The Priest who spoke with Jesus Christ

[General of Darkness]

Just thought I'd share.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uZ38qeO7LQ&NR=1&feature=endscreen

[StreetsOfGold]

Without even watching the video, the "STILL" picture choosen by the poster has this video shows him making a 666 sign with his left hand.

Anyone can speak to Jesus Christ but he will speak back through his word - Are you English? That would be the King James Bible

[Spectrism]

I also saw the 666 hand signal in the video. I couldn't get past 5 minutes. This guy thinks Mary is the ruler of heaven. Truly delusional.

[JohnQPublic]

666 my ass. Just watch what he is doing in the first minute.

I agree with him about priests wanting to be like laity. Too many jokes from the pulpit during the mass, too much clapping, etc.

As to whether this really happened? I don't know.

As to Mary. She is the queen of heaven, but she is still one of us. She has no power, other than the power any mother has over an adult son. I am a convert from Lutherism, so I understand the difficulty with Mary.

As too his statement that we are living the book of Revelation- this I believe (based on the amillenial view).

Re: St. Michael prayer- the scary thing is that the modern church has largely stopped the practice of saying it.

Re: Fatima- I do not believe the consecration has yet been done.

Re: Garabandal- not sure I buy into this one (nor Medjugorje).

[JohnQPublic]

A Fatima Soliloquy Based on a Famous Scene from Shakespeare's Hamlet

To consecrate or not to: that is the question:
Whether ‘tis wiser to pander to Russia,
And continue a stalemate, nay, a threat increasing,
Or armed with faith and Mary’s assistance,
Oppose the error and convert them? Act not: to concede;
No out; and by concede to say we end
The separation ecumenism desires to repair
The solution of man, ‘tis a consummation
Naively to be wish’d. Act not: to concede;
To concede: perchance to bear fruit: ay, there’s the rub;
In that concession of lies what chaff may be rife
When we have relinquished this consecration,
Must give us pause: An act of faith
That can bear great effect if acted upon;
For who would bear the threats and actions of error,
Those errors of Russia, the atheist’s materialism,
The pangs of rejected offers, the law’s delay,
The Pharisee’s hypocrisy and rejection
Christ’s Church continually abides with love,
When compromise may be enacted
With a simple concession? Why consecrate Russia,
Reversing pacts sweated and wearied for,
But for the prophecy of continued aggrandizement,
The further coneyance of errors from whose seed,
The world will knowingly suffer, these forcing the will
And leading to the revealed belated consecration
Than compromise further and lose yet more souls?
Thus uncertainty makes for hesitation;
And fear of acting in a manner unsound,
Drains the courage needful to act with simple faith,
And occasions granted from heaven,
Slip away like sand, and through delay and refusal,
Abate the favors to be obtained. -- Hail thee, Mary!
Sinless Virgin! Our Mother, in thy prayers,
Remember we sinners and our Vicar.

[JohnQPublic]

Commentary on "A Fatima Soliloquy" A Fatima Soliloquy
With Commentary and Explanation
Based on a Famous Scene from Shakespeare's Hamlet
January 18th, 2006



To consecrate or not to: that is the question:

The basic issue addressed is whether to follow Heavens request to consecrate Russia.

Whether ‘tis wiser to pander to Russia,
And continue a stalemate, nay, a threat increasing,
Or armed with faith and Mary’s assistance,
Oppose the error and convert them? Act not: to concede;

A struggle ensued starting with Pius XI and through at least John Paul II. The struggle regards negotiations, ecumenical gestures, etc. between Russia and the Vatican. In Hamlet, “to sleep” is to close ones eyes to the evil in front of them. It is an attempt to escape from it. “To die” is the actual consequence, i.e., not just to sleep. And in death, an unknown is entered into, where the evil one is trying to escape may in fact torment one worse. Here, instead of “to sleep”, the attempt to escape [the need to consecrate or the evils of Russia] is in the form of “not Act”ing, i.e., finding reasons not to perform the consecration. The actual consequence is in fact “to concede” or make concessions to the evil one is trying to escape, i.e., conceding to Russia’s demand not to perform the consecration, and identify her evils. If the consecration is performed, it is promised that Russia will convert.

No out; and by concede to say we end
The separation ecumenism desires to repair
The solution of man, ‘tis a consummation
Naively to be wish’d. Act not: to concede;

There is no way to escape the need for the consecration. The ecumenical dialogue will fail, as Heaven has already layed the solution at our feet (the consecration). Man’s solutions (i.e., ecumenicism in the face of this, political negotiations, etc.) are naïve in face of the request from Heaven.

