C-SPAN getting 9/11 calls day after day

[PatColo]

Published on May 27, 2013
Federal legislators and pundits are asked questions about 9/11 controlled demolition evidence on C-SPAN's program "Washington Journal"



12 mins:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnVZovV5dyw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnVZovV5dyw

[PatColo]

Re the "tsk tsk, we're talking about the IRS today" Truth-blocker, callers should have asked something about "How were IRS operations negatively affected by the loss of their vast 90K sq ft "Regional Council" office in WTC-7 due to that skyscraper's CD on the afternoon of 9/11, as publicly concluded by 1,928 Architects & Engineers, and growing?"

http://wtc7.net/background.html
http://www.ae911truth.org
http://architects-engineers.org

[JohnQPublic]

I love their packaged answers. I am sure they are told to have an answer for 9/11 before they even get to the studio.

[Cebu_4_2]

Their going to have to stop listeners calling in.

[gunDriller]

"i go by the 9-11 Commission" = "i am a moron".

[PatColo]

recent red ice radio, 1st free hour, VG! see download button, or can listen through video console at link:
http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2013/05/RIR-130528.php


Niels Harrit - Hour 1 - Thermitic Material in the World Trade Center Dust & Building 7
May 28, 2013

Niels Harrit is the Associate Professor for the Department of Chemistry at the Copenhagen University in Denmark, who has published a large number of scientific papers with a special focus on nano-science. He was part of the scientific team which discovered nanothermite in dust samples from the 9-11 World Trade Center attack. In the first hour, he’ll discuss his scientific opinion on the collapse of the WTC and also WTC building 7. Niels tells his story as an independent researcher investigating 9-11 wreckage. He explains why he thinks nanothermite was at work. In the second hour, we discuss the official scientific report of the 9-11 disaster. He speaks more on the strange materials found in the rubble. Later, Niels discusses the loss of civil rights due to the events on 9-11. As a Danish citizen, he talks about the obstacles he faces when discussing the truth about the 9-11 attack.
http://www.redicecreations.com/img/radiodownloadbutton.png (http://rediceradio.net/radio/2013/RIR-130528-nielsharrit-hr1.mp3)

[gunDriller]

> nanothermite


i have wondered about nano-thermite. thermite = aluminum powder + rust (iron oxide).

nano-thermite just means, really small particles of aluminum.

you can get small pieces of aluminum by machining it - but nano-thermite particles are much smaller than meticulously machined aluminum chips.

i think they (Israel) used some chemical process to precipitate out individual aluminum atoms. can't get much smaller than that.

[PatColo]

Tuskin Shakes up NPR with Call Mentioning Building 7 (http://www.grizzom.blogspot.com/2013/07/bob-tuskin-shakes-up-npr-with-call.html)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWpS2I8350I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWpS2I8350I
For the last edition of NPR's nationally syndicated "program" Talk of the Nation hosted by Neil Conan, Bob Tuskin decided to call up and info jam some truth.

Posted by WHOOLI (http://www.blogger.com/profile/12745432266860223770) at 5:48 AM 1 comment: (http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440450620561193447&postID=8305420745292741646)

[Publico]

Their going to have to stop listeners calling in.

Most of the msm did that during the OJ trial. I remember callers outsmarting the talking puppets.

[collector]

Now lookey here...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lP8TwjRMdS0

[PatColo]

@ AE911Truth.org (http://www.ae911truth.org/), who are up to 1,948 A/E signatories now.



Senator John McCain Free-Falls on 9/11… Again (http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/760-senator-john-mccain-free-falls-on-911-again.html)

http://www.ae911truth.org/images/M_images/printButton.png (http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/760-senator-john-mccain-free-falls-on-911-again.html?tmpl=component&print=1&page=)
http://www.ae911truth.org/images/M_images/emailButton.png (http://www.ae911truth.org/en/component/mailto/?tmpl=component&link=79fcbc789a1395417d336e3ace3c1f8a92474082)




