If I can’t put it in my pocket, I have some reservations about that.”... V

[Ponce]

Hummmmmmm, sounds familiar?......."If you don't hold it, ra ra ra"
===============================================


Former Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) told Bloomberg TV’s Erik Schatzker and Sara Eisen today that he is ”concerned about the erraticness of the dollar. The dollar is up, the dollar is down. We print a lot of dollars. The dollar gets devalued. That is really the concern. If people think the gold price up and down is a reflection of something wrong with gold, no, I say it is something wrong with the dollar.”



On Bitcoin, Paul said, “To tell you the truth, it’s little bit too complicated. If I can’t put it in my pocket, I have some reservations about that.”


Read more at http://investmentwatchblog.com/ron-paul-on-bitcoin-if-i-cant-put-it-in-my-pocket-i-have-reservations/#Q8a14RXe3PZuQV8R.99

[palani]

Coupons are printed. Clip them out of the newspaper and take them in to the store for a reduction in price in the goods they represent. You can even put them in your pocket if you like.

12 USC 411 states that you handle federal reserve notes as an AGENT. I have no argument with this however I am not an agent so don't personally handle them. They are fine as corporate coupons and I expect corporations can handle them with no problems whatsoever (other than the obligation of accounting for them).

[madfranks]

You can put one of these in your pocket. As silver, it's worth about $23; as bitcoins, it's worth about $1270.

https://www.casascius.com/silvercoin.jpg

[7th trump]

Coupons are printed. Clip them out of the newspaper and take them in to the store for a reduction in price in the goods they represent. You can even put them in your pocket if you like.

12 USC 411 states that you handle federal reserve notes as an AGENT. I have no argument with this however I am not an agent so don't personally handle them. They are fine as corporate coupons and I expect corporations can handle them with no problems whatsoever (other than the obligation of accounting for them).

No retard, you are interpreting the 12usc 411 statute wrong....as you do with all your other interpretations of laws.
I always thought you were a follower of David Merrill Vanpelt...even after you denied knowing David Vanpelt and his theory about 12usc 411 and lawful money....now you are caught in a lie.

You really cant, and have proven, you cant interpret or comprehend law when reading simple English grammar structure at all can you palani?
You act so smart and studious but yet cant comprehend simple English grammar.......^%@ *&%$ your an idiot!
Do you even notice that statute 12usc 411 has three(3) parts to it.
There's a semicolon that separates the three individual aspects to 12usc 411.


12 USC § 411 -Issuance to reserve banks; nature of obligation; redemption

The 1st aspect of 12usc 411 is:

Issuance to reserve banks;
Here's the pertain information in relation to "issuance to reserve banks".


Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized.

This has nothing at all to do with you (the individual) being a bank or an agent.
It has everything to do with reserve notes themselves, at the level between the reserve system to reserve banks, being issued by the discretion of the Board of Governors to other reserve banks reserve agents.
What this is describing is FRN's have no other purpose besides being issued to reserve banks at the discretion of the governors at the level of the Federal Reserve System.
There's nothing there saying you, the individual, is a "bank" because you have frn's in your pocket.
In a nutshell Palani, its saying its taking over duties of the US Treasury who once issued "treasury notes".

The 2nd aspect to 12usc 411 is:

nature of obligation;
Here's the pertain information in relation to "obligation".


The said notes shall be obligations of the United States and shall be receivable by all national and member banks and Federal reserve banks and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues.

This is where 12usc 411 is saying since the "US Treasury note" is replaced by FRN's these same FRN's will act just like "treasury notes" being backed by the US government (obligation).....to pay public dues such as paying your employees, paying your mortgage, paying federal, state, and even local taxes. They are even good for purchasing groceries at your local grocery store...and so on and so on!
Not only that but FRN's are to be accepted by all national and member banks....just like the old Treasury notes still do to this day!

The 3rd and last aspect to 12usc 411 is:

Redemption;
Here's the pertain information in relation to "obligation".


They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, or at any Federal Reserve bank.

This part of 12usc 411 is benign until the suspension of the Gold Standard is lifted.
Its my opinion this 3rd part has never been removed or repealed from 12usc 411 because the Gold Standard has been "suspended" meaning its never been permanent. The US can go back on a Gold Standard at any time it wishes.
Then, and only then, will the Treasury redeem FRN's for Treasury notes backed by the precious metal.

