PDA

View Full Version : What Obama and I Learned at Columbia: How to Destroy America From Within



Serpo
11th November 2013, 04:07 PM
What Obama and I Learned at Columbia: How to Destroy America From Within Nov. 11, 2013 8:27am


Wayne Allyn Root (http://www.theblaze.com/author/wayne-allyn-root/) http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/userphoto/13706315.571692.jpg (http://www.theblaze.com/author/wayne-allyn-root/) Wayne’s latest book is: The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide: How to Survive, Thrive, and Prosper During Obamageddon (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1621570916/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1621570916&linkCode=as2&tag=theb0871-20). It hit #1 in bookstores, and is currently the 6th bestselling political hardcover in America for the past year. Wayne Allyn Root is a former Libertarian Vice Presidential nominee, successful entrepreneur, small business defender, business speaker, Capital Evangelist, and media personality- appearing on over 5000 interviews in the past 5 years. Wayne’s web site: ROOTforAmerica.com. (http://www.rootforamerica.com)













Remember when Geraldo opened Al Capone’s vault live on national TV? Well I’m about to solve the mystery of Obama. I’m about to break “the Obama code.” I’m about to tell you everything about the way Obama, and the people around him, really think. I’m about to rip open the true Obama plan to destroy our country. Because I was there when the plan was hatched.
How do I know all this? Because I was Barack Obama’s college classmate at Columbia University, Class of 1983. I was easy to recognize – the lone outspoken conservative in a class of 700 students. I knew I was in trouble when my first political science class at Columbia was “Communism 101″ taught by Professor Trotsky in the Fidel Castro Building, at the corner of Marx Blvd. and Lenin Drive.
I’m only half-kidding. My experiences at Columbia were not far off.
Everyone needs to hear my story because what Obama and I learned at Columbia explains EXACTLY what Obama is doing to America today.
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/barack-obama-columbia.jpeg (http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/barack-obama-columbia.jpeg)
The economy in deep decline; the disappearance of jobs; the annihilation of the middle class; the demonization of business owners; the destruction of small business with onerous regulations and taxes; the overwhelming debt and spending of out-of-control government; the millions of Americans losing their health insurance; and the unimaginable increase in dependency through welfare, food stamps, unemployment, disability, and now free health care.
It’s all easily explained when you hear what Obama and I learned at Columbia.
America’s decline under Obama isn’t due to mistake, ignorance, or incompetence at the hands of a community organizer. It’s a purposeful, brilliant plan hatched at Columbia University to destroy capitalism, American exceptionalism, Judeo-Christian values, and the American Dream.
I never met Obama at Columbia. We were both Political Science majors, both Pre Law. We graduated on the same day. There were perhaps 100 to 150 of us in the Political Science department. And I thought I knew all of them.

America’s decline under Obama isn’t due to mistake, ignorance, or incompetence. Share:

As the token big-mouthed conservative patriot, I know they all knew me. But not Obama. I never met him, saw him, or even heard of him. Not one of my friends at Columbia ever met him either. At our 30th class reunion last May, I could not find a single classmate who had ever met him. Strange story, but I digress.
What matters is what Obama learned and experienced at Columbia. My classmates hated America. They spoke with glee about one day ”taking the system down.” They blamed America for “unfairness, racism, inequality, and lack of social justice.”
Recognize those words?
My classmates proudly called themselves socialists, communists, and Marxists. Even though almost all of them came from wealthy families (or perhaps because of it), they hated the rich and despised business owners. They talked about how the “white power structure” had to be dismantled, business owners bankrupted, and capitalism destroyed. Everything in their minds was based on “social justice.”
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Entitlements-620x331.jpeg (http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Entitlements.jpeg)Protesters upset with the ongoing federal government shutdown and what they fear could lead to Social Security benefit reductions rally outside Republican U.S. Rep. Steve Daines’ office in Helena, Mont., Tuesday, Oct. 8 2013. (AP Photo/Matt Gouras)

Sound like the policies of anyone you recognize in the White House? Does “We have to spread the wealth around” ring a bell? How about “If you own a business, you didn’t build that.”
How about Obama’s hatred of Republicans and refusal to negotiate with Congress? It’s clear he thinks he’s “morally superior” to conservatives. That attitude was born at Columbia too.
In 1981 when a student burst through the doors to our political science class and screamed “The President has been shot. They’ve assassinated Reagan”… my classmates yelled, hugged, high-fived, and jumped up and down cheering the death of a Republican. Today most of my classmates are either in government with Obama, or controlling the mainstream media. They talk about “moderation and compromise,” but always remember 30 years ago they cheered for the death of a Republican.
But, there’s more. We were all taught a simple, but brilliant plan. My classmates discussed it 24/7. It was their “American Dream.”

