PDA

View Full Version : 10 reasons why war is coming to syria....



Large Sarge
13th September 2013, 04:12 PM
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/09/13/323776/10-reasons-why-war-is-coming-to-syria/

Libertarian_Guard
13th September 2013, 04:19 PM
General Wesley Clark:

Because I had been through the Pentagon right after 9/11. About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, "Sir, you've got to come in and talk to me a second." I said, "Well, you're too busy." He said, "No, no." He says, "We've made the decision we're going to war with Iraq." This was on or about the 20th of September. I said, "We're going to war with Iraq? Why?" He said, "I don't know." He said, "I guess they don't know what else to do." So I said, "Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?" He said, "No, no." He says, "There's nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq." He said, "I guess it's like we don't know what to do about terrorists, but we've got a good military and we can take down governments." And he said, "I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail."

So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, "Are we still going to war with Iraq?" And he said, "Oh, it's worse than that." He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, "I just got this down from upstairs" -- meaning the Secretary of Defense's office -- "today." And he said, "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran." I said, "Is it classified?" He said, "Yes, sir." I said, "Well, don't show it to me." And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, "You remember that?" He said, "Sir, I didn't show you that memo! I didn't show it to you!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw

vacuum
13th September 2013, 04:21 PM
It's starting to look like it would have been better if Obama had taken this to congress. The chances of it passing was pretty bad, and even if it did pass, it would have been super obvious that it was only because of Jewish lobby groups.

Now they can delay the vote, and reform their argument for the strike from the position of having to provide proof Assad did the chemical attack and the need to punish him, to a new position of him 'breaking the deal' and 'stalling' when in fact destroying the chemical weapons was never even on the table the first time around.

EE_
13th September 2013, 04:56 PM
#11 Because the Jewish controlled US government is running out of war in the rest of the Middle East and if more war isn't started soon, troops will have to be brought home. The US government doesn't want these highly trained American troops on US soil while they are planning to issue martial law against it's citizens and use foreign military forces to brutalize Americans that won't conform to the new unconstitutional laws which include gun seizure.

Large Sarge
13th September 2013, 06:02 PM
Over the past few days, there has been a tremendous wave of optimism that it may be possible for war with Syria to be averted. Unfortunately, it appears that a diplomatic solution to the crisis in Syria is extremely unlikely.


Assad is certainly willing to give up his chemical weapons, but he wants the US to accept a bunch of concessions that it will never agree to. And it certainly sounds like the Obama administration has already decided that “diplomacy” is going to fail, and they continue to position military assets for the upcoming conflict with Syria. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey are all going to continue to heavily pressure the Obama administration. They have invested a huge amount of time and resources into the conflict in Syria, and they desperately want the US military to intervene. Fortunately, overwhelming domestic and global opposition to an attack on Syria has slowed down the march toward war for the moment, but unfortunately that probably will not be enough to stop it completely. The following are ten reasons why war is almost certainly coming…

#1 Assad wants a guarantee that he will not be attacked by the United States or by anyone else before he will give up his chemical weapons.

That is extremely unlikely to happen.

#2 Assad is not going to agree to any chemical weapons deal unless the US stops giving weapons to al-Qaeda terrorists and other jihadist rebels that are fighting against the Syrian government.

That is extremely unlikely to happen.

In fact, according to the Washington Post, the US has been ramping up the delivery of weapons to jihadist rebels in Syria…

The CIA has begun delivering weapons to rebels in Syria, ending months of delay in lethal aid that had been promised by the Obama administration, according to US officials and Syrian figures. The shipments began streaming into the country over the past two weeks, along with separate deliveries by the State Department of vehicles and other gear - a flow of material that marks a major escalation of the US role in Syria’s civil war.

#3 Assad is suggesting that the Israelis should give up their weapons of mass destruction.

That is extremely unlikely to happen.

#4 The Syrian “rebels” desperately want the US military to intervene in the war in Syria. In fact, that was the entire reason for the false flag chemical weapon attack in the first place.