To concede: perchance to bear fruit: ay, there’s the rub;
In that concession of lies what chaff may be rife
When we have relinquished this consecration,
Must give us pause: An act of faith
That can bear great effect if acted upon;

Still, sparing Russia the consecration was considered a number of times, over the request for consecration. Clearly the popes involved felt it would pay off, but acting in faith to a message from heaven would have greater positive effect. Conceding to Russia may lead to many ills (detailed in the next passage, and here expressed as chaff being rife, i.e., much chaff among the wheat, to be seperated). These are among the errors Russia has spread for not performing the consecration.

For who would bear the threats and actions of error,
Those errors of Russia, the atheist’s materialism,
The pangs of rejected offers, the law’s delay,
The Pharisee’s hypocrisy and rejection
Christ’s Church continually abides with love,
When compromise may be enacted
With a simple concession?

Why risk these ills, if perhaps a compromise can be reached?

Why consecrate Russia,
Reversing pacts sweated and wearied for,

Consecrating Russia risks reversing the work of negotiation, ecumenicism, etc., already accomplished and in the works.

But for the prophecy of continued aggrandizement,
The further conveyance of errors from whose seed,
The world will knowingly suffer, these forcing the will
And leading to the revealed belated consecration

But it cannot be escaped that in fact a message from Heaven was given, and it promised Russia’s errors would spread, the world will suffer, and ultimately the consecration would be performed (though late, i.e., belated).

Than compromise further and lose yet more souls?

Unfortunately, it was prophesized that the consecration would be too late, leading to the loss of many souls (falling as snowflakes into hell).

Thus uncertainty makes for hesitation;
And fear of acting in a manner unsound,
Drains the courage needful to act with simple faith,
And occasions granted from heaven,
Slip away like sand, and through delay and refusal,
Abate the favors to be obtained. <-- Hail thee, Mary! >

The indecision, lack of courage and certainty, the inability to act in simple faith has meant the world has lost its great opportunity (occasion), and through delay and refusal, the favors from Heaven abated (lessened).

-- Hail thee, Mary!
Sinless Virgin! Our Mother, in thy prayers,
Remember we sinners and our Vicar.

In Hamlet, after this soliloquy, Hamlet rejects Ophelia. What of the request of Mary?

[Spectrism]

666 my ass. Just watch what he is doing in the first minute.

Why would anyone form their fingers the way he did?



I agree with him about priests wanting to be like laity. Too many jokes from the pulpit during the mass, too much clapping, etc.


As soon as I see someone use the term "laity" or lay person" seriously, I know they are lost- either as an authority figure or as one deceived under such a system. The whole concept of priests or lording pastors is misguided.

Here is what God said:
Exo 19:5 And now if listening you will listen to My voice, and will keep My covenant, you shall become a special treasure to Me above all the nations, for all the earth is Mine.
Exo 19:6 And you shall become a kingdom of priests for Me, a holy nation. These are the words which you shall speak to the sons of Israel.

The outside nations of unbelievers would be lost. Israel would be ALL priests.

And notice this warning from Messiah:
Rev 2:6 But you have this, that you hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.
Rev 2:15 So you also have those holding the teaching of the Nicolaitans, which thing I hate.
What were/are the Nicolaitans? Nico- lord over/ laitans- lay people. These were the religious rulers who claim spiritual high ground and lorded over the people.



As to whether this really happened? I don't know.

As to Mary. She is the queen of heaven, but she is still one of us. She has no power, other than the power any mother has over an adult son. I am a convert from Lutherism, so I understand the difficulty with Mary.


How do you know that Mary is the "queen of heaven"?
I suspect you would have to defer to Roman dogma. It is not biblically supported.

[7th trump]

Yeah I listened by skipping through the video and when I came across the guy talking about Marry asking to spare this person from Gods wrath and Christ paused and said ok I knew this video and the priest is pure bullshit.
Marry is nobody special. She had to follow the word of God like everyone else and accept Christ the same as everyone else.
Yeah Marry was chosen to give birth to Christ, but look at her history before the angels appeared to tell her she was chosen. Marry and Joseph had nothing who worked physically for an honest days wage....in todays standards they were basically homeless.
God says he is not a respecter of persons......translating into he doesn't have favorites that are given special treatment. Marry had to have faith just like the rest of us.

[goldleaf]

Hard to make progress with holy rollers.

[Spectrism]

Hard to make progress with holy rollers.

What kind of progress are you trying to make?

[JohnQPublic]

Why would anyone form their fingers the way he did?...

Again, watch the first couple of minutes. He counted three things, but started on his pinky finger. Unusual, maybe, but I find it difficult to call sinister.