View Full Version : TIME Magazine Glamorizes Life Without Children.......... V
Ponce
7th August 2013, 02:54 PM
Believe it or not I really hate saying this.....another gold star for Ponce...... I would be on welfare right now if I had had kids......a kid is not for the first 18 years but is a life sentence...go to link for A LOT MORE on this article.
PS: A lot of big planes flying overhead, nothing like this has had happened in the 13 years of living here
===============================================
The article begins with a story about a woman who decided she never wanted to have children, and further, never regretted that decision, followed by a weighty discussion of how our nation’s birthrate is currently the lowest it has ever been in its history:
“From 2007 to 2011, the most recent year for which there’s data, the fertility rate declined 9%. A 2010 Pew Research report showed that childlessness has risen across all racial and ethnic groups, adding up to about 1 in 5 American women who end their childbearing years maternity-free, compared with 1 in 10 in the 1970s.”
This ‘Childfree Life’s’ main agenda, as if you couldn’t guess it from the cover, only gets more obvious from there. It discusses the expense of having a child, noting that:
“…the sheer economic cost of raising a child—for a child born in 2011, an average of $234,900 until age 18, according to the USDA, and $390,000 if your household earns over $100,000—has made motherhood a formidable prospect for some women.”
Also stressed is that, while life can be lonely for people who have ‘disappeared into parenthood’, other women and childless couples are frustrated and resent living in a society where they feel they are forced to have to ‘trade their freedom’ or independence to be parents, grieve their childless lifestyle if they lost it to having a child, and that motherhood has been rendered socially unrealistic with how much it is expected that mothers invest in their children these days.
The propaganda is clear. Prospective couples should think twice about the burden and cost of raising a child in modern society, and turn instead to the supposed indulgence and freedom of never conceiving.
http://intellihub.com/2013/08/07/time-magazine-glamorizes-life-without-children/
ximmy
7th August 2013, 03:07 PM
Do the pictures show white couples?
midnight rambler
7th August 2013, 03:26 PM
The money powers through their jewsmedia want to push the meme that 'intelligent' people don't reproduce so as to facilitate their goal of creating their perfect two tier society, i.e. THEM and THOSE WHO SERVE THEM.
Twisted Titan
7th August 2013, 05:08 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icmRCixQrx8&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Cebu_4_2
7th August 2013, 06:37 PM
Do the pictures show white couples?
But of course!
http://intellihub.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/time-childless-life-300x193.jpg
madfranks
7th August 2013, 07:44 PM
This utter selfishness is just beyond the pale. Dying childless used to be a sign of dishonor and shame, and this sick jewsmedia wants to showcase it as the ideal way life is supposed to be. I hope, when these people are elderly and on the verge of death, they die alone, wondering what their lives could have been like if they had reared children and grandchildren to be by their side instead of living a "carefree, childfree" life for all those years.
ShortJohnSilver
7th August 2013, 08:44 PM
I predict the current stupidity will be gone in 10 years or so, giving way to a return in some fashion to more traditional values.
Atocha
7th August 2013, 08:57 PM
Children are over rated though... Jeeez
Ponce
7th August 2013, 09:51 PM
This utter selfishness is just beyond the pale. Dying childless used to be a sign of dishonor and shame, and this sick jewsmedia wants to showcase it as the ideal way life is supposed to be. I hope, when these people are elderly and on the verge of death, they die alone, wondering what their lives could have been like if they had reared children and grandchildren to be by their side instead of living a "carefree, childfree" life for all those years.
Well Franks, I have made plans behind plans for anything that might happen in my old age....the Dr "You know Ponce if you don't take BP pills something will happen to you and you will have to depend on others", me "Well Dr, as long as I can move one of my finger to put around a trigger then that's all that I need"............you only worry about something if you haven't made plans for it..........to many people in this world and the more that there are the more troubles that there will be...........................by the way......................the Zionist wants to get rid of 6.5 billion people.
V
Twisted Titan
8th August 2013, 07:12 AM
This utter selfishness is just beyond the pale. Dying childless used to be a sign of dishonor and shame, and this sick jewsmedia wants to showcase it as the ideal way life is supposed to be. I hope, when these people are elderly and on the verge of death, they die alone, wondering what their lives could have been like if they had reared children and grandchildren to be by their side instead of living a "carefree, childfree" life for all those years.
But thats the thing.....the people that are pushing this happy horseshit are breeding like vermin
You ever go to babies r us lately.
The zionist all have Toyota mini vans and you when open the door....they literally spill out the side.
gunDriller
8th August 2013, 08:15 AM
Do the pictures show white couples?
for that you have to read the British tabloids or People magazine, and to skip the articles on Rihanna.