The “top rebel commander” is now declaring that the Free Syrian Army “categorically rejects the Russian initiative”, and he is calling on the United States to strike the Assad regime immediately.

#5 Saudi Arabia desperately wants the US military to intervene in Syria. The Saudis have spent billions of dollars to support the rebels in Syria, and they have been lobbying very hard for an attack.

#6 Qatar desperately wants the US military to intervene in Syria. Qatar has also spent billions of dollars to support the rebels in Syria, and it has been reported that “Arab countries” have even offered to pay for all of the costs of a US military operation that would remove Assad.

#7 Turkey has wanted a war which would remove Assad for a very long time. And CNN is reporting that Turkey has moved troops to the border with Syria in anticipation of an upcoming attack.

#8 Many members of the US Congress want this war. Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham are virtually foaming at the mouth, and Robert Menendez, the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said that he “almost wanted to vomit” after reading Russian President Vladimir Putin’s plea for peace in the New York Times.

#9 Obama does not want to look weak, and he seems absolutely obsessed with starting a war with Syria. For the moment, he has been backed into a corner diplomatically by Russia, but the Obama administration is already laying the groundwork for making it look like “diplomacy has failed”. According to CNN, US Secretary of State John Kerry is already talking about the “consequences” that will happen when the Syria deal falls apart…

Any agreement reached must be “comprehensive,” “verifiable,” “credible” and “able to be implemented in a timely fashion,” Kerry said, adding that “there ought to be consequences if it doesn’t take place.”

#10 There have been reports that US soldiers are now receiving orders to deploy to Syria. For example, the following is from a recent article by Paul Joseph Watson…

For the moment, Obama and Kerry will dance around and make it look like they are considering peace. They will try to get Congress to authorize a strike “if diplomacy fails.”

But they already know that diplomacy is going to fail. Once they are ready, Obama will declare that the conditions for war set forth in the congressional authorization have been fulfilled and then he will start raining cruise missiles down on Syria.

AGB/AGB

osoab
13th September 2013, 07:14 PM
umm, Syria has been at war for two years. The proxy war just hasn't been working out in TPTB's favor.

mamboni
13th September 2013, 09:33 PM
War in Syria may be inevitable. But, I believe that if America attacks Syria, it will be our Little Big Horn:

The Sunburn - Iran's Awesome
Nuclear Anti-Ship Missile
The Weapon That Could
Defeat The US In The Gulf
By Mark Gaffney
11-2-4

A word to the reader: The following paper is so shocking that, after preparing the initial draft, I didn't want to believe it myself, and resolved to disprove it with more research. However, I only succeeded in turning up more evidence in support of my thesis. And I repeated this cycle of discovery and denial several more times before finally deciding to go with the article. I believe that a serious writer must follow the trail of evidence, no matter where it leads, and report back. So here is my story. Don't be surprised if it causes you to squirm. Its purpose is not to make predictions history makes fools of those who claim to know the future but simply to describe the peril that awaits us in the Persian Gulf. By awakening to the extent of that danger, perhaps we can still find a way to save our nation and the world from disaster. If we are very lucky, we might even create an alternative future that holds some promise of resolving the monumental conflicts of our time. --MG


Last July, they dubbed it operation Summer Pulse: a simultaneous mustering of US Naval forces, world wide, that was unprecedented. According to the Navy, it was the first exercise of its new Fleet Response Plan (FRP), the purpose of which was to enable the Navy to respond quickly to an international crisis. The Navy wanted to show its increased force readiness, that is, its capacity to rapidly move combat power to any global hot spot. Never in the history of the US Navy had so many carrier battle groups been involved in a single operation. Even the US fleet massed in the Gulf and eastern Mediterranean during operation Desert Storm in 1991, and in the recent invasion of Iraq, never exceeded six battle groups. But last July and August there were seven of them on the move, each battle group consisting of a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier with its full complement of 7-8 supporting ships, and 70 or more assorted aircraft. Most of the activity, according to various reports, was in the Pacific, where the fleet participated in joint exercises with the Taiwanese navy.

