PDA

View Full Version : top U.S> general in charge of nukes has been fired...



Large Sarge
11th October 2013, 04:05 PM
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/10/11/20922413-air-force-general-in-charge-of-nuclear-weapons-removed-for-lack-of-trust-defense-officials?lite

StreetsOfGold
11th October 2013, 04:23 PM
At first I just saw the in the title "nukes has been fired" and read it to say that nukes have been fired.

I was surprised since this won't happen until the the time of Jacob's trouble. Makes me wonder what "trust" are they REALLY talking about?

ximmy
11th October 2013, 04:51 PM
from link:
An Air Force statement said that Carey was relieved from command “due to a loss of trust and confidence in his leadership and judgment.” The statement goes on to say that “the allegations are not related to operational readiness, inspection results, nor do they involve sexual misconduct.”

In other words, he was not redirecting nuclear parts and components to Israel, as he was commanded to from TPTB...

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?22927-Thought-Provoking-Photos-%28Now-Stickied-%29&p=663514&viewfull=1#post663514

all these American missing nukes are probably in joo hands...

In other words, unauthorized removal of nuclear weapons would be virtually impossible to accomplish unless the chain of command were bypassed, involving, in this case, the deliberate tampering of the paperwork and tracking procedures. http://www.globalresearch.ca/missing...est-order/7158 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/missing-nukes-treason-of-the-highest-order/7158)

there are 92 KNOWN cases of nuclear bombs lost at sea. By lost at sea, this means that the bombs have become too unstable to use, or, in some cases, the actual NUCLEAR BOMB has gone MISSING.
Read more at http://www.omg-facts.com/History/The...ZA6LJhwcpxc.99 (http://www.omg-facts.com/History/There-Are-92-Known-Cases-Of-Nuclear-Bomb/56725#w7famZA6LJhwcpxc.99)

The US military cannot locate hundreds of sensitive nuclear missile components, according to several government officials familiar with a Pentagon report on nuclear safeguards.... http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2008...tml?view=print (http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2008/06/nuke-j28.html?view=print)

Hatha Sunahara
11th October 2013, 08:23 PM
You have to ask yourself, 'whose trust and confidence in his leadership and judgment?' Who fired him? Obama? Hegel? They ask other generals if they would obey orders to fire on Americans who resist turning over their firearms. Any general who would hesitate or give it a second thought gets sacked. Now, why wouldn't they ask a generalin charge of nukes whether he would obey an order to initiate an unprovoked attack with nuclear weapons? The sociopaths in charge need blind obedience. Anyone not providing that has no place in the chain of obedience.

I'm pretty sure that this guy, and whoever else they fired do not 'know too much'. If they knew too much, they wouldn't be fired. They would meet with unfortunate accidents. Just prior to WWII, Stalin purged the armed forces of the Soviet Union for essentially the same reasons--trust and confidence, but he didn't fire his best generals. He disappeared them.

What we need to worry about is not who is fired--but who ISN"T fired--the people who keep their jobs. They are the bigger danger to the nation.


Hatha

vacuum
11th October 2013, 09:00 PM
He was the second top ranking nuclear officer fired within a week's time period.

The first guy was relieved of duty on the same day Alex Jones reported an unauthorized nuclear weapons transfer.

The same day Lindsey Graham warned of a domestic nuclear strike if we didn't go into Syria.

Let that sink in.

Jewboo
12th October 2013, 05:13 AM
Who fired him? Obama? Hegel?



Israel had to order their zio-stooge to do it:




Obama became involved because only the president can relieve a three- and four-star officer.

Neuro
12th October 2013, 06:16 AM
What we need to worry about is not who is fired--but who ISN"T fired--the people who keep their jobs. They are the bigger danger to the nation.


HathaIn this case, I would be even more worried about the general they HIRE... He goes into the position with the knowledge that he is there to let nukes go missing smoothly...

Is there any chance that the General was fired, because the nukes went missing?

Large Sarge
12th October 2013, 06:49 AM
this is really strange, carol griggs (sp?), documented how all the top military are largely blackmailed, she has a video on it

PatColo
12th October 2013, 07:20 AM
^ U mean Kay Griggs, I think this full interview is about 10 hours (all on YT), here's a snip,

KAY GRIGGS Homosexual Blackmail In US.Government Pt.1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKfDbfcoAK8)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKfDbfcoAK8