ImaCannin
10th August 2013, 10:57 AM
Rachel Parent is 14 and has the crazy idea that GMOs should be labeled in food. (What’s next, attacking those sweet carcinogens in our makeup?!) The young activist has been making public speeches about GMOs since age 12, when my idea of “making a public statement” was layering my dad’s flannel shirt over a clearance American Eagle tee. Parent recently challenged Canadian TV personality Kevin O’Leary to a debate about GMOs after he said “Stupid people protest about Monsanto”:
Have me on your show next week, and if you promise not to use the word “stupid,” I won’t use the word “fascist.”
Zing! He took her up on it on July 31:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIXER_yZUBg
Gems include O’Leary asking patronizingly, “You know what a lobbyist is, right?”, accusing her of being a shill for devious, mustache-twirling environmentalists, and telling her she’ll change her mind when she gets older.
Parent, in contrast, comes across as articulate and respectful. O’Leary equates denying people in developing countries GM food as handing them a death sentence, while Parent states that she simply thinks genetically modified food should be labeled for the consumer to decide. “They can keep growing [GMOs] as long as they continue to test and also give us the choice. Because it’s our right to know,” Parent says at one point. “I’m not anti-science, but I’m for responsible science and ethical progress.” Ugh, those teens and their radical ideals!
O’Leary says it’s fine that Monsanto’s never tested its GM products for more than 90 days, because little independent groups like Parent’s will, adding:
Rachel, we’re IN a long-term study. You’re eating genetically modified food whether you like it or not.
DAAAAD!!!
Have me on your show next week, and if you promise not to use the word “stupid,” I won’t use the word “fascist.”
Zing! He took her up on it on July 31:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIXER_yZUBg
Gems include O’Leary asking patronizingly, “You know what a lobbyist is, right?”, accusing her of being a shill for devious, mustache-twirling environmentalists, and telling her she’ll change her mind when she gets older.
Parent, in contrast, comes across as articulate and respectful. O’Leary equates denying people in developing countries GM food as handing them a death sentence, while Parent states that she simply thinks genetically modified food should be labeled for the consumer to decide. “They can keep growing [GMOs] as long as they continue to test and also give us the choice. Because it’s our right to know,” Parent says at one point. “I’m not anti-science, but I’m for responsible science and ethical progress.” Ugh, those teens and their radical ideals!
O’Leary says it’s fine that Monsanto’s never tested its GM products for more than 90 days, because little independent groups like Parent’s will, adding:
Rachel, we’re IN a long-term study. You’re eating genetically modified food whether you like it or not.
DAAAAD!!!