Log in

View Full Version : IMF wants you to pay 71% income tax



Large Sarge
13th December 2013, 01:07 AM
The IMF Wants You To Pay 71% Income Tax
Tyler Durden's pictureSubmitted by Tyler Durden on 12/12/2013 23:08 -0500

Gross Domestic ProductInternational Monetary FundTax Revenue

.

inShare.5

.
Submitted by Simon Black of Sovereign Man blog,

The IMF just dropped another bombshell.

After it recently suggested a “one-off capital levy” – a one-time tax on private wealth as an exceptional measure to restore debt sustainability across insolvent countries – it has now called for “revenue-maximizing top income tax rates”.

The IMF’s team of monkeys has been working around the clock on this one, figuring that developed nations can increase their overall tax revenue by increasing tax rates.

They’ve singled out the US, suggesting that the US government could maximize its tax revenue by increasing tax brackets to as high as 71%.

Coming from one of the grand wizards of the global financial system, this might be the clearest sign yet that the whole house of cards is dangerously close to being swept away.

Think about it– solvent governments with healthy economies don’t go looking to steal 71% of people’s wealth. They’re raising this point because these governments are desperate. And flat broke.

The ratio of public debt to GDP across advanced economies will reach a historic peak of 110% next year, compared to 75% in 2007.

That’s a staggering increase. Most of the ‘wealithest’ nations in the West now have to borrow money just to pay interest on the money they’ve already borrowed.

This is why we can only expect more financial repression from desperate governments and established institutions.

This means more onerous taxation. More regulation. More controls over credit and capital flows.

And that’s only the financial aspect; the deterioration of our freedom and liberty will continue at an accelerated pace.

Can a person still be considered “free” when 71% of what s/he earns is taken away at the point of a gun by a bankrupt, bullying government? Or are you merely a serf then, existing only to feed the system?

This is why we often stress having a global outlook and considering all options that are on the table.

Because the other side of the coin is that while some countries are tightening the screws and making life more difficult, others are taking a different approach.

Whether out of necessity or because they recognize the trend, many nations around the world are launching new programs to attract international talent and capital.

I’ve mentioned a few of these already– economic citizenship programs in places like Cyprus, Malta, and Antigua (I met a lot of these programs’ principals at a recent global citizenship conference that I spoke at in Miami).

Then there are places like Chile and Colombia which have great programs for entrepreneurs and investors. Other places like Georgia and Panama have opened their doors to nearly all foreigners for residency.

Bottom line– there are options. Some countries are really great places to hold money. Others are great to do business. Others are great places to reside.

The era we’re living in– that of global communications and modern transport– means that you can live in one place, your money can live somewhere else, and you can generate your income in a third location.

Your savings and livelihood need not be enslaved by corrupt politicians bent on stealing your wealth… all to keep their destructive party going just a little bit longer.

The world can truly be your playground. You just need to know the rules of the game.

Average:
4.30769

mick silver
13th December 2013, 03:22 AM
once the top starts sucking off the bottom they cant stop . more more more

woodman
13th December 2013, 04:57 AM
The top can suck my bottom.

Spectrism
13th December 2013, 05:56 AM
once the top starts sucking off the bottom they cant stop . more more more

They can suck the bottom of my septic tank.

Let me see if I got this right. Obama & Bush allowed more than $10trillion to go to banks and that cost was applied to national debt. Now the banks want the US to get whole by ripping the vital organs out of the producing Amerikans who managed to squirrel away some savings. All the while, they put millions out of work when they orchestrated a globalized economy, sending most large volume manufacturing factories to China.... and, they developed an entitlement mentality among the ghetto breeders who suck the lifeblood through the government use of deadly force threat from those same producers. And.... they have increasingly made it "illegal" for said producers to own firearms for self-protection or to keep the government honest.

Take your pick: war or gulag.

Neuro
13th December 2013, 06:06 AM
They can suck the bottom of my septic tank.

Let me see if I got this right. Obama & Bush allowed more than $10trillion to go to banks and that cost was applied to national debt. Now the banks want the US to get whole by ripping the vital organs out of the producing Amerikans who managed to squirrel away some savings. All the while, they put millions out of work when they orchestrated a globalized economy, sending most large volume manufacturing factories to China.... and, they developed an entitlement mentality among the ghetto breeders who suck the lifeblood through the government use of deadly force threat from those same producers. And.... they have increasingly made it "illegal" for said producers to own firearms for self-protection or to keep the government honest.

Take your pick: war or gulag.
Good synopsis!

Ares
13th December 2013, 06:19 AM
I want the IMF to pay me 71% of their yearly earnings.

Yeah it carry's the same amount of weight.... None, an imaginary entity asking for more. Just ignore them, they'll go away eventually. They can only rule and tax those who obey them.

palani
13th December 2013, 06:54 AM
Not a whiz at math these days. Let's see. What is $0 x 71%? Oh ... my ... still works out to zero.

Neuro
13th December 2013, 07:33 AM
Not a whiz at math these days. Let's see. What is $0 x 71%? Oh ... my ... still works out to zero.
What types of favors do you do for your trust fund?

madfranks
13th December 2013, 07:44 AM
I want the IMF to pay me 71% of their yearly earnings.

I don't believe the IMF actually earns anything, all their revenue comes from governments who stole it from the people. Can you imagine if the IMF actually had paid customers? Would they even exist? I doubt it.

palani
13th December 2013, 07:55 AM
What types of favors do you do for your trust fund?
Any trust should do just fine but it isn't my trust. It is simply a legal entity I chose to engage in a contract with. I do like that it is a common law trust and it is non-statutory but as it is not of my creation I don't get to control the operation. The trust itself has a policy of only engaging in specie transactions which I also approve of.

Ponce
13th December 2013, 08:53 AM
Ever since president Monroe passed the law in 1930 that "All properties will pay tax" part of that tax has being going to the IMF and this will be FOR EVER and something that the American people are not aware off.......but.... that law was cancelled in 1971 or 1972. forgot the exact year........but something that the government NEVER told us about.

When that law was passed in 1930 the president NEVER said "Private Properties".....these means people holding a Land Patent ..........the states decided to include private property that up to that year were paying no taxes........ of course this was something else that the government "forgot" to tell to those with a land patent so that they have been collection "property tax" from the land patent holders ............ILLEGALY

I have found a lot more about the collection of tax from private property owners.... but this is something else.

V

palani
13th December 2013, 11:03 AM
Ever since president Monroe passed the law in 1930 ...

V
Would that be president Marilyn Monroe?

Have you been introduced to Miss Lube Rack of 1955 (aka Nancy Pelosi)? Still practicing the ole lube job!!!

http://i39.tinypic.com/2u89fyf.jpg