the American people the more they have to let the cat out of the bag about the 14th amendment citizenship being completely voluntary.

The 14th amendment does allow people to volunteer to become US citizens and to volunteer to be under the jurisdiction of the US. But It did not amendment the Constitution to remove or nullify the second amendment. Still any portion of any law or any treaty that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void.