View Full Version : Bi-partisan House resolution to release 9/11 documents to public. What??
Sparky
16th December 2013, 06:14 PM
Shouldn't this be a big story? Was this already posted? Two senators describe shocking revelations regarding 9/11 that the public should be made aware of, and have filed a bi-partisan House Resolution to have the documents made public.
This is two Congressman from different parties, filing a resolution in the U.S. Congress. Isn't this a huge deal?
Two Congressmen claim secret report on 9/11 pins the blame on Saudi Arabia (http://hotair.com/archives/2013/12/16/two-congressmen-claim-secret-report-on-911-pins-the-blame-on-saudi-arabia/)
mick silver
16th December 2013, 06:43 PM
if it was to happen . and if they would tell it like it is , not made up for us all
Silver Rocket Bitches!
16th December 2013, 06:52 PM
C'mon now. They've always implied Saudi Arabia had some hand in 9/11. From admitting the "hijackers" were Saudi and that Michael Moore movie, that's always been the official misdirection piece. Unless these documents show collusion between the US and Israhell, I'm assuming it's more of the same.
Sparky
16th December 2013, 07:00 PM
Don't miss the point here. This isn't about what will be revealed. This is about bi-partisan Congressional support to open secret documents that they claim will be a shocking revelation. What's going on here? If this was some kind of misdirection, the mainstream press would be all over it, but they're not.
woodman
16th December 2013, 08:41 PM
Definitely misdirection. If any senator actually steered the public toward the truth about 9/11 they would be suicided immediately. As a matter of fact, wasn't a senator from Minesota killed in a plane crash when he started making noise about 9\11?
midnight rambler
16th December 2013, 09:09 PM
Definitely misdirection. If any senator actually steered the public toward the truth about 9/11 they would be suicided immediately. As a matter of fact, wasn't a senator from Minesota killed in a plane crash when he started making noise about 9\11?
"...stop sticking your nose into 9/11" --Big Dick Cheney to Sen. Paul Wellstone
http://beforeitsnews.com/9-11-and-ground-zero/2012/01/senator-wellstone-they-killed-him-for-911-questions-1582848.html
Shami-Amourae
16th December 2013, 09:17 PM
Israel did it. Anything else is bullshit.
Neuro
17th December 2013, 01:03 AM
Probably has more to do with Saudi Arabia thinking about leaving the Petro-dollar... Now will they scrub the Internet on all news articles showing what a great friend Saudi Arabia is?
1984
Neuro
17th December 2013, 01:27 AM
Last time you see this?
http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/GTY_barack_obama_king_abdullah_sr_131210_16x9_992. jpg
BrewTech
17th December 2013, 09:57 PM
The truth about 9/11 is already well "documented"... it's all over the Internet.
So, what is the .gov going to "release" that will add to the discussion?
mick silver
18th December 2013, 05:37 AM
Two Congressmen Push for Release of 28-Page Document Showing Saudi Involvement in 9/11Posted on December 11, 2013 (http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2013/12/11/two-congressmen-push-for-release-of-28-page-document-showing-saudi-involvement-in-911/)
I have publicly questioned the official story of 9/11 (http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2013/09/11/rethinking-911-building-7-was-the-first-known-instance-of-a-tall-building-collapse-from-fires/)for many years. Of course, I’ve never claimed to know exactly what happened on that fateful day, but I’ve maintained that the official story stinks to high heaven. I always found it beyond bizarre that the U.S. launched a war against Iraq following the terrorist attacks, yet never really questioned the potential (and obvious) Saudi involvement, despite the glaring fact that 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi citizens.
Saudi suspicion crept even further into my mind following their anger at the U.S. for not going to war in Syria, in what now seems likely to have been a Saudi provocation to begin with.
Disturbingly, it appears the highest levels of the Bush Administration knew all too well about such a link and intentionally covered it up. The Obama Administration continues the coverup. The Saudi link is made clear in a 28-page, redacted classified document from 2002, which has now been seen by two Congressmen who were “absolutely shocked” by what they read. They are now leading a campaign to have these documents released and we must all support their efforts.
More from the International Business Times:
Since terrorists attacked the United States on Sept. 11, 2001, victims’ loved ones, injured survivors, and members of the media have all tried without much success to discover the true nature of the relationship between the 19 hijackers – 15 of them Saudi nationals – and the Saudi Arabian government. Many news organizations reported that some of the terrorists were linked to the Saudi royals and that they even may have received financial support from them as well as from several mysterious, moneyed Saudi men living in San Diego.
Saudi Arabia has repeatedly denied any connection, and neither President George W. Bush nor President Obama has been forthcoming on this issue.
