PDA

View Full Version : Obama Believes Following Constitution Counterproductive to Syria Attack Plan



Serpo
27th August 2013, 05:25 PM
http://www.infowars.com/obama-believes-following-constitution-counterproductive-to-syria-attack-plan/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuvlCj5lD4Ihttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuvlCj5lD4I


Getting approval to pull off an attack would be nigh impossible, Todd said, because of “isolationists” in both houses of Congress.
“Isolationist,” naturally, is a word used to describe folks who oppose baseless and illegal military interventions, folks who are, sadly, a minority in government.
This isn’t, of course, the first time Obama has ignored Congress and violated the Constitution. He also did so when he bombed Libya, where 30,000 people lost their lives during Operation Odyssey Dawn, and he continues to do it in Pakistan and Yemen with his drone program.
MSNBC host Ari Melber made sure to draw attention to these previous and ongoing constitutional violations, just so we’re up to speed on the fact wars are no longer declared by Congress because… well, because the vast majority of Americans oppose endless war and this antiwar sentiment is counterproductive to the plans of the global elite and warmongers addicted to recurrent slaughter and its profitability.
Todd also mentioned that Democrats (and, earlier, Republicans under Bush) have consistently exploited the “authorization” issued after the attacks of September 1, 2001, to attack new targets, apparently ad infinitum and at the discretion of the president.
As a reminder, let us consider Article One, Section Eight of the Constitution. It states: “Congress shall have power to… declare War,” not the president. As an example of how far we’ve wandered from the original intent of the framers, Doe v. Bush decided that congressional authorization suffices for declaration.
The last constitutionally valid declaration of war occurred in December 8, 1941, when Franklin D. Roosevelt signed a declaration of war against Japan following the attack on Pearl Harbor.
All wars since have been unconstitutional.

Cebu_4_2
27th August 2013, 05:34 PM
They are under guessing the amount of people dead and maimed. This is an offshoot of population control as well as enriching the global oil consumption.

Ares
27th August 2013, 05:40 PM
It could be argued that even the war that was declared by FDR was illegal. How can the Congress declare a war when it hasn't been in session since 1861? The southern states withdrew consent. They were brought back to Congress at the barrel of a gun. It would be like a wife wanting to leave her husband, he points a gun to her head and says you're staying in this marriage and you're going to like it. So anything the husband does after that, that involves his wife is it legitimate if she truly doesn't want to be in the marriage to begin with?

Twisted Titan
27th August 2013, 05:50 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKjuQrHp3A0&feature=youtube_gdata_player