By the time the middle class realizes he’s the killer and they’re the prey, they’ll already be dead. Share:

It was called “Cloward-Piven,” after former Columbia professors Richard Cloward (http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/23/nyregion/richard-cloward-welfare-rights-leader-dies-at-74.html) and Frances Piven (http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/11/16/frances-fox-piven-says-the-problem-that-will-end-the-world-is/). To bring down America and our capitalist system, they were taught to overwhelm the system with massive spending, entitlements and debt. That would cause the economy to collapse, wipe out the middle class, and bring Americans to their knees, begging government to save them.
It’s the exact plan Obama has been implementing. The centerpiece is Obamacare.
Obamacare isn’t about health care. It’s about bankrupting the middle class and addicting it to government dependency. It’s about redistributing wealth from the middle class and small business to Obama’s voters (the poor and unions). Its goal is to wipe out the last vestiges of middle class America, creating a two-class society: the super rich and the poor (both beholden to Obama).
Obama learned well, it’s working to perfection.
So that explains the plan. But how do you implement it? We were taught that at Columbia too.
A key component of the plan involved fooling the voters by calling yourself “moderate” and a “uniter,” even though you are a radical Marxist. We were taught to never admit what you really believe in. It involved demonizing your opponents, calling them “evil, greedy, extreme, radical, and terrorist.” Look in the mirror and call your opponents the very things you are.
Obama learned well.
The plan taught us to hide your true intensions (in other words- lie, misrepresent, commit fraud). So Obamacare is about “saving the uninsured,” as opposed to income redistribution.
Government regulations are to “protect us from global warming,” as opposed to wiping out small business.
Amnesty for illegal immigrants is about “fairness,” as opposed to creating 12 million new Democratic voters.
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/600x3967.jpg (http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/600x3967.jpg)Immigration advocates support an American flag while taking part in a National Day of Dignity and Respect march on October 5, 2013 in Los Angeles, California. Thousands of people marched for comprehensive immigration reform in more than 150 events nationwide. Credit: Getty Images

High taxes are to “create equality,” as opposed to starving Obama’s political opposition.
Obscene spending is always about “helping widows and orphans,” as opposed to bribing Obama’s voters.
Higher teacher salaries to reward terrible performance are “for the kids,” as opposed to enriching teachers unions so they can funnel hundreds of millions to Democrat politicians.
Bailing out GM was to “save jobs,” as opposed to saving bloated auto union pensions.
It’s always about lying to coverup the Marxist agenda of destroying the middle class, redistributing wealth, and putting big government in control of our every move. Why the lies? We were taught at Columbia that “It’s for the greater good” and “We know what’s best for those people” and ”The ends justify the means.”
Obama learned well.
But the key to it all is to “boil the frog slowly.” We learned at Columbia to set the fire low, so the frog wouldn’t complain. By the time he realized what was happening, he’d be cooked.
That’s why every Obama speech starts and ends with “I’m here to save the middle class,” while his actions are annihilating them. He’s boiling the frog slowly. By the time the middle class realizes he’s the killer, and they’re the prey, they’ll already be dead.
The root (excuse the pun) of every Obama policy, everything Obama does, and everything happening to the U.S. economy, all started at Columbia. The entire Obama agenda to overwhelm the system, wipe out the middle class, bankrupt small business, and destroy capitalism, was hatched at Columbia. Obama may not have attended class, but he learned well.
He should have received the Karl Marx Award for “Student Most Likely to Destroy America.”

http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/what-obama-and-i-learned-at-columbia-how-to-destroy-america-from-within/

woodman
11th November 2013, 05:13 PM
Historic times. We are watching the destruction of America. It's going to be a rough ride.

Silver Rocket Bitches!
11th November 2013, 10:21 PM
From the Cloward Piven plan:

