madfranks
10th April 2013, 12:26 PM
I just heard this on the local talk radio, and I think the man made a good point! Regarding the "large capacity" magazine ban, according to the law (http://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/rpt/2013-R-0198.htm):
"A person may possess a large-capacity magazine if he or she (1) owns the magazine on July 1, 2013 and (2) maintains continuous possession of the magazine."
The "continuous possession" clause made a lot of people upset because it meant that folks can't let their friend use their gun at the range, and it criminalizes family members who would use the weapon for self-defense. The weapon must remain in continuous possession of the owner. So if you get pulled over and the cops want to disarm you, you have legal grounds to maintain possession of your weapon. You can tell the police that it is against the law for you to give up continuous possession of your firearm.
Will it work? Probably not, but I thought it was a good point. The law is bullshit, anyways.
"A person may possess a large-capacity magazine if he or she (1) owns the magazine on July 1, 2013 and (2) maintains continuous possession of the magazine."
The "continuous possession" clause made a lot of people upset because it meant that folks can't let their friend use their gun at the range, and it criminalizes family members who would use the weapon for self-defense. The weapon must remain in continuous possession of the owner. So if you get pulled over and the cops want to disarm you, you have legal grounds to maintain possession of your weapon. You can tell the police that it is against the law for you to give up continuous possession of your firearm.
Will it work? Probably not, but I thought it was a good point. The law is bullshit, anyways.