Serpo
20th September 2013, 06:04 PM
building 7.......BBC had prior knowledge according to their news report.............
Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks (http://beforeitsnews.com/r2/?url=http://www.sott.net/article/266268-UK-man-wins-court-case-against-BBC-for-911-cover-up), he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.
So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.
For all intents and purposes a UK ccourt has just ruled that the BBC was complicit in the september 11th, 2001 attacks in the United States. Fantastic. A small victory but a huge symbolic victory and one you would have never otherwised have heard of. So I suggest to you the reader to get the word out on this one. Spread it far and wide. This is big ifonly symbolic. -Mort
http://beforeitsnews.com/9-11-and-ground-zero/2013/09/uk-man-wins-court-case-against-bbc-for-9-11-wtc-7-cover-up-video-2440298.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHQPaAkIl0I#t=45https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHQPaAkIl0I#t=45
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpEct4q4z9o)
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpEct4q4z9o)Missile hits WTC Building 7
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpEct4q4z9o)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6ZkkpzOymEhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6ZkkpzOymE
Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks (http://beforeitsnews.com/r2/?url=http://www.sott.net/article/266268-UK-man-wins-court-case-against-BBC-for-911-cover-up), he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.
So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.
For all intents and purposes a UK ccourt has just ruled that the BBC was complicit in the september 11th, 2001 attacks in the United States. Fantastic. A small victory but a huge symbolic victory and one you would have never otherwised have heard of. So I suggest to you the reader to get the word out on this one. Spread it far and wide. This is big ifonly symbolic. -Mort
http://beforeitsnews.com/9-11-and-ground-zero/2013/09/uk-man-wins-court-case-against-bbc-for-9-11-wtc-7-cover-up-video-2440298.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHQPaAkIl0I#t=45https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHQPaAkIl0I#t=45
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpEct4q4z9o)
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpEct4q4z9o)Missile hits WTC Building 7
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpEct4q4z9o)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6ZkkpzOymEhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6ZkkpzOymE