Log in

View Full Version : Cops shoot dog - What else is new?



Spectrism
2nd July 2013, 09:47 AM
Amazing scene of cops being brutal abusers of the people.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDBZr4ie2AE

midnight rambler
2nd July 2013, 09:50 AM
Amazing scene of cops being brutal abusers of the people.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7vpUl6N0ok&feature=player_embedded

I'm thinking you cut and pasted the wrong url in the op. lol Is this the sort of thing you usually watch??

Spectrism
2nd July 2013, 09:55 AM
I'm thinking you cut and pasted the wrong url in the op. lol Is this the sort of thing you usually watch??

LOL... I like vocal trance. It makes good background music. My copy paste missed the cop video. Something is weird with YouTube these days. I get long delays and sometimes the pages don't change over as I click them.

BTW- I caught that in about 15 seconds. Some people are hawks.

midnight rambler
2nd July 2013, 10:00 AM
Regarding the video you *intended* to post about the Negro and his pet Rottie - I can't help but think this was a case of being stupid in a no stupid zone on the part of the Negro. Two points: the Negro was aggravating the donut munchers with the loud stereo in his car and apparently when the donut munchers told him to turn it down the Negro gave them some attitude (the equivalent of poking a hornet's nest with a stick), and secondly, NEVER allow your pet to come into contact with the donut munchers, they always have carte blanche from their adminstrators and judges to shoot your pet and THEY WILL*.

*when looking for an example of anti-social behavior, this a clear cut one

Spectrism
2nd July 2013, 10:24 AM
I am glad for the stupid people. They expose the mindset of the "overlords". Stupid or not, what the cops did was without excuse.

midnight rambler
2nd July 2013, 10:36 AM
I am glad for the stupid people. They expose the mindset of the "overlords". Stupid or not, what the cops did was without excuse.

Absolutely it's inexcusable, but completely predictable. These days the donut munchers are trained to be pussies who are scared of their own shadows, and little do they realize that their own anti-social behavior is what sets dogs off in the first place. But it is what it is, and that's what makes it extremely dangerous for the family pet to come into contact* with those who think of themselves as 'protecting and serving'.

*My current young adult female is the sweetest, sunniest, most affectionate and playful dog - 4 or 5 cops were next door ('investigating') and along came my bitch with her tennis ball in her mouth looking for someone to play fetch with her while wagging her tail (she LOVES people and she's very outgoing). One of the donut munchers pulled his service pistol preparing to shoot her (he was 'in fear for his life' you see). I gave him the stink eye and he re-holstered his pistol after a few seconds.

mamboni
2nd July 2013, 10:51 AM
The dog didn't deserve to be made to suffer. Stupid humans!

Dogman
2nd July 2013, 10:59 AM
Hate to say it but the guy got what he asked for. He egged on the walking donuts and stupid him, he did not secure his dog enough, leaving the window open was a invite for the cluster fuck that happened.

Always hate to see one of our hair suited friends get hurt/killed because of human stupidity.

Ignorance can be cured, but stupidity is bone deep and the guy in the video was one stupid sob, sorry to say stupid comes in all colors and backgrounds!

midnight rambler
2nd July 2013, 11:02 AM
The dog didn't deserve to be made to suffer. Stupid humans!

Who are the real terrorists?

Spectrism
2nd July 2013, 11:32 AM
Nobody cares about the reason for arresting the guy? He had the temerity to film/ record the cops and that pissed them off. When cops are "untouchable", they will end up getting more than a gentle touch. Cops are now just walking guns. Every abnormality will be treated with bullets.

ximmy
2nd July 2013, 11:34 AM
Guy got what he deserved but the dog didn't.

I encourage folks to see this video. The Donut eaters enjoyed shooting the dog.

Witness true American cowardice in action...

Dogman
2nd July 2013, 11:53 AM
Guy got what he deserved but the dog didn't.

I encourage folks to see this video. The Donut eaters enjoyed shooting the dog.

Witness true American cowardice in action... Yep, but the sorry sugar eaters/walking donuts felt threatened and it did look like the dog was just doing what he/it thought was its job helping his owner/friend.

Tho, the state of American militarized cops today does piss me off to the max! I have a radio tuned to the locals and it runs 24/7 some I give kudos to and others I would not piss on because they are that low.

Cebu_4_2
2nd July 2013, 12:13 PM
http://youtu.be/2DBLrzwZ-RI

iOWNme
2nd July 2013, 02:19 PM
Hate to say it but the guy got what he asked for. He egged on the walking donuts and stupid him, he did not secure his dog enough, leaving the window open was a invite for the cluster fuck that happened.

Always hate to see one of our hair suited friends get hurt/killed because of human stupidity.

Ignorance can be cured, but stupidity is bone deep and the guy in the video was one stupid sob, sorry to say stupid comes in all colors and backgrounds!

FUCK YOU.

You have Stockholm syndrome. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome) You are validating the oppressors by trying to demonize a NON VIOLENT person in favor of the Facsist COWARDS and their 'Law'. The man was filming Cops. He was not harming anyone, did not threaten anyone, and scumbags like you try and twist REALITY into some Hitlerian dystopia where individual people shouldn't 'egg on' one of the Priests of 'Government'.

Cowering nitwits like you have ruined this planet, and have HELPED Authoritarian regimes throughout history absolutley DESTROY the individual and his divine right to exist.

Jewboo
2nd July 2013, 02:51 PM
Two points: the Negro was aggravating the donut munchers with the loud stereo in his car and apparently when the donut munchers told him to turn it down the Negro gave them some attitude (the equivalent of poking a hornet's nest with a stick), and secondly, NEVER allow your pet to come into contact with the donut munchers..



http://www.joe-ks.com/archives_mar2008/AfricanPitBullB.jpg

http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg93/mykmittruckerk/pitbull.jpg


There should be a BOUNTY on pit bulls in America.