Written by By Andrew Steele, 911FreeFall.com


Sunday, 05 May 2013 18:53


http://gold-silver.us/forum/image/png;base64,iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADcAAAAUCAIAAAC mgTKJAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAAzdJREFUSEvVl01IVFEUx23bolWLRPqyIIiCol1tIiIw 2rRoEbaJWgRCEIVYCm1yKjIkU8xIm1JbWE3B5MegZkzOWPYyQU eLqWlCRkRGxmaajyyp3/M8L6+ZgYGB4jUc9Lxzzz33d//n3ue4IvVjcTQU/RhOFFjys3n1yh1FqwpeBSMjoW+/rPqBDcKCNi1kVUKDC8L/hzK5sGhlM7TMidjmmbA5h3zTkZyZfyPBoIymfiqzvxwLzSfNkf 31XUVV7ftqHprjpB203TdbXZfXPCsPXwvOIUTmRIMyklhQVvFk qPBs06l7rp6xIMHq/okNtc/XX+0uqrCX3nKqNCqi7oUHvWtOXi5r7sIffB8y18nDP3SljVKZE 7NQspWt1zoRD6wyx/Duu6+LG4c31nvWXnoKfSAcG5mal0I0dyr8FUqvfxofLas6XhBH 8r0X7wi0U5ssrXuEc7NH23O+gThNmIl9J9I7GiipthNkq0Qcw5 Obymq2nL4OK4qaWQ1Kksw28Hlue4Mb/VARxOImjZ/4oBeeaWwZeKeSKQdl/3iQCMuzhjgiMD6IxxseyxAcDq+PIYfmpxU4bMw98WXnuXpAKQU x3OSwTzNPdkoEO9H5QecTxCVDzm03+g7fdtW6tKyUlGZhzglk6 AEWdZAHOZEQVjaDwUECWDCBSKS8tZs0aqqOp6lmULIAxv7EwRC 8pGNcIUrTOaPEKaHS6L5oKRGWR0Ii8EGJL+pCCROgGEGkhYwhF eGoMJ27yKgqrpw/KP2z8aNNzyo7Pe1aoNw1uWtZRRGSw8raaSWkcYpSGgoTaYIrqw IBJdPZZLPrDc3lUDLK2eVAIzaPpKGlHMq0VQzKQCSJMUahY63u dTYnWKrd+AdaBrkiesJSpjI2hiSwqgo8ctp4pJtysfCRE9l4lD 2QT4Q0iTAFStJ4K0tEFZSyy5ThGOuBiDGf21M58OmIw4dxQO1v 9cuhT1hKSDP+1sr2xOJJ/f6K6vhqCM30oWicfCklbwkSVAVWIQdLW8ugBNFsoqs6wjymJeT 9mFkK3JzVslPmnPaPEwxK30zcyqZT8h2zzz/LzbKmwaZ/C04kU/ziBWFNg43/eX4DKuVtXDsPfl0AAAAASUVORK5CYII=


WTC Building 7 Highlighted on C-SPAN TV Editor’s note: 911 Free Fall Radio show host Andrew Steele spoke truth to power (http://www.911freefall.com/2013/04/mccain-asked-about-free-fall-of.html) when he asked Senator John McCain about the freefall of WTC7 on C-SPAN last month. AE911Truth Action Groups Leader Pam Senzee recently approached McCain (https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=445431188874732) and spoke with him about the evidence of nanothermite in the WTC dust. We encourage all of our supporters to follow their lead and reach out to local and federal representatives with this important information. If you also have video of peaceful but provocative encounters such as these, post them online and let us know!

(http://www.ae911truth.org/en/contact.html)

On April 9, 2013, Senator John McCain appeared on C-SPAN’s live call-in show Washington Journal. I asked him the following question:


http://www.ae911truth.org/images/articles/2013/05/john-mccain-responding-to-andrew-steele-on-cspan.jpg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=p7bIgiu-BXg)
Click the image above to Watch the Video
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=p7bIgiu-BXg)
“The National Institute of Standards and Technology asserts that the collapse of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11 was caused by fire. Yet they acknowledge that the first 100 feet of that collapse took place at free-fall acceleration. Engineers will tell you that fire cannot do this, that the only method by which it can be accomplished is the use of pre-planted explosives.


How do you explain this discrepancy...of a hundred feet of free fall, without the use of explosives?”