This isn't difficult Palani but when you are infected by WANTING to believe in "conspiracy" you'll never be able to properly understand law.
This is what you get for believing a lie when the truth fits......you've just completely destroyed any creditability you had all by yourself!
Now you look even more of a toad with all your latin bullshit cites.

[zap]

Sometimes I just click on a thread cause..... 7th and Palani are there. ;) going round and round.

[palani]

This part of 12usc 411 is benign until the suspension of the Gold Standard is lifted.

Do you even bother to READ your garbage before you post? I thought electricians were supposed to be well versed in LOGIC. That doesn't appear to be the case.

In any event ... YOU are the one who holds statutes as law above all others. Me? I know of other laws that actually ARE laws. And Congress did not write them.

[7th trump]

Do you even bother to READ your garbage before you post? I thought electricians were supposed to be well versed in LOGIC. That doesn't appear to be the case.

In any event ... YOU are the one who holds statutes as law above all others. Me? I know of other laws that actually ARE laws. And Congress did not write them.

I never said I hold statutes above all other laws...that's you putting words in my mouth.
The Constitution is also in statute form, so it appears you don't know what a statute is!

There hasn't been a Treasury gold certificate since 1933 when Congress suspended the standard to redeem a FRN.
That's historical fact!

Hey palani............if the Reserve act was enacted in 1913 with the introduction of the FRN why werent millions of Americans not ever requiredto file a 1040 until 1940?

[7th trump]

Do you even bother to READ your garbage before you post? I thought electricians were supposed to be well versed in LOGIC. That doesn't appear to be the case.

In any event ... YOU are the one who holds statutes as law above all others. Me? I know of other laws that actually ARE laws. And Congress did not write them.Sure you do palani....wink ....wink!
Stop paying your taxes and see who knocks on your door...and taketh away!

I know you pay taxes because you don't know what causes "reporting" and who gets the "reported" information.
Hint....its not the IRS.

There's two different types of income. Ones is required to be "reported" and one is not required to be reported, both consists of being FRN's.
Hint....what causes reporting?

You want to talk about logic and yet cant even comprehend 12usc 411 correctly....you're infected with a "conspiracy" thought pattern palani...plain and simple!
Shit palani....who you kidding? You didn't even notice that 12usc 411 had three separate aspects about it until I just pointed them out to you.
And you are out yapping your jaws saying because you have FRN's in your pocket you must be a bank or an agent.
Show just for far gone up the "conspiracy" rabbit hole you really are!
Looks like you are the one who's NOT reading!


Are you even honest with yourself Palani or are you just that naïve?

[7th trump]

Seriously Palani...you're not a stupid person.
Chuck the ego and humble yourself.
You'll go farther than you ever imagined!

[joboo]

Everyone gets the same block chain to download, millions of copies, and growing, It's all just different keys to access different segments representing different values, and miners hashing out those transactions to keep it flowing. I suppose it all depends on if you think computers, and electricity will go away at any point.


Then there's the issue of network connectivity, (which is paramount) to get block chain updates in order to move the money around so to speak. No doubt it's a much higher risk.

A lightbulb moment for me was the money is in the cloud, not your wallet. Your wallet is just a key to access the cloud (distributed block chain) where all the transactions aka the "money" is. A big pile of virtual money with a bunch of keys to access a piece of the virtual pie.

Network goes down, big problems...


Same deal at the grocery store when the debit system goes down....oh what a mess that is. Ever been in one of those moments? Carts full of groceries, and a sea of unhappy faces.

Cash to the front of the line...that's my number ...scuse me pls, and thanks. Phew...

[Glass]

7th trump, What were your comments on Redemption. I didn't see anything there after the quote.

FRNs are negotiable instruments. Negotiable instrumnets are a specie of money, Coupons are specie of money, Remittance slips are a specie of money. Money is what you make of it as far as I can tell. Well at least that is what I am trying to determine atm.

[7th trump]

7th trump, What were your comments on Redemption. I didn't see anything there after the quote.

FRNs are negotiable instruments. Negotiable instrumnets are a specie of money, Coupons are specie of money, Remittance slips are a specie of money. Money is what you make of it as far as I can tell. Well at least that is what I am trying to determine atm.