:rolleyes:

gunDriller
2nd July 2013, 03:32 PM
Hate to say it but the guy got what he asked for. He egged on the walking donuts and stupid him, he did not secure his dog enough, leaving the window open was a invite for the cluster fuck that happened.

what did the dog's owner do wrong ?

all he did was videotape the Pigs.

i must be missing some back-story. maybe the Pigs were there to arrest him.

the dog's owner was thoughtful enough to put his dog in the car. yes, he could have rolled the windows up. but not many people think super-clearly when they are being cuffed.

the Pigs deserve what they dealt out. x100.


i can not see what the dog's owner did to deserve being cuffed. that's what makes me wonder if there's more to it than what we saw.

cuffed for video-taping the police ? wow, guess i better keep my cameras rolling but hidden.

Jewboo
2nd July 2013, 05:10 PM
DogsBite.org Releases Report: U.S. Police and Citizen Shootings of Pit Bulls 2008

The report shows that 40% of the incidences resulted in pit bull bite injury; in six cases, the injury led to death. 3% of the occurrences involved human bullet injury.

Download Report (http://www.dogsbite.org/reports/dogsbite-report-pit-bull-shootings-2008.pdf)

Seattle, Washington (June 3, 2009) -- DogsBite.org, a national dog bite victims’ group dedicated to reducing serious dog attacks, releases its 2008 report on pit bulls shot for public safety reasons. The 20-page report documents 373 incidences in which U.S. law enforcement officers and citizens were forced to shoot a dangerous pit bull to prevent an attack or to stop an ongoing attack.

The report tracked 12 data aspects per incident. Of the 373 incidences, 626 bullets were fired and 319 pit bulls were killed. 148 people suffered bite injury in these incidences as well. In at least three instances, the bite injury resulted in amputation. In six instances, the bite injury resulted in death. The findings also show that firearm intervention might have prevented at least eight deaths by a pit bull mauling in this period.

According to the report, 43 U.S. states had at least one shooting. States with the highest number of shootings include: California (37), Texas (32), Florida (24), Illinois (23) Ohio (23), Pennsylvania (20), Washington (15) and Indiana (13). Of the U.S. cities documented, Omaha had the most shootings (9), all of which occurred within a 6-month period, followed by Chicago (7) and a group of U.S. cities each reporting four.

Information for the 12-month report was gathered through online media sources -- Google News Alerts and web searches -- at the time of the shooting. Extensive Internet searches were not performed to find the 373 incidences.

Link (http://www.dogsbite.org/dogsbite-newsroom-2009-us-police-citizen-shootings-of-pit-bulls.php)

gunDriller
2nd July 2013, 05:22 PM
DogsBite.org Releases Report: U.S. Police and Citizen Shootings of Pit Bulls 2008

The report shows that 40% of the incidences resulted in pit bull bite injury; in six cases, the injury led to death. 3% of the occurrences involved human bullet injury.

sure, sometimes, dogs are extra-agressive.

but then, so are cops.

does this mean we can shoot cops when they are extra-aggressive ?


in that video, the guy's dog looked like a normal dog. we could see the dog because a third party was video-taping it. therefore, the cops could see the dog.

unless the cops are on LSD or bath salts, they would see the same peaceful dog, followed by dog approaching its master, that we saw.


besides, there are other ways to subdue an animal. it's called a net. also, there are tranquilizers.

the dog wasn't going for anybody's face or neck. it was walking towards its master when they shot it.

i dare say, if a technique works on lions and tigers - namely, tranquilizers - it would work on a 70 pound dog.

the only reason the Pigs get away with it is because America has morphed into a Stasi-style police state, on steroids.

General of Darkness
2nd July 2013, 05:34 PM
A couple of points.

I think the owner was an fucking idiot and he created the situation because cops always use deadly force against an animal. And any sane person should know that. Apparently he's filed like 8 complaints against the Hawthorne PD, so you know they know who the fuck he is. He's acting tough with his dog then puts his dog into his car with the windows WAY too low. I never leave either of my dogs in my truck when they're in it alone with the window lower than they could stick their head out in case they get a hair up their ass an go bonkers. Also, lets assume that the black guy was me, and Enzo got out, he wouldn't fucking hesitate to rip the cops arms off that were touching me, I guarantee you that. But with the training I have on him, I would be screaming the DOWN command and he'd do that, another guarantee.

The problem is perception. Most, not ALL, Rotties these days have been bred for show and their aggressiveness out of them. And with backyard breeding's you can clearly see the dog comes out because of instinct and then doesn't know what to do. Watch it. He jumps out to protect his master and then starts getting nervous because his owner is nervous. He starts sniffing the ground.

This poor dog didn't have a fucking chance and didn't do shit until they tazed him and he went into fear drive because of the pain and you can see the instinct kick in. He goes after the cop but it's a shit attempt, more of a make the pain stop lunge. The cop tries to grab the collar, dog spins and bang bang bang bang.

Rambler and I have had the conversation about our dogs being meat shields as a last resort. I know what my dogs are capable of, and how much control I have over them, but I also love them too much to put them in that situation with fucking stupid cops. The owner played a stupid fucking game and lost.

Now like GD posted that's the whole OTHER side to the story. The cuffed him for WHAT exactly? Other than being stupid, which isn't against the law, the cops MURDERED an innocent dog. It's fucking sad and breaks my heart. But stupid is what stupid does. Play stupid games you win stupid prizes.

Spectrism
2nd July 2013, 05:45 PM
So General... the guy knew the cops were going to violate the law and slam cuffs on him because he was watching them. Is that your argument? Really?

And because he knew the cops would brutalise him with a false arrest, he should have known not to walk his dog that day. And when he was driving, he should have known to keep the window closed more although it was a warm day.

And he should have known that the cop was going to shoot his dog. So.... by your reasoning... it was the owner's fault the cop shot his dog.

By that reasoning, you are already at fault for MANY events that did not yet happen. You have your dogs ready to attack people ON PURPOSE. That alone puts you way ahead of this guy.

General of Darkness
2nd July 2013, 06:16 PM
So General... the guy knew the cops were going to violate the law and slam cuffs on him because he was watching them. Is that your argument? Really?

And because he knew the cops would brutalise him with a false arrest, he should have known not to walk his dog that day. And when he was driving, he should have known to keep the window closed more although it was a warm day.

And he should have known that the cop was going to shoot his dog. So.... by your reasoning... it was the owner's fault the cop shot his dog.

