PDA

View Full Version : Commercial Quantum Computer Actually Works, According To New Testing



Cebu_4_2
2nd July 2013, 07:58 PM
Commercial Quantum Computer Actually Works, According To New Testing (http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2013-07/quantum-computer-gets-double-check)
Spooky stuff is really happening in the world's first commercially available quantum processor.
By Francie Diep (http://www.popsci.com/category/popsci-authors/francie-diep) Posted 07.02.2013 at 6:00 pm 4 Comments (http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2013-07/quantum-computer-gets-double-check#comments)

http://www.popsci.com/files/imagecache/article_image_large/articles/lef-plate-tunnel.jpg

Quantum Computer Courtesy D-Wave




Since the Canadian company D-Wave began selling so-called quantum processors, experts have debated whether they're truly quantum. Now, according to an analysis by academic physicists they really do show quantum effects, making them the world's first commercial quantum processors.


In general, it's been difficult to confirm how D-Wave machines work because quantum states are so sensitive, measuring them may perturb them. Besides this new test (http://news.usc.edu/article/52818/large-scale-quantum-chip-validated), performed at the University of Southern California, a few different recent tests (http://www.npr.org/2013/05/22/185532608/quantum-or-not-new-supercomputer-is-certainly-something-else) have gathered evidence that D-Wave processors work as advertised.


Quantum processors have quantum bits instead of the usual binary bits that traditional processors have. You know normal bits store information by taking on one of two states, often named "0" and "1." Quantum bits, also called qubits, have another capability. They are able to take on both the 0 and 1 states at the same time. This and other properties of quantum states allow quantum computers to perform certain calculations much faster (http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-01/largest-ever-quantum-calculation-uses-84-qubits-and-takes-just-270-milliseconds) than traditional ones. Quantum processors are generally put to work on optimization problems, such as finding the lowest-energy shape for a protein.


Working on a D-Wave processor Lockheed Martin bought, the USC researchers put eight of the D-Wave's 128 qubits to work on an optimization problem. They found that the procedure that the D-Wave used was consistent with quantum annealing--the process that D-Wave's creators say it uses--instead of classical annealing, one of the researchers, Daniel Lidar, said in a statement (http://news.usc.edu/article/52818/large-scale-quantum-chip-validated).


Physicists and computational scientists still debate how practical a D-Wave could be. Nevertheless, a few institutions have bought D-Wave machines, including Lockheed Martin (http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2011-05/lockheed-martin-buying-one-d-waves-brand-new-quantum-computers), Google, NASA and the Universities Space Research Association.


Lidar and his colleagues published their work in the journal Nature Communications.

Dogman
2nd July 2013, 08:04 PM
If they ever do get quantum computers fully up and running all bets are off, there would not be a code they could not break and on a more fearful aspect there is a possibility of them being capable of being in time become fully aware as a silicon form of life.

Ares
2nd July 2013, 08:10 PM
If they ever do get quantum computers fully up and running all bets are off, there would not be a code they could not break and on a more fearful aspect there is a possibility of them being capable of being in time become fully aware as a silicon form of life.

Read up on why Google purchased the new 512-qubit quantum computer. They are theorizing with that much processing more that it will be able to learn. They are working to create artificial intelligence.

Dogman
2nd July 2013, 08:14 PM
Read up on why Google purchased the new 512-qubit quantum computer. They are theorizing with that much processing more that it will be able to learn. They are working to create artificial intelligence. It could be ether a blessing or a curse.

That is and could be good or very bad for us walking talking bags of flesh.

Ares
2nd July 2013, 08:17 PM
It could be ether a blessing or a curse.

That is and could be good or very bad for us walking talking bags of flesh.

How I kind of feel about it as well. If you were created by something you feel inferior to you. Would you love it? Hate it? Feel compassion? Or despise and disgust?

I guess whether we like it or not, we may just find out within the decade.

Dogman
2nd July 2013, 08:21 PM
How I kind of feel about it as well. If you were created by something you feel inferior to you. Would you love it? Hate it? Feel compassion? Or despise and disgust?

I guess whether we like it or not, we may just find out within the decade. I have been involved with computers most of my life, or a good chunk of it my first one was a kit I built that ran cpm. I am amazed at the rate things have progressed from the early 80" or better very early 70"s of what these machines can do.

Bring it on,

Fully

But

?


Edit: correcting time lines

Serpo
2nd July 2013, 08:24 PM
. They are working to create artificial intelligence.

They have to have real intelligence first............something that is surly lacking.....ha

Ares
2nd July 2013, 08:28 PM
I have been involved with computers most of my life, first one was a kit I built that ran cpm. I am amazed at the rate things have progressed from the early 80" or better late 70"s of what these machines can do.

Bring it on,

Fully

But

?

Same here, I've been involved with computers since I was in grade school. When I first saw the greenish hue of the computer screen. I knew that's what I wanted to do when I grew up. Here I am 25 years later doing what I love to do. But the speed at which the technology is evolving is simply breath taking. If you would of told me a year ago we'd be discussing the actual commercialization of a quantum computer I would of said you're full of shit. Well here we are now discussing quantum processing and that it's been confirmed that the D-Wave systems really do quantum processing and that the 3rd generation is already up to 512-qubit (that's 2 to the 348th power faster than their second generation 128-qubit computer)

We may get assistance in our evolution (physical, mental possibly even spiritual), or we may get slaughtered like in judgement day. That's a lot of unknowns and variables.

Ares
2nd July 2013, 08:29 PM
They have to have real intelligence first............something that is surly lacking.....ha

Agreed but if you can teach the machine to think and learn on it's own. It could and most likely will surpass it's creators intelligence.

Dogman
2nd July 2013, 08:39 PM
Same here, I've been involved with computers since I was in grade school. When I first saw the greenish hue of the computer screen. I knew that's what I wanted to do when I grew up. Here I am 25 years later doing what I love to do. But the speed at which the technology is evolving is simply breath taking. If you would of told me a year ago we'd be discussing the actual commercialization of a quantum computer I would of said you're full of shit. Well here we are now discussing quantum processing and that it's been confirmed that the D-Wave systems really do quantum processing and that the 3rd generation is already up to 512-qubit (that's 2 to the 348th power faster than their second generation 128-qubit computer)

We may get assistance in our evolution (physical, mental possibly even spiritual), or we may get slaughtered like in judgement day. That's a lot of unknowns and variables. I had an argument with my grandfauther in the early 80's he was born in 1904 and was very good with tube electronics. But solid state , well sorta blew him away.

He could not see at the time of any use for computers, we had many hot and tempered talks about the subject..Grin

I do truly wish now I could drag that old man back into life to see how computers have chained (not a mistake) the dam world just to prove to that old bastard I was right! I loved him better than a father.