PDA

View Full Version : The United States Is Still in an Extraordinarily Good Position - Jamie Dimon



Silver Rocket Bitches!
31st May 2013, 09:49 AM
NOW THIS IS RICH! THIS GUY PRETENDS TO BELIEVE THAT EVERYTHING IS HUNKY DORY. NOWHERE DOES HE MENTION THE CORPORATE WELFARE THAT HIS BANK NEEDED TO STAY SOLVENT. NOWHERE DOES HE MENTION THE TRILLIONS IN DERIVATIVES SET TO EXPLODE. FOR HIM IT'S ALL, WE'VE GOTTEN THROUGH IT BEFORE WE'LL GET THROUGH IT AGAIN. FUCK THIS GUY!

http://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/p/8/000/26d/160/10b1129.png
If you look past the immediate economic situation and the recent financial crisis and take stock of the overall picture, the United States is in a great position. Let's look at our outstanding strengths:


The United States has the world’s strongest military, and this will be the case for decades. We also are fortunate to be at peace with our neighbors and to have the protection of two great oceans. (How strong is a military that needs to borrow money to stay afloat? How strong is a military that is mired by social liberalism and scandal not to mention all time high suicides?)



The U.S. has among the world’s best universities and hospitals. (The best universities creating a generation of debt servants! The best hospitals that are fiscally unreachable for most and the biggest cause of bankruptcies ya fuck!)



The U.S. has a reliable rule of law and low corruption. (Ha! Did you hear that??! HE SAID LOW CORRUPTION! You gotta be kidding me!)



The people of the United States have a great work ethic and “can do” attitude. (A can do attitude that is immediately countered with a overreaching government stepping up to say CAN'T DO!)



Americans are among the most entrepreneurial and innovative people in the world – from those who work on the factory floors to the geniuses like Steve Jobs. Improving “things” and increasing productivity is an American pastime. And America still fosters an entrepreneurial culture where risk taking is allowed – accepting that it can result in success or failure. (And a government that squashes the entrepreneurs every step of the way by creating a playing field that is one sided for the big players.)



The United States is home to many of the best businesses on the planet – from small and middle sized to large global multinationals. (Especially the banks, right Jamie??)



The United States also has the widest, deepest, most transparent and best financial markets in the world. And I’m not talking about just Wall Street and banks – I include the whole mosaic: venture capital, private equity, asset managers, individual and corporate investors, and the public and private capital markets. Our financial markets have been an essential part of the great American business machine. (You just can't make this stuff up! He said the most transparent financial markets! This same financial market where the FOMC refuses to release their minutes until a minimum of 3 weeks has passed!)

http://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/p/6/000/271/175/1478bb1.pngAll Americans today benefit from what our forefathers struggled to build – from democracy itself to what is still the best economy in the world. We benefit from the hundreds of trillions of dollars that have been invested over the centuries in research and development, in public infrastructure and in our companies. When my grandfather was born in 1897, there was nothing that resembled the healthcare and technology of today – there were no cars, planes, phones, TVs or computers. Technology and exponentially growing human knowledge are like the energy of “dark matter” – it is everywhere – and it will drive productivity and growth for decades. I have little doubt that a hundred years from now, there will be new technologies that, today, we never could have imagined.
While the wounds of the financial crisis still are healing and too many Americans still are struggling, the country actually may be in a better position today than it has ever been in. In fact, Americans born today hold a far better hand than Americans who were born 50 or 100 years ago – we all clearly stand on the shoulders of all those who came before us.
America, however, does not have a divine right to success
Great potential and past glory do not guarantee future success. This is true for companies, and it is true for countries. America does not have a divine right to success -- we have some serious issues to address. Our immigration policy is flawed. We have yet to find a way for law-abiding but undocumented immigrants to stay in this country. And it is alarming that approximately 40% of those who receive advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering and math at American universities are foreign nationals with no legal way of staying here even when many of them would choose to do so.
We need five- to 20-year intelligent infrastructure plans (electrical grids, roads, tunnels, bridges, airports, etc.) for our cities, states and federal government. We also need better opportunities for all our citizens, and that can’t happen when 50% of our high school students in the inner cities fail to graduate. And without rational, long-term fiscal policy, including cost-effective reform of our entitlement programs – it will not be possible to establish a proper safety net and to create the incentive for consumers to responsibly take care of their health. It also is time to reform both the individual and corporate tax codes, which are confusing, inefficient and costly. Our corporate tax policies are, at the margin, driving capital overseas, just as, at the margin, our immigration policies are driving brainpower back overseas. The good news is that all these problems are known, and they are solvable. Fixing these issues would greatly increase American prosperity for decades. I also suspect it would improve income equality, a cherished American ideal. (So the big issue in our country is the CORPORATE TAX POLICIES DRIVING BUSINESS AWAY. Let's get on that right away!)

