View Full Version : What............
Serpo
14th May 2013, 02:19 AM
good grief..........
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2324149/Angelina-Jolie-reveals-double-mastectomy.html
vacuum
14th May 2013, 02:32 AM
Preventative mastectomy. So there was nothing actually wrong with her?
Norweger
14th May 2013, 03:20 AM
She's a nutcase just like most of the Hollywood actors... that's whats wrong with her.
Shami-Amourae
14th May 2013, 03:36 AM
Everytime she gets tested for breast cancer her chances of getting breast cancer increase...
http://www.secretsofthefed.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/mammogram_buttons_600.jpg
http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111107003558/runescape/images/1/1f/Emoticon-Facepalm.gif
I wonder what could be causing that.
Serpo
14th May 2013, 03:49 AM
She's a nutcase just like most of the Hollywood actors... that's whats wrong with her.
Obviously
Serpo
14th May 2013, 03:53 AM
Preventative mastectomy. So there was nothing actually wrong with her?
That is insane.......medical profession has no answers, maybe she could of looked somewhere else.
Oh but thats right ,once you walk thru the hospital doors they have you and there is no other treatment.
Unless you have half a brain of course.
I hate it when you think someone is maybe smart but is stupid instead.
Glass
14th May 2013, 05:37 AM
does anyone put any stock in the story or do they think she could be acting? I saw this and thought BS. The detectors been getting a work out this week. I think they are just planting the seed. Then like the cartoon goes, everyone is suddenly a winner but now they have a leader to follow. A great example. A pied piper if you will. Anyone remember that story? That's all these people are. Pied pipers. Doesn't having children and breast feeding reduce the chance of breast cancer? Probably by something like 87%. Wouldn't that be a coincidence.
Santa
14th May 2013, 06:00 AM
Well, she has a 100% chance of dying, so perhaps she aught to cryogenicly preserve her head now as a precaution.
gunDriller
14th May 2013, 06:43 AM
maybe she'll end up getting butt cancer.
BrewTech
14th May 2013, 07:15 AM
does anyone put any stock in the story or do they think she could be acting? I saw this and thought BS. The detectors been getting a work out this week. I think they are just planting the seed. Then like the cartoon goes, everyone is suddenly a winner but now they have a leader to follow. A great example. A pied piper if you will. Anyone remember that story? That's all these people are. Pied pipers. Doesn't having children and breast feeding reduce the chance of breast cancer? Probably by something like 87%. Wouldn't that be a coincidence.
Hollywood's job is social engineering and trendsetting, so this had occurred to me.
“When other little girls wanted to be ballet dancers, I kind of wanted to be a vampire.”
― Angelina Jolie (http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/77307.Angelina_Jolie)
tags: vampire (http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/vampire)
389 people liked it (http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/51884-when-other-little-girls-wanted-to-be-ballet-dancers-i)
like (http://www.goodreads.com/user/new)
“If being sane is thinking there's something wrong with being different....I'd rather be completely fucking mental.”
― Angelina Jolie (http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/77307.Angelina_Jolie)
223 people liked it (http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/170276-if-being-sane-is-thinking-there-s-something-wrong-with-being)
like (http://www.goodreads.com/user/new)
“If I make a fool of myself, who cares? I'm not frightened by anyone's perception of me.”
― Angelina Jolie (http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/77307.Angelina_Jolie)
184 people liked it (http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/102955-if-i-make-a-fool-of-myself-who-cares-i-m)
like (http://www.goodreads.com/user/new)
“I don't believe in guilt, I believe in living on impulse as long as you never intentionally hurt another person, and don't judge people in your life. I think you should live completely free”
― Angelina Jolie (http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/77307.Angelina_Jolie)
169 people liked it (http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/127542-i-don-t-believe-in-guilt-i-believe-in-living-on)
like (http://www.goodreads.com/user/new)
“I like someone who is a little crazy but coming from a good place. I think scars are sexy because it means you made a mistake that led to a mess.”
― Angelina Jolie (http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/77307.Angelina_Jolie)
151 people liked it (http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/176814-i-like-someone-who-is-a-little-crazy-but-coming)
like (http://www.goodreads.com/user/new)
“Without pain, there would be no suffering. Without suffering, we would never learn from our mistakes. To make it right, pain and suffering is the key to all windows, without it, there is no way of life.”
― Angelina Jolie (http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/77307.Angelina_Jolie)
141 people liked it (http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/102953-without-pain-there-would-be-no-suffering-without-suffering-we)
like (http://www.goodreads.com/user/new)
“Anything that feels good couldn't possibly be bad.”
― Angelina Jolie (http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/77307.Angelina_Jolie)
More telling quotes here:
http://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/77307.Angelina_Jolie
Jewboo
14th May 2013, 07:58 AM
http://blogs.smh.com.au/lifestyle/asksam/Bebel-cry.jpg
Not my silicone funbags! Oh God!
http://www.attraction-tickets-direct.co.uk/forum/images/smilies/2/3/cry.gif
BrewTech
14th May 2013, 08:01 AM
http://blogs.smh.com.au/lifestyle/asksam/Bebel-cry.jpg
Not my silicone funbags! Oh God!
http://www.attraction-tickets-direct.co.uk/forum/images/smilies/2/3/cry.gif
I'm thinking hers were real, Book. Hopefully she donated them to charity as it would be a shame to take those out of circulation just yet.
