PDA

View Full Version : 2 weeks ago it was 105 years... Bradley Manning sentenced to 35 years in prison



Cebu_4_2
21st August 2013, 07:44 AM
Bradley Manning sentenced to 35 years in prison for WikiLeaks disclosures By Jesse Hicks (http://www.theverge.com/users/jesse.hicks) on August 21, 2013 10:18 am Email (jesse@theverge.com) @jessehixxx (https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=jessehixxx) 22 (http://www.theverge.com/2013/8/21/4642816/bradley-manning-sentenced-wikileaks-case#comments)Comments
Don't miss stories Follow The Verge
(https://plus.google.com/+TheVerge/posts)

http://cdn0.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/8775645/manning2_large_verge_medium_landscape.jpg


2
inShare

Bradley Manning's court-martial reached an end today, with Army Colonel Denise Lind sentencing him to 35 years in prison. She also ordered a reduction in rank to Private, a forfeiture of all pay, and a dishonorable discharge. He will receive credit for 1,294 days for time served.
The WikiLeaks source, arrested in Iraq in 2010 for releasing nearly 700,000 government documents to WikiLeaks, was found not guilty (http://www.theverge.com/2013/7/30/4571100/bradley-manning-not-guilty-of-aiding-the-enemy-in-wikileaks-case/in/3801093)of the most serious charge of "aiding the enemy," which could have resulted in life imprisonment. Manning was found guilty on virtually all other charges under the Espionage Act, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and the code of military justice. The verdict left him facing a maximum 136 years; Lind later found the government had overcharged Manning and reduced that number to 90 years. Within the military justice system, Colonel Lind does not have to explain the reasoning behind Manning's sentence. She did not, taking less than two minutes to read the sentence.
Much of the prosecution's case took place behind closed doors in order to present classified information
During the sentencing phase of the trial, prosecution and defense jousted over the question of consequences. The prosecution sought to demonstrate that Manning's leaks had damaged relationships between American diplomats and their foreign counterparts, for example, but could present only speculative evidence in open court. Colonel Lind rejected testimony about alleged "ongoing" damage from the leaks. Much of the prosecution's case took place behind closed doors in order to present classified information.
Manning's sentencing defense focused on his mental and emotional state (http://www.theverge.com/2013/8/16/4625746/wikileaks-trial-defense-shows-bradley-manning-as-good-intentioned-idealist/in/3801093) at the time of the leaks, portraying him as an isolated soldier suffering from "gender dysphoria (http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/Gender%20Dysphoria%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf)," a condition in which a person's subjective understanding of gender conflicts with his or her outward experience of gender. Such long-term experience causes "clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning," according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). The defense argued Manning should have received mental health care from the Army and been removed from duty before the time of his leaks.
Defense witnesses also described Manning as an idealist who overestimated his authority and ability to provoke a discussion about the documents he released. In a brief statement, he apologized for his actions (http://www.theverge.com/2013/8/14/4620464/bradley-manning-wikileaks-statement/in/3801093), saying, "At the time of my decisions, as you know, I was dealing with a lot of issues. Although they have caused me considerable difficulty in my life, these issues do not excuse my actions." He expressed a desire to return to society and rebuild a relationship with his family, including the aunt and sister who'd testified about Manning's childhood as the son of alcoholic, dysfunctional parents. "Before I can do that, though," he said, "I understand that I must pay a price for my decisions and actions."
In closing arguments Monday, the prosecution asked the court to sentence Manning to 60 years, plus a $100,000 fine. "He betrayed the United States," a prosecuting attorney said, "and for that betrayal he deserves to spend the majority of his remaining life in confinement." The government has also consistently emphasized a desire to make Manning an example. "There’s value in deterrence," said the prosecutor.
"There’s value in deterrence."
Defense attorneys countered that a repentant Manning could still find his place as a productive member of society. "Your honor, the defense requests that you judge a sentence that allows him to have a life," defense attorney David Coombs said. Coombs responded to the prosecution's request for 60 years by suggesting Manning would be in jail long after the information he released had been officially declassified. He did not suggest a number of his own.
"The defense requests that you judge a sentence that allows him to have a life."
Manning will receive credit for time served, more than 1000 days, plus a 112-day credit ordered by Colonel Lind for pre-trial treatment she described as "more rigorous than necessary." Manning spent nine months in solitary confinement in a Marine Corps brig in Quantico, Virginia; he spent 23 hours a day in the windowless cell and was often deprived of his clothing. He is working with his defense attorney on a clemency process hoping to reducing his sentence. He will also be eligible for parole.
Under military justice, the case will next move to the Army Court of Criminal Appeals. Before that can happen, transcripts of the current trial (which began in June) have to be prepared and approved by the prosecution and defense — likely to be a lengthy process.
Manning's defense attorney, David Coombs, has scheduled a press conference for 1:30 PM.
Developing...

Hatha Sunahara
21st August 2013, 08:49 AM
That should make it so nobody in the military ever leaks anything ever again. That was the agenda behind the trial and the sentencing. The fact that it is Bradley Manning that is being sentenced is incidental. It is the 'leaker' that is the target whoever that might be. This is the way we deal with people who expose our crimes. Our crimes are CLASSIFIED information--Top Secret at a minimum. And it's Top Secret for a reason. If anybody knew about it, we'd go to jail. So, if anybody leaks it out, the fact that the information is about OUR crimes is irrelevant--the REAL crime is 'leaking' classified information.

The military thinks that the American people are really gullible and stupid. For the most part, they are right. But not all Americans are gullible and stupid. Soon enough it will become a crime to NOT be gullible and stupid. They will find a way to punish anyone who believes anything leaked out about their crimes on top of punishing the leaker.