But why so much naval power underway at the same time? What potential world crisis could possibly require more battle groups than were deployed during the recent invasion of Iraq? In past years, when the US has seen fit to "show the flag" or flex its naval muscle, one or two carrier groups have sufficed. Why this global show of power? The news headlines about the joint-maneuvers in the South China Sea read: "Saber Rattling Unnerves China", and: "Huge Show of Force Worries Chinese." But the reality was quite different, and, as we shall see, has grave ramifications for the continuing US military presence in the Persian Gulf; because operation Summer Pulse reflected a high-level Pentagon decision that an unprecedented show of strength was needed to counter what is viewed as a growing threat in the particular case of China, because of Peking's newest Sovremenny-class destroyers recently acquired from Russia.

"Nonsense!" you are probably thinking. That's impossible. How could a few picayune destroyers threaten the US Pacific fleet?" Here is where the story thickens: Summer Pulse amounted to a tacit acknowledgement, obvious to anyone paying attention, that the United States has been eclipsed in an important area of military technology, and that this qualitative edge is now being wielded by others, including the Chinese; because those otherwise very ordinary destroyers were, in fact, launching platforms for Russian-made 3M-82 Moskit anti-ship cruise missiles (NATO designation: SS-N-22 Sunburn), a weapon for which the US Navy currently has no defense.

Here I am not suggesting that the US status of lone world Superpower has been surpassed. I am simply saying that a new global balance of power is emerging, in which other individual states may, on occasion, achieve "an asymmetric advantage" over the US. And this, in my view, explains the immense scale of Summer Pulse. The US show last summer of overwhelming strength was calculated to send a message. The Sunburn Missile I was shocked when I learned the facts about these Russian-made cruise missiles. The problem is that so many of us suffer from two common misperceptions. The first follows from our assumption that Russia is militarily weak, as a result of the breakup of the old Soviet system. Actually, this is accurate, but it does not reflect the complexities.

Although the Russian navy continues to rust in port, and the Russian army is in disarray, in certain key areas Russian technology is actually superior to our own. And nowhere is this truer than in the vital area of anti-ship cruise missile technology, where the Russians hold at least a ten-year lead over the US. The second misperception has to do with our complacency in general about missiles-as-weapons probably attributable to the pathetic performance of Saddam Hussein's Scuds during the first Gulf war: a dangerous illusion that I will now attempt to rectify.

Many years ago, Soviet planners gave up trying to match the US Navy ship for ship, gun for gun, and dollar for dollar. The Soviets simply could not compete with the high levels of US spending required to build up and maintain a huge naval armada. They shrewdly adopted an alternative approach based on strategic defense. They searched for weaknesses, and sought relatively inexpensive ways to exploit those weaknesses. The Soviets succeeded: by developing several supersonic anti-ship missiles, one of which, the SS-N-22 Sunburn, has been called "the most lethal missile in the world today." After the collapse of the Soviet Union the old military establishment fell upon hard times. But in the late1990s Moscow awakened to the under-utilized potential of its missile technology to generate desperately needed foreign exchange. A decision was made to resuscitate selected programs, and, very soon, Russian missile technology became a hot export commodity.


Today, Russian missiles are a growth industry generating much-needed cash for Russia, with many billions in combined sales to India, China, Viet Nam, Cuba, and also Iran. In the near future this dissemination of advanced technology is likely to present serious challenges to the US. Some have even warned that the US Navy's largest ships, the massive carriers, have now become floating death traps, and should for this reason be mothballed. The Sunburn missile has never seen use in combat, to my knowledge, which probably explains why its fearsome capabilities are not more widely recognized.