Horn
14th May 2013, 08:13 AM
Well, she has a 100% chance of dying, so perhaps she aught to cryogenicly preserve her head now as a precaution.
I've actually already had that procedure, I just use my tongue to post here.
I thought you knew?
Sparky
14th May 2013, 08:41 AM
Could we use more informative thread titles please? It helps us filter out the bullshit.
gunDriller
14th May 2013, 09:08 AM
what i want to know is, did she preserve her old breasts in formaldehyde ?
they would make good paper-weights.
Serpo
14th May 2013, 05:00 PM
does anyone put any stock in the story or do they think she could be acting? I saw this and thought BS. The detectors been getting a work out this week. I think they are just planting the seed. Then like the cartoon goes, everyone is suddenly a winner but now they have a leader to follow. A great example. A pied piper if you will. Anyone remember that story? That's all these people are. Pied pipers. Doesn't having children and breast feeding reduce the chance of breast cancer? Probably by something like 87%. Wouldn't that be a coincidence.
And throw away the bra
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/05/19/Can-Wearing-Your-Bra-Cause-Cancer.aspx
Serpo
14th May 2013, 05:02 PM
what i want to know is, did she preserve her old breasts in formaldehyde ?
they would make good paper-weights.
stop it............
Serpo
14th May 2013, 05:04 PM
Could we use more informative thread titles please? It helps us filter out the bullshit.
sorry but no way this was this going to be in the heading..................someone getting there tits cut off
and good luck on filtering......;D
Serpo
14th May 2013, 05:04 PM
I've actually already had that procedure, I just use my tongue to post here.
I thought you knew?
we guessed
singular_me
14th May 2013, 05:37 PM
actually 2 years ago when in NYC, I went to see my physician and since he hadnt seen me for a very long while and he asked me to go through a mammogram and a colonoscopy and I said "no thanks"... guess what? He told me to find another primary physician as he regarded me as a "high risk patient". I had to sign a release form to relieve him from any potential lawsuit!!
milehi
14th May 2013, 06:00 PM
I ended up sitting down next to her at the bar in a Malibu cafe after brunch two years ago. She was wearing a somewhat revealing sun dress and everything looked just fine to me; and I'm an expert. I chatted with her for around twenty minutes, then left. I never let on that I knew who she was.
Horn
14th May 2013, 07:00 PM
I ended up sitting down next to her at the bar in a Malibu cafe after brunch two years ago. She was wearing a somewhat revealing sun dress and everything looked just fine to me; and I'm an expert. I chatted with her for around twenty minutes, then left. I never let on that I knew who she was.
What about those elves that were poking their heads around the corner a couple years back, are they still there?
milehi
14th May 2013, 07:48 PM
What about those elves that were poking their heads around the corner a couple years back, are they still there?
Celebrities are a dime a dozen in the Santa Monica neighborhood I frequent.
zap
14th May 2013, 08:31 PM
My mom had breast cancer, just 1 lump surgically removed they wanted to give her Chemo, she did it one time, her whole personality changed and then she told me she didn't want anymore treatments. I told her fine what ever she decided I would support her 100 %, she got back to normal, and its been 5 years, no problems, also she had been on hormone replacement therapy years before cause she had a hysterectomy, I think that is what caused the lump, a friend on birth control for a good 20 years also had the same problem 1 lump surgery,(radiation) she did all the treatment, so far so good.
I don't know the answer other then stay away from the white coats.
I think If I had breast cancer I would do what Jolie did, get rid of the old ones and get brand new boobs!!!
But she didn't even have cancer !
zap
14th May 2013, 09:46 PM
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20700149,00.html?xid=rss-topheadlines&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+people%2Fheadlines+%28PEOPLE. com%3A+Top+Headlines%29
I'm sure you guys will appreciate the picture. But this is a woman's issue?
Shall we all cut off our breasts, or stay away from the white coats?
Glass
14th May 2013, 09:52 PM
1.3 million wrongly treated after false positives from mammograms
The Susan G. Komen for breast cancer awareness reports on their site that breast cancer will strike more than 1.3 million women annually over the next 20 years. They are proud to report that 70 percent of women 40 and older receive regular mammograms now. What they aren't telling the public is that their pharmaceutical and radiation-funding "awareness" project is giving millions of women false diagnoses by the very mammogram technology they promote. As a matter of fact, the New England Journal of Medicine has identified approximately 1.3 million cases of misdiagnosed breast cancer, concluding that mammograms are leading millions of women astray, making them believe they have cancer when they really don't.
This means that the highly entrusted mammograms are manifesting millions of fake cancers, sending millions of unsuspecting women through further unneeded tests, procedures, medications, and radiation.
Where's the breast cancer awareness money going?