As the video shows, John McCain claimed ignorance, saying, “To tell you the truth, this is an area that I’m not very familiar...and if you would drop me a note and mention that we talked on C-SPAN, I’d be glad to get you a more complete answer.


But... honestly, every once in a while I have to plead ignorance about an issue, and this is one that I have not been involved in, but I’ll be more than happy to look into it...”


John McCain, of course, is not ignorant of 9/11 Truth. He wrote the foreword for the Popular Mechanics (PM) book “Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can’t Stand Up to the Facts.” In his essay “9/11 Conspiracy Myths: Truth Under Attack (http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/3485427),” which was adapted from his foreword for PM’s book, McCain wrote:
“Any explanation for 9/11 must start and end with the facts. The evidence must be gathered and analyzed. Then—only then—can conclusions be drawn.”


Indeed, 100 feet of free-fall acceleration of WTC 7 is a fact, as acknowledged by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which was the government agency tasked with investigating the destruction of the building. NIST was forced to admit to WTC 7’s free fall after physics teacher David Chandler embarrassed the agency into telling the truth at a technical briefing in August of 2008.


http://www.ae911truth.org/images/articles/2013/05/nist-response-to-david-chandler.jpg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA)
Click the image above to Watch the Video
As well, NIST has refused requests to disclos (http://911blogger.com/news/2010-07-12/nist-denies-access-wtc-collapse-data)e the input data used to create the computer models for its WTC7 investigation, claiming that doing so would “jeopardize public safety.”


It’s likely that John McCain’s plea of ignorance on Washington Journal was in reference to the technical information cited in the question that I asked him, and not to 9/11 Truth in general. In regard to the controversial issue of WTC 7’s destruction, he should be quite familiar with the topic.


In 2008, Blair Gadsby (http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/220-update-on-arizona-events.html) — a religious history professor and constituent of McCain — held a hunger strike for 17 days at McCain’s Phoenix office after failing to obtain a personal meeting with the Senator to discuss his concerns about the 9/11 crime. Richard Gage, AIA — CEO and founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth — offered his immediate availability to Senator McCain to discuss the evidence. http://www.ae911truth.org/images/articles/2013/05/john-mccain-crisp-image.jpg
Despite numerous attempts by AE911Truth supporters to inform Senator McCain about the explosive 9/11 evidence, he has refused to lift a finger in support of a new investigationAlthough a member of McCain’s staff finally met with Gadsby and other 9/11 activists after nine days into Gadsby’s hunger strike, and the staff member was given materials that laid out the evidence of the Twin Towers and Building 7’s controlled demolition on 9/11, Senator McCain himself refused to meet with the activists personally, stating in a letter to Gadsby:


“I believe these investigations have been conducted in good faith by qualified experts who have approached this daunting task honestly and objectively. My staff and I are always open to new, scientifically substantiated information that helps explain how and why the tragedies of September 11th occurred. I welcome any additional new information you may wish to present on the subject and will make my staff available to listen to your concerns.”


Because NIST’s acknowledgement of WTC 7’s freefall took place after McCain wrote those words to Gadsby, it qualifies as the “new, scientifically substantiated information” McCain was seeking. McCain promised on Washington Journal that he would try to answer the question that I asked him. Based on his promise and the existence of the new evidence, John McCain’s office should, therefore, be open to a new meeting with supporters of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and a personal re-examination of the evidence.


Please join the effort and contact Senator McCain (http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.contactform). Encourage him to fulfill his promise and have his staff directly address the questions about the destruction of WTC 7.


Senator John McCain Contact Information
Phoenix Office:
2201 East Camelback Road
Suite 115
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Main: chrome://skype_ff_extension/skin/numbers_button_skype_logo.png(602) 952-2410
Fax: (602) 952-8702
Prescott Office:
122 North Cortez Street
Suite 108
Prescott, AZ 86301
Main: chrome://skype_ff_extension/skin/numbers_button_skype_logo.png(928) 445-0833
Fax: (928) 445-8594
Tucson Office:
407 West Congress Street
Suite 103
Tucson, AZ 85701
Main: chrome://skype_ff_extension/skin/numbers_button_skype_logo.png(520) 670-6334
Fax: (520) 670-6637
Washington Office:
241 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Main: chrome://skype_ff_extension/skin/numbers_button_skype_logo.png(202) 224-2235
Fax: (202) 228-2862

[madfranks]

Now lookey here...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lP8TwjRMdS0

Ha ha ha, I love those bobba booey prank calls!!!