By that reasoning, you are already at fault for MANY events that did not yet happen. You have your dogs ready to attack people ON PURPOSE. That alone puts you way ahead of this guy.

No I'm not saying anything that's your "interpreting".

There are TWO separate issues here.

The dog being shot and him being illegally detained.

Why did he bring his dog out of his car to begin with? And don't start with, "That's not illegal", blah blah blah. Yes, I know that, but his intent was to be a bad ass. Look at me I've got a tough looking dog that will fear bark at you. GTFO. He did it because he was an asshole and brought attention to himself. Google world star hiphop, there's millions of this fucking Leroys running around. He's a stupid fuck.

Now the cops cuffing him was obviously illegal at least from the video. He had not committed a crime and was being detained. The rest of it is a pure cluster fuck.

BTW - No I can't get my dogs to attack any person on the fly, they do have a brain and do understand right and wrong and have situational awareness. Someone would have to be behaving in a threatening or threatening them or me. Keep in mind a dog can smell aggression, fear etc. Once you pose a threat, then it's EASY to turn my dogs on and the training kicks in.

Osiris
2nd July 2013, 06:33 PM
DogsBite.org Releases Report: U.S. Police and Citizen Shootings of Pit Bulls 2008

The report shows that 40% of the incidences resulted in pit bull bite injury; in six cases, the injury led to death. 3% of the occurrences involved human bullet injury.

Download Report (http://www.dogsbite.org/reports/dogsbite-report-pit-bull-shootings-2008.pdf)

Seattle, Washington (June 3, 2009) -- DogsBite.org, a national dog bite victims’ group dedicated to reducing serious dog attacks, releases its 2008 report on pit bulls shot for public safety reasons. The 20-page report documents 373 incidences in which U.S. law enforcement officers and citizens were forced to shoot a dangerous pit bull to prevent an attack or to stop an ongoing attack.

The report tracked 12 data aspects per incident. Of the 373 incidences, 626 bullets were fired and 319 pit bulls were killed. 148 people suffered bite injury in these incidences as well. In at least three instances, the bite injury resulted in amputation. In six instances, the bite injury resulted in death. The findings also show that firearm intervention might have prevented at least eight deaths by a pit bull mauling in this period.

According to the report, 43 U.S. states had at least one shooting. States with the highest number of shootings include: California (37), Texas (32), Florida (24), Illinois (23) Ohio (23), Pennsylvania (20), Washington (15) and Indiana (13). Of the U.S. cities documented, Omaha had the most shootings (9), all of which occurred within a 6-month period, followed by Chicago (7) and a group of U.S. cities each reporting four.

Information for the 12-month report was gathered through online media sources -- Google News Alerts and web searches -- at the time of the shooting. Extensive Internet searches were not performed to find the 373 incidences.

Link (http://www.dogsbite.org/dogsbite-newsroom-2009-us-police-citizen-shootings-of-pit-bulls.php)

Wake the fuck up!

Colleen Lynn (creator of dogsbite.org) is a psycho!

who is the crazy one


For the last couple of years Colleen Lynn has been scrambling to get all her articles/stories, and anything else related to her off the internet. I wonder why? All her old articles and stories at Colleen Lynn is now unavailable, even if you use a website called "Archives" which take you back to her old website in 2004 it simply redirect you to her company site called "Vain Notion"

Luckily for us, we know a place where her articles/stories are still posted on the internet. She has created masterpieces such as "Sleeping with Ann Coulter" and various other articles/stories.

The following quotes from Colleen Lynn's Master Pieces are used under the "fair use" doctrine of the U.S. copyright statute.

Straight from the horse’s mouth:

"After a high-level attack, Disassociation sets in. This usually lasted for about two weeks. During this time, I was incapable of looking at anyone directly. Relating conversationally to people, even my close friends, was like the disorientation of going deaf. I watched their lips move, but only heard parts of sentences, and sometimes no sentences at all. I was a mild catatonic, dressed up as myself."

"My boyfriend, who lived with me, got the worst of it. I would slingshot from a stupefied state into one of aggression, especially if he approached me from behind. “F*** YOU!” I would shriek. “Don’t you EVER come up behind me without announcing yourself.”

"One of the greatest fear’s I have now is: What if my medication stops working? But because I am on medication, I only have this thought once, then it floats away, like I have just let go of a balloon. There doesn’t seem to be a downside to taking the pills. And my boyfriend, without hesitation, says that I should keep taking them."

She always portray pitbull owners as crazy people, yet she herself is a self-admitted paranoid psychotic that has to take medication to keep from over generalizing to the point where she cannot function in a normal society.

"People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones"
(http://thetruthaboutdogsbite.blogspot.com/)


First, let’s look at where the CDC and other studies get their information: You guessed it – largely from media accounts. Of course, the media reports on pit bull-related incidents far more than those involving other types of dogs, a fact clearly detailed in the Canine Research Council’s publication, “The Pit Bull Placebo,” and the ASPCA’s “Pit Bull Bias in the Media.” Another commonly cited source, the anti-pit bull website Dogsbite.org, also sites studies that use press accounts to compile their numbers.
(http://www.aspca.org/fight-animal-cruelty/advocacy-center/animal-laws-about-the-issues/pit-bull-bias-in-the-media.aspx). (http://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/uploaded_files/publications/230603563_Pit%20Bull%20Placebo.pdf)

Sites like Dogsbite.org like to claim that pit bulls only make up 5 percent of the total dog population in the United States and are therefore “attacking” at a much higher rate than other dogs, but the truth is that there are no accurate statistics kept on the total number of dogs in this country, let alone dogs by type. The CDC clearly states this on its website: “There is currently no accurate way to identify the number of dogs of a particular breed, and consequently no measure to determine which breeds are more likely to bite or kill.” And while it’s anyone’s guess exactly how many pit bull type dogs there are in this country, it’s clear from looking around most cities, neighborhoods and shelters that dogs labeled as pit bulls are far more common than 5 percent.