Glass, let look up negotiable instrument to get an idea what it is you are looking for in relation to redemption.

[palani]

I never said I hold statutes above all other laws...that's you putting words in my mouth.
The Constitution is also in statute form, so it appears you don't know what a statute is!STATUTE. The written will of the legislature



There hasn't been a Treasury gold certificate since 1933 when Congress suspended the standard to redeem a FRN.
That's historical fact! Did these just vaporized then?
http://www.jsmineset.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/1922-Gold-Certificate-Gold-Coin-Note-xf-31606.jpg


..if the Reserve act was enacted in 1913 with the introduction of the FRN why werent millions of Americans not ever requiredto file a 1040 until 1940? Supposition is beyond my pay grade and I don't meddle with what does not affect me.

[palani]

Stop paying your taxes and see who knocks on your door.

You are presuming I have a door. Actually I have none. I am homeless.

[palani]

Seriously Palani...you're not a stupid person.

'Person' is a word, action or representation. 'Stupid' is an adjective that does not go with 'word'. An action can be stupid if you regret it later. Representation can be stupid depending upon who you select to represent you. 'Ewe' is a female sheep and that is how I view your comments.

[7th trump]

Palani's posts #13, #14, #15 are three(3) demonstrations of a person infected with a conspiracy mind set.

All three replies are inferior reactions to regain control and minimize damage. What you are look at is an up close look at "denial".

[palani]

7th trump's post number 16 is non-responsive and evasive. Motion to strike. Sustained!!!!

[7th trump]

STATUTE. The written will of the legislature


Did these just vaporized then?
http://www.jsmineset.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/1922-Gold-Certificate-Gold-Coin-Note-xf-31606.jpg

Supposition is beyond my pay grade and I don't meddle with what does not affect me.
Ohhh dont shit yourself Palani...they haven't printed gold treasury notes since 1933 when the standard was suspended. Did you happen to look at the date on your example dipshit or you betting on me not noticing your terrible attempt at deflection?

There's no supposition about how many filed in 1940....its historical fact.
Roughly 7 million new first time filers were required to file a 1040 in 1940 for tax year ending 12/31/1939.

What was added to the tax statutes in 1939 to cause this jump from 7 million to 14 million filers Palani?

1933 3,892,000 125,578,763 3.10% -4.68%
1934 4,198,000 126,373,773 3.32% 7.86%
1935 4,670,000 127,250,232 3.67% 11.24%
1936 5,486,000 128,053,180 4.28% 17.47%
1937 6,350,000 128,824,829 4.93% 15.75%
1938 6,251,000 129,824,939 4.81% -1.56%
1939 7,652,000 130,879,718 5.85% 22.41%
1940 14,711,000 132,122,446 11.13% 92.25%
1941 25,870,000 133,402,471 19.39% 75.85%
1942 36,619,000 134,859,553 27.15% 41.55%
1943 43,722,000 136,739,353 31.97% 19.40%
1944 47,111,000 138,397,345 34.04% 7.75%
1945 49,932,000 139,928,165

[7th trump]

You are presuming I have a door. Actually I have none. I am homeless.
Theres a concept....a homeless person yapping he knows all there is to know about "LAW".........."its a conspiracy!"

To busy thinking of ways to make yourself look smart and witty huh palani? You made yourself look totally........not creditable!

Dumb move!

[palani]

they haven't printed gold treasury notes since 1933 when the standard was suspended.
Did the note suddenly VAPORIZE in 1933. It still EXISTS in contradiction to YOUR statement than none were in EXISTENCE after 1933.

If you meant something else then you should have elucidated more accurately.

[palani]

a homeless person yapping he knows all there is to know about "LAW"

Why wouldn't I know all about Law? Isn't there a maxim that 'ignorance of the law is no excuse'. If there is a law and it is MY law then hadn't I better know it? On the other hand I have no idea of what YOU call law. You are likely a homo or child molester and operate under a completely different set of laws.

Actually ... as I have pointed out in the past ... the entire statement is "Ignorance of law ... Ignorance of law, consists in the want of knowledge of those laws which it is our duty to understand, and which every man is presumed to know."

[Hypertiger]

bit coins are like a stock tied to a company that does not exist...

It's just a greater fool game.

1929 and 2013

[madfranks]

Is that a bitcoin in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?