[madfranks]

@ AE911Truth.org (http://www.ae911truth.org/), who are up to 1,948 A/E signatories now.

Doesn't matter any more. I thought maybe the 1000 milestone would get some attention, but nope. It's been too long now, most people don't have attention spans that last this long, and most people don't care anymore. At most, if you can find someone who will hear you out, you'll get a "wow that's interesting", maybe they'll ponder it for a while, but then move on.

[Blink]

Doesn't matter any more. I thought maybe the 1000 milestone would get some attention, but nope. It's been too long now, most people don't have attention spans that last this long, and most people don't care anymore. At most, if you can find someone who will hear you out, you'll get a "wow that's interesting", maybe they'll ponder it for a while, but then move on.


The days of arguments/debate is over. Words alone are not gonna fix anything........

[collector]

Ha ha ha, I love those bobba booey prank calls!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIHGm6mcHYc - princess Diana
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31PzIkJk5B8 - Hurricane coverage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMDmvFqpGeo - CNN storm coverage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ncp2t0NA4LA - CNN shooting coverage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUJFB6N3hCE - Space shuttle debris **

and who can forget...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4NJZPcEby8 - Marge Schott apology
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3hNREiVhVY - Marge Schott gay parade

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK7WC11nBC0 - inappropriate jackie laughs




Billy West
Captain Janks
gilbert Gottfried
Jackie Martling
...those were the days !! :^)

[Roland]

I was listening to this shmuck last Thursday when the call came through.....pure gold. Neil Conan sounded like a buffoon trying to counter the WT7 comments. Needless to say the remainder of the show droned on with much to do about nothing, way to sum up years of broadcasting Neil you sad sad hack

[gunDriller]

i got a 1000 minutes on my cell-phone and a shitload of stuff to do besides sitting on the C-Span phone lines.

BUT it is a noble cause. that phone line is one of the few democratic tools left to us, in a country where elections are fixed and every elected representative is loyal to IsraHell.

[PatColo]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbnW_NoiUTM
"Congressman The Evidence That WTC Building-7 Was Brought Down With Explosives Is Real And Proven!""And that's the way it is" "No, I did not" "Yeah, Yeah, I think so"


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbnW_NoiUTM

[Sparky]

There was one yesterday morning. The response by the Congressman was "I accept the results of the WTC Commission Report." The caller followed up by asking if the Congressman had actually read the report. "No."

[PatColo]

^ hmm what a coincidence, that's exactly like the one I posted in #18! ;)

funny about that exchange though, caller asked specifically about 7's CD, then host asked CONperp about the Whitewash Commish Report, he says he didn't read it but thinks its explanation was adequate.

Whitewash Commish Report didn't mention 7 whatsoever. :D

[SWRichmond]

What Washington is hearing, and it scares the crap out of them for sure, is that "We neither trust nor believe you anymore, about anything". And that is as it should be, and as it always should be. "Where the people fear the government, there is tyranny. Where the government fears the people, there is liberty."

[mick silver]

back up ,,, little more fear for liberty would be good thing .........................The great political lie is that individuals need the state. It is a lie on at least two levels. The first layer of the great lie: It states the opposite of what is true; the state needs individuals. And the state is desperate for you to believe it is indispensable to your life. If it were not there to "take care of you," the state wants you to believe that your children would be uneducated, the roads would remain unpaved, health care would disappear, foreign tanks would roll past your doorstep and crime would run amok in the streets. Nonsense.The state produces nothing; it only takes and consumes what productive individuals create. The few state 'services' that mimic free-market ones are so notoriously inefficient and incompetent that they are often worse than nothing at all; public schools are an example. Moreover, the purpose of the 'services' is not to benefit society but to skim tax dollars from it and to exert social control over it. If the state wanted society to function at its potential, then it would step out of the way of private competitors rather than hobble or ban them. Instead, it obstructs private services precisely because they perform far better and less expensively.



