View Full Version : DMV gives EXEMPT Plate
palani
17th May 2013, 01:58 PM
http://freeinhabitant.info/travel-rights/dmv-gives-exempt-plate-to-not-for-hire-driver.htm
DMV gives EXEMPT Plate, to “not for hire” driver.
Attached are new genuine CA Exempt license plates. Issued yesterday (5-15-2013) from the California Costa Mesa DMV. Total cost $0, expires December 2099.
This man went in complaining that he keeps getting harassed as he is a “not for hire”, not a US citizen, as he traveled as a right.
Possibly this is an “exemption” only from registration, true independence from the Department of Motor Vehicles would be a complete “not included”.
Exemption means that they chose to not include you, actually when if “not for hire” then you are independent by right, not by privilege.
More info will soon be posted on this process being used by his many friends across the nation.
Exempt plates
http://freeinhabitant.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Exempt-plates.jpg
http://freeinhabitant.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Mercedes+CA+Exempt+Registration+Card.pdf
Click on the above, you will see that the “state” requires liability insurance on the Mercedes. Travel by right requires no regulation and that means no requirement for Liability insurance, all you need to understand is that you are liable under common law.
Ares
17th May 2013, 02:19 PM
you will see that the “state” requires liability insurance on the Mercedes. Travel by right requires no regulation and that means no requirement for Liability insurance, all you need to understand is that you are liable under common law.
Which is my only deterrent from going this route. IF for whatever reason I am the cause of an accident. I am liable for damages. Which in a true not fiat based society would make since and would be the PREFERRED method for liability. But due to inflation, you dent a bumper you're looking at 2-3k FRN's for damages for parts and labor.
palani
17th May 2013, 02:39 PM
But due to inflation, you dent a bumper you're looking at 2-3k FRN's for damages for parts and labor.
I doubt it. The strict liability is still there from common law but nobody would be suggesting you pay in FRNs. They are an IOU from government and not substance at all. More likely you would have to make the other guy whole again but that doesn't mean you pay in a currency not recognized by common law.
Cebu_4_2
17th May 2013, 03:13 PM
Which is my only deterrent from going this route. IF for whatever reason I am the cause of an accident. I am liable for damages. Which in a true not fiat based society would make since and would be the PREFERRED method for liability. But due to inflation, you dent a bumper you're looking at 2-3k FRN's for damages for parts and labor.
I imagine you could still get liability since you are only not for hire. Along them same lines you could probably get full coverage.
midnight rambler
17th May 2013, 03:49 PM
I imagine you could still get liability since you are only not for hire. Along them same lines you could probably get full coverage.
In order to get automobile liability one MUST have a DRIVER LICENSE (i.e. be a political subdivision of the corporate state - amongst other issues). No DRIVER LICENSE = NO insurance (aka limited liability).
Hatha Sunahara
17th May 2013, 03:57 PM
Why bother with partial freedom from the DMV, when you can have complete freedom granted you by the Kingdom of Heaven:
http://kingdomofheaven.info/
You can peruse the kinds of documents they will provide you with here"
http://www.embassyofheaven.org/
Hatha
madfranks
17th May 2013, 04:55 PM
Why bother with partial freedom from the DMV, when you can have complete freedom granted you by the Kingdom of Heaven:
http://kingdomofheaven.info/
You can peruse the kinds of documents they will provide you with here"
http://www.embassyofheaven.org/
Hatha
I was interested, but unfortunately all their tutorials only come in audio tape form. I haven't had a tape player for 20 years.
iOWNme
17th May 2013, 05:14 PM
If you were actually FREE you wouldnt need to ask permission, file paperwork or explain yourself to the Master, now would you?
Im sorry guys but the entire idea that if you file the right papers, say the right legal mumbo etc, you can obtain your freedom DOES NOT make you free. You are not 1" closer to freedom by asking your Master for permission and him granting it to you, NOT AN INCH.
Im not trying to be a dick or rude, but its the truth. If you were a 'free man' you wouldnt even recognize 535 morons half way across the country or anything they had to say.
This is no different than having the Kings Stamp on your personal papers, only the King gave you the special 'Exempt' Stamp which you didnt have to pay for. BUT YOU MUST USE IT. And if you dont, you will be punished. It is 100% psychological indocturnation, domination, control and submission.
Dont even bother Palani. :)
palani
17th May 2013, 06:58 PM
Dont even bother Palani. :)
I posted a link and quoted it and nothing more. You have to applaud people for at least taking the effort to INVESTIGATE freedom even as misguided as the effort might be because in the process of making mistakes they might learn from them.
ximmy
17th May 2013, 07:03 PM
If you were actually FREE you wouldnt need to ask permission, file paperwork or explain yourself to the Master, now would you?
Im sorry guys but the entire idea that if you file the right papers, say the right legal mumbo etc, you can obtain your freedom DOES NOT make you free. You are not 1" closer to freedom by asking your Master for permission and him granting it to you, NOT AN INCH.
Im not trying to be a dick or rude, but its the truth. If you were a 'free man' you wouldnt even recognize 535 morons half way across the country or anything they had to say.
This is no different than having the Kings Stamp on your personal papers, only the King gave you the special 'Exempt' Stamp which you didnt have to pay for. BUT YOU MUST USE IT. And if you dont, you will be punished. It is 100% psychological indocturnation, domination, control and submission.
Dont even bother Palani. :)
The idea is to "disconnect" as much as you can from the grid. A person who does not pay for television is more liberated than the one who pays $90.00 a month for it.
Jewboo
17th May 2013, 07:34 PM
...A person who does not pay for television is more liberated than the one who pays $90.00 a month for it.
...A person who does not watch television is more liberated than the one who does.
http://smileys.sur-la-toile.com/repository/Films_et_TV/TV.gif
ximmy
17th May 2013, 07:40 PM
...A person who does not watch television is more liberated than the one who does.
http://smileys.sur-la-toile.com/repository/Films_et_TV/TV.gif
Hi book! \uu\
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.