Instead of "ending breast cancer forever", as the Susan G. Komen cause claims, they are actually funding perpetual mammogram testing and subsequent medication and radiation that is only feeding the medical industry and the cancer itself. The Komen Race for the Cure alone has raised $2 billion. Where is this money going? It's definitely not going to find a cure, but rather fooling millions of women into believing they have cancer, when they really don't...........
...............
...............
Here's the even bigger con
Mammograms put off low energy x-ray 30kVp radiation, which is 300 percent more carcinogenic than high energy radiation that comes from atomic bomb blasts! This fact goes unnoticed, because today's radiation risk models were developed before DNA was even discovered.
What scientists should be developing is real scanning technology that goes after the mammogram itself, exposing its low energy radiation effects on human cells.
Full article (http://www.naturalnews.com/040331_Susan_G_Komen_mammograms_breast_cancer.html )
zap
14th May 2013, 10:05 PM
I am 46 and haven't had a mammogram, I am sure if I did they would want to do a biopsy ( lets cut it out)?, I have a bump towards my inner arm on one breast that I have felt for at least 20 years, kinda feels like a lima bean, it doesn't grow or move so my leave shit alone !
Glass
14th May 2013, 10:41 PM
Andrew Hornery (http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/by/Andrew-Hornery) 1:28pm That Angelina Jolie managed to keep her surgery a secret is verging on the miraculous.
yes I wonder how she did that?
Serpo
14th May 2013, 10:57 PM
yes I wonder how she did that?
dunno but we know
Mouse
14th May 2013, 11:53 PM
Celebrities are a dime a dozen in the Santa Monica neighborhood I frequent.
Fucking long ass ride back up the hill though. 2 hours?
Hitch
15th May 2013, 12:40 AM
But she didn't even have cancer !
The article said since her Mom had cancer, they figured out that she has an 87% chance of getting it herself. How they came up with that percentage, I have no idea.
I don't follow much mainstream media stuff, but I must say that she did an amazing thing. She sacrificed part of her body to ensure that she can be there, be healthy, and care for her children. Being in movies, Hollywood, is all about looks. To do something that harms your looks, intentionally, in that environment, takes a lot of courage. Imo. Also, good for her husband Brad to support her through this.
My two bits that will probably get trolled and flamed upon....
Glass
15th May 2013, 01:11 AM
I still don't think it happened. News is putting out stories of other heroic women who cut them off for no proven problem. Seems like a meme. A bit like the ugly vagina meme that keeps cropping up every 6 months. Seems they had lots of stories ready to go, just waiting for the right moment. Same thing a few months/years? back when Christina Applegate did the same thing. I'd like to know if anyone (in the know of these things) thinks the time line for treatment is realistic. I know someone who did have cancer and did have one removed and did have remedial surgery and it took months before it was all finished. There was removal, then healing, then plastic surgery and I think all up it took maybe 2.5 - 3 months. Private care so no queueing.
milehi
15th May 2013, 01:11 AM
Fucking long ass ride back up the hill though. 2 hours?
Naw, a little over an hour if I leave at the right time, driving quickly. And the 210 is wide fuckin' open. Fast lane speed is 85-90. I zip out at least twice a month to hang with my grandparents and do handyman shit around their house. They gave me a Silver Dollar for my birthday eight years ago, and here I am.
Hitch
15th May 2013, 01:45 AM
I zip out at least twice a month to hang with my grandparents and do handyman shit around their house. They gave me a Silver Dollar for my birthday eight years ago, and here I am.
Good for you, grandparents can be a wealth of knowledge. When my grandpa died, I was given 2 silver bars that were in his safety deposit box. I cherish those.
Tonight, talking to my grandma, who's turning 92 in a week, found out my great grandpa fought in WW1. He was calvary, charged on horseback. Found out he was a fighter. A big redhaired Irishman. He worked security on the railroads to fight of Jesse James type bandits. Had a scar on his hand from an attacker with a knife. Grandma said I'd like him, he was a man's man.
Milehi, while you are there helping your grandfolks, pick their brains and listen. The history is amazing. I told my grandma I helped build the new Bay Bridge, in SF (true). My Grandma responded....she said she watched the original bridge being built, as a child back in 33. My grandpa would speed cars across that bridge because no cops could catch him, on that bridge.
Found out it's a family tradition to hammer on the gas and go as fast as you can across bridges now. My uncle told me tonight he got a rented Camaro up to 120 on the san mateo bridge, in grandpa's honor.
milehi
15th May 2013, 02:05 AM
Milehi, while you are there helping your grandfolks, pick their brains and listen. The history is amazing.
I always have. Grandma was a Rosie the Riveter. Grandpa served in North Africa. Great stories. Especially of the California Coast pre WW2.
Hitch
15th May 2013, 02:16 AM
I always have. Grandma was a Rosie the Riveter. Grandpa served in North Africa. Great stories. Especially of the California Coast pre WW2.
Awesome. I hear these stories and all I can think, is that I was born too late. 100 years too late. I helped build the new bridge bringing in concrete barges in. The men back in 33/34, they built the thing with slide rules and wrenches. Bolts, dangling off of rafters.
Who has the balls to charge their enemy on horseback, like my great grandpa did?
I've got some good stories, from my life, I'm grateful for that. But man, our elders were true MEN. They fought hard, lived hard, and didn't take any shit, from anyone.
