Holy crap! Look at this!

[chad]

/some random 27 minute video or even better, an hour and a half video, with no explanation of what it is, because typing a one sentence summary is wicked hard

[Celtic Rogue]

What?

[chad]

the new trend is to post a topic with some salacious title, then when you click the thread, all it is is an embedded youtube video that is abnormally long with no explanation of what you're about to watch. apparently, they are so important that they need no foreshadowing, YOU JUST HAVE TO WATCH THEM.

[Shami-Amourae]

I'm probably guilty of this sometimes. I'll keep it in mind next time. I do try to give a descriptive title though.

[Neuro]

I think the rule of thumb should be, the longer the video, the better description it should have!

[ximmy]

Thread title:

WOW!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw7ER3Bqta0

[Horn]

As the world has to turn around chad & his high bandwidth/low reception fantastically fascist handheld cellular device.

We offer you wine & only receive sour grapes in return...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqHmhpMGqu0

[chad]

As the world has to turn around chad & his high bandwidth/low reception fantastically fascist handheld cellular device.

We offer you wine & only receive sour grapes in return...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqHmhpMGqu0

king crimson, nice choice.

[Horn]

king crimson, nice choice.

There's hope for you yet, though none for your purgatorial dollar equivocating :)

[willie pete]

KC Rocks......:D


http://youtu.be/ujIbpt-CCTY

[Norweger]

I've seen rules like that enforced on certain forums and the result is that the moderators delete whatever video they don't like because the description "wasn't good enough". Either way it doesn't take much to determine if you want to see a video or not with or without description.

[Horn]

I always appreciate a highlight quote from the video, Like "it says such and such @ xx minute mark."


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3FpGiBr-nY

@ 10 seconds in

[Cebu_4_2]

I've seen rules like that enforced on certain forums and the result is that the moderators delete whatever video they don't like because the description "wasn't good enough". Either way it doesn't take much to determine if you want to see a video or not with or without description.

We will have 10 threads on the same subject and it will be cool.

[BrewTech]

/some random 27 minute video or even better, an hour and a half video, with no explanation of what it is, because typing a one sentence summary is wicked haaad

That's how it sound when you say it, huh?