Blink
8th August 2013, 08:27 AM
I predict the current stupidity will be gone in 10 years or so, giving way to a return in some fashion to more traditional values.
Like jackboot fascism or soviet style communism?
horseshoe3
8th August 2013, 08:36 AM
...a kid is not for the first 18 years but is a life sentence...
Only if you're a horrible parent. Children are a joy beyond compare if you raise them right. I have enjoyed avery stage of my childrens' development so far and look forward to seeing them become stable, productive, awake adults.
madfranks
8th August 2013, 09:14 AM
Well Franks, I have made plans behind plans for anything that might happen in my old age....the Dr "You know Ponce if you don't take BP pills something will happen to you and you will have to depend on others", me "Well Dr, as long as I can move one of my finger to put around a trigger then that's all that I need"............you only worry about something if you haven't made plans for it..........to many people in this world and the more that there are the more troubles that there will be...........................by the way......................the Zionist wants to get rid of 6.5 billion people.
V
You know Ponce, I didn't mean to offend you, because I know you don't have kids, but that Time magazine photo really pissed me off. They are actively trying to get my people to stop breeding (unless it's mixed race breeding), while at the same time encouraging all the base ghetto dwellers to pop out kids as fast as they can. I can see far enough up the chain to understand that this campaign against white Christian heterosexuals is from the pit of hell itself.
Jewboo
8th August 2013, 09:21 AM
I can see far enough up the chain to understand that this campaign against white Christian heterosexuals is from the pit of hell itself.
http://youtu.be/5jl-OJJVAEg
Jews are now exterminating Whitey worldwide.
Ponce
8th August 2013, 09:27 AM
Well Franks, you did not "offend" me..........I never get in the water unless I lke the temperature.
Once a man have kids he stops being a husband and becomes a provider.
V
madfranks
8th August 2013, 09:30 AM
Well Franks, you did not "offend" me..........I never get in the water unless I lke the temperature.
Once a man have kids he stops being a husband and becomes a provider.
V
It is true that having kids dramatically changes your role in a family, but I think that some of life's greatest lessons are learned by being a parent and seeing what it means to raise a child. As far as stopping being a husband and becoming a provider, it's a difficult balance, but I try to be both.
horseshoe3
8th August 2013, 09:53 AM
The word "husband" comes from a Norse word meaning "house bound" or "house dweller". So having children makes you more of a husband than ever.
sirgonzo420
8th August 2013, 10:06 AM
The word "husband" comes from a Norse word meaning "house bound" or "house dweller". So having children makes you more of a husband than ever.
from one of my favorite websites:
husband (n.) (http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=husband&allowed_in_frame=0) http://www.etymonline.com/graphics/dictionary.gif (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=husband)Old English husbonda "male head of a household," probably from Old Norse husbondi "master of the house," from hus "house" (see house (http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=house&allowed_in_frame=0) (n.)) + bondi "householder, dweller, freeholder, peasant," from buandi, present participle of bua "to dwell" (see bower (http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=bower&allowed_in_frame=0)). Beginning late 13c., replaced Old English wer as "married man," companion of wif, a sad loss for English poetry. Slang shortening hubby first attested 1680s.
from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=husband&allowed_in_frame=0
In case anyone were curious, the Old English word "wer" for "man"/"husband" is still with us in the word "werewolf".
(http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=husband&allowed_in_frame=0)
Ponce
8th August 2013, 10:18 AM
So, I must have kids in order to be somebofy?..........I am glad to be shit in the dirt and have NO kids.
How many of you have $287,000 to upkeep a kid till he is 18?.......how many worries, how many fight with your partner because of the brats?.......my X remarried and adopted two kids from Hungary, I think, when they were baby's and guess what? because of the drinking problems of their natural mother the kids came out as mogolois, or something like that, I felt so sorry for her..............is this the kind or world that you want your brat to grow in?........only because you want to be a father or a mother?............SHAME ON YOU for wanting your future kid live in this kind of a world.
V
horseshoe3
8th August 2013, 10:37 AM
I always get a good chuckle when I read those studies on how much it costs to raise a kid. It seems they use some funny accounting.
For example: You and your wife have a $200,000 house. Now you have a kid. 1/3 of that house is now responsible for sheltering the kid. See, your kid just cost you $66,666.67 in housing immediately upon birth.
Yes I really did see that example seriously set forth in one of those studies. I would be surplrised if raising a kid actually costs 1/10 of what the experts claim.
singular_me
8th August 2013, 02:03 PM
having kids should not be encouraged by the system, but we all know why it has been this way for centuries. They need(ed) us to breed for their wars and financial schemes. global domination agenda.
In a "sane" society, upsides and downsides of both sides of the fences is taught from an early age.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.