Glass
15th May 2013, 07:23 AM
Doctors warn of long wait times for mastectomies
Australian women are waiting up to two years to have the surgery Angelina Jolie had to reduce her high chance of breast cancer, and doctors fear these waiting times could increase in coming years.
Leading surgeons and genetic specialists said some Australian women with gene mutations that predispose them to cancer were waiting longer than they should for preventive breast removal surgery because it was not seen as a priority in public hospitals.
Increasing pressure on health budgets was also pushing these cases further down the waiting list - a trend that could increase as more people compete for limited public health care.
Breast surgeon Professor Bruce Mann said while Australian women wanting risk-reducing mastectomies were generally listed as category three non-urgent patients, to be treated within a year, in his experience most were being operated on within 18 months.
The Breast Cancer Network said it knew of women who had waited up to two years in the public system when those paying for private care waited several weeks.
Professor Mann, the director of breast services at the Royal Melbourne and Royal Women's hospitals, said although it was important for women carrying BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations not to rush into the irreversible procedure, there was a risk they could get cancer while waiting.
So, don't procrastinate on it. get onto the list now. If you wait you could get the cancer. Act now!
''The chance of that happening is about 1-2 per cent per year because that is the incidence of breast cancer in [faulty gene] carriers of the age where people choose mastectomies,'' he said. ''It would be far preferable to be able to do it sooner.''
Do it now! Cut em off! Let me do it!
Professor Mann said he feared public hospitals' capacity to do the surgery would reduce as governments tried to limit health spending. This would be a ''tragedy'' because the procedure was highly likely to prevent cancers, making it a cost-effective intervention.
Get private health cover! Get it done now! No waiting!
On Tuesday, Jolie revealed she had undergone a preventive double mastectomy because she carried inherited gene mutations that doctors believed gave her an 87 per cent chance of breast cancer.
More on this CYTON meme (http://www.theage.com.au/national/health/doctors-warn-of-long-wait-times-for-mastectomies-20130515-2jmtq.html)
If someone said to me I had an 87% chance of getting cancer in my important bits and I should cut them off as a preventative measure, my answer would be that I prefer those odds.
messianicdruid
15th May 2013, 10:32 AM
Have any of you folks checked out carnivora?
http://www.carnivora.com/
Serpo
15th May 2013, 02:49 PM
Have any of you folks checked out carnivora?http://www.carnivora.com/
Yes ,this is the sort of thing she should be using combined with cats claw.
Serpo
15th May 2013, 02:55 PM
Vitamin D Can Make Breast Cancer Cells Fall Apart Dr. Cedric F. Garland of the University of California's San Diego Moores Cancer Center is the epidemiologist who has connected the dots between Vitamin D deficiency and cancer. According to Garland, in nearly all forms of breast cancer, vitamin D affects the structure of your epithelial cells. These cells are held together by a glue-like substance called E-cadherin, which provides structure to the cell. E-cadherin is made up of mostly vitamin D and calcium. If you don’t have adequate vitamin D, that structure comes apart and those cells do what they are programmed to do in order to survive — they go forth and multiply. If this growth process (cell proliferation) gets out of control, you may end up with cancer. If you have breast cancer in progress, the addition of vitamin D can help stop cancer cells in their tracks by replenishing E-cadherin. Once cancer growth is slowed, your immune system can begin to get ahead of the cancer cells, because it doesn’t have to deal with gazillions of them. It’s just disposing of the “leftovers.”
The theory above is Dr. Garland’s DINOMIT theory and has been substantiated by subsequent studies by other researchers. Optimizing Vitamin D Reduces Your Risk of Preterm Birth by HALF In addition to being a strong cancer preventive, if you are a pregnant woman, vitamin D has some important benefits for you and your baby. Unfortunately, an astounding 80 percent of pregnant women are vitamin D deficient, and you definitely do not want to be one of them. Carol Wagner and Bruce Hollis studied the effects of vitamin D levels on pregnant women, with phenomenal results. The researchers gave 4,000 IUs of vitamin D to a group of pregnant women, lowering their incidence of preterm deliveries by a whopping 50 percent. These stellar results gave rise to a new prenatal program at GrassrootsHealth, called Protect Our Children Now, which you can learn about on their website. Vitamin D is also known to improve a number of different problems of pregnancy, including reducing your risk of having a low birth weight baby and lowering your chances of C-section. If you’re pregnant and have good D3 levels, you are passing on important health protection to your newborn baby that will continue well after birth. It’s ALL About Your Vitamin D Blood Level The most important factor is your vitamin D serum level. It doesn’t matter how much time you spend in the sun, or how much vitamin D3 you take: if your serum level is low, then you’re at risk, plain and simple. And the only way to know your serum level is to test it. As of the present time, we don’t understand why people differ so widely in their serum responses to vitamin D supplementation. Until science figures this out, the only way to determine your serum level is by testing your blood on a regular basis. Fortunately, all of the major labs have updated their vitamin D testing protocols, so it no longer matters which lab you