[General of Darkness]

Sometime in the near future you'll need big pockets even if you want to buy a loaf of bread.

http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/P1-BA632_ZIMDLR_DV_20110510183741.jpg

[7th trump]

Did the note suddenly VAPORIZE in 1933. It still EXISTS in contradiction to YOUR statement than none were in EXISTENCE after 1933.

If you meant something else then you should have elucidated more accurately.
So you cant argue facts, so you argue a fault in the use of a word huh?

Childish tantrum...simply childish!

[sirgonzo420]

You are presuming I have a door. Actually I have none. I am homeless.

If "home is where the heart is", does this mean you are heartless too?

:|~

[7th trump]

Why wouldn't I know all about Law? Isn't there a maxim that 'ignorance of the law is no excuse'. If there is a law and it is MY law then hadn't I better know it? On the other hand I have no idea of what YOU call law. You are likely a homo or child molester and operate under a completely different set of laws.

Actually ... as I have pointed out in the past ... the entire statement is "Ignorance of law ... Ignorance of law, consists in the want of knowledge of those laws which it is our duty to understand, and which every man is presumed to know."
Your law?
You haven't figured out how you stepped into federal jurisdiction.
How can you proclaim "your" law when in you are squarely standing in their jurisdiction?


Like I say about you Palani............. you are lost in the law.
You cant be a master when standing in another's law.

You havent demonstrated you are your own master. You havent because you dont know what it is you are stepping on to understand how to not step into their jurisdiction.
(You admittedly dont research the proper statutes).

You havent identified it yet.......you claim you do with all your demonstrations of reciting latin, but thats just legal bling bling to fool others into thinking you know.

[Ponce]

Is that a bitcoin in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?

I hope that you mean A ROLL of bitcoins.....Mae West would be very angry at you.

First dunm post of the day........good morning to one and all.

V

[palani]

Childish tantrum...simply childish!

I am happy that you are finally recognizing your faults.

[palani]

If "home is where the heart is", does this mean you are heartless too?

:|~
Lots of heart. Just no door.

[palani]

You haven't figured out how you stepped into federal jurisdiction.

Is this your latest claim? Are you able to prove it? If so then proceed.

[madfranks]

Lots of heart. Just no door.

How do you get in and out of your domicile?

[palani]

How do you get in and out of your domicile?

There is always an unlocked window.

[Ponce]

There is always an unlocked window.

Knock at my door, and you will be served.

V

[madfranks]

Knock at my door, and you will be served.

V

Cool, I'm coming over for dinner. What are you going to serve me? :D

[palani]

What are you going to serve me? :D

My guess? Braised palani.

[7th trump]

Is this your latest claim? Are you able to prove it? If so then proceed.The unmistakeable deflective palani method of operation.........
Cute, but childish!

[Hypertiger]

People have no ability to make or break LAW.

All that people have the ability to do is make and break rules and call rules LAW

But when rules attempt to break LAW...LAW will break the rules.

[palani]

People have no ability to make or break LAW.

People are the only ones who may make law. It seems frequently the law that they make (such as robbing banks and doing drugs or alcohol) ends up injuring someone. When they get hauled into court and proclaim their law then it is up to the judge (who is retained exercise the law of the community) or the jury (who have a duty to judge the facts and occasionally the law) to decide whether their law supersedes the laws of society.

For example there might be a person whose law states that he/she can kill anyone with red shoes. Should this law be exercised society will no doubt take notice and decide to try the issue based upon whose law is superior: the individuals or societies. This is an extreme example. A less extreme case is whether to obey a stop sign or not. After all, there is no authority posted and the sign even has a border around the command STOP. The border (according to the government printing office style manual) means that whatever is inside the border (the STOP command) is for information purposes only. Does this mean that everyone must come to a complete stop before proceeding or, if no traffic can be spotted, is a 'rolling stop' (or California stop) sufficient?

[palani]

Cute, but childish!
So you cannot prove your claim? Guess that makes you an unreliable witness.

[sirgonzo420]

People are the only ones who may make law. It seems frequently the law that they make (such as robbing banks and doing drugs or alcohol) ends up injuring someone. When they get hauled into court and proclaim their law then it is up to the judge (who is retained exercise the law of the community) or the jury (who have a duty to judge the facts and occasionally the law) to decide whether their law supersedes the laws of society.

