PDA

View Full Version : Cooling Looms as Earth's True Climate Calamity



Horn
10th June 2013, 11:32 AM
Although we have been enmeshed in a long debate over global warming and climate change, this controversy has been politically motivated, not a response to actual global warming, as there has been no warming for 16 years.


In fact, it is likely we will soon need to take a long, hard look at adjustments in behavior based not on warmth, which, by and large, results in good things, but, rather, on cold, which creates endless problems for both individuals and society.


Scientists from Pulkovo Observatory in St. Petersburg, Russia, stated in the Voice of Russia on April 22, that solar activity is waning to such an extent that the global average yearly temperature will soon begin to decline.


Now, there is no reason to believe there will be any warming during the remainder of this century, says Vladimir Kotlyakov, head of the Institute of Geography at the Russian Academy of Science, speaking with Vladimir Radyuhin for the Hindu newspaper on April 22, 2013. In the same article, Dr. Yuri Nagovitsyn, academic secretary of the Pulkovo Observatory, is quoted as saying coming generations will have to grapple with temperatures several degrees lower than those today.


On Jan. 8, on NASA's Science News website, Tony Phillips cited Matt Penn and William Livingston of the National Solar Observatory as noting we are now in the final stages of Solar Cycle 24, which has been "the weakest in more than 50 years." By the time Solar Cycle 25 arrives shortly, they predict, "magnetic fields on the sun will be so weak that few if any sunspots will be formed," Phillips wrote.
The effects of this weak solar activity have been notable. The United Kingdom just suffered through a winter with temperatures 5 to 10 degrees Celsius below normal, and German meteorologists report 2013 has been the coldest year in 208 years. Writing April 27 in England's Sunday Telegraph, Christopher Booker noted 3,318 places in the United States that had recorded their lowest temperatures for that time of year since records began. Similar records were set in every province of Canada, and the Russian winter has seen its deepest snowfall in 134 years.


Anthony Watts, at his Watts Up With That blog, shows that, in this century, average U.S. winter temperatures have dropped by 1.45 degrees C, more than twice as much as their rise from 1850-1999 and twice as much as the net rise in the 20th century.


This cooling has come as a big surprise to many. All of mankind's new carbon dioxide emissions were supposed to make things too warm, with climate models indicating the world would heat up by 0.3 degrees C every decade.


Armed with an understanding of the solar cycles, however, Vladimir Bashkin and Rauf Galiulin from the Institute of Fundamental Problems of Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences state the warming in the past century was simply what should be expected when coming out of a mini ice age, rather than any changes caused by man's activities.


Cold causes more disruptions for people than warming, and mankind always has been more prosperous during warmer periods. However, with modern technology, we have the ability to plan accordingly and manage the slow change toward cooling that is likely upon us. But unless the governments of the world turn off the spigots that have fed tens of billions of dollars annually to support only research on man-caused warming, and begin to fund serious science intent on determining what the real global temperature trends are, it will be a decade or more before the truth is told.


The suggestion that the Earth may actually be cooling, not warming, is based not on science-fiction computer projections but, instead, on centuries of real data of how our planetary system actually works. It is time to turn away from supposing and direct our attention to reality.

http://news.heartland.org/editorial/2013/06/05/cooling-looms-earths-true-climate-calamity

vacuum
10th June 2013, 11:43 AM
A new study published online today (http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024/article) in the journal Environmental Research Letters puts a figure on how real this (genuine) scientific consensus is. The takeaway figure? Ninety-seven percent of scientific papers that take a position on anthropogenic climate change say it exists, and of authors of those papers, 97 percent endorse the idea of human-caused warming. That suggests both a consensus, and an overwhelming one.

http://www.psmag.com/environment/climate-study-consensus-still-means-consensus-57917/

Horn
10th June 2013, 12:06 PM
A new study published online today (http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024/article) in the journal Environmental Research Letters puts a figure on how real this (genuine) scientific consensus is. The takeaway figure? Ninety-seven percent of scientific papers that take a position on anthropogenic climate change say it exists, and of authors of those papers, 97 percent endorse the idea of human-caused warming. That suggests both a consensus, and an overwhelming one.

http://www.psmag.com/environment/climate-study-consensus-still-means-consensus-57917/

In reality that is a consensus of scientists who's heads are supposed (by themselves) larger in diameter than the Sun itself.

Simply comparing human population figures over the last 20 years to temperature data,

defeats all notions of them & any "anthropogenic" it.

Serpo
10th June 2013, 12:39 PM
The sun isnt as warm as it was

Neuro
10th June 2013, 12:55 PM
A new study published online today (http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024/article) in the journal Environmental Research Letters puts a figure on how real this (genuine) scientific consensus is. The takeaway figure? Ninety-seven percent of scientific papers that take a position on anthropogenic climate change say it exists, and of authors of those papers, 97 percent endorse the idea of human-caused warming. That suggests both a consensus, and an overwhelming one.

http://www.psmag.com/environment/climate-study-consensus-still-means-consensus-57917/
Imagine the savings to tax payers as 97% of climatologists are fired, for being frauds or incompetent fools! Though I believe the 97% figure is massaged. It has become one of those figures that can't change, no matter what new facts emerge that would challenge the consensus. 6 million anyone?

Horn
10th June 2013, 01:02 PM
Imagine the savings to tax payers as 97% of climatologists are fired,

I was estimating if we simply eliminated 66.6% of them, and their LEED politico counterparts,

global production of CO2 as "hot air" would be reduced some 33.3% overall across all latitudes.

Neuro
10th June 2013, 01:12 PM
In reality that is a consensus of scientists who's heads are supposed (by themselves) larger in diameter than the Sun itself.

Simply comparing human population figures over the last 20 years to temperature data,

defeats all notions of them & any "anthropogenic" it.
Maybe people's metabolism is lower nowadays? Also body weight is increasing, that would be a significant carbon sink, I think. People should be buried in deep mineshafts in the middle of Antarctic to stop them from decomposing. They could have a virtual memorial on the Internet where their relatives could easily go and pay their respect. About $12 is reasonable I think! And they can choose to donate those money to their favorite charity. Either to an anti-carbon organization or directly to Al Gore without any middle man...

Neuro
10th June 2013, 01:19 PM
I was estimating if we simply eliminated 66.6% of them, and their LEED politico counterparts,

global production of CO2 as "hot air" would be reduced some 33.3% overall across all latitudes.
Yes firing them is not very good of course. Freeze drying them is more environ-mental, if we could just figure out a way to condensate the climate changing water vapour that would come from such an operation...

Horn
10th June 2013, 02:04 PM
People should be buried in deep mineshafts in the middle of Antarctic to stop them from decomposing.

Methane is a problem, maybe there is someway to sell this thing such that, we can prove that,

using the certain logic center synapses with and regards to mainstream climatology leads to an inevitable 3 fold increase in methane output from the human host...?

LOL!

Serpo
10th June 2013, 02:17 PM
http://www.jsmineset.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/clip_image001_thumb9.jpg (http://www.jsmineset.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/clip_image00110.jpg)