use. It’s recommended you check your level every three to six months, because it takes at least three months for it to stabilize after a change in sun exposure or supplement dose. The window you’re shooting for is 50 to 70ng/ml. More studies are needed to tease out the benefits of getting your serum level above 50, and 60, and 70 — in terms of what specific benefits occur at each increment. Above 20, you’re safe from rickets. Above 30, your gums will be healthy. Above 40, you receive great cancer benefits. But there may very well be reasons to push your level even higher — we just don’t have this information available yet. Science progresses slowly, and researchers are very cautious. For an interesting chart that shows disease prevention by serum vitamin D level, based on the research to date, visit this page on the GrassrootsHealth site. It is Actually Difficult to Get Toxic The best way to optimize your vitamin D level is through sun exposure or a safe tanning bed as that virtually eliminates any risk of overdose. As a very general guide, you need to expose about 40 percent of your entire body to the sun for approximately 20 minutes between the hours of 10 am and 2 pm, when the sun is at its zenith. There appears to be no risk of vitamin D toxicity from ultraviolet B exposure. If you’re using an oral supplement, recent studies suggest adults need about 8,000 IU’s of oral vitamin D3 per day in order to get serum levels above 40 ng/ml. However, remember that if you take oral vitamin D, you also need to boost your vitamin K2, either through your food choices or a supplement. Vitamin K2 deficiency is actually what produces the symptoms of vitamin D toxicity, which includes inappropriate calcification that can lead to hardening of your arteries. In general, however, taking vitamin D3 is very safe. Even the conservative Institute of Medicine has concluded that taking up to 10,000 IU per day poses no risk for adverse effects. The ideal or optimal ratio between vitamin D and vitamin K2 has yet to be elucidated, so there’s little to go on in this regard. Dr. Kate Rheaume-Bleue, author of Vitamin K2 and the Calcium Paradox: How a Little Known Vitamin Could Save Your Life, suggests 150-200 micrograms of K2 per day will meet the vitamin K2 needs of the "average" healthy person, if you’re not taking a vitamin D supplement. Keep in mind that some of that can come from your diet, such as fermented vegetables. If you take a vitamin D supplement, you may need to increase your vitamin K2 some more. Your health insurance may very well pay for vitamin D testing.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/05/12/vitamin-d-may-prevent-breast-cancer.aspx
Serpo
15th May 2013, 03:22 PM
In a New York Times op-ed explaining her decision to have both of her breasts surgically removed even though she doesn't have breast cancer, Angelina Jolie cited risk numbers as key to her decision. She said that doctors told her she had an "87% risk of breast cancer." Her solution? Undergo three months of surgical procedures and have her breasts cut out.
Problem solved, right? With her breasts removed, she says her risk of breast cancer is now reduced to a mere 5 percent. The same bizarre logic can also be applied to men who cut off their testicles to "prevent testicular cancer" or people who cut out their colons to "prevent colorectal cancer." But that would be insane, so nobody does that, because one of the most basic principles of medicine is that you don't subject patients to the considerable risks and costs of surgery and anesthesia to remove organs that have no disease!
But the really sad part about all this is that Angelina Jolie was lied to. She didn't have an 87% risk of breast cancer in the first place. All the women reading her NYT op-ed piece are also being lied to. Here's why...
How cancer doctors lie with statistics and use fear to scare women into high-profit procedures
The very idea that breast cancer is a "percent risk" is a complete lie. In reality, everyone has cancer micro-tumors in their bodies, including myself. Cancer is not a disease you just "get" like being randomly struck by lightning. It's something you must "manage" or "prevent" day by day, meal by meal, through a lifestyle choice that involves vitamin D supplementation, nutrition, superfoods, vegetable juices and avoidance of cancer-causing chemicals and radiation.
So when a doctor says you have a "chance" of getting cancer, what he's implying is that you have no control over cancer, and that's an outright lie. Cancer quackery, in other words.
Even Jolie with her BRCA1 gene that's linked to breast cancer can quite easily follow a dietary and lifestyle plan that suppresses BRCA1 gene expression. It's not rocket science. It's not even difficult. It can be done with simple foods that cost a few dollars a day. Those foods include raw citrus, resveratrol (red grapes or red wine), raw cruciferous vegetables, omega-3 oils and much more. Those same foods also help prevent heart disease, diabetes, Alzheimer's and other chronic diseases.
Indole-3-carbinol (I3C), by the way, a natural chemical found in cruciferous vegetables like broccoli and cabbage, offers powerful prevention against BRCA1 gene expression. But you don't hear cancer doctors telling women to "eat more cabbage" because that doesn't make the cancer industry any money. You can buy I3C as a potent nutritional supplement from a variety of sources. It's literally cancer prevention in a capsule.
So the whole "chance" argument is pure quackery. There is no chance involved in whether you get cancer. It's all cause and effect. You are either living a pro-cancer lifestyle and therefore growing cancer, or you're living an anti-cancer lifestyle and keeping cancer in check so that it never becomes a problem. Cause and effect is what results in either the growth of cancer tumors or the prevention of cancer tumors. There is no "luck" involved.