Other cruise missiles have been used, of course, on several occasions, and with devastating results. During the Falklands War, French-made Exocet missiles, fired from Argentine fighters, sunk the HMS Sheffield and another ship. And, in 1987, during the Iran-Iraq war, the USS Stark was nearly cut in half by a pair of Exocets while on patrol in the Persian Gulf. On that occasion US Aegis radar picked up the incoming Iraqi fighter (a French-made Mirage), and tracked its approach to within 50 miles. The radar also "saw" the Iraqi plane turn about and return to its base. But radar never detected the pilot launch his weapons. The sea-skimming Exocets came smoking in under radar and were only sighted by human eyes moments before they ripped into the Stark, crippling the ship and killing 37 US sailors. The 1987 surprise attack on the Stark exemplifies the dangers posed by anti-ship cruise missiles. And the dangers are much more serious in the case of the Sunburn, whose specs leave the sub-sonic Exocet in the dust. Not only is the Sunburn much larger and faster, it has far greater range and a superior guidance system. Those who have witnessed its performance trials invariably come away stunned. According to one report, when the Iranian Defense Minister Ali Shamkhani visited Moscow in October 2001 he requested a test firing of the Sunburn, which the Russians were only too happy to arrange. So impressed was Ali Shamkhani that he placed an order for an undisclosed number of the missiles.

The Sunburn can deliver a 200-kiloton nuclear payload, or: a 750-pound conventional warhead, within a range of 100 miles, more than twice the range of the Exocet. The Sunburn combines a Mach 2.1 speed (two times the speed of sound) with a flight pattern that hugs the deck and includes "violent end maneuvers" to elude enemy defenses. The missile was specifically designed to defeat the US Aegis radar defense system. Should a US Navy Phalanx point defense somehow manage to detect an incoming Sunburn missile, the system has only seconds to calculate a fire solution not enough time to take out the intruding missile. The US Phalanx defense employs a six-barreled gun that fires 3,000 depleted-uranium rounds a minute, but the gun must have precise coordinates to destroy an intruder "just in time." The Sunburn's combined supersonic speed and payload size produce tremendous kinetic energy on impact, with devastating consequences for ship and crew. A single one of these missiles can sink a large warship, yet costs considerably less than a fighter jet.


Although the Navy has been phasing out the older Phalanx defense system, its replacement, known as the Rolling Action Missile (RAM) has never been tested against the weapon it seems destined to one day face in combat. Implications For US Forces in the Gulf The US Navy's only plausible defense against a robust weapon like the Sunburn missile is to detect the enemy's approach well ahead of time, whether destroyers, subs, or fighter-bombers, and defeat them before they can get in range and launch their deadly cargo. For this purpose US AWACs radar planes assigned to each naval battle group are kept aloft on a rotating schedule. The planes "see" everything within two hundred miles of the fleet, and are complemented with intelligence from orbiting satellites.

But US naval commanders operating in the Persian Gulf face serious challenges that are unique to the littoral, i.e., coastal, environment. A glance at a map shows why: The Gulf is nothing but a large lake, with one narrow outlet, and most of its northern shore, i.e., Iran, consists of mountainous terrain that affords a commanding tactical advantage over ships operating in Gulf waters. The rugged northern shore makes for easy concealment of coastal defenses, such as mobile missile launchers, and also makes their detection problematic. Although it was not widely reported, the US actually lost the battle of the Scuds in the first Gulf War termed "the great Scud hunt" and for similar reasons.




more at: http://rense.com/general59/thesunburniransawesome.htm

Ponce
13th September 2013, 11:06 PM
What if Syria is only a diversion and the troops are really going elsewhere?......like Iran or N Korea?....who knows, even Venezuela? all countries should be on high alert till all this is over.

V

Hypertiger
14th September 2013, 08:01 AM
There is a global trade system...Syria was cut off from inflation and began to deflate...and the top or rich began to increase their demands on the bottom or poor...and then the social media was used like it is used on all of you...to get them hot and ready to protest.

In the trayvon deal...bu the time they get to the mass city protest phase...They had the mass mob protesting against standing your ground.

or protesting against protesting...circular logic of that revolution had it over before it even began...next.

In Syria they had NATO commandos along with their cannon fodder FSA suicide troops...waiting for TET.

then all they did was run all the programs downloaded into the drones and the baby seals all rose up and began protesting and this cause the economy to collapse further.

