PDA

View Full Version : Rand Paul names dead libertarians Milton Friedman, Friedrich Hayek as favorites for



Cebu_4_2
9th August 2013, 10:12 AM
Rand Paul names dead libertarians Milton Friedman, Friedrich Hayek as favorites for top Federal Reserve job By JOSEPH LAWLER (http://washingtonexaminer.com/AUTHOR/JOSEPH-LAWLER) | AUGUST 9, 2013 AT 11:00 AM

Leave a comment (http://washingtonexaminer.com/rand-paul-names-dead-libertarians-milton-friedman-friedrich-hayek-as-favorites-for-top-federal-reserve-job/article/2534077/comments#disqus_thread)
Topics: Tea Party (http://washingtonexaminer.com/section/tea-party) Rand Paul (http://washingtonexaminer.com/section/rand-paul) PennAve (http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/penn-ave) Federal Reserve (http://washingtonexaminer.com/section/federal-reserve)
http://cdn.washingtonexaminer.biz/cache/w200-c16be47d768e54870385e8c20a79a908.jpg (http://washingtonexaminer.com/gallery/articleid/2534077) U.S. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, is associated with hard-money views and opposition to the... U.S. senator and Tea Party favorite Rand Paul is not just looking beyond the usual suspects for his endorsement for Federal Reserve chairman — he’s looking beyond the grave.


Asked by Bloomberg’s Joshua Green (http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-08-08/rand-paul-on-republicans-voter-appeal-and-the-federal-reserve) who his ideal Fed chairman would be, the Kentucky senator said, “Hayek would be good, but he’s deceased.” Pressed by Green to name a living economist, Paul again named a dead Nobel Prize-winning libertarian, Milton Friedman. “Let’s just go with dead,” Paul explained, “because then you probably really wouldn’t have much of a functioning Federal Reserve.”


Paul is associated with hard-money views and opposition to the Fed’s control of the money supply. His father, congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul, long campaigned against the central bank and was the author of the 2009 book “End the Fed.”


Paul’s comments about Hayek and Friedman, two of the most prominent figures in libertarian political philosophy, were facetious. But both would have been receptive to the idea of removing influence over the money supply from living people.


George Mason University economist Lawrence H. White wrote in a 2008 paper (http://ideas.repec.org/a/mcb/jmoncb/v40y2008i4p751-768.html) that “Hayek’s monetary policy norm in fact prescribed stabilization of nominal income.” In other words, the Fed would be run according to a simple rule that aimed at keeping nominal gross domestic product or some other statistic growing at a stable rate from year to year. That rule would minimize the discretionary power of whoever was controlling the Fed at any given time.


Friedman, known as the father of monetarists who believe that the Fed should focus solely on the growth of the money supply, went a step further and suggested that the Fed chairman should be replaced by a computer.


“We don’t need a Fed,” Milton Friedman said in a 1999 interview (http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/milton-rose-friedman-offer-radical-ideas-21st-century) with Deroy Murdock. “I have, for many years, been in favor of replacing the Fed with a computer.”


If Friedman had his way, that computer “would print out a specified number of paper dollars” to conduct monetary policy. “Same number, month after month, week after week, year after year.”

Libertarian_Guard
9th August 2013, 12:58 PM
Why not his dad?

Shami-Amourae
9th August 2013, 01:11 PM
Why not his dad?

He's not a Jew.

Cebu_4_2
9th August 2013, 01:15 PM
^ LoL

govcheetos
9th August 2013, 03:34 PM
What a douche, names two dead guys?

How about G. Edward Griffin?

Shows this guy is just a NWO tool and offering no real solutions.

Libertarian_Guard
9th August 2013, 03:43 PM
He is arrogant. His dad was humble, big difference.

iOWNme
9th August 2013, 04:49 PM
I like how the question was WHO should run the illegitimate, immoral, unjust, unconstitutional EVIL Federal Reserve. But no question of should we have it or not? A loaded question.....A set-up question to re-enforce the myth of 'Government' running the economy.

And your NEVER going to get rid of the FED without getting rid of the 'Government'. Hate to clue you in to this SIMPLE FACT. The FED is a symptom of the problem.

gunDriller
9th August 2013, 05:25 PM
once i saw Milton Friedman speak when i was in college. it was some panel discussion about economists.


what was striking was - he is really short. they had normal folding chairs for the panelists.

when he was sitting down, his feet didn't touch the ground. he was swinging his feet like a little kid when he was in his chair.


i used to think he was a great economist, but now i'm not so sure.

Cebu_4_2
9th August 2013, 07:35 PM
If Rand was to go anywhere the choice would not to spit into the jew world... Don't anyone see shit? And IF he did he would be obligated by the entire TPTB to do what they say..


Man rhis place getting fluoridated.

Spectrism
10th August 2013, 05:42 AM
I like how the question was WHO should run the illegitimate, immoral, unjust, unconstitutional EVIL Federal Reserve. But no question of should we have it or not? A loaded question.....A set-up question to re-enforce the myth of 'Government' running the economy.

And your NEVER going to get rid of the FED without getting rid of the 'Government'. Hate to clue you in to this SIMPLE FACT. The FED is a symptom of the problem.

But the government we have is a symptom of the wickedness of the people. Go back one or two more steps and you discover the only cure for the problems we face is for people to fall on their faces in shame and seek God.

The blindness people have is caused by their choice to love lies more than truth.
The corrupt leaders appointed over the people are the result of people being corrupt.
The pollution and disease we experience is a result of the polluted minds people bathe in.

Jewboo
10th August 2013, 06:00 AM
http://www.jpost.com/HttpHandlers/ShowImage.ashx?ID=211164


Randy is kosher. Leave him ALONE you haters!

:)