For example there might be a person whose law states that he/she can kill anyone with red shoes. Should this law be exercised society will no doubt take notice and decide to try the issue based upon whose law is superior: the individuals or societies. This is an extreme example. A less extreme case is whether to obey a stop sign or not. After all, there is no authority posted and the sign even has a border around the command STOP. The border (according to the government printing office style manual) means that whatever is inside the border (the STOP command) is for information purposes only. Does this mean that everyone must come to a complete stop before proceeding or, if no traffic can be spotted, is a 'rolling stop' (or California stop) sufficient?


I believe the LAW to which Hypertiger alludes is more a metaphysical matter, although that puts it lightly.

[palani]

I believe the LAW to which Hypertiger alludes is more a metaphysical matter, although that puts it lightly.

There are laws that you may break at your own risk ... such as whether to accept a contract in fiat money or in specie. These laws come with their own penalties. You might get away breaking them once or twice and get away with it but with higher frequency the severity follows.


VERITAS LVX MEA ET VINCIT OMNIA VERITAS.
All Rights Reserved. - No liability assumed. - No value assured. - Without recourse. - Not amenable to process. - Not to be construed as legal advice. - From without the UNITED STATES.
You left out AT ARMS LENGTH and ALL APPEARANCES DE BENE ESSE

[7th trump]

So you cannot prove your claim? Guess that makes you an unreliable witness.Where did I make a claim?

[palani]

Where did I make a claim?

You make claims all the time and fail to provide any evidence. Check post #27 for the one I called you on.

[7th trump]

You make claims all the time and fail to provide any evidence. Check post #27 for the one I called you on.

That's not a claim palani.....that is a result from observing that you haven't brought forth any evidence, facts...nothing.
You say a lot of bullshit that is regurgitated from other forums on GSUS and never do you post any link or provide any law to your claims......why do you think I always call you out on your legal transparent fantasies?

What do you think I was doing with 12usc411 by dissecting it into the three parts that 411 consists of?

It was to show everyone you are reading 12usc 411 with conspiracy goggles on to get the result you want. The statute completely says something different.



I guess its all damage control for you here on out isn't it palani?

[palani]

That's not a claim
Then it is garbage. Something you seem to not be lacking in.


What do you think I was doing with 12usc411 by dissecting it into the three parts that 411 consists of? Titillating yourself?


It was to show everyone you are reading 12usc 411 with conspiracy goggles on to get the result you want. The statute completely says something different. Which statement suggests a course in remedial english might help you out.

[7th trump]

Then it is garbage. Something you seem to not be lacking in.

Titillating yourself?

Which statement suggests a course in remedial english might help you out.

Gee I never thought you would refer your statements as "garbage".
But then again I've been proving your statements are garbage with the lack of evidence to back them for months now.

Of course your post is deflection on your part so as to not ever admit anything.
You believe by playing the role a slick lawyer with your word salad mumbo jumbo you make yourself feel important.

[palani]

Of course your post is deflection on your part so as to not ever admit anything.

Majus dignum trahit in se minus dignum. The more worthy or the greater draws to it the less worthy or the lesser.

I count you as the less worthy. Go figure.

[Horn]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ueHpjvcWTg

[7th trump]

Majus dignum trahit in se minus dignum. The more worthy or the greater draws to it the less worthy or the lesser.

I count you as the less worthy. Go figure.
Its obvious you are in denial palani.

[palani]

Its obvious you are in denial palani.

It is obvious you intend to be a weed all your life.

[Twisted Titan]

Dude this thread is EPIC

Kinda like Godzilla vs Mothra

[7th trump]

It is obvious you intend to be a weed all your life.

A weed huh?

You have it all wrong, but thats your method of operation to play a slick lawyer deflecting to turn it around!
I do the diligent statute research to confirm premises where as you just spout what has been spouted in other forums without any research to prop your phony self up.

Oh wait what was it that you said a while back....ohhh yeah thats right.....you admit you dont read any laws, statutes or court cites regarding how the laws are interpreted.
You are no different than the politicians who pass laws without reading them first.