The second layer of the great lie is its foundation. Namely, there is no "state" as opposed to individuals. Both the state and society consist of nothing more than their individual members and the sum total of their interactions. In other words, the state consists of individuals who organize together according to a set of rules; the individuals cooperate together in order to perform specific acts, from passing legislation to delivering tax bills. But every act of the state devolves to one individual dealing with another individual. In his magnum opus, Human Action (http://www.thedailybell.com/definitions/params/id/2405/), the Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises (http://www.thedailybell.com/definitions/params/id/637/) described this dynamic. "First we must realize that all actions are performed by individuals... If we scrutinize the meaning of the various actions performed by individuals we must necessarily learn everything about the actions of the collective whole. For a social collective has no existence and reality outside of the individual members' actions." The state exists only through its individual members.
In viewing abstractions such as "the state" as the sum total of their individual members, Mises did not deny the importance of the abstractions. Quite the contrary. Mises explained, "Methodological individualism, far from contesting the significance of such collective wholes, considers it as one of its main tasks to describe and to analyze their becoming and their disappearing, their changing structures, and their operation. And it chooses the only method fitted to solve this problem satisfactorily." Methodological individualism is an analytical tool through which to make sense of the collectives such as the state, society and family.
With regard to the state, Mises offered an example of how to analyze its dynamics. "The hangman, not the state, executes a criminal. It is the meaning of those concerned that discerns in the hangman's action an action of the state." This is a key point. The people who look upon the hanging see nothing more than one individual killing another individual; that is the visceral reality before their eyes. They 'see' a state action and an execution only because they grant the hangman the legitimacy of being a representative of the collective known as "the state." Their belief converts what would be a wanton killing into a justified execution.
And, yet, Mises wrote, "It is illusory to believe that it is possible to visualize collective wholes... We can see a crowd, i.e., a multitude of people." But, as with the hangman, we do not see authority or "the state"; all we see are people. Mises continued: "Whether this crowd is a mere gathering...or any other kind of social entity is a question which can only be answered by understanding the meaning which they themselves attach to their presence. And this meaning is always the meaning of individuals.... [A] mental process makes us recognize social entities." Individuals who form the state through their membership attach a specific meaning to gathering and coordinating with each other. The meaning or purpose is to exercise the perceived privilege to rule over individuals who are non-members. To do so, it is necessary to convince non-members of the state's legitimacy.
The 18th century political philosopher William Godwin – the first modern proponent of anarchism – observed, "Government is founded on an opinion... A nation must have learned to respect a king, before a king can exercise any authority over them." The process by which this opinion is formed can be called "mystification." This is the process by which the commonplace is elevated to the exalted. Thus the state comes to be seen as more than its individual members, as higher than society. The state becomes an independent entity to which individuals swear loyalty, for which they send their children to die in wars and toward which they genuflect. The mystique is maintained in many ways, including: the pomp of swearing-in ceremonies; awe-inspiring buildings such as the Supreme Court; the rituals of saluting flags with hands over the heart; uniforms that minimize individuality; the appeal to tradition such as the American Revolution (http://www.thedailybell.com/definitions/params/id/3366/); and, most importantly, the public schools (http://www.thedailybell.com/definitions/params/id/2601/) that teach the legitimacy of the state along with the alphabet.
Mystification sanctifies the actions taken by individuals in the name of the state. That is, a double standard of morality is introduced – one for individuals who are members of the state and another for non-members. The double standard contradicts a longstanding principle of liberty; namely, that a violation of violates committed by an individual remains a violation of rights when performed by a group of individuals. The group does not relinquish personal responsibility by acting in someone else's name. Rape is no less rape because a gang is involved or because they shout "do for England!" A 1657 pamphlet (ascribed to the rebel Colonel Titan) argued, "What can be more absurd in nature and contrary to all common sense than to call him Thief and kill him that comes alone... and to call him Lord Protector and obey him that robs me with regiments and troops?" And, yet, this is what the state accomplishes. It converts an act that would be theft if committed by an individual into a 'legitimate' act of taxation when committed by a group in the name of the state.
The state pulls off this moral sleight-of-hand because non-member individuals accept that it functions by a different standard of morality. The radical individualist R.C. Hoiles, who built a publishing empire, called this double standard "The Most Harmful Error Most Honest People Make." An editorial in his flagship newspaper The Orange County Register (Dec. 17, 1956) explained that the error "is the belief that a group or a government can do things that would be harmful and wicked if done by an individual and produce results that are not harmful, unjust and wicked. It is the belief that a number of people doing a thing that is wrong for an individual to do, can make it right and just."
Hoiles went one step farther. He went beyond the visible violations of right that occur under the double standard to make a more subtle point. In another Register editorial (Oct. 31, 1958), he argued that the "profit motive" was more accurately called the "hope of rewards." A man worked for one of two reasons: "Either he has hope of rewards or he is forced." The former was freedom; the latter was slavery. A double standard by which the state expropriated the wealth which individuals had freely produced only created slavery. The state destroyed the "hope of rewards" not only through direct violation of rights such as taxation but also by granting legal privileges to individuals who comprised entities such as corporations. The privileges constituted theft because they robbed private producers of the right to compete fairly and, so, they robbed individuals of hope itself.
The state exists as an engine of privilege only because the vast majority of people believe that the individuals who comprise it can properly operate on a double standard. If state agents, from the president to post office workers, were viewed as individuals who are bound to the same rules of decency as the rest of us, then the state as we know it would crumble as the illusion it is. Freedom will come when the same standard of morality is applied to the individuals who are the state; the path to freedom is methodological individualism.

