PDA

View Full Version : Giants of Ancient America and Mysterious Mounds



Serpo
11th September 2013, 04:17 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QQuVoD10pw#t=197http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QQuVoD10pw#t=197

Cebu_4_2
11th September 2013, 05:37 AM
That was good, love the Ted show.

When I was a little kid the dentist removed "an extra row of teeth" I always thought they scammed my parents but I do have some fucked up scars and shit around my teeth...

Twisted Titan
11th September 2013, 06:09 AM
Absolutely astounding info.

More and more hidden history being reavealed.

I totally agree on the science blackout.

The halls of education are filled with more zealots then the height of the inqusition..

Glass
11th September 2013, 06:59 AM
you beat me to it TT. That was pretty amazing. I picked up something on my 222 observations. He stated that the pyremid they found there in the US was 220 000 cubic feet or metres of volume. Need to go back and check. So that immediately says to me, maybe 222 is a volume. So I goes a looking. Messing with some numbers. Calculating the volume of a pyremid is difficult if you don't know the base or height. Someone will know how it's done.

I thought instead of looking at existing ones. Taking wiki with a desert load of salt as to dimensions there is definately some correlation there. Its vague. We have cubits, feet and meters. So messing around to stumble on the right dimensions using each of those units of measure and using the same number for each or taking cubits as the base and converting to feet then metres to see what it looks like. Doing the same for the other 2.

Couple other things were stated there. been raised before but worth pointing out. Claims that oldest highest structure until 1300. There has been talk about those other ones from europe being older and taller. Establishment is denying other valid structures exist.

Seems great pyremids were first precisely measured in the 1800's and everyone relies on those measurements. That is curious to me. How acurate are those measurements if they were taken in the 1800s? I think it's hard to believe they are the only public ones. I think a volume of 2,500,000 cubic metres and 2,300,000 blocks starts looking interesting. Also seems 222 and 72 relate well.

Celtic Rogue
11th September 2013, 06:59 AM
REMEMBER its only history when they say its history!

There was a thriving culture here in America that had its zenith before western man made his journey here. A city built by these mound building cultures that was bigger than London at the same time period. Its easy to understand that the predominant view of the indigenous population was that they were unintelligent people that had little technology. That was propaganized by the media and facilitated the destruction of the people and theft of their lands.

The bit about the double rowed teeth giants is interesting... I would like to see a scull from one of these people. during the latter part of the 19th century and the early part of the 20th century there have been untold fakes being touted as real for exhibits in side shows and tourist attractions to draw in the masses and fleece their pockets. I am not saying this is what we have here... but I would like to see proof in a scull with double rows of teeth. Gigantism as well as dwarfism are somewhat common however small in our human existence. The fact that we are not fining massive amounts of giant skeletons says something to that the ones they found are the exception and not the norm.