It’s also important to note which types of dogs are listed as responsible for bites or fatalities changes over time, depending on which types of dogs are popular for negative functions, such as guarding, at that time. The CDC report also discusses this: “[B]reeds responsible for DBRF have varied over time. … As ascertained from our data, between 1979 and 1980, Great Danes caused the most reported human DBRF. … [S]ince 1975, dogs belonging to more than 30 breeds have been responsible for fatal attacks on people, including Dachshunds, a Yorkshire Terrier, and a Labrador Retriever.” (It’s also key to point out that you are more likely to be killed by lightening than a dog, and dog bites are at historic lows.)

Read more: http://www.pitbull-chat.com/showthread.php?106192-the-truth-about-bite-statistics#ixzz2Xw9lOvFw

Research the shit you are spewing or shut the fuck up!

please excuse the rant but that just pisses me off.

Back on topic, the cops were completely out of line and I can't believe there is even debate about that on this forum. The whole idea of this being the owners fault because that's just what cops do proves we're are so far beyond fucked!

Jewboo
2nd July 2013, 06:49 PM
The CDC clearly states this on its website: “There is currently no accurate way to identify the number of dogs of a particular breed, and consequently no measure to determine which breeds are more likely to bite or kill.”





http://www.dogbreedinfo.com/images10/BichPooCasponstepCUTE.jpg



Yeah...probably the same mathematical odds of this little poodle killing us as Osiris's pit bull.




:rolleyes: sorry to be suspicious of and "profiling" all those innocent pit bulls

Dogman
2nd July 2013, 07:14 PM
FUCK YOU.

You have Stockholm syndrome. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome) You are validating the oppressors by trying to demonize a NON VIOLENT person in favor of the Facsist COWARDS and their 'Law'. The man was filming Cops. He was not harming anyone, did not threaten anyone, and scumbags like you try and twist REALITY into some Hitlerian dystopia where individual people shouldn't 'egg on' one of the Priests of 'Government'.

Cowering nitwits like you have ruined this planet, and have HELPED Authoritarian regimes throughout history absolutley DESTROY the individual and his divine right to exist.

Must be your time of the month, hope you get your hormones balanced soon, I still say the guy in the video asked for it by egging the pigs on.

Sorry to see your lack of expanded language skills, and are stuck in the common low mental state of expressions. What happened did your significant other in your life cut you off? Flowers may help him.

The dude in the film was hooting and hollering at the pigs and his actions got the attention that led to the cluster fuck that ended bad for the dog , that asshole of an owner (dog) did everything except walking up to the cops and pissing on their legs.

He did reap what he sowed!

Now go kiss and make up to him, you know you want to. Being on the rag is a bitch as I have seeing with the lady's in my life (female types)


Grin!!

General of Darkness
2nd July 2013, 07:16 PM
Osiris, I agree that pitbulls get a bad rap, but in all fairness. People that are breeding them don't know what the fuck they're doing and the ones that do know what they're doing can't make any money at it. The hoodrats can't determine the difference between a pit showing signs of aggression out of fear or prey drive. It's pathetic. But then again the same people doing the breeding's are just low IQ fucktards to begin with. Within 10 years I guarantee pits will start getting outlawed in the states.

You have to understand breeding coefficients, lines, stacking, inbreeding, out crossing etc, the list is long. This shit takes decades.

Here's a perfect example of that. The Dalmatian project. Most Dalmatians because of poor breeding techniques are really fucked up, hearing etc etc. SO they out crossed to a pointer to bring the health back in line while maintaining the looks.

http://www.dalmatianheritage.com/index.htm

While Enzo is a Doberman, looks like all the other dobermans in the club he's from a different line. He's from the psycho 70's. Even breeding him to my female would be considered an out cross. These stupid fucks these days have NO IDEA what they're doing. If I were a pit enthusiast, I'd get a Argentine Dogo because the American pit has become a pile of shit and it's too hard to find one that will be great dog and do any work. These fucking dogs are pimp.

http://ourworldofdogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/dogo-argentino.jpg

Dogman
2nd July 2013, 07:31 PM
Osiris, I agree that pitbulls get a bad rap, but in all fairness. People that are breeding them don't know what the fuck they're doing and the ones that do know what they're doing can't make any money at it. The hoodrats can't determine the difference between a pit showing signs of aggression out of fear or prey drive. It's pathetic. But then again the same people doing the breeding's are just low IQ fucktards to begin with. Within 10 years I guarantee pits will start getting outlawed in the states.

You have to understand breeding coefficients, lines, stacking, inbreeding, out crossing etc, the list is long. This shit takes decades.

Here's a perfect example of that. The Dalmatian project. Most Dalmatians because of poor breeding techniques are really fucked up, hearing etc etc. SO they out crossed to a pointer to bring the health back in line while maintaining the looks.

http://www.dalmatianheritage.com/index.htm

While Enzo is a Doberman, looks like all the other dobermans in the club he's from a different line. He's from the psycho 70's. Even breeding him to my female would be considered an out cross. These stupid fucks these days have NO IDEA what they're doing. If I were a pit enthusiast, I'd get a Argentine Dogo because the American pit has become a pile of shit and it's too hard to find one that will be great dog and do any work. These fucking dogs are pimp.

http://ourworldofdogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/dogo-argentino.jpg


General here pits are behind about all dog attacks that have happened in my memory, I do not care what breed of dog, it all boils down on how they are raised from birth and trained and treated. I have seen some very loving pits (both breeds that are called by the name) but also have seen a basic instinct that I would be careful if the dogs were with other people than the family they were raised with.

Jewboo
2nd July 2013, 07:39 PM
I have seen some very loving pits (both breeds that are called by the name) but also have seen a basic instinct that I would be careful if the dogs were with other people than the family they were raised with.



http://i.usatoday.net/communitymanager/_photos/paw-print-post/2010/07/01/dogbansx-large.jpg

http://www.maltesemaniac.com/images/maltese-poodle-puppy-sundrop-21524090.jpg


Yeah...Pit bull owners are just as nice and loving a neighbor as poodle owners. Hard to tell them apart out in public.

