PDA

View Full Version : “Choose One” — Little Red Riding Hood or an Assault Weapon?



General of Darkness
25th April 2013, 09:12 AM
Why are only cracker kids holding rifles? Pushing something are we?

April 15, 2013 By momsdemandaction (http://momsdemandaction.org/author/momsdemandaction/) 17 Comments (http://momsdemandaction.org/in-the-news/choose-one-little-red-riding-hood-or-an-assault-weapon/#comments)
“Choose One” — Little Red Riding Hood or an Assault Weapon?
We keep ‘Little Red Riding Hood’ out of schools because of the bottle of wine in her basket. Why not assault weapons?
http://mom.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Little-Red-Ridinghood-940x608.jpg (http://mom.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Little-Red-Ridinghood.jpg)

We ban the game dodgeball because it’s viewed as being too violent. Why not assault weapons?
http://mom.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Choose-One_Dodgeball-940x608.jpg (http://mom.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Choose-One_Dodgeball.jpg)

We won’t sell Kinder chocolate eggs in the interest of child safety. Why not assault weapons?
http://mom.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Choose-One_Kinder-Egg-940x608.jpg (http://mom.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Choose-One_Kinder-Egg.jpg)
Moms Demand Action announces new PSA campaign, “Choose One,” a series of print ads featuring assault weapons alongside other objects that have been banned in America to protect child welfare.
Share the need for common sense gun safety legislation by sharing this page on Facebook, by email or through your other social networks.

sirgonzo420
25th April 2013, 09:14 AM
damn badass little white kids with their awful minority-killing assault death machine weapons!

Twisted Titan
25th April 2013, 09:49 AM
We Banned Littel Red Riding Hood The Result: We have the Highest Illiteracy Rate among " Developed" Nations

We Banned Dodge Ball The Result: We have The Most Obese Children among " Developed " Nations

We Banned Chocolate eggs The Result: We have Parents that have been all but stripped of their right to decide what their child can consume.

When we ban guns The Result: Expect child life insurance policies to soar in cost as claims will be filled on a increased basis.

still afloat
25th April 2013, 09:52 AM
What's the problem , I see 3 white children protecting 3 minority children's right to life , liberty and the pursuit of happiness .no minority child was harmed in the production of this campaign and I see that they are holding the things that they feel are wrongfully banned from having. Atleast they didn't use the redneck looking white kids acting stupid in this attack on gun ownership.

ximmy
25th April 2013, 10:02 AM
What grade school in america allows kids to walk around campus with AR-15's?

That is what the ad is implying

Twisted Titan
25th April 2013, 10:09 AM
2 of them have abosultely no weapons training as the have exhibit piss poor gun control ( but that is done on purpose )

The first may have had some.

Neuro
25th April 2013, 10:13 AM
I wonder which plutocrat elitist pig are responsible for "Moms Demand Action"... Certainly sounds very grass rooty so it most certainly isn't, I believe...

iOWNme
25th April 2013, 10:58 AM
Using innocent children to push a Political Agenda........... IS CHILD ABUSE.

Its sad that all of these moms are used to push an idea that will ultimately lead to their and their childrens futures DESTRUCTION.

And historically it is the good natured people who belive in 'Authority', and who follow their 'leaders' who have caused the most theft, assault and MURDER on this planet. NOT all of the supposed 'Bad' people......

The fact that they let the children hold these weapons for pictures shows you that they dont even believe their own propaganda. Do you think they would let a child hold onto a bong? How about some cocaine and a condom?

General of Darkness
25th April 2013, 11:38 AM
Looky looky.

Bay Area Jewish moms take leading role in campaign against gun violence by renee ghert-zand (http://www.jweekly.com/contact/author/7590/reneeghertzand/), j. correspondent


Follow j. on
http://www.jweekly.com/images/uploads/fb_logo.gif (http://www.facebook.com/jewishsf)
and
http://www.jweekly.com/images/uploads/twitter_logo.gif (http://twitter.com/jewishsf)



As soon as Sara Smirin heard the news about the Sandy Hook school massacre last December, she posted her heartbreak and outrage on Facebook. She immediately heard back from friends who felt the same way.
“It started with a bunch of moms talking to one another and saying they were not going to take it anymore,” said Smirin, 45, marketing director for Jewish LearningWorks in San Francisco and the mother of two young sons.
Los Altos mom Ronit Bodner was one of them. “With every mass shooting since Columbine, I’d be shocked, but then I’d forget about it as the news cycle went on to focus on something else,” said Bodner, a
http://www.jweekly.com/images/uploads/v_photos_2013/zo3_8_13/bamoms_demand_capitol_normal.jpg Outside the Capitol on Jan. 24 are (from left) Sara Smirin, Jennifer DiBrienza, Christine Tachner, Kim Samek, Michelle Sandberg and Nancy Rudin. photo/jennifer fiore