- See more at: http://www.thedailybell.com/editorials/34802/Wendy-McElroy-Death-by-Methodological-Individualism/#sthash.UXpz6ue8.dpuf

[PatColo]

Sunday, December 29th, 2013 | Posted by Kevin Barrett (http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/barrett/)
New York Times DC correspondent covers up 9/11 (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/12/29/nyt911/)

By Kevin Barrett (http://TruthJihad.com), for Press TV (http://presstv.com/detail/2013/12/27/342150/nyts-dc-correspondent-covers-up-911/)
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/RW2-320x213.jpg (http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/RW2.jpg)
“Would you believe me if I told you the fish
was…THIS big?”



With some people – the really bad liars – it’s easy to spot what criminologists call “guilty demeanor.”




When George W. Bush sat reading to schoolchildren on the morning of 9/11 (http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=713_1316035998&comments=1), remaining in the classroom for almost ten minutes after supposedly learning that America was under attack, the guilty look on his face was palpable.


At 9:03 that morning, as schoolchildren chanted “kite plane must hit steel (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBeadagtecU),” Chief of Staff Andrew Card supposedly whispered in Bush’s ear: “A second plane has hit the World Trade Center, America is under attack.” But in reality, Card could not possibly have told Bush that. Whatever Card said required only two seconds. That was not enough time to explain a novel situation outside the President’s usual frame of reference.


In fact, Card must have said something like: “The operation is under way, await further instructions.”


If the Secret Service had really learned that America was under surprise attack, its agents would have immediately grabbed Bush and rushed him – at full speed – to a safe location. Instead, Bush just sat there looking guilty as the children read the book “My Pet Goat” for eight or nine minutes while the Secret Service did nothing.


When the reading session finally ended, Bush remained at the school for another twenty minutes.


After Bush had dawdled nearly half an hour in the classroom, the presidential motorcade took its time following the pre-announced route to the airport. Bush’s plane unhurriedly took off around 10 a.m. – almost an hour after Bush supposedly learned of the 9/11 “surprise attack.”


The whole world knew exactly where Bush was; the school event had been widely publicized in advance. If hijacked planes had really been used as missiles that day, the President would have been considered their number one target. But apparently the Secret Service knew Bush wasn’t in danger. The Secret Service’s complete lack of interest in the safety of the Commander-in-Chief (and in their own safety) proves, all by itself, that 9/11 was an inside job.



New York Times “embedded White House journalist” David Sanger was in the Florida classroom that day. He saw with his own eyes that the Secret Service knew Bush wasn’t a target.