It's fascinating, isn't it, that medical doctors don't believe in luck or voodoo on any topic other than cancer. But when it comes to cancer, they want all women to be suckered into the victim mentality that cancer is purely a matter of "luck" and therefore women have no control over their own health outcomes. How dis-empowering! How sick! How incredibly exploitive of women!
If you really want to be informed about breast cancer and the corrupt, dishonest cancer industry, read my related article 10 Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You're Not Supposed to Know. Or listen to our upcoming FREE Cancer Solutions Summit broadcasting this coming Monday, May 20th.
Why doesn't the cancer industry empower women with a sense of control over their own health?
I find it astonishing that the cancer industry doesn't believe in cause and effect. They would rather scare women with "risk" statistics that imply people have no control over cancer. Empowering women with a sense of control over their own health is the last thing the cancer industry wants to do, because that would cause them to lose customers and lose money.
It's far more profitable to scare all women into a state of such irrational panic that they agree to the most insane things imaginable such as chopping off both their healthy breasts even though they have no cancer. Such women are then convinced they've literally saved their own lives by agreeing to be mutilated by cancer surgeons.
"My chances of developing breast cancer have dropped from 87 percent to under 5 percent," says Jolie. "I can tell my children that they don't need to fear they will lose me to breast cancer."
Will she also tell her children they should mutilate themselves, too, as a form of medical disease prevention? And what happens if she learns she has a risk of brain cancer? Does she chop off her head and call it a cure?
The scam of making women believe there is only ONE way to reduce your "risk" of breast cancer
The other enormous scam in all this is the idea that there's only one way to reduce your "risk" of breast cancer. Even if you believe the fictitious number of "87% risk," why does everyone automatically assume there is one and only one way to lower that risk?
"For any woman reading this, I hope it helps you to know you have options," writes Jolie in the NYT. Yet she utterly fails to offer women any options other than the one she took: check in to a cancer center and let them play "cut-poison-burn" on your body. Jolie's op-ed piece, which reads as if it were written by the public relations department of the Pink Lotus Breast Center, offers nothing in the way of nutrition advice, lifestyle choices, holistic therapies, wellness, alternative medicine... nothing! What an incredible disservice to all the women of America...
In the world of health, nutrition and cancer, there are thousands of ways to prevent cancer and suppress the expression of BRCA1 genes. But Jolie and the cancer industry seem to imply no options exist other than chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery. Three options only. Nothing else exists in their world, not nutritional prevention, not vitamin D therapy, not vitamin C potentiated micro-chemotherapy, not ozone therapy, sauna treatments, acupuncture, Chinese herbal medicine, stress reduction or anything else. You are supposed to believe that none of these things exist!
And why? Because the cancer industry wants to funnel women like cattle into their slash-poison-burn system of quack treatments. And Angelina Jolie is their new cheerleader. Scarred and no doubt experiencing the chest and armpit numbness that almost always accompanies mastectomy surgery, she now seeks to "inspire" other women to exercise their own sick "choice" and have their breasts removed, too!
It is the sickest invocation of women's power that I've ever witnessed. This is not empowering women, it's marching them into self-mutilation. And the "risk" is a complete fraud. In truth, Angelina Jolie had a higher risk of dying on the operating table than dying from breast cancer if she simply followed an anti-cancer lifestyle.
Don't be tricked into self-mutilation by cancer industry quacks
In summary:
• The claim that you have a "percent risk" of breast cancer is a big lie which implies you have no control over cancer.
• BRCA1 genes can be kept quiet (suppressed) through proper foods and lifestyle choices. A gene is not a death sentence.
• The implication that there is only ONE way to reduce breast cancer risk is a complete lie. There are thousands of options and strategies for preventing cancer. Never be cornered into surgery by a group of surgeons pushing irrational fear.
• Cancer micro-tumors exist in everyone. Cancer must be "managed" in everyone to keep it in check and avoid the growth of tumors.
• The cancer industry tricks women using unethical fear tactics to scare women with false statistics into high-profit cancer procedures that only cause them harm.
• The claim that cutting off healthy breasts somehow "empowers" women is sick and demented. Women are far more empowered by honest information on nutrition and healthy living that allows them to keep their bodies intact rather than being sliced up by dishonest cancer surgeons.
http://www.naturalnews.com/040349_Angelina_Jolie_breast_cancer_surgery.html
Glass
15th May 2013, 04:30 PM
Have any of you folks checked out carnivora?
http://www.carnivora.com/
QFT:
Dr. C. Joe Schneller M.D., N.D., D.Sc., D.Ac., D.C. and Inventor of World's First Hybrid Darkfield Microscope performs preliminary study preceding double blind clinical study demonstrating how three Capsules of Carnivora wake up important white blood cells & NK cells of the immune system creating "Powerful Immune Defense."
"Make no mistake: It's your Immune System that heals you!"
My emphasis
Glass
16th May 2013, 12:38 AM
They must be winding me up. Cut em out. Gut your carcasses ladies. What ever is in there, get rid of it.
Jolie to have ovaries removed
Angelina Jolie is planning to undergo surgery to have her ovaries removed, according to reports this morning.
The Oscar-winning actor, who recently had a preventative double mastectomy, carries a gene that puts her at high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer.