Causing the centeral government to sent out the clubbers to get the baby seals back to work.

and as soon as the first baby seal is touched and it crries up to the world community for salvation.

You run the TET program to run around and blow up everything you can to fight the evil dictator.

It pulls the military out to mow down the infestation...and you have the NATO commandos sending their new recruits into suicide missions to hold infrastructure that is obliterated...to accelerate the collapse of Syria...and you just get new recruits from outside trained up and not told the secret mission they are on to supply the NATO commandos with fresh suicide troops to keep the chaos at a maximum and the economy collapsing to create the most noise from the baby seals to suck the USA and world into the black hole of Syrian humanitarian crisis.

which is tied to the collapse of the 1944 Bretton woods global trade system.

all the sides are being financed with US dollars...basically before the supply into Syria was cut off from the 2005 collapse of the 1991 to 2005 real estate boom in the USA.

everyone was being paid to not kill each other.

and now they are being paid to kill each other.

the US Dollar is fighting the US Dollar for a Dollar.

of course down at the puppet level they all are oblivious all are basically spectators or arena fodder...In the theatre of war of the absurd.

They still have electricity and water and Food...It's not even a fraction as bad as it can and will get.

The electricity is to keep the drones under control.

They shut off the Internet and both sides being ultimately financed from the same source...will lose their mind control.

Hypertiger
14th September 2013, 08:21 AM
The Muslim Brotherhood is the FSA...the king of Jordan says MB = masonic brotherhood and you can trace it back to British intelligence.

Washinton DC...it was Built after the city of London financed American revolution to be the Government of the New World Order...and the scapegoat of the New World Order is who lives in the White House.

Obama is 100% installed puppet with a hidden agenda to supply the Muslim Brotherhood with victory...

The regime in the USA is over 200 years old...The elected part is mostly a puppetshow the population thinks is the Government...it is just the administration system.

Removing Obama is not regime change...That is only removal of one fundable asset that has been used up and is becoming an unfundable liability and replacement with a new fundable asset.

Bush was the dream that turned into a nightmare followed by Obama that was a dream that is turning into a nightmare.

Lies look good at the start and are believe to be Truth until they demand truth to sustain their existence and they self destruct and look bad.

new lies believed to be Truth to replace the old self destructing lies that are no longer believed to be Truth.

The new scapegoat replaces the old used up scapegoat.

that is what people seem to be voting for over and over

Hypertiger
14th September 2013, 08:50 AM
following the revolution...Alexander Hamilton a banker and made first treasury secretary of the US Treasury on Sept 11, 1789 a city of London asset By George Washington...A British east India company asset...basically set up the same exact financial system in New York out of coffee hoses as was set up in the city of London out of coffee houses.

"London was still at the top of the financial pyramid with New York"

-Alan Greenspan K.B.E. September 25, 2002 in a speech to business leaders and dignitaries at both the Treasury and the Bank of England after receiving his K.B.E...Or Knight Commander of the British Empire...By Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms (USA) and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.

for his work handling the 911 false flag to cover the collapse of the 1971 New Economy lie and replace it with the war on Truth...er Terror lie all believed was truth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Financial_Centres_Index

The first 4 are all British empire operations.

The start of the Syrian revolution was said to be 15 march 2011...and 911 days later was just this last Sept 11 when the US was supposed to vote to see if Syria was going to be Hit

but the clock was stopped...and Bashar al-Assad was given a birthday present when he turned from 4+7 = 11 to 48 in on Sept 11, 2013.

Hypertiger
14th September 2013, 09:00 AM
You are living in the New world order right now and have your whole life...and it reached maximum potential in 2000 and has been collapsing since to oblivion.

they are not trying to take over the world.