Look what I did with 12usc 411.........that research made you look like the foolish conspiracy nut you prove yourself to be.
You picked up the 12usc 411 statute because someone posted it on other forum and ran with their idea that FRN's makes everyone into agents and banks....because thats what you wanted to hear......you wanted to hear a conspiracy!
You want to hear a lie so you can spread the lies.
What you are doing is helping the PTB to keep the people confused rather than alert and sharp.
You offer them no guidance to get out of babylon.

[palani]

You offer them no guidance to get out of babylon.

Nemo videtur fraudare eos qui sciunt, et consentiunt. One cannot complain of having been deceived when he knew the fact and gave his consent.

A weed. One who consents to everything. You have no complaint. Then why are you complaining? You can articulate no trespass. Therefore there has been no trespass. A weed has no right to complain.

[7th trump]

Nemo videtur fraudare eos qui sciunt, et consentiunt. One cannot complain of having been deceived when he knew the fact and gave his consent.

A weed. One who consents to everything. You have no complaint. Then why are you complaining? You can articulate no trespass. Therefore there has been no trespass. A weed has no right to complain.
1. Most common people dont know the facts, so why are you hiding behind your statement about being deceived to not help them?
You are a fake!
All your yapping in Latin and the regurgitated theories from other conspiracy forums is still not helping them...or is the truth about you has been out in the open that you are not capable of helping them because you dont understand what it is you are yapping about.


2. You are making a claim!
Provide your evidence I have consented to everything or even consented at all to pass judgement I'm a weed!
As far as your "weed" theory ...you just defined yourself.......if you knew what causes you to stand in someone's jurisdiction you'd tell them about it but to this day you haven't provided that path.
Your demonstrations of Latin and your other wacky doodle theories you regurgitate from other conspiracy forums is acken to an old rickety road sign that points in what ever direction the wind blows.
You are lost in the law like the wind blowing in every direction.

[palani]

1. Most common people dont know the facts, so why are you hiding behind your statement about being deceived to not help them?
You are a fake!
All your yapping in Latin and the regurgitated theories from other conspiracy forums is still not helping them...or is the truth about you has been out in the open that you are not capable of helping them because you dont understand what it is you are yapping about.


2. You are making a claim!
Provide your evidence I have consented to everything or even consented at all to pass judgement I'm a weed!
As far as your "weed" theory ...you just defined yourself.......if you knew what causes you to stand in someone's jurisdiction you'd tell them about it but to this day you haven't provided that path.
Your demonstrations of Latin and your other wacky doodle theories you regurgitate from other conspiracy forums is acken to an old rickety road sign that points in what ever direction the wind blows.
You are lost in the law like the wind blowing in every direction.

With all your rhetoric you have still articulated no trespass. Yet you appear to complain constantly.

You aren't a female are you? That would explain a lot.

[7th trump]

With all your rhetoric you have still articulated no trespass. Yet you appear to complain constantly.

You aren't a female are you? That would explain a lot.

AAHHHH.....yes the famous palani deflection move.

Do you people see the lawyer trick palani is employing (its his method of operation) in an attempt to draw attention away from being caught playing his other game of making a "claim".

palani is a slick one!

Palani says a lot that never ever really mounts to a hill of beans.

[palani]

7th Trump asking a seemingly valid question:

http://cdn3.gurl.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/get-pregnant.gif

[7th trump]

7th Trump asking a seemingly valid question:

http://cdn3.gurl.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/get-pregnant.gif

And right on par..........palani knowing he's cornered attempts to discredit the opposition for an escape.

Like I said earlier...its all damage control from here on out for you isnt palani.

[palani]

its all damage control from here on out

http://cdn3.gurl.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/preach.gif

[Mouse]

why don't you cocksuckers get a fucking room?

[palani]

why don't you cocksuckers get a fucking room?

We are looking for a Bitch. Are you her?

[palani]

This guy has a good handle on what is real and what is fake. 7th Trump goes thru life confused. He relies upon statutes.

http://www.unitedearth.com.au/topics.html#harris

[palani]

why don't you cocksuckers get a fucking room?

By the way ... for general information ... Mouse happens to be a CPA. He admits to being a licensed statute code ENFORCER. From the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct


The Principles call for an unswerving commitment to honorable behavior, even at the sacrifice of personal advantage.

http://www.aicpa.org/Research/Standards/CodeofConduct/Pages/default.aspx

[7th trump]

This guy has a good handle on what is real and what is fake. 7th Trump goes thru life confused. He relies upon statutes.

http://www.unitedearth.com.au/topics.html#harris
Ummm yeah......about that website. You said this guy has a good handle what is real and what is fake.
Yeah........that website has more links to conspiracy's and theory's than it does facts.