Jolie revealed this week that she had had both breasts removed after discovering she had an 87 per cent chance of getting breast cancer. The double mastectomy reduced that risk to under 5 per cent.
Jolie's mother had breast cancer and died of ovarian cancer at 56, and that her maternal grandmother also had ovarian cancer. She hopes that removing her ovaries will ensure she remains cancer-free.
Doctors who treated the mother-of-six revealed overnight that Jolie has a reconstruction with implants after both breasts were removed.
A doctor at the Pink Lotus Breast Center in Beverly Hills said Jolie had three operations in all, and tests showed no sign of cancer in her breasts or lymph nodes. The last operation was on April 27, 10 weeks after her double mastectomy.
Partner Brad Pitt said the experience had been "an emotional and beautifully inspiring few months." "I'm quite emotional about it, of course," he said.
"She could have stayed absolutely private about it and I don't think anyone would have been none the wiser with such good results. But it was really important to her to share the story and that others would understand it doesn't have to be a scary thing. In fact, it can be an empowering thing, and something that makes you stronger and us stronger."
Doctors said overnight that Jolie was "doing well".
link
(http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/entertainment/a/-/access-all-areas/17174567/jolie-to-have-ovaries-removed/)
vacuum
16th May 2013, 12:47 AM
I have a 100% chance of dieing at some point in the future, statistically.
What should I do?
Maybe I should quit my job, rob a bank, and live the good life until my condition finally overtakes me? Need advice guys...
Serpo
16th May 2013, 12:50 AM
I have a 100% chance of dieing at some point in the future, statistically.
What should I do?
Maybe I should quit my job, rob a bank, and live the good life until my condition finally overtakes me? Need advice guys...
ah the jewish philosophy
Glass
16th May 2013, 12:50 AM
I have a 100% chance of dieing at some point in the future, statistically.
What should I do?
Maybe I should quit my job, rob a bank, and live the good life until my condition finally overtakes me? Need advice guys...
Don't be silly. The answer that any student councellor will give is to top yourself now. You might like to watch a childrens TV show or play about comitting suicide for inspirational purposes. Hanging? too easy. sorted.
Serpo
16th May 2013, 12:55 AM
QFT:
My emphasis
Thats right about our immune systems.
Sounds like this stuff provides what your immune system needs in spades(cats claw adds more benefits on top of this) and so our own immune systems in the end can fight practically anything.
Immune systems can be depressed and this carnivora appears to improve on that to a very large degree.
Serpo
16th May 2013, 01:03 AM
As for surgery (which is over practiced) every effort should be made to find a preventive measure first.
Search every corner for the answer because it is my belief that the cures and right treatments for any problem are out there and exists today.
Surgery is cutting the body with knifes with no effort to find a natural cure
NATURAL MEDICINE IS TOTALLY SUPPRESSED.
Serpo
16th May 2013, 01:07 AM
This is what they are saying at this web site.
17 benefits for the immune system sound alright.
Carnivora is the 100 percent absolutely PURE PHYTONUTRIENT EXTRACT and CAPSULE of Dionaea Muscipula, the particular species of the venus flytrap plant. Development of this extract began in Germany in the late 1970's by German physician Dr. Helmut Keller.
This specific German technology employs a method of manufacturing that yields the 100 percent pure capsule product and pure liquid extract. Our 100% PURE Liquid Extract product is not even diluted with water. It is entirely free of alcohol, glycerin, propylene glycol and all other toxic excipients and fillers.
Nothing is added. Nothing is deleted.
Our Capsule product is also 100% PURE - not even diluted with water. It contains silica and cellulose powder - non-toxic to humans and animals.
There is NO other.
We are the SOLE manufacturer of Carnivora around the world.
The 17 multi-faceted immune-supporting compounds as described in international medical literature occur naturally in the plant:
Droserone
Free radical scavenger
Hydroplumbagin
Immune Modulation / Stimulation
Quercetin
Anti-oxidant, free radical scavenger, protectant
Formic Acid
Natural bactericidal
Myricetin
Bioflavonoid. Identical properties as Quercetin
Gallic Acid
Antioxidant, Immune stimulative
Arginine
Supports NK function. Improves immune responses to foreign entities, crucial for tissue repair
Asparagine
Explusion of harmful ammonia, increased resistance to fatigue and increase of endurance
Threonine
Aids in function of intestinal / digestive tracts. Assists in metabolism and assimilation of nutrients; Prevention of fat build-up in the liver
Glutamine
Helps maintain white blood cell population and T-cell production, supports intestinal health. Nature's brain food to improve mental capacities, decrease fatigue, controls craving for sugar
Alanine
Strengthens immune system by producing antibodies, important source of energy for muscle tissue, brain and central nervous system
Cysteine
Facilitates the production of glutathione, which enable white blood cells (lymphocytes such as T cells, B cells and NK cells) to reproduce to make antibodies to destroy foreign substances in the body
Serine
Component of production of immune antibodies. Antibodies bind with antigens which are toxins, etc. destroying them and removing them from the body
Histidine
Found abundantly in hemoglobin. This amino acid is used as a potent free-radical scavenger to normalize systemic functions in the body
Proteases
Known for their ability to enhance immunity, proteases are considered an important line of defense and intestinal toxicity are among the most common symptoms of protease deficiency
Lipopolysaccharides
Contribute to stimulation of the immune system. Contains properties that are highly potent against harmful cellular entities
Phytohormones
Plant-derived building blocks that your body can use to rapidly create any hormone that your body needs. These substances, also called phytosterols, are vital to a healthy balanced endocrine or hormonal system.