The dupes that you think are your masters just think they are on a mission...and you are trying to stop them...and this has you all destroying yourselves.

while the system is crumbling and the collapse of the system is the cause...of all the chaos which is an effect...is being promoted as the cause of the effect.

you all basically begin waking up to the fact that you are trapped/lied to and you try to resist since you only find the lies behind the lies you thin are Truth and believe they are truth and the system basically kills you all back to sleep while you all try to stop it.

Just like in Syria...you just knock over one small domino or give some children matches to play with and eventually the whole country burns down and hides the evidence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y97rBdSYbkg

of course at the bottom...when the dust clears...the survivors are employed to build the next new world order...like a phoenix that rises out of the ashes.

it's why the UN inspectors landed and then the gas attack showed up...perfect timing...

too perfect like they were behind schedule to make it look like an accident of the Universe rather than intelligent design by the Great Architect of it...

Hypertiger
14th September 2013, 09:15 AM
“Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy.”--Henry Kissinger member of P2

A member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, leading Bilderberger and head of Kissinger Associates (with Lord Carrington), Henry Kissinger is also connected with the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), the Chase Manhattan Bank, the Rockefeller Foundation, and is international advisor to the Hollinger Group. He is also a member of the Alpine Freemasons Lodge in Switzerland and was possibly a leading figure in P2.

the world Trade center towers were built as part of the 1971 new economy and instigated by the Rockefellers in the late 1968's before the switch in 1971.

the Nasdaq was also part of this 1971 new or computer economy...which peaked in 2000...but the lights did not go out...things just grew darker and darker.

Chatham House, also known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs is a non-profit, non-governmental organization based in London whose mission is to analyse and promote the understanding of major international issues and current affairs. It is regarded as one of the world's leading organizations in this area. It takes its name from its premises, an 18th century house in St. James's Square designed in part by Henry Flitcroft and once occupied by the British Prime Minister William Pitt, 1st Earl of Chatham (The Council on Foreign Relations is its American sister institute)

Chatham House is the origin of the confidentiality rule known as the Chatham House Rule, which provides that members attending a seminar may discuss the results of the seminar in the outside world, but may not discuss who attended or what they said.

Hey if your memories are not shot by the 24/7 multi billion dollar mind blast machine...Remember this back in 2002?

Bush names Kissinger to head 9/11 probe
Bush: 'Follow all the facts, wherever they lead'
Friday, November 29, 2002 Posted: 10:43 AM EST (1543 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush on Wednesday named former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger to lead an independent panel to investigate U.S. intelligence failures before the September 11 terrorist attacks.

"This investigation should carefully examine all the evidence and follow all the facts, wherever they lead," said Bush, whose administration initially opposed the commission.

"We must uncover every detail and learn every lesson of September the 11th," Bush said.

Peter Alexander Rupert Carington, 6th Baron Carrington, KG (The Most Noble Order of the Garter) , (GCMG The Most Distinguished Order of Saint Michael and Saint George) , CH (Order of the Companions of Honour) , MC (Military Cross), PC (Her Majesty's Most Honourable Privy Council) ,DL (Deputy Lieutenant)

Her Majesty's Most Honourable Privy Council is a body of advisors to the British Sovereign. The Sovereign, when acting on the Council's advice, is known as the King-in-Council or Queen-in-Council. The members of the Council are collectively known as The Lords of Her Majesty's Most Honourable Privy Council (sometimes The Lords and others of...). The chief officer of the body is the Lord President of the Council, who is the fourth highest Great Officer of State, a member of the Cabinet, and normally, the Leader of either the House of Lords or the House of Commons. Another important official is the Clerk, whose signature is appended to all orders made in the Council. like this one

The Most Noble Order of the Garter is an English order of chivalry with a history stretching back to mediæval times; today it is the world's oldest national order of knighthood in continuous existence and the pinnacle of the British honours system. Its membership is extremely limited, consisting of the Sovereign and not more than twenty-five full members. The monarch of the United Kingdom is known as the "Sovereign of the Garter" and the Prince of Wales is known as a "Knight Companion of the Garter."