Damn! This world has been turned upside down. The real question is how long it can function that way? I suppose for as long as people let it.


Hatha

Jewboo
21st August 2013, 09:22 AM
The military thinks that the American people are really gullible and stupid.




http://2012patriot.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/sheeple-4sheeple-202183909_std.jpg



:rolleyes: You are slowing accepting the reality that our fellow American goyim are really gullible and stupid. Good for you Hatha.

gunDriller
21st August 2013, 10:46 AM
in a sane world, Manning would get the Nobel Prize, and Obama & Netanyahu would get the prison cell treatment.

Cebu_4_2
21st August 2013, 03:26 PM
WikiLeaks: Manning's sentence a ‘tactical victory’ Published time: August 21, 2013 18:13
Edited time: August 21, 2013 18:44 Get short URL (http://rt.com/news/wikileaks-manning-sentence-victory-806/)

http://rt.com/files/news/20/2d/e0/00/2.si.jpg




Trends
Bradley Manning trial (http://rt.com/trends/bradley-manning-trial/) Tags
Court (http://rt.com/tags/court/), Crime (http://rt.com/tags/crime/), Human rights (http://rt.com/tags/human-rights/), Intelligence (http://rt.com/tags/intelligence/), USA (http://rt.com/tags/usa/), WikiLeaks (http://rt.com/tags/wikileaks/)

The trial and conviction of US Army Pfc. Bradley Manning flies in the face of the principles of Western justice systems, Julian Assange said in a statement posted on WikiLeaks. But the relatively low sentence term shows the defense has won, he argued.
For reaction and more details follow RT's LIVE UPDATES (http://rt.com/usa/manning-sentence-live-updates-784/)

"This hard-won minimum term represents a significant tactical victory for Bradley Manning’s defense, campaign team and supporters," a statement on the WikiLeaks site claimed, reminding that at the start of the proceedings Bradley Manning was charged with a capital offense and other charges liable for a potential 135 years of incarceration. The prosecutors had been insisting on at least 60 years in jail. However, the private was sentenced to 35 years behind bars.
"His defense team is now appealing to the US Army Court of Criminal Appeals in relation to this sentence and also for due process violations during the trial," the statement added.

“Manning’s trial and conviction is an affront to basic concepts of Western justice,” stated Assange, the founder of the whistleblowing website on Wednesday, following the sentencing in Fort George G. Meade, Maryland.

The WikiLeaks frontman said that from the very start of the trial the private was subject to “cruel, inhumane and degrading” treatment, according to the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture.
According to Assange, Manning’s treatment “has been intended to send a signal to people of conscience in the US government who might seek to bring wrongdoing to light,” but instead, this strategy has “spectacularly backfired.”
“There will be a thousand more Bradley Mannings,” the whistleblower remarked.
The only just outcome in this case would have been his “unconditional release, compensation for the unlawful treatment he has undergone, and a serious commitment to investigating the wrongdoing his alleged disclosures have brought to light,” Assange stressed, urging the supporters of Bradley Manning not to give up their efforts.

aeondaze
21st August 2013, 03:39 PM
You are slowing accepting the reality that our fellow American goyim are really gullible and stupid. Good for you Hatha.

Using the word goyim shows me that you're are direspectful shit stirring filthy kike.

The one thing these bastards have succeded in is getting us to accept the word goy or goyim. You all know it means cattle, it is meant to be demeaning???

don't allow it, take these fuckers to task.

The ADL sure as shit aint gonna jump up and fight on our behalf.

Hatha Sunahara
21st August 2013, 07:28 PM
I recognize that gullible and stupid is the default condition for most of humanity. I also recognize that there are evil people who exploit that fact for personal gain, to enrich themselves, and to get and increase their power over the gullible and stupid masses, who, by nature, are innocents devoid of evil intent. I identify more closely with the mass of humanity than I do with moloch who the evil people worship. But I am an outsider in both camps. I hold Jesus Christ in high esteem for his urging us to love rather than to hate. But I despise 'religions' because they are creations of evil people. The gullibility and stupidity of the masses is their inability, or unwillingness to recognize and to deal with evil.


Hatha

Jewboo
21st August 2013, 07:30 PM
don't allow it, take these fuckers to task.



How many NSA agents did you beat up today?

:rolleyes:

midnight rambler
21st August 2013, 07:32 PM
How many NSA agents did you beat up today?

:rolleyes:

I doubt that he's gonna have much success finding the NSA agents (if any) in Australia.

Jewboo
21st August 2013, 07:35 PM
I hold Jesus Christ in high esteem for his urging us to love rather than to hate...The gullibility and stupidity of the masses is their inability, or unwillingness to recognize and to deal with evil.

Hatha



http://www.museumofconceptualart.com/Jesusisms_vs_Bushisms/images/Love%20Your%20Enemies.jpg




Jews exploit this "Love Thy Enemy" stuff so "Doing Good" to them in return is kinda naive and gullible and stupid...............yes?


:(??

Cebu_4_2
21st August 2013, 07:52 PM
Jews exploit this "Love Thy Enemy" stuff so "Doing Good" to them in return is kinda naive and gullible and stupid...............yes?
:(??

Yes and no. Think about it in frequency. Bad, evil or fear thoughts are a certain frequency where good, love and kind thoughts are another frequency.

Put it into work... (Do not count the sold souls Satanists, they have a special place) Good concurs evil, it has a frequency that supposedly cancels evil.

Shit man I been drinking, I cant do this now. Someone feel free to chime in.

Hypertiger
21st August 2013, 09:54 PM
He is basically a pea brain that was exposed to too much information and he popped.

He lost his puny mind...and it infected others and they have lost their puny minds.