The major problem for people in westernized cultures is that we do not get enough of these essential nutrients from our current food intake and it is becoming more difficult, not to mention all the factors that interfere with this process
Glass
16th May 2013, 01:49 AM
I always have a chuckle when I hear the TV spiel for something that has all the "Essential Vitamins and Minerals" for your diet.
I find myself talking loudly at bright picture window box device in the corner, "what the hell does Vitamins mean?"
It means Vital Minerals!
Serpo
16th May 2013, 04:37 AM
Tommy Chong Beats Prostate Cancer with Hemp Oil and Proper Diet (http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/05/15/tommy-chong-beats-prostate-cancer-with-diet-and-hemp-oil/)
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/05/15/tommy-chong-beats-prostate-cancer-with-diet-and-hemp-oil/
gunDriller
16th May 2013, 07:00 AM
what will Brad do if Angelina starts worrying about Brain Cancer ?
and how does this apply to Men with Moobs ?
Glass
17th July 2013, 12:31 AM
So this is the tragedy of the Jolie double masectomy scam than unfolded earlier this year and this is just in my home town.
Jolie effect clogs cancer services
WA genetic services say they have been swamped with more than 650 referrals in the past two months, fuelled by "worried well" women seeking inappropriate breast cancer testing after Angelina Jolie's health scare. They call it the Angelina effect (http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/national/17647796/jolie-sparks-big-rise-in-cancer-inquiries/).
Doctors say the surge in inquiries for Government-funded genetic testing, many from women who did not need it, was putting enormous pressure on resources and taking valuable time away from high-risk cases.
Jolie revealed in mid-May that she had a double mastectomy to avoid her high risk of developing breast cancer caused by the BRCA 1 gene mutation.
Jack Goldblatt, director of Genetic Services WA and the Familial Cancer Program at King Edward Memorial Hospital, said since then his unit had received 659 referrals, including 144 directly from women rather than their doctors, more than three times the 214 referrals for the same period last year.
The referrals were still being investigated but many appeared to be from women who did not meet the criteria for testing, which required a strong family or personal history of breast or ovarian cancer.
"Anecdotally, a lot of them are not appropriate referrals to a high-risk familial cancer service, so we're desperately looking at ways to deal with this because it involves a tremendous amount of work for us to validate and make sure they're not appropriate," Professor Goldblatt said. "This is taking time away from the high-risk people where we really need to put our resources, because we've had no new resources to deal with the sudden increase.
"We're also getting lots of letters from GPs who in short consultations with their patients are being asked to refer them for genetic testing when it's not warranted."
Professor Goldblatt said many people believed if they had one relative with breast cancer, they were at high risk and qualified for free genetic testing and some were almost demanding it from their GP.
It was positive that Jolie's case had raised awareness about genetic testing for breast cancer (http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/breaking/17716015/jolie-inspires-many-to-have-gene-test/) but doctors wanted to see more of high-risk people rather than the worried well.
Only 5 per cent of breast cancers were caused by high-risk gene mutations such as BRCA 1 and 2 and even those with a strong family history did not commonly carry these genes.
People were advised to visit a reputable health website to do a review of their circumstances before seeking testing.
Link to story (http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/lifestyle/a/-/article/18026217/jolie-effect-clogs-cancer-services/)
So as we all realised straight away, it was a storm in a T-CUP. T stands for terribly sorry, you disfigured yourself for no reason.....IMO.
Serpo
17th July 2013, 01:38 AM
idiots
Cebu_4_2
17th July 2013, 01:47 AM
Since they are no longer obligated by the laws to show you "real" news you are in for a ride folks!
Remember to think "when was this really" and "did this really happen" Shits going to get interesting real fast.
3. 2. 1. ...
Jewboo
17th July 2013, 08:53 AM
She's a nutcase just like most of the Hollywood actors... that's whats wrong with her.
http://ripley.za.net/wp-content/plugins/rss-poster/cache/4a201_08ea8_130514063925-07-jolie-horizontal-gallery.jpg
Jew Producer and his two sex toys.
singular_me
17th July 2013, 03:31 PM
I would not be surprised if she had been paid for going through this, or saying this, so more women would follow suit
So this is the tragedy of the Jolie double masectomy scam than unfolded earlier this year and this is just in my home town.
Link to story (http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/lifestyle/a/-/article/18026217/jolie-effect-clogs-cancer-services/)
So as we all realised straight away, it was a storm in a T-CUP. T stands for terribly sorry, you disfigured yourself for no reason.....IMO.
gunDriller
17th July 2013, 05:38 PM
i wondered if she saved her mammary's in Formaldehyde.
or had them cremated & spread the ashes at their favorite park.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.