:)

General of Darkness
2nd July 2013, 07:40 PM
General here pits are behind about all dog attacks that have happened in my memory, I do not care what breed of dog, it all boils down on how they are raised from birth and trained and treated. I have seen some very loving pits (both breeds that are called by the name) but also have seen a basic instinct that I would be careful if the dogs were with other people than the family they were raised with.

A dog is like a house. When you build a house you make sure you have a stable foundation. Yes they way you raise it and train it are extremely important. But at the end of the day, if you have a shit foundation, your just building on shit.

Which has nothing to do with this story other than me pointing out that the current "version" of Rotties aren't the same rotties from 30 years ago. They're a big weak dog these days that react out of fear and not aggression. This is becoming a circular conversation because at the end of the day. The cops had no business detaining him, and he had no business injecting himself in the situation.

Dogman
2nd July 2013, 07:45 PM
A dog is like a house. When you build a house you make sure you have a stable foundation. Yes they way you raise it and train it are extremely important. But at the end of the day, if you have a shit foundation, your just building on shit.

Which has nothing to do with this story other than me pointing out that the current "version" of Rotties aren't the same rotties from 30 years ago. They're a big weak dog these days that react out of fear and not aggression. This is becoming a circular conversation because at the end of the day. The cops had no business detaining him, and he had no business injecting himself in the situation. Amazing I agree!

midnight rambler
2nd July 2013, 08:14 PM
The cops had no business detaining him, and he had no business injecting himself in the situation.

Morale of the story: never get into a pissing contest with donut munchers, you will always lose (unless your intention is suicide by donut muncher).

iOWNme
3rd July 2013, 11:04 AM
Must be your time of the month, hope you get your hormones balanced soon, I still say the guy in the video asked for it by egging the pigs on.

I noticed you couldnt rebut ANYTHING i said. You had to resort to adhominem attacks and character assassination: 2 things people who have no intellectual acumen use to try and change the discussion away from THE FACTS. Is 'egging on' a Cop a CRIME?



Sorry to see your lack of expanded language skills, and are stuck in the common low mental state of expressions. What happened did your significant other in your life cut you off? Flowers may help him.

Again, a childish response from a man WHO ADVOCATES VIOLENCE AGAINST NON VIOLENT PEOPLE. People like YOU are the problem with society, and history in general. You actually think that you are a good person, while you pro actively avocate for violent aggression to be used against INNOCENT people you feel are acting wrong, but it is obvious you do not have any moral principle on which to base your 'opinions'.


The dude in the film was hooting and hollering at the pigs and his actions got the attention that led to the cluster fuck that ended bad for the dog , that asshole of an owner (dog) did everything except walking up to the cops and pissing on their legs.

He did reap what he sowed!

You are a COWARD. It is people JUST LIKE YOU that have allowed and even ADVOCATED for the oppression of non-violent people all throughout hsitory.

The people in the streets cheering on the NAZI's as they raided their neighbors house.......THAT WAS YOU.
The people in the crowds supporting the Communists as they slaughtered innocents..........THAT WAS YOU.
The people who swore allegience to the Facsists as they destroyed the individual.............THAT WAS YOU.
The idiots who cry for 'Freedom' in support of Democracy while millions suffer...................THAT IS YOU.

The STATE uses idiots like you as their launching pad for EVIL all around the world, and you GLADLY accept it. You have Stockholm syndrome. No matter what evil act your MASTERS commit, you find a way to legitimize it by demonizing innocent non-violent people who get stomped on by the Communist STATE.


Now go kiss and make up to him, you know you want to. Being on the rag is a bitch as I have seeing with the lady's in my life (female types)

LOL. YOU are the one who complains here about women you fucking TOOL. I have had the same amazing woman for 13 years. Maybe she has stayed with me BECAUSE i do not advocate for violence against non violent innocent people, and maybe your alone BECAUSE you do advocate for violence against non-violent innocent people?

Spectrism
3rd July 2013, 11:26 AM
A dog is like a house. When you build a house you make sure you have a stable foundation. Yes they way you raise it and train it are extremely important. But at the end of the day, if you have a shit foundation, your just building on shit.

Which has nothing to do with this story other than me pointing out that the current "version" of Rotties aren't the same rotties from 30 years ago. They're a big weak dog these days that react out of fear and not aggression. This is becoming a circular conversation because at the end of the day. The cops had no business detaining him, and he had no business injecting himself in the situation.

When they haul me off for no good reason other than I am a threat to the new world order and I happen to like the principles/ laws spelled out in the constitution and the bible.... I sure hope there are people "injecting themselves" into my situation. Dumb sheep put their heads down and don't even let out a quiet bleat when one of their own is dragged off by wolves.

General of Darkness
3rd July 2013, 12:18 PM
When they haul me off for no good reason other than I am a threat to the new world order and I happen to like the principles/ laws spelled out in the constitution and the bible.... I sure hope there are people "injecting themselves" into my situation. Dumb sheep put their heads down and don't even let out a quiet bleat when one of their own is dragged off by wolves.

Did you even read my posts and do you understand the term, "Pick your battles WISELY"? How old are you? You're talking like a kid with a hair up its ass.

Based on you last comment the only place they're hauling you off to is the retard academy.

Now let me ask you this, can you EVEN TELL ME WHY THE POLICE WERE THERE? Probably not you twat. The shooting Sunday occurred after a standoff between police and armed robbery suspects near the intersection of 137th Street and Jefferson Avenue. So would you want me to "inject" myself into this situation>

Now keep in mind from the owners words. Rosby said he thinks the Hawthorne Police Department might have it in for him because he sued the department back in March, claiming civil rights violations, false imprisonment and battery stemming from an incident that happened last summer. Leroys just trying to make a buck. Guaranteed this whole deal, while messed up as it is, is all about Rosby making money.

midnight rambler
3rd July 2013, 12:45 PM
Rosby said he thinks the Hawthorne Police Department might have it in for him because he sued the department back in March, claiming civil rights violations, false imprisonment and battery stemming from an incident that happened last summer. Leroys just trying to make a buck. Guaranteed this whole deal, while messed up as it is, is all about Rosby making money.