While the U.S. political system appears to be in deep gridlock today, it always has been able to find its way forward. America has exhibited extraordinary resiliency through its darkest moments – and I wouldn’t bet against her today. The future is extremely bright, but we are still going to have to earn it. (You heard it here - the future is bright! For the billionaires of the world maybe!)
Expansionary global fiscal and monetary policies may create additional potential risky outcomes
Governments around the world, partially but not entirely due to the crisis (Just a quick little mention of the crisis and make it as minimal as possible), generally have been spending more money than they take in. And central banks, mostly as a reaction to the global financial crisis, essentially have been creating money (called Quantitative Easing) to keep rates low and foster a stronger recovery. For the most part, these policies have helped the world economy recover – particularly in the United States. But this medicine is untested, and it may have severe aftereffects. This especially is true if fiscal policy makes it increasingly harder for central banks to slowly remove some of the monetary stimulus. Good fiscal policy and any policies that create growth will make the central banks' job easier ("good fiscal policy" what the hell does that even mean Jamie? A crash is baked in at this point regardless of policy). Higher interest rates and a little bit of inflation won’t matter much if we have strong job growth, good profitability and general prosperity (high interest rates won't matter when we have multi trillion dollar deficits? What's this guy smoking?) .
http://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/p/1/000/271/1ab/10e7e46.pngWe don't know the outcome of all these efforts. While it is entirely possible that we will manage through the process without too much suffering, there also are some fairly coherent arguments that suggest there could be significant negative consequences. We cannot ignore this possibility and must safeguard against unintended and adverse outcomes. One such scenario would be rapidly raising rates without strong growth. In the recent past, in 1994 and 2004, interest rates, both short term and long term, rose about 300 basis points within approximately a one-year period. In 1994, such action was unexpected, and it caused real damage for many who were unprepared (i.e., the failure of Orange County and significant financial losses at several financial and non-financial institutions). In 2004, the increase in rates was more expected – institutions probably had additional tools at their disposal to manage it, and the damage was far more limited. (We should be so lucky! As if the situation today can be compared to the 90s or 2004 which was a boom year)
Although we are not predicting it, we need to be prepared for rapidly rising rates, potentially even worse than we have seen in recent history. One of the ways we do this is to position our company – if all things are equal – so we can benefit from rapidly rising interest rates. As we currently are positioned, if rates went up 300 basis points, our pre-tax profits would increase by approximately $5 billion over a one-year period. Remember, however, that all things are not equal, and that $5 billion of improved income should be looked at as an additional cushion to protect us from other bad outcomes. You should know that it costs us a significant amount of current income to be positioned this way. But we believe it is better to be safe than sorry. (In other words - it's good to be a gangster!!)

http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20130528134559-257626722-the-united-states-is-still-in-an-extraordinarily-good-position

Ponce
31st May 2013, 09:56 AM
Sure, we are in a "Extraordinarily Good Position".......bent over go get a good f--k.