For England to send their armed forces to the 2003 Iraq war...requires the command of the commander in chief of the Commonwealth forces...her Majesty.

and the above mention privacy council member that is one of Kissinger's associates is one is the top adviser to the monarchy.

from just before Obama was installed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SISUIhprOa8

the queen...

Who is from the German family of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha...from Bavaria.

Where the Illuminati showed up in 1776 with one goal being...the removal of all the crowned heads of Europe...that were on the hit list...the ones not still have their heads and crowns.

Ponce
14th September 2013, 09:22 AM
As long as Russia is bahind Syria the US wont do a danm thing.........even if the missiles factories are now going at full force, you can defeat the army of a country but not the people of the country, after all, the people makes a country.

V

Hypertiger
14th September 2013, 10:14 AM
Putin is working for London.

The lines on the map of the plaent Earth?

were financed into existence by the Bankd of England creating Trillions and trillions of pounds of stirling silver out of thin air over the centuries...financed the USA out of thin air into existence to this day.

and in 1945 Bretton woods made one US silver dollar = to 2.8 British pounds of stirling silver.

and in 1950? equal to 360 grams of aluminum which is what the current figment of people's imaginations is called a Yen.

has neow turned into in relation to what the US Dollar has transformed into over the years.

Like the euro...it started out as the US dollar and then transformed in 2001 when 911 hit...into the Euro and poof...the world was mesmerized by more magic tricks.

and this was during the peak of blow off of the 1991 new world order boom...from the collapse of the USSR and entire communist system...which was plundered to supply cheap resources to the USA and the world to power the USA up to the peak in 2000.

The 1987 crash was the end of the world...nope...the supply of funding that was drying up from the USA...was cut...off to the communist world...and it imploded to oblivion into the great depression of the 1990's while the fire sale was fed into the hyperinflation in the west to sustain it to sustain the east.

of course you can see that the so called communist world has inflated back up nicer looking then before compared to the USA and the west which are crumbling a tad now.

it's all moving in reverse...the first gulf war kicked off the 1991 new world order boom from daddy bush up to his son to finish off the now sanctioned and bombed into the ground Saddam....followed by the collapse of the real estate boom into the collapse that Obama showed up to save the world from.

Warsaw pact in Afghanistan....and then poof look at that NATO in Afghanistan...the reverse of inflation is deflation.

In the lead up to the so called collapse of the British empire...It had spread everywhere to maximum potential and the French Empire too...and it all collapsed backwards leading into the great depression where the USA powered out of the bottom of and spread out into the world....and took over right where jolly old London did not leave off and is still sending out James bond to spy on you in whit his all seeing eye in theaters.

the same is happening this time...but it is the USA at the top slowly losing the war against deflation while at the ends of the supply of inflation of the global empire...they are being cut off and imploding to oblivion at various rates of collapse.

missiles into Syria from the USA is basically to press the fast forward button.

once the top thinks they have enough resources to survive without another welfare case...the yare cut off and burn to the ground and bets are placed to extract yields from shorting it to oblivion.

since the top knows how it is going to turn out before you all that are the workforce finish constructing the outcome is going to turn out.

for Putin and Kerry to be talking...that has to be fiananced into existence....the clock is being stopped now that they/you all are...sucked in.

when the finances run out...you are firebombed to oblivion...like Japan...Syria is being liquidated.

Japan was built into a war machine by London to liquidate the China operation and the nthe USA had powered up to the point that it was ready to liquidate japan and then the USA cut off the oil to Japan and they began to collapse backwards while someone convinced the Japanese that blasting the USA with a shot gun just after the oil was cut off was a bright Idea.

To stop the USA from it's mission of liquidate Japan and take it over and turn it into like the 51st state of the USA with a puppet population ruled by the Bretton woods global trade system set up by two city of London assets...or frontmen/salesmen.

that is the best time to get people to sign on the dotted line...when it look like you saved the world from evil...you must have a clue.

you would not lie to us.

that is right...just sign here...checkmate.

But all you have to do is tell people that the system collapsed in 1971...and like that poof...it just ceases to exist...