Time travel?
UFOlogy?
Lawful rebellion?
What the fuck palani?

So theres is such a thing as unlawful rebellion?

Yep just what I've been telling people about you Palani....they need to stay away from you and your conspiracy nutcase theories.
I dont think its a good idea to mix law and conspiracy theories like UFo's and time travel together.....snake skin oil salesmen comes to mind.
Its like you admitting you are homeless and yet want to educate people in law.

Beware people!

[7th trump]

By the way ... for general information ... Mouse happens to be a CPA. He admits to being a licensed statute code ENFORCER. From the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct



http://www.aicpa.org/Research/Standards/CodeofConduct/Pages/default.aspx

Good, I can use Mouse to confirm what i have to say about Social Security and being liable for federal taxes.

[palani]

Good, I can use Mouse to confirm what i have to say about Social Security and being liable for federal taxes.

Then you and he ought to find a hotel room and become bunkies.

[palani]

that website has more links to conspiracy's and theory's than it does facts.

I linked to one guys video. Suddenly I am supposed to be advocating everything imaginable or unthinkable? That is a loser argument from a loser.

[7th trump]

I linked to one guys video. Suddenly I am supposed to be advocating everything imaginable or unthinkable? That is a loser argument from a loser.

To damn bad palani.......you know very well the legal system is hinged on creditability.

And to say the least palani you linked to a video pertaining to a legal system not of the United States....the video appears to be from Britain.
What does this video have to do with the legal system here in the USofA?
Talk about being a loser huh?

[palani]

you know very well the legal system is hinged on creditability.

The video spoke of the Lawful system rather than the Legal system. You are mired in legal and are ignoring Lawful. Since you don't know the rules of the game: YOU LOSE.

[7th trump]

The video spoke of the Lawful system rather than the Legal system. You are mired in legal and are ignoring Lawful. Since you don't know the rules of the game: YOU LOSE.

You're playing games again to draw attention away from the fact that the video is a legal, or even lawful, system of a foreign country.

Doesn't really matter if its legal or lawful. I just used the word. What matters is the video has nothing at all to do with the system here in the US.
Therefore the video is just more bullshit you are peddling.

Like I keep saying....you are lost in the law!

[palani]

Doesn't really matter if its legal or lawful. I just used the word.

Pretty sloppy of you. Law deals with the substance. Legal deals with the fiction. You have no compulsion apparently with mixing real and fiction.

But I already knew that.

[7th trump]

Pretty sloppy of you. Law deals with the substance. Legal deals with the fiction. You have no compulsion apparently with mixing real and fiction.

But I already knew that.

Oh.... come on palani. With all your conspiracy theory's you never seem to keep straight you wouldn't know a lawful hole if legal didn't bit you in the ass.

You're lost in all that conspiracy theories you call law.

[zap]

To 7th and Palani I love you both, hang in there boys it isn't going to matter in the end.you can argue til the cow' s come home ,.. Its not going to matter.

xoxo

[palani]

You're lost in all that conspiracy theories you call law.

Law is what I know and understand. Isn't that the requirement? That ignorance of the Law is no excuse? So how can I proclaim that I not know it?

You are ignorant of Law but seem to believe you understand Legal enough to obey it. No conspiracy there. Just your continued ignorance.

[palani]

I love you both
Right back at you, Hun.


you can argue til the cow' s come home ,.. Its not going to matter.
Sometimes it is hard to tell the difference between debate and argument. Arguing with a madman is insane. Reasoning with him is, well, reasonable.

[7th trump]

To 7th and Palani I love you both, hang in there boys it isn't going to matter in the end.you can argue til the cow' s come home ,.. Its not going to matter.

xoxo

What's the matter Zap?
I sense a bit of disheartenment in you?

So you believe you were a little rough on the ones who received a 7 day weekend. No big deal Zap.....cheer up they weren't perma banned. Besides Jewboo can really find his way under anybody's skin to get someone going to say some of the things they say.
I wouldn't give two shits about Jewboo anyway....Jewboo is already been perma banned under Book.

Cheer up Zap its the weekend!


XOXO