PDA

View Full Version : LOL Opps - Microsoft Writes Off $900 Million on Surface Tablets



Ares
19th July 2013, 11:06 AM
Microsoft on Thursday reported lower-than-expected quarterly earnings as faltering PC sales ate into its Windows business and the company took an unexpected $900 million (£591m) charge for its inventory of unsold Surface tablets, sending its shares down 5% in after hours trading.

The massive charge underlines the struggles of the world's largest software company, which last week announced a deep reorganisation to transform itself into a "devices and services" leader, but is struggling to make mobile devices as attractive as those from Apple or Samsung.

"That's the biggest miss we've ever seen from Microsoft, the biggest that I could remember," said Brendan Barnicle, an analyst at Pacific Crest Securities. "It looks like everything was weak and that's what we need an explanation on."

Ahead of the announcement Microsoft shares were up a record 32% this year, beating a 19% rise in the Standard & Poor's 500 index.

Challenge

Microsoft said the $900 million charge was related to its Surface RT tablet, the version of its tablet running on ARM-designed chips and using a 'lite' version of Windows 8. The Surface was meant to challenge Apple's iPad when it was launched alongside Windows 8 in October, but has not sold well.

According to IDC the company only shipped 900,000 of the tablets in the first three months of 2013. Earlier this week in an apparent bid to boost flagging sales the company announced a dramatic price cut of £100 off the basic Surface RT tablet.

Taking the £590m write-down into account, it would suggest that Microsoft has a store of six million unsold Surface tablets.

"Have to do better"

"We do know we have to do better, particular in mobile devices," Amy Hood, Microsoft's new chief financial officer, said in a telephone interview with Reuters. "That's a big reason we made the strategic organisational changes last week."

Microsoft's biggest shake-up in five years, unveiled by CEO Steve Ballmer last week, creates a single devices unit for the first time at the company, suggesting that it will double down on its so-far unsuccessful move into hardware.

Microsoft reported fiscal fourth-quarter profit of 59 cents per share, compared with a 6 cents per share loss in the same quarter last year, when it wrote off the cost of the failed aQuantive acquisition.

Average

Wall Street had expected earnings of 75 cents per share, on average, according to Thomson Reuters.

Revenue rose 10% to $19.9 billion, helped by sales of Microsoft's Office suite of applications, but fell short of analysts' average estimate of $20.7bn.

The sales of Windows rose slightly, but only because of the inclusion of some deferred revenue, weighed down by an estimated 11% dip in PC sales in the quarter.

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/492120/20130718/microsoft-takes-900-million-charge-surface-tablets.htm

Ares Note: I guess they thought shoving a user interface down everyone’s throat saying pay for it and like it isn’t working out too well for them.

Cebu_4_2
19th July 2013, 11:40 AM
Ares Note: I guess they thought shoving a user interface down everyone’s throat saying pay for it and like it isn’t working out too well for them.

Not when there are viable options.

Ares
19th July 2013, 11:44 AM
Not when there are viable options.

In the business world there really isn't any viable alternatives. Microsoft dominates that market with Windows Operating Systems and Office suites however. Just like with Vista, businesses passed that up. License agreements can be tricky. A lot of business will purchase the Windows 8 Professional license key, because it comes with a free Windows 7 downgrade option. So all those "sales" that microsoft touts, well not so fast.

Linux desktop OS's aren't viable in a business environment with a user base that has spent the last 20 years learning Windows. Same with Open Office, great product, just not much use in a business environment when everyone uses Excel and Word and Outlook... etc.

madfranks
19th July 2013, 11:50 AM
The surface is a joke. Windows 8 is supposed to be some hybrid OS that is supposed to work on a tablet just as good as it works on a desktop, and the result is that it does neither very good. We just got some windows 8 computers at work, and the home screen looks like a big touch screen, even though the monitors are not touch screen, and then to use your windows programs on a tablet, you need a keyboard, which defeats the purpose of the tablet. Yeah, it sucks, and I'm not surprised at all to see the lack of demand.

Ares
19th July 2013, 11:55 AM
The surface is a joke. Windows 8 is supposed to be some hybrid OS that is supposed to work on a tablet just as good as it works on a desktop, and the result is that it does neither very good. We just got some windows 8 computers at work, and the home screen looks like a big touch screen, even though the monitors are not touch screen, and then to use your windows programs on a tablet, you need a keyboard, which defeats the purpose of the tablet. Yeah, it sucks, and I'm not surprised at all to see the lack of demand.

Yep, I was on a test committee to try it at my former job. I downloaded it from our MSDN account installed it on a laptop and after it was finished and booted up. Showed it to my director first thing he says and I shit you not "What the fuck is this"?
I said Windows 8
He said "No way are installing that piece of shit, install a standard image on it and roll it out."

He also said the interface looked like a gay care bear shit all over it.

That was pretty much the end of the testing phase for that OS. Everything else we installed after that was Win 7 64-bit with Office 2010.

Ponce
19th July 2013, 12:29 PM
That happens when you get to gready......you get trap in your own trap.

V

JohnQPublic
19th July 2013, 12:45 PM
The surface is a joke. Windows 8 is supposed to be some hybrid OS that is supposed to work on a tablet just as good as it works on a desktop, and the result is that it does neither very good. We just got some windows 8 computers at work, and the home screen looks like a big touch screen, even though the monitors are not touch screen, and then to use your windows programs on a tablet, you need a keyboard, which defeats the purpose of the tablet. Yeah, it sucks, and I'm not surprised at all to see the lack of demand.

I just bought a laptop for work. i7, 8 Gb ram, 750 Gb hard drive, $780 (HP). It is Windows 8, and the laptop does have a touch screen. It is ok. I am used to tablets now (android and ipad), so it is pretty comparable plus has laptop capabilities (oddly it does not have a dvd/cd drive but is pretty thin), but a bit more expensive. Windows 8 is basically Windows 7 + touch screen capabilities.

madfranks
19th July 2013, 01:25 PM
I just bought a laptop for work. i7, 8 Gb ram, 750 Gb hard drive, $780 (HP). It is Windows 8, and the laptop does have a touch screen. It is ok. I am used to tablets now (android and ipad), so it is pretty comparable plus has laptop capabilities (oddly it does not have a dvd/cd drive but is pretty thin), but a bit more expensive. Windows 8 is basically Windows 7 + touch screen capabilities.

Yeah, but can you see how awkward the interface would be for non-touch screen computers?

Twisted Titan
19th July 2013, 01:27 PM
It couldnt happen to nicer company.

StreetsOfGold
19th July 2013, 02:27 PM
Oh, I'll help them out, I'll buy once, give em 50 bucks for it. Of course, the first thing to do is wipe it and put linux on it