PDA

View Full Version : Park Ranger: 'We've been told to make life as difficult for people as we can'



Ares
4th October 2013, 08:45 PM
Wesley Pruden of the Washington Times reported yesterday that "the Park Service appears to be closing streets on mere whim and caprice."

It is difficult to imagine that shutting people out of parks and privately owned concessions has to do with anything other than politics. One of these "whims" is the parking lot at Mount Vernon, which is "privately owned by the Mount Vernon Ladies' Association."

A Park Service ranger in Washington said that

“We've been told to make life as difficult for people as we can. It’s disgusting.”

Steven Dinan of the Washington Times reported today that Bruce O'Connell, the owner of the Pisgah Inn, which holds a concession on the Blue Ridge Parkway was told to "cease operations." He said

“The level of intimidation and coercion became such that we backed down. Then after sleeping on it, our own convictions took front and center and we decided to reopen.”

According to mounting sources, President Obama has been hard at work trying to make the public feel the "shutdown," despite the fact that eighty percent of federal employees are still working. Josh Barro of Business Insider reported this week,

"...of about 4.1 million people who work for the federal government, about 80% will still be expected to show up for work."

The owner of the "privately run, funded and staffed" Claude Moore Colonial Farm said that "we think they have closed us down illegally..." as reported today by J.D. Tuccille of reason.com. The staff was even "threatened with arrest" if they showed up for work, despite the fact that they are not government employees. The owner said,

"We have had to cancel every event at the Farm this week so we have already lost more than $15,000 in operating income because October is the busiest month of the year for us."

Hans Bader of OpenMarket.org compiled many of these distrubing stories today. He reported that sites that were previously open without guards, such as the Lincoln Memorial, now have guards assigned to keep out the public. The Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial is now "fenced off" despite the fact that it was previously open 24/7 without guards. Bader writes,

"the government is actually expanding its presence at national monuments in order to drive people away, at increased expense to taxpayers." [added emphasis]

Bader also reflected at Liberty Unyielding on the politics surrounding the sequester, where similar tactics were used.

Additionally, Patrik Jonsson of the CSMonitor reported today that the National Park Service has rebuked "offers by state and private officials to help keep the Grand Canyon and other places open." It is clear that the goal of keeping the public away from national (and privately owned) parks and monuments is a disturbing, expensive and childish political move.

http://www.examiner.com/article/park-ranger-we-ve-been-told-to-make-life-as-difficult-for-people-as-we-can

palani
5th October 2013, 02:43 AM
There is of course an answer to this type of harassment. Anytime there is a taking that obligates the federal government to reimburse the private property owner for the value of the thing taken. You do this at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (being the only court in the land that recognizes private property rights).

http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/

Now this raises an interesting concept. Reviewing the thread on the 143 year old Antideficiency act that spells out criminal penalties for causing the federal government to incur costs that were not appropriated (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?73133-143-year-old-law-puts-fear-in-officials-during-shutdown) these costs that would be caused by federal interference would seem to actually be PUNISHABLE.

'Twere me I believe I would keep a copy of 31 U.S.C. § 1341with me and when threatened with a federal act that would be a TAKING make this provision of law known.


(1) An officer or employee of the United States Government or of the District of Columbia government may not—
(A) make or authorize an expenditure or obligation exceeding an amount available in an appropriation or fund for the expenditure or obligation;
(B) involve either government in a contract or obligation for the payment of money before an appropriation is made unless authorized by law;
(C) make or authorize an expenditure or obligation of funds required to be sequestered under section 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985; or
(D) involve either government in a contract or obligation for the payment of money required to be sequestered under section 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.
(2) This subsection does not apply to a corporation getting amounts to make loans

Here is a link to a 2010 report of violations of the Antideficiency Act.
http://www.gao.gov/ada/adarptinfofy10.pdf

ShortJohnSilver
5th October 2013, 09:23 AM
And how many park rangers are going along with this sick directive? Isn't the whole idea of the National Park System , that the government is only a caretaker on behalf of the people who own it?

If you are a park ranger and you are participating in this, you don't deserve the job!

Twisted Titan
5th October 2013, 09:29 AM
We have had to cancel every event at the Farm this week so we have already lost more than $15,000 in operating income because October is the busiest month of the year for us."


Dont worry Obama will give you free money.

Just like he gave you free healthcare.

palani
5th October 2013, 11:51 AM
Dont worry Obama will give you free money.

That is his prerogative. The so called 'national debt' belongs to Obama. A municipality is defined as


MUNICIPALITY. The body of officers, taken collectively, belonging to a city, who are appointed to manage its affairs and defend its interests.

and the United States is nothing if not a municipality centered in the District of Columbia at Washington City. Therefore the debt belongs to those officers that represent the municipality. It is his debt and he can do with it as he likes without ME having to worry about paying it back.

PatColo
11th October 2013, 07:59 PM
Agenda 21 was my first thought in reading this OP article. I guess I never got around to posting it here though. This from anti-A21 activist Rosa Koire,


Practice Makes Perfect: Government Shutdown and Agenda 21 (http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/1/post/2013/10/practice-makes-perfect-government-shutdown-and-agenda-21.html) 10/08/2013
0 Comments (http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/1/post/2013/10/practice-makes-perfect-government-shutdown-and-agenda-21.html#comments)


Closing wilderness roads, national parks, national seashore areas, putting K-rail across scenic road turnouts, collapsing in-park recreational businesses, creating a strain on workers...all fit with the Wildlands project goals of moving people out of the rural areas.

Both Republicans and Democrats in Congress knew that this would be the outcome of their standoff. Was it the goal?

Is this shutdown a practice run for something more permanent? Is it training for federal law enforcement?

The federal government had to order the K-rail in advance. Had to have contracts in place for installation. Had to order signs printed in advance. This showdown was expected and planned for. Is this a practice run for a wider plan?

UN Agenda 21 is in effect now throughout our country. Our cities, counties, states, and federal government are implementing regional plans that are creating a new layer of governance not responsible or responsive to us. We are slowly being collapsed into this 'no mans land' of no return. Any crisis can be used to push us further into compliance. Larger units of governance--regional units--are a stepping stone to global governance and are 'sold' to us as being 'more efficient.'

What is the most efficient form of government? Dictatorship. A single 'decider.' Whether a neo-con or a progressive acts in the theater of globalization is ultimately irrelevant. What is relevant is the behavior of the audience when the play pretends to be real.

We will not be fooled.
SPEAK OUT. BE THE RESISTANCE.