PDA

View Full Version : Mother of three negligently shot in the head during botched drug raid



Ares
15th December 2013, 01:28 PM
CHILLICOTHE, OH — The American Drug War claimed another casualty when a woman was shot in the head while sitting on a couch by an incompetent police officer, who fired his weapon through an exterior wall prior to raiding the home.

At about 10:30 p.m. on December 11th, a group of cops calling themselves the U.S. 23 Task Force swarmed the residence and prepared to break in and capture people for possessing drugs. One of the officers, Sgt. Brett McKnight, an 11-year-veteran of the Ross County Sheriff’s Office, negligently handled his weapon and fired a round through the exterior wall of the mobile home.

http://www.policestateusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/KrystalBarrows-150x150.jpg

The bullet traveled into the residence and struck a woman sitting on a couch. Krystal Marie Barrows, 35, of Chillicothe, was “in critical condition” and flown by helicopter to Ohio State University’s Wexner Medical Center, where she died the following day.

No one inside the home fired back, the Chillicothe Gazette reported. Six individuals were arrested for prohibition crimes.

Ross County Prosecutor Matt Schmidt said the round was not intentionally fired, and it’s unclear whether the gunfire was the result of a weapon malfunction or user error. But anyone with any knowledge of firearms would understand that following the most basic safety rules completely eliminates the possibility of such things happening.

The four laws of firearms safety, as commonly taught by instructors across the country, are listed below. These are taught within the first 10 minutes of any responsible Day #1 firearm training class.

Always treat the gun as if it were loaded.
Never point the gun at something you are not prepared to destroy.
Keep your finger of the trigger and outside the trigger guard until your sights are on the target.
Be sure of your target, and what is behind your target.

It would be impossible for a “malfunction” to wound Barrows if Sgt. McKnight were following basic safety guidelines. The muzzle of his gun should not be aiming at a home, nor should his finger have been near the trigger. By his negligence alone did Barrows get shot.

Krystal Barrows was the mother of three sons ages 9, 14 and 19. The Columbus Dispatch reported that she had no criminal record in Ross County aside from a misdemeanor conviction for disorderly conduct by intoxication.

Sgt. Brett McKnight has been placed on leave. The Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation is looking into the incident.

McKnight should not get preferential treatment when facing justice. He should be treated the same as any person who stands outside a stranger’s home pointing guns at the walls. There is no excuse for what he did. Sheriff George Lavender should put the rest of his officers through some beginner-level firearm safety training, to emphasize the point.

From a policy perspective, the violent and nonsensical Drug War should be backed off and abandoned before more innocent people get killed in the police crossfire. It is clear that the enforcement is just as hazardous as the substances.

http://www.policestateusa.com/2013/mother-negligently-shot-in-the-head-during-botched-drug-raid/

midnight rambler
15th December 2013, 01:37 PM
Paid vacation! SWEET!!!

EE_
15th December 2013, 01:47 PM
Paid vacation! SWEET!!!

Officials asked Sgt. Brett McKnight what he will do with his paid time off: Sgt. Brett McKnight said he plans to take his family to Walt Disney World and to spend some much deserved time vacationing on Florida beaches.

midnight rambler
15th December 2013, 01:55 PM
Officials asked Sgt. Brett McKnight what he will do with his paid time off: Sgt. Brett McKnight said he plans to take his family to Walt Disney World and to spend some much deserved time vacationing on Florida beaches.

And when he comes back on duty he's getting a promotion and a raise.

Hatha Sunahara
15th December 2013, 08:04 PM
Makes you wonder if the cops understand that they are committing real crimes with real victims, while enforcing victimless policy violations? Or that they are inviting the arrival of vigilante dispensers of justice who will target the killer cops? If their employers won't hold them accountable, maybe the families and friends of the people they kill will. The officer safety argument evaporates just a little more with each unjustified killing.

Hatha

willie pete
15th December 2013, 09:55 PM
if her family pursues it, they may or may not win a wrongful death case and probably get $40-$50k after the lawyer takes his 40%

Ares
16th December 2013, 07:35 AM
if her family pursues it, they may or may not win a wrongful death case and probably get $40-$50k after the lawyer takes his 40%

That's most of the problem with American's today. Greed, don't go after the cops department as its just the city that foots the legal bills. Go after him in a personal capacity in a civil court. His union lawyer can represents him if he wants too, but all cost and judgements are levied against the officer PERSONALLY. Make it so that he can't even make a living without paying you a sizable portion of it.

Cebu_4_2
16th December 2013, 11:59 AM
That's most of the problem with American's today. Greed, don't go after the cops department as its just the city that foots the legal bills. Go after him in a personal capacity in a civil court. His union lawyer can represents him if he wants too, but all cost and judgements are levied against the officer PERSONALLY. Make it so that he can't even make a living without paying you a sizable portion of it.

Don't they call them frivolous lawsuits?

Neuro
16th December 2013, 01:45 PM
That's most of the problem with American's today. Greed, don't go after the cops department as its just the city that foots the legal bills. Go after him in a personal capacity in a civil court. His union lawyer can represents him if he wants too, but all cost and judgements are levied against the officer PERSONALLY. Make it so that he can't even make a living without paying you a sizable portion of it.
I bet most lawyers would recommend against it. So you would pay the lawyer an hourly fee, and you'ld be on the hook for the fee regardless of the outcome. But I agree, it would be the sensible thing to do!

Ares
16th December 2013, 01:55 PM
Don't they call them frivolous lawsuits?

Nope, in a civil trial all you're doing is showing how the actions of one caused harm or property damage to another. It's more along the lines of common law, instead of administrative law. You just want compensation for the damage they have done. Look what happened to OJ, he "won" his first trial, but got his ass handed to him in a civil trial. That one pretty much bankrupted him.

That's also the beauty of a jury awarded judgement. They cannot be discharged through bankruptcy. So you get a jury awarded judgement on that douche bag and have him work for you until his dieing day.

Ares
16th December 2013, 02:00 PM
I bet most lawyers would recommend against it. So you would pay the lawyer an hourly fee, and you'ld be on the hook for the fee regardless of the outcome. But I agree, it would be the sensible thing to do!

Most lawyers will advise against that strategy because it's not a big "payday" for them. But if you look hard enough you can find a lawyer that will do it. Or learn a little legalese, motions and proceedings and represent yourself (If you're the injured party.) It's not too difficult especially in this case to show gross incompetence on behalf of the officer. Any modern weapon made in America has to undergo strict safety checks to prove it will not fire unless the safety is off and the finger is on the trigger. Most modern weapons of the last decade or so have 2-3 different firing pin safeties that prevent the firing pin from striking the bullet even after being dropped from a 2 story building.

File for a motion of discovery of the weapon that Officer Pig used that fateful day, contact the manufacturer about the safety checks, who signed off on it, etc. You basically show beyond a doubt that Mr. Pig has his finger on the trigger and fired the weapon at an occupied dwelling killing a person. In any normal non-police state world, that's called manslaughter.

Son-of-Liberty
16th December 2013, 02:51 PM
tag