But earlier this year, Reps. Walter B. Jones, R-N.C., and Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., were given access to the 28 redacted pages of the Joint Intelligence Committee Inquiry (JICI) of 9/11 issued in late 2002, which have been thought to hold some answers about the Saudi connection to the attack.
“I was absolutely shocked by what I read,” Jones told International Business Times. ”What was so surprising was that those whom we thought we could trust really disappointed me. I cannot go into it any more than that. I had to sign an oath that what I read had to remain confidential. But the information I read disappointed me greatly.”
The public may soon also get to see these secret documents. Last week, Jones and Lynch introduced a resolution that urges President Obama to declassify the 28 pages, which were originally classified by President George W. Bush. It has never been fully explained why the pages were blacked out, but President Bush stated in 2003 that releasing the pages would violate national security (https://www.fas.org/irp/news/2003/08/cs080103.html).
Do we really need an explanation? Whenever the government wants to cover up its own crimes, or the crimes of our allies, they just yell “national security.” It’s a disgrace.
It took Jones six weeks and several letters to the House Intelligence Committee before the classified pages from the 9/11 report were made available to him. Jones was so stunned by what he saw that he approached Rep. Lynch, asking him to look at the 28 pages as well. He knew that Lynch would be astonished by the contents of the documents and perhaps would join in a bipartisan effort to declassify the papers.
While neither Jones nor Lynch would say just what is in the document, some of the information has leaked out over the years. A multitude of sources tell IBTimes, and numerous press reports over the years in Newsweek, the New York Times, CBS News and other media confirm, that the 28 pages in fact clearly portray that the Saudi government had at the very least an indirect role in supporting the terrorists responsible for the 9/11 attack. In addition, these classified pages clarify somewhat the links between the hijackers and at least one Saudi government worker living in San Diego.
Former Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., who chaired the Joint Inquiry in 2002 and has been beating the drum for more disclosure about 9/11 since then, has never understood why the 28 pages were redacted. Graham told IBTimes that based on his involvement in the investigation and on the now-classified information in the document that his committee produced, he is convinced that “the Saudi government without question was supporting the hijackers who lived in San Diego…. You can’t have 19 people living in the United States for, in some cases, almost two years, taking flight lessons and other preparations, without someone paying for it. But I think it goes much broader than that. The agencies from CIA and FBI have suppressed that information so American people don’t have the facts.”
Graham notes that there was a significant 9/11 investigation in Sarasota, Fla., which also suggests a connection between the hijackers and the Saudi government that most Americans don’t know about.
The investigation, which occurred in 2002, focused on Saudi millionaire Abdulaziz al-Hijji and his wife, Anoud, whose upscale home was owned by Anoud al-Hijji’s father, Esam Ghazzawi, an adviser to Prince Fahd bin Salman bin Abdulaziz al-Saud, the nephew of Saudi King Fahd.
The al-Hijji family reportedly moved out of their Sarasota house and left the country abruptly in the weeks before 9/11, leaving behind three luxury cars and personal belongings including clothing, furniture and fresh food. They also left the swimming-pool water circulating.
Totally normal behavior. Move along my little sheeple, nothing to see here.
Lynch said he didn’t know how the Obama administration would respond to the congressional resolution urging declassification, if it passes the House and Senate.
“But if we raise the issue, and get enough members to read it, we think we can get the current administration to revisit this issue. I am very optimistic,” he said. “I’ve talked to some of my Democratic members already, and there has been receptivity there. They have agreed to look at it.”
Considering we have been pressured to give up many of our civil liberties (http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2013/09/11/how-i-remember-september-11-2001/) as a result of the 9/11 attack, you’d think we might want to know what actually happened. Please share this post and get the pressure going to get this document released.
Full article here (http://www.ibtimes.com/911-link-saudi-arabia-topic-28-redacted-pages-government-report-congressmen-push-release-1501202).
In Liberty,
Mike
BrewTech
18th December 2013, 07:41 AM
"It was the Saudi's! Honest!"
"Saudi's, I tell ya! The SOOOWWWDEEEESSSS!!!!!"
"Building 7? We know it wasn't hit by a plane! See here's what happened... one of those really, really rick sheik guys plowed into it with one of their gold-plated Ferraris, and it fell down... SRSLY!!"
Sparky
18th December 2013, 12:03 PM
This isn't so much about exposing the complete truth about this particular matter, but rather, whether this is an important development toward changing the general attitude (awakening) of the population regarding the way their leaders operate.
Most of the population that need to be awakened buy into the two-party system, and that their representatives are generally working in their best interest. So here we have a bi-partisan agreement, with two Congressman saying they are shocked with information that is being inappropriately held from the general population. This is a big deal. The more they press this, the more people are going to be motivated to learn what's going on, and why there is such resistance to revealing the information.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.