V

JohnQPublic
31st May 2013, 10:00 AM
"The United States Is Still in an Extraordinarily Good Position - Jamie Dimon "

Translation: There is more for us to steal.

Cebu_4_2
31st May 2013, 11:39 AM
Jamie Dimon won a big victory last week over a gaggle of lefty activists who tried to strip him of his title of board chairman of JPMorgan. But another, bigger, battle looms for Dimon, one with more far-reaching consequences — proving to the world that the megabank isn’t too big to manage.

Morgan was always big, but it got bigger still in the aftermath of the financial crisis, snapping up parts of other troubled banks, notably Bear Stearns. Today, with nearly $2.5 trillion in assets and more than $1 trillion in customer deposits, it’s the country’s largest bank.

http://www.nypost.com/rw/nypost/2013/05/28/oped/web_photos/jamie_dimon--300x300.jpg Is even the best good enough? Jamie Dimon is keeping both top jobs at JPMorgan — but the bank may be too big for anyone to manage well.


Morgan mostly avoided the pitfalls that plagued other banks, steering clear of the wild risk-taking and major scandals that nearly destroyed the financial system. Dimon deserves the credit for that.

But the bank hasn’t been as scandal-free of late. Regulators are picking through a number of issues, including why Morgan’s controls didn’t prevent the multibillion “London Whale” trading loss.

Thing is, no bank of this size can ever stay scandal-free. This fine point was lost on the lefty crew behind the drive to strip Dimon of his role as bank chairman (he would remain as chief executive officer). The thinking there was that the same guy who navigated JPMorgan through the financial crisis somehow needs yet another person looking over his shoulder, on top of the bank’s board.

The effort was soundly defeated because most shareholders saw the flaws in that premise. Morgan already has plenty of internal oversight, while some of the biggest corporate scandals came at places that separated the CEO and chairman.

Totally ignored in the months of debate over Dimon’s jobs was the question of whether JPMorgan (or any other megabank, such as Bank of America or Citigroup) is simply too big for anyone to effectively manage. But the question should be urgent, given how the post-crisis financial system so concentrates both power and risk into a handful of institutions.

Dimon would say this is a good thing. After all, the smallest firms, such as Bear Stearns and Lehman Bros., sank first back in 2008, thereby threatening to bring the whole system down. He’s also told me if Morgan does shrink, corporations would move their business to European megabanks, since they love getting all the banking needs done at one place.

Huh? Last I checked, Goldman Sachs has plenty of customers, though it’s far smaller than Morgan, Citi or BofA. And, sorry, every Wall Street bank, including JPMorgan, was imperiled during the 2008 crisis; they all took government funds to ensure their survival.

Morgan may have survived the tumult best because it was better managed, but there were no guarantees as the system began to hemorrhage.

For all the excellent work of Dimon and his team before, during and since the crisis, they did miss the London Whale. And if the best bank CEO in the country and maybe the world can miss that fiasco, what would happen if screw-ups of that magnitude occurred at a lesser institution, such as Citigroup?

And what happens if Dimon just screws up again, on something bigger? With so much financial risk squeezed into so few firms, 2008 might look like a walk in the park.

gunDriller
31st May 2013, 02:13 PM
when a Jew or Shabbas Goy like Dimon say "everything is all right", it is a sort of code-speak.

it means, "everything is all right for the Jews, and the Shabbas Goyim will get the bigger crumbs".


when Jim Kunstler spoke about economic collapse at Google in about 2006, they had the same response. "we'll get through it".

and they were right - they will get through it. Jewgle has a management stacked with Jews, a token black guy for a chief counsel, etc.

the rest of the economy may be in tatters, and they will be working on a digital technology, with an ex-Google guy (like Erik Schmidt) working for the government, telling them to buy Google's stuff.


a lot like how Oracle works it. Jew Larry Ellison sells database software to the government. the CIA & NSA & FBI & DHS buy it - and hire ex-Oracle geeks to help run it.