In the twelve-and-a-half years that followed, Sanger never breathed a word about the obvious Secret Service foreknowledge.


That raises the term “embedded journalist” to a whole new level.


A few days ago, Sanger followed in the footsteps of the “Pet Goat President,” and gave the world another lesson in “guilty demeanor.”


During a C-Span interview, Sanger was asked by a 9/11 survivor why the New York Times has refused to cover the obvious controlled demolition of World Trade Center Building 7. Sanger’s response was evasive, obfuscatory, and mendacious.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2U3jpELK-ts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2U3jpELK-ts


The C-Span caller asked Sanger:


“Across the street from the New York Times building there’s a billboard asking where your paper’s coverage is of the over 2,000 architects and engineers who are demanding a new investigation of Building 7′s destruction on 9/11, and the overwhelming evidence that pre-planted explosives destroyed it. Since this has everything to do with our national security, can you explain what rational and scientific basis your paper has for failing to fairly and objectively cover this crucial issue?”


Sanger’s demeanor suggested he knew he was lying as he gave this circuitous answer:


“Trust me, the people who work at the New York Times have as much of a critical interest in what happened on 9/11 as anybody else. Because not only are they reporters there, but they live and work within the city. And we’ve devoted a fairly considerable amount of reportorial time over the past number of years to the question of all the different theories – conspiracy theories, regular theories, non-conspiracy theories – about what happened on that day. And you’ve heard the huge variety of them. We have not yet found any convincing evidence to suggest that there was a plot …that there was a plot that the President knew about in advance, which was one of the issues that came up. I was with the President on 9/11 at the school in Florida. I can tell you that he looked pretty shocked by what had happened, and shell-shocked by what had happened. And we have not found any evidence so far. That doesn’t mean that there’s none there. But we have not found any evidence so far to suggest that the building collapses were caused by anything other than the two airplanes that flew into them.”



Sanger blatantly evaded the caller’s question about Building 7. When he blamed the explosive destruction of the Twin Towers, and the smooth free-fall drop of Building 7, on “the two airplanes that flew into them” he was lying in two ways.



First, no airplane flew into Building 7.


Second, Sanger must know that the US government agency NIST admits that the planes and their jet fuel did very little damage to the Twin Towers. NIST blames office fires fueled by burning paper and carpets, not plane crashes or jet fuel, for the explosive pulverization of most of the Towers and their contents.


But whatever happened to the Towers, the destruction of Building 7 was the most obvious – and most perfect – controlled demolition in history. No smoother and more symmetrical near-free-fall implosion of a tall building has ever been recorded. Even Canadian scientist Frank Greening, the most prominent defender of NIST’s account of the destruction of the Twin Towers, has been forced to admit that NIST’s claim that Building 7 “just fell down from office fires” is ludicrous.


If David Sanger is really unaware of any evidence that Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition, he should just call up Frank Greening, the most-cited defender of the US government’s position on the destruction of the World Trade Center. Or he could try any of the more than 2000 Architects and Engineers.


Sanger’s bad faith – or his guilt-induced brain-freeze – is obvious when he divides the “different theories” about 9/11 into three categories: “Conspiracy theories, regular theories, and non-conspiracy theories.”


What can this possibly mean?


A “conspiracy” is a plan by a group of two or more people to commit a crime. How could there possibly be a “regular theory” or a “non-conspiracy theory” of 9/11? Is Sanger suggesting that a single individual may have acted alone?


As an embedded national security journalist, Sanger knows that the CIA was responsible for putting the weaponized term “conspiracy theorist” into circulation. (http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/01/20/cia-document-1035-960-foundation-of-a-weaponized-term/) The terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” were virtually unheard-of until the mid-1960s, when the CIA issued a memorandum to its thousands of Operation Mockingbird media assets telling them to attack JFK assassination researchers using those words. That memo is preserved as CIA Document 1035-960, released in response to a 1976 FOIA request by none other than the New York Times.


Apparently the CIA put out a similar memo after 9/11. And Sanger apparently got the memo.
Or maybe he didn’t need to.