Bearing in mind that the donut munchers are essentially in 'the people business'*, i.e. they are in the habit of committing faces and names (as well as their 'record' or background info, each with their own respective positive and/or negative reference points) to memory as a matter of course (I've spent enough time around them that I *know* this is what they routinely do). Surely when they saw Rosby they said to each other, "There's that troublemaker Rosby! This is a perfect opportunity!* Let's cuff him and stuff him!" Like I said earlier, a case of being stupid in a no stupid zone (waving the red flag in front of the bull), plus he exposed his furry kid to their (potential) violence so the furry kid got a fatal dose of their terrorism. The donut munchers couldn't care less about your property/property rights.

*the donut munchers are also in the business of taking people to jail, it's what they do, and Rosby having gotten their attention the donut munchers were more than happy to accommodate him (I'm sure you noticed how quick Rosby was to submit to getting cuffed, it appears to me that Rosby was wanting to get cuffed and stuffed)

sirgonzo420
3rd July 2013, 01:19 PM
Bearing in mind that the donut munchers are essentially in 'the people business'*, i.e. they are in the habit of committing faces and names (as well as their 'record' or background info, each with their own respective positive and/or negative reference points) to memory as a matter of course (I've spent enough time around them that I *know* this is what they routinely do). Surely when they saw Rosby they said to each other, "There's that troublemaker Rosby! This is a perfect opportunity!* Let's cuff him and stuff him!" Like I said earlier, a case of being stupid in a no stupid zone (waving the red flag in front of the bull), plus he exposed his furry kid to their (potential) violence so the furry kid got a fatal dose of their terrorism. The donut munchers couldn't care less about your property/property rights.

*the donut munchers are also in the business of taking people to jail, it's what they do, and Rosby having gotten their attention the donut munchers were more than happy to accommodate him (I'm sure you noticed how quick Rosby was to submit to getting cuffed, it appears to me that Rosby was wanting to get cuffed and stuffed)

He knows the routine.

"Assume the position."

Mouse
3rd July 2013, 01:20 PM
As a result of his mild provocation the donut eaters went ballistic and lost their poo at him. This will make him a lot of money in his court case. It will be entered into evidence and any jury watching it will find it quite believable that the cops are out of control and violate peoples civil rights.

midnight rambler
3rd July 2013, 01:25 PM
As a result of his mild provocation the donut eaters went ballistic and lost their poo at him. This will make him a lot of money in his court case. It will be entered into evidence and any jury watching it will find it quite believable that the cops are out of control and violate peoples civil rights.

And where do you think you're going to find these 'reasonable' jurors?? ??? From a pool of self-admitted very compliant 'U.S. citizens'??

Osiris
3rd July 2013, 01:39 PM
http://www.dogbreedinfo.com/images10/BichPooCasponstepCUTE.jpg



Yeah...probably the same mathematical odds of this little poodle killing us as Osiris's pit bull.




:rolleyes: sorry to be suspicious of and "profiling" all those innocent pit bulls

So we should just ban all dogs over a certain weight because they have the potential to be more dangerous? You make absolutely no valid points.

Banning a specific breed does nothing. You have to start with the problem which is the owners! Even with bad breeding a dog raised correctly will 99% of the time be a loving dog regardless of breed.

I have worked in animal hospitals a lot and have only been bitten by small dogs. While they may not have the potential to kill me they are almost always more aggressive. In fact, one of the reasons i fell in love with 'pit bulls' is because they were always the calmest dogs when being treated regardless of their injury.

So how about we just ban all dogs because they have the potential of harming someone?

I can't stand ignorance and you to take the cake! Adding pictures like you have here just proves my point.

God, I agree on the breeding. You would be lucky to find a real 'pit bull'. The breed has been mixed so much with other breeds to be bigger or more aggressive, etc. which actually proves the point that it isn't the breed as they are most likely not even 'pit bulls'.

Spectrism
3rd July 2013, 01:54 PM
Dude - you wearing a rubber nose today?

ahhhh... there you are.

http://www.vilificationtennis.com/wp-content/uploads/clown.jpg


Did you even read my posts and do you understand the term, "Pick your battles WISELY"? How old are you? You're talking like a kid with a hair up its ass.

Based on you last comment the only place they're hauling you off to is the retard academy.

So I should be like you, huh? The image of maturity and wisdom. The one in control of his emotions and the owner of robotic dogs he thinks he built like a house.

What battle have I picked? My outrage at what the cops did is hardly a battle. If you think this is how I "battle" you have no idea what I am. I merely expressed a mild displeasure.



Now let me ask you this, can you EVEN TELL ME WHY THE POLICE WERE THERE? Probably not you twat. The shooting Sunday occurred after a standoff between police and armed robbery suspects near the intersection of 137th Street and Jefferson Avenue. So would you want me to "inject" myself into this situation>


It really doesn't matter what they were doing. The victim was attacked OUTSIDE the area of operation. Got that? OUTSIDE. He was no threat to "the investigation" and he was no threat to any donut munchers. YOU are the clown using the word "inject". The only injection is your belligerent childish attitude.



Now keep in mind from the owners words. Rosby said he thinks the Hawthorne Police Department might have it in for him because he sued the department back in March, claiming civil rights violations, false imprisonment and battery stemming from an incident that happened last summer. Leroys just trying to make a buck. Guaranteed this whole deal, while messed up as it is, is all about Rosby making money.

So what? It sure seemed to me that the cops assaulted this guy without cause. They killed his dog without cause. I would say they either have it in for him or they are generally dangerous to anyone walking the public streets.

General of Darkness
3rd July 2013, 02:30 PM
Sometimes the truth is hard to swallow. Good luck with life.

midnight rambler
3rd July 2013, 02:31 PM
It sure seemed to me that the cops assaulted this guy without cause. They killed his dog without cause. I would say they either have it in for him or they are generally dangerous to anyone walking the public streets.

The incident was a volatile mix of stupid people with one side of stupidity (the ultra violent side) convinced only they are the righteous...and a dog got terrorized to death.

I still assert that Rosby was INTENT upon waving the red flag in front of the bull.

Spectrism
3rd July 2013, 02:35 PM
The incident was a volatile mix of stupid people with one side of stupidity (the ultra violent side) convinced only they are the righteous...and a dog got terrorized to death.