39-year-old attorney and mother of three. “But Newtown was my call to arms. Complacency suddenly felt like complicity.” Smirin and Bodner reached out to Shannon Watts, the Indianapolis-based founder of Moms Demand Action For Gun Sense in America, a grassroots, non-partisan organization that sprang up in response to the Connecticut tragedy. Originally called One Million Moms For Gun Control, it has since been rebranded and has garnered 80,000 members, 2,000 of them in the Bay Area.
Smirin volunteered to become the group’s national COO. It’s a huge undertaking, but she believes that women like her with relevant experience should step up to lead this social media–based campaign. “In particular, moms in Silicon Valley have brought important networks and resources to help make things happen,” she said.
Kim Samek, another local Jewish mom and attorney, has volunteered to be general counsel for the organization.
Moms Demand Action is working on the local, state and national levels, pushing for key legislative items that it believes will greatly reduce the level of gun violence and gun fatalities. “We’re focused on gun safety and commonsense regulations. Our agenda is not extreme,” explained Michelle Sandberg, a 39-year-old pediatrician and mother of three from Atherton who sees this as a public health issue.
http://www.jweekly.com/images/uploads/v_photos_2013/zo3_8_13/bamoms_demand_filming_normal.jpg Sara Smirin at video filming photo/courtesy michelle sandberg

“We recognize the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms,” Sandberg said, “but we want a ban on assault weapons and ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds; required background checks for all gun and ammunition purchases; required reporting of sales of large quantities of ammunition to the ATF [the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives]; and a ban on online sales of ammunition.” Eileen Soffer of Mountain View added: “The gun lobby has been very powerful, but the numbers are not on their side.” The 53-year-old mother of two adult children is a veteran of election-year campaigning and other advocacy projects. Like many others drawn to Moms Demand Action, the horror of this particular massacre compelled her to get involved: “The children at Newtown were so young, it was impossible to avert your eyes.”
Soffer now spends 15 to 25 hours per week as the regional manager for six Western states, and provides support and guidance to 16 local chapters.
“It’s unbelievable how much is happening around the country. There’s been a flurry of activity,” she noted as she spoke of marches, rallies, town hall meetings, letter-writing campaigns, personal appearances at hearings and legislative sessions, and partnerships with other nonpartisan organizations.
One such partnership is with Mayors Against Illegal Guns’ “Demand a Plan” campaign. Sandberg coordinated the production of a “Demand a Plan” video featuring many Bay Area members of Moms Demand Action, including herself, Smirin, Bodner, and Bodner’s mother Yael. The video is available on YouTube. The San Francisco–based company Joyus donated its services to the project, and a series of video portraits of individual mothers personally affected by gun violence is forthcoming.
Several of the Bay Area moms, including Smirin and Sandberg, went to Washington, D.C., in late January to witness Sen. Dianne Feinstein introduce the assault weapons ban of 2013. They and many others are preparing to return to the nation’s capital for Moms Take the Hill Day on March 13, when mothers from around the country will converge on Capitol Hill to lobby for commonsense gun laws.
“I feel optimistic. I feel that public opinion is on our side. It’s going to be an uphill battle, but we’re not going away this time,” said Sandberg.

osoab
25th April 2013, 11:39 AM
Is this any different than holding a raffle for a gun to benefit a little league?

(http://www.news-gazette.com/michael-kiser/2013-04-24/ar-15-raffle-already-29000.html)AR-15 raffle already up to $29,000 (http://www.news-gazette.com/michael-kiser/2013-04-24/ar-15-raffle-already-29000.html)

Neuro
25th April 2013, 12:24 PM
Looky looky.

Bay Area Jewish moms take leading role in campaign against gun violence
Now that is a surprise... ;D And of course it is all grass rooty. In a Jewish mom well financed kind of way...

madfranks
25th April 2013, 07:54 PM
Anyone else notice in the background of the first pic it says, "fiction", and in the background of the third pic it says, "agenda"? Still looking for a clue in the 2nd pic...

midnight rambler
25th April 2013, 08:02 PM
In 2 and 3 their fingers are on the triggers.

AndreaGail
25th April 2013, 08:06 PM
they all look drugged out and on prozac

Mouse
25th April 2013, 11:33 PM
Anyone else notice in the background of the first pic it says, "fiction", and in the background of the third pic it says, "agenda"? Still looking for a clue in the 2nd pic...

The basketball goal in the second pic "appears" to be riddled with bullet holes.

vacuum
25th April 2013, 11:44 PM
damn badass little white kids with their awful minority-killing assault death machine weapons!

LOL...keen observation.

vacuum
25th April 2013, 11:57 PM
- Presents the false dichotomy fallacy
- Appeals to fear, not reason
- Uses children
- Is racist

Basically, jews (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?69041-%93Choose-One%94-%97-Little-Red-Riding-Hood-or-an-Assault-Weapon&p=629415&viewfull=1#post629415) doing the typical social engineering. ^When will we ever stop allowing these tricks to work on us?

madfranks
26th April 2013, 08:23 AM
The basketball goal in the second pic "appears" to be riddled with bullet holes.

Could be... but I also notice a stage in the background, for acting. So we have:

1. Fiction
2. Acting
3. Agenda

It's subtle, but it's there. They're pushing their fictional agenda with actors in our faces!!!

midnight rambler
26th April 2013, 08:37 AM
Isn't the blatant ray-cist aspect enough on its own??

gunDriller
26th April 2013, 11:08 AM
What grade school in america allows kids to walk around campus with AR-15's?

Tel Aviv Elementary.