How can the poor be organized to press for relief from poverty? How can a broad-based movement be developed and the current disarray of activist forces be halted? These questions confront, and confound, activists today. It is our purpose to advance a strategy which affords the basis for a convergence of civil rights organizations, militant anti-poverty groups and the poor. If this strategy were implemented, a political crisis would result that could lead to legislation for a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty.
:oIgnorance of welfare rights can be attacked through a massive educational campaign Brochures describing benefits in simple, clear language, and urging people to seek their full entitlements, should be distributed door to door in tenements and public housing projects, and deposited in stores, schools, churches and civic centers. Advertisements should be placed in newspapers; spot announcements should be made on radio. Leaders of social, religious, fraternal and political groups in the slums should also be enlisted to recruit the eligible to the rolls. The fact that the campaign is intended to inform people of their legal rights under a government program, that it is a civic education drive, will lend it legitimacy.:o
A welfare crisis would, of course, produce dramatic local political crisis, disrupting and exposing rifts among urban groups. Conservative Republicans are always ready to declaim the evils of public welfare, and they would probably be the first to raise a hue and cry. But deeper and politically more telling conflicts would take place within the Democratic coalition. Whites--both working-class ethnic groups and many in the middle class--would be aroused against the ghetto poor, while liberal groups, which until recently have been comforted by the notion that the poor are few and, in any event, receiving the beneficent assistance of public welfare, would probably support the movement. Group conflict, spelling political crisis for the local party apparatus, would thus become acute as welfare rolls mounted and the strains on local budgets became more severe. In New York City, where the Mayor is now facing desperate revenue shortages, welfare expenditures are already second only to those for public education.
The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Povertyhttp://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/03/24-4

Hatha Sunahara
11th November 2013, 11:06 PM
I am wrestling with a difficult question. Once Obama and all his pals destroy America--when the country is in ruins, what do they get out of it? Isn't it more desirable to be in power in a prosperous, strong nation than in a third world shithole? Does the end justify the means? Is it just collectivism for its own sake? That didn't work out too well for the Soviet Union and its eastern European satellites. It's not hard for me to see what we all lose. I just don't see what they gain. Is the goal 'one world government'? Or is it a two class system--the jewish banksters and the goyim slaves? If the slaves are too unhappy, they become less productive. Or did they dumb down the slaves so much that they are happy with anything? Seriously, WTF do they get from destroying America? Do they think they have worked out all the details, and nothing could possibly go wrong with their plan? I can easily imagine this small body of hubris smitten clowns lined up before a firing squad, and it's game over for them.

Hatha

Jewboo
11th November 2013, 11:27 PM
Or is it a two class system--the jewish banksters and the goyim slaves? If the slaves are too unhappy, they become less productive. Or did they dumb down the slaves so much that they are happy with anything?



https://lh3.ggpht.com/_1_WxkOeIxkk/S-Vn5ILEELI/AAAAAAAAAWU/oeSCGudqsSY/s1600/fight4israel.gif


They dumbed down the Goyim this much. We are doomed.

woodman
12th November 2013, 03:02 AM
I am wrestling with a difficult question. Once Obama and all his pals destroy America--when the country is in ruins, what do they get out of it? Isn't it more desirable to be in power in a prosperous, strong nation than in a third world shithole? Does the end justify the means? Is it just collectivism for its own sake? That didn't work out too well for the Soviet Union and its eastern European satellites. It's not hard for me to see what we all lose. I just don't see what they gain. Is the goal 'one world government'? Or is it a two class system--the jewish banksters and the goyim slaves? If the slaves are too unhappy, they become less productive. Or did they dumb down the slaves so much that they are happy with anything? Seriously, WTF do they get from destroying America? Do they think they have worked out all the details, and nothing could possibly go wrong with their plan? I can easily imagine this small body of hubris smitten clowns lined up before a firing squad, and it's game over for them.

Hatha

Destruction of whitey. Control.

gunDriller
12th November 2013, 07:11 AM
I am wrestling with a difficult question. Once Obama and all his pals destroy America--when the country is in ruins, what do they get out of it?

$100K speaker fees.

Twisted Titan
12th November 2013, 07:16 AM
Do you see how the original author is playing into it?

He is validating that zero went to columbia even though not a single soul can place him there.

chad
12th November 2013, 07:16 AM
another person who claims no one at columbia remembers him. tons of these stories, he's a ghost.

mamboni
12th November 2013, 08:14 AM
Do you see how the original author is playing into it?

He is validating that zero went to columbia even though not a single soul can place him there.


No TT, he's skillfully pointing out that there is not a single witness to Obama's supposed attendance at Columbia. But he does it in a cheeky way so as to have plausable deniability against charges of slander. The author clearly knows that Obama did not attend Columbia.

mick silver
16th November 2013, 09:40 AM
back up , more need to see

Sparky
16th November 2013, 11:20 AM
I am wrestling with a difficult question. Once Obama and all his pals destroy America--when the country is in ruins, what do they get out of it? Isn't it more desirable to be in power in a prosperous, strong nation than in a third world shithole?
...
Hatha
Excellent questions. That's why I think that the destruction of America is not their main goal. Rather, it is an unfortunate bi-product of their main goal, which is the accumulation of power, control, and wealth. If they could accomplish that without destroying America, they would. But they can't.