I still assert that Rosby was INTENT upon waving the red flag in front of the bull.


So what? What if he intended to provoke them? They CANNOT touch him unless he is in violation of a law or at risk of causing imminent danger to someone. If I insult a cop.... let's say I call him a fat donut-munching fascist... does that give him the right / authority to throw me to the ground while his partner pulls a weapon on me?

midnight rambler
3rd July 2013, 02:49 PM
If I insult a cop.... let's say I call him a fat donut-munching fascist... does that give him the right / authority to throw me to the ground while his partner pulls a weapon on me?

Of course not, but you'll dealing with a gang of thugs who cover for each other and are being thoroughly backed up by their administrators and the perverts in the black dresses.

Question for ya: when was the last time you were in court defending yourself (i.e. you didn't hire a shyster to 're-present' you)?

Spectrism
3rd July 2013, 02:52 PM
Of course not, but you'll dealing with a gang of thugs who cover for each other and are being thoroughly backed up by their administrators and the perverts in the black dresses.

Question for ya: when was the last time you were in court defending yourself (i.e. you didn't hire a shyster to 're-present' you)?

20 years ago.... no.... make that 30 years ago.

gunDriller
3rd July 2013, 03:06 PM
none of my business, but - why are you 3 guys arguing ?

it seems like you agree about the major points.

Cebu_4_2
3rd July 2013, 03:29 PM
none of my business, but - why are you 3 guys arguing ?

it seems like you agree about the major points.

This is the agenda and goal, divide and conquer. Whitie vs whitie and the rest of the goys. We have absolutely no chance of making it through the exit door.

sirgonzo420
3rd July 2013, 03:58 PM
This is the agenda and goal, divide and conquer. Whitie vs whitie and the rest of the goys. We have absolutely no chance of making it through the exit door.

We'll make it. Just not alive.

;D

skidmark
3rd July 2013, 05:58 PM
The brave dog killers have been assigned desk duty for their own protection...

hree police officers appearing in the video where one shoots and kills a dog as they arrested its owner in Hawthorne were pulled from street duty Wednesday following numerous death threats against them and their families, police said.
The decision to assign them to duties within the station for their safety followed an inundation of threats over the telephone, Facebook and emails, Hawthorne police Lt. Scott Swain said.
"I understand that people have been affected by this video. Anyone would be," Swain said. "The police officers involved are affected by this incident and having to kill a dog. I don't understand how it translates into an eye for an eye. 'We are going to kill you and your family because of this incident.' Like in my case. I wasn't even working that night."
As Swain talked on the phone with the Daily Breeze, his office line beeped repeatedly. Swain, the agency's Public Information Officer, has been the target of some of
the threats just for appearing in the news. He said his telephone has not stopped ringing. "There's a lot of calls coming in where people are calling us names and dog killers," Swain said. "They are entitled to their opinions and to make comments like that. But where you cross the line is when you make the threat against the safety of police officers and police officers' family members."



http://www.dailybulletin.com/news/ci_23594182/hawthorne-police-pull-officers-involved-dog-shooting-from

gunDriller
3rd July 2013, 06:01 PM
The police officers involved are affected by this incident and having to kill a dog.

so the dog-killers are crying crocodile tears.

reminds me of the ADL.

Hitch
3rd July 2013, 08:28 PM
So what? What if he intended to provoke them? They CANNOT touch him unless he is in violation of a law or at risk of causing imminent danger to someone. If I insult a cop.... let's say I call him a fat donut-munching fascist... does that give him the right / authority to throw me to the ground while his partner pulls a weapon on me?

If you insult a cop that does not give him the right to violate your constitutional rights.

The only time it might, is if you interfere with a cop from performing his duty.

I agree with your post. The man in the video was not interfering with police business and they had no lawful right to detain him. Cops 'should' be used to people filming them, hurling insults at them, etc. In fact, from what I saw, the cops are the ones who instigated this whole situation, and a dog was shot because of it.

Serpo
3rd July 2013, 10:50 PM
i looked up dog shoots cop and found no entries .but there where pages and pages of cop shoots dog.

Jewboo
3rd July 2013, 11:07 PM
http://youtu.be/LfI9cOlTaQQ

:rolleyes:

Shami-Amourae
4th July 2013, 09:49 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzvJzqZ8iVY

Mouse
4th July 2013, 10:28 PM
5082

TRUTHseekr
5th July 2013, 12:49 AM
^^that pic gets me crackin' every time, lol

skidmark
5th July 2013, 08:02 AM
Hawthorne police purportedly threatened by radical hacking group Anonymous over dog shooting









Video: Video of Hawthorne dog being shot by police (http://youtu.be/WDBZr4ie2AE) Note: This video contains graphic footage of the shooting and aftermath. Viewer discretion advised.
Heated reaction: Hawthorne police take brunt of reader anger in dog shooting (http://www.dailybulletin.com/ci_23591473/hawthorne-dog-killing-heated-reaction-aimed-at-police)
More: Hawthorne police pull 3 officers involved in dog shooting incident from the street for their safety (http://www.dailybulletin.com/news/ci_23594182/hawthorne-police-pull-officers-involved-dog-shooting-from)
Original story: Hawthorne police kill dog during arrest of owner, video of shooting goes viral (http://www.dailybulletin.com/news/ci_23578147/hawthorne-police-kill-dog-during-arrest-owner) Anonymous, the computer hacking activist group, purportedly announced to the world this week via a YouTube video its intention to retaliate against the Hawthorne Police Department for the killing of a dog by a police officer.
The so-called "hacktivist" group has the department's full attention, as computer forensics officers and city information technology specialists were pushed into duty on July Fourth in response not only to the threats allegedly made by Anonymous on the Internet, but also by a confirmed cyberattack that has
left the city's website crippled since Monday. "We are not sure who is responsible, but there was a DDOS, or distributed denial of service, attack," a police source said on the condition of anonymity. "The city website has been down since Monday. The city is working with the Web host to get the site back up."
Distributed denial of service attacks have long been a favored method employed by Anonymous.
In the past, the group has aimed its cyberattacks
http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site577/2013/0701/20130701__TDB-L-DOGSHOT%7Ep3_300.jpg (http://www.dailybulletin.com/portlet/article/html/imageDisplay.jsp?contentItemRelationshipId=5249745 )A young rottweiler was shot and killed by Hawthorne police officers as they arrested his owner Sunday for obstructing justice at a crime scene. The dog was shot four times and the incident was videotaped by the man, who has a pending court case of police harassment against Hawthorne officers. (Gabriel Martinez via YouTube)