Sanger has been a speaker at Foundation for Defense of Democracies – the neocon-Zionist successor to Project for a New American Century, which openly called for a “new Pearl Harbor” exactly one year before 9/11.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGMafpxO0GE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGMafpxO0GE


Former New York Times journalist Phillip Weiss calls Sanger a “complete insider” and a proponent of the Zionist notion that Iran is a threat to America.

(http://mondoweiss.net/2012/06/not-on-the-front-page-nyts-david-sanger-presumes-were-conducting-covert-hostilities-against-north-korea.html)

Weiss has elsewhere alluded to another of Sanger’s possible motives for complicity in 9/11: Zionist sympathies. In his article “Do Jews dominate in American media? And so what if we do?” (http://mondoweiss.net/2008/02/do-jews-dominat.html) Weiss points out that the majority of his former colleagues and bosses at the New York Times are, in effect, Israeli propagandists: “The Jewish cohort of which I am a part has largely accepted the duty … of supporting Israel.”


David Sanger must know that Zionist billionaire Larry Silverstein, a close friend of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, bought the condemned-for-asbestos World Trade Center just six weeks before 9/11, doubled the insurance, then collected double-indemnity (http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2004/12/07/48289.htm) due to the “two unrelated terror attacks” (the two planes). Silverstein has confessed twice on television to the controlled demolition of World Trade Center Building 7.


Sanger must know that Netanyahu’s first reaction to 9/11 was “It’s very good!” (http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/its-very-good-recalling-benjamin-netanyahus-words-day-911-attacks) He must know that Israeli spies were arrested in New York filming and celebrating the destruction of the World Trade Center. He must know about the New York Police Department radio recording describing Israelis being arrested on 9/11 near the George Washington Bridge with a truck full of explosives.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Huf2Kz7bV2k

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Huf2Kz7bV2k

Sanger apparently has plenty of reasons for parsing “conspiracy theories” from “non-conspiracy theories” and pretending he doesn’t know that 9/11 was an inside job.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/12/29/nyt911/

[PatColo]

Gage VEastwood's show-- @ 1h 2m, says just last week, his 45 min CSPAN interview became the most watched ever Wa. Journal on YouTube, out of the thousands W.J. has online. On the bad side though, their 15 min Ed Asner WTC7 vid at http://architects-engineers.org got taken down for undefined reason (spam, commercially deceptive content...). Why they don't re-code http://architects-engineers.org to point to one of the numerous other YT copies I don't know,???


Important Messages Hidden In Film, Mark Passio,
Architect Richard Gag Gives up $100k Salary To Expose 9/11
(http://www.thevinnyeastwoodshow.com/2015-archives/important-messages-hidden-in-film-mark-passio-architect-richard-gage-gives-up-100k-salary-to-expose-911)
25 Mar Mark Passio Richard Gage Vinny Eastwood Show 2015 - VinnY Eastwood
Picture
Hour 1: Talking with Mark Passio about how general overviews often need deep investigation, we also speak about the interesting phenomenon of super hero franchises and what moral messages people in the so-called truth movement are able to glean from these allegory's.
www.whatonearthishappening.com
Hour 2: Founder of Architects and Engineers For 9/11 Truth Richard Gage comes on to tell us how it all started, how he went from a republican warmonger to 9/11 truth activist, giving up a $100k salary and going on relentless tours to get it out!
www.ae911truth.org

25_mar_mark_pass
io_richard_gage_vinny_eastwood_show_2015.mp3
Download File
YouTube Audio Version (No Music or Ads)

yt_audio_25_mar_mark_passio_4226_richard_gage_vinn y_eastwood_show_2015.mp3
Download File
http://www.thevinnyeastwoodshow.com/2015-archives/important-messages-hidden-in-film-mark-passio-architect-richard-gage-gives-up-100k-salary-to-expose-911

[PatColo]

Gage on cspan; I see it's 40 mins,

https://youtube.com/results?sp=CAASAggA&search_query=richard+gage+cspan

The 15 min Wtc7 vid w/ed asner,

https://YouTube.com/results?q=solving%20the%20mystery%20of%20wtc%207%2 0&sm=1