at corporations and public figures both large and small. Visa, PayPal, MasterCard, Bank of America, the Tea Party and even South Pasadena resident and anti-cursing crusader McKay Hatch have all been victims of Anonymous' cyberattacks.
The ominous video posted to YouTube on Wednesday makes no reference to Monday's cyberattack against the city of Hawthorne. In the video, a person whose face is hidden behind a Guy Fawkes mask, popular with members of the hacking group, appears to read from a prepared statement and with a digitally altered voice. The alleged Anonymous member calls the shooting of the dog, a Rottweiler named Max, "unacceptable" and vows retaliation.
"Police of Hawthorne you must know that you are our primary target," the alleged Anonymous activist says. "This matter will not remain unresolved."
The masked activist goes on to say: "We do not forgive; we do not forget."

Rosby was handcuffed and Max lunged from the car toward the officers. One officer draws his weapon, and shoots and kills Max. The dog can been seen writhing in pain minutes before he dies.

In the wake of the killing, the officers received death threats, which prompted the department to remove the officers involved in the shooting from street patrols.
The outrage continued Thursday, as online petitions at change.org (http://www.change.org/petitions/police-unlawful-arrest-and-animal-brutality-prosecute-the-corrupted-hawthorne-cops), causes.com (http://www.causes.com/justice-for-max) and whitehouse.gov (https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/terminate-officer-jeffrey-salmon-hawthorne-police-department/1jyg1Mvn) collected more than 130,000 signatures of people calling for the officer who killed Max to be fired.
"This is a horrifying event," said Melanie Brierly, who commented on the Change.org (http://www.Change.org) petition. "The dog should not have been shot. Just because you have a badge doesn't make you god."

An officer's name, badge number and address were leaked to the Internet, which has only heightened concerns about safety, officials said.

Jewboo
6th July 2013, 08:19 AM
Research the shit you are spewing or shut the fuck up!



Toddler injured by pit bull attack in South Florida


Updated: July 3, 2013

DANIA BEACH, Fla. — A toddler was hospitalized following a pit bull attack in South Florida.

The Broward Sheriff's Office reports that the 13-month-old child was playing inside a Dania Beach home Wednesday when the family pet began acting erratically and attacked. Family members pulled the dog away and called authorities

The child's name and gender weren't immediately released. The Miami Herald reports that the child was taken to a Hollywood hospital with serious injuries.

Animal control took the dog into custody. The victim's mother, who owns the pit bull, requested that the dog be euthanized.

The dog owner was cited for not having proper identification tags for the pet and for not getting the animal vaccinated for rabies.

http://www.startribune.com/nation/214218431.html

:rolleyes:

Ponce
7th July 2013, 09:57 AM
And another one bites the dust........if they were to do mine I would give them $100.00........danm dog.
================================================== ======

An Iraq War veteran claims that Buffalo Police targeted the wrong apartment when they kicked in his door and killed his dog Monday searching for drugs.

Adam Arroyo says he did nothing wrong, and now he wants an apology.

"I saw the carnage when I came in the door," he says.

Arroyo showed us bullet holes and blood left behind after he says Buffalo Police raided his apartment and killed his two-and-a-half-year-old pit bull Cindy.

"I would like an apology. They murdered, it was like my daughter, you know. That was my baby. Everybody knew that was my little girl. I took care of her so well. You know, that was my love," he says.

Around 8:30 Monday night, Arroyo, who works security at a bank, says he got a call from his landlord telling him police had just raided his apartment and killed his dog.

"I suddenly just started crying. I'm at work. People are like, what's wrong, what's wrong," says Arroyo.

By the time Arroyo made it back to the west side, police, and his dog were already gone. He did find a trashed apartment and a search warrant.

He says that while the search warrant is for 304 Brekenridge "upper," his apartment is the "upper rear."
Also, Arroyo points out a striking difference in who police were searching for.

"They were looking for a black male. I'm Hispanic. Puerto Rican. And, they were looking for crack/cocaine," he says showing us the search warrant.

So what did the raid turn up?

Arroyo says no drugs, just a military baton and pepper spray.

"This is stuff that I use for my safety because there are people on this block that get hurt, that get killed, and I've been here for three years and I've heard stories," he says.

He says he called 911 but that didn't help, then went to a police substation where he was given a number to call the narcotics division. He left a message Tuesday afternoon.

Police told us that the Buffalo Police Commissioner has opened an internal investigation into the case with the Internal Affairs Division in Charge.

We asked if police raided the wrong apartment, and we are told they believe they had the proper address and apartment.

Commissioner Daniel Derenda did speak with reporters on Wednesday about the case. When asked about the verification process for addresses in a search warrant, Derenda said "There are proper procedures in place. We should not get the wrong apartment. I can't justify getting the wrong apartment and as I said...we are looking into what took place."

"People make mistakes, but this is something, it was a very big mistake, you know, especially coming in here and killing an innocent dog that is chained up. I could understand it if the dog was loose and it charged, then you know that gives them probable cause because they fear for their life, but to shoot an innocent dog that doesn't pose a threat," says Arroyo.

Right now, detectives do not think Cindy was chained or leashed Monday night. Derenda says police officers have the right to use lethal force against a dog if it attacks them but adds "I'm a dog lover. I have three of them at home. You hate to see it happen to any animal but you don't want to see an officer get injured."
We asked "But you don't know if that's definitely the case here yet ? Derenda replied "I...I'm telling you right now it's under investigation."

Arroyo had to go to the SPCA to claim Cindy's body and pay for her cremation. They gave him a discount and charged him $20 instead of the usual $100+, he says.

Arroyo also told us that he has plans to sign up for the National Guard, but those